Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator 15 G9-593

Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/16/2016

Atualização Pascal. A Acer agora utiliza as mais recentes GPUs Pascal da Nvidia para o atual Predator 15. Nós também recebemos alguns recursos adicionais que faltavam nos modelos anteriores. O design do robusto portátil para jogos de 15 polegadas ainda é uma questão de gosto.

Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q (Predator 15 Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1443 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 369.22
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2400, Dual-channel, 2/4 slots livres, até 64 GB
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), IPS, Full HD, G-Sync, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
LiteOn CV1-8B512, 512 GB 
, SSD + Toshiba MQ01ABD100, HD de 1 TB, 5400 rpm
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Fones + microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD
Funcionamento em rede
Qualcomm/Atheros e2400 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 39 x 391 x 300
Bateria
6000 mAh Lítio-Ion, 8 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.1, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, PSU de 230 Watts, Frost Core, manuais de serviço , several manufacturer tools, Dolby Audio, XSplit Gamecaster (6-month premium license), Office 365 (30-day trial), 24 Meses Garantia
peso
3.72 kg, Suprimento de energia: 930 g
Preço
2500 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Front: no ports
Front: no ports
Right side: USB 3.1 Type-C with TB3, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort, Gigabit Ethernet, Kensington lock
Right side: USB 3.1 Type-C with TB3, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort, Gigabit Ethernet, Kensington lock
Left side: power, 2x USB 3.0, headphones, microphone, SD-card reader, optical drive/additional fan
Left side: power, 2x USB 3.0, headphones, microphone, SD-card reader, optical drive/additional fan
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
140 MB/s ∼100% +77%
Aorus X5 v6
79.9 MB/s ∼57% +1%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
79 MB/s ∼56%
Schenker XMG P507
77 MB/s ∼55% -3%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
74 MB/s ∼53% -6%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
190 MB/s ∼100% +113%
Aorus X5 v6
90.3 MB/s ∼48% +1%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
89 MB/s ∼47%
Schenker XMG P507
86 MB/s ∼45% -3%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
84 MB/s ∼44% -6%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
670 MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
654 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
647 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade (2016)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
646 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
608 MBit/s ∼92%
Razer Blade (2016)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
591 MBit/s ∼90% -3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
506 MBit/s ∼77% -17%
292
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
273
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 294 cd/m² Médio: 267.2 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 273 cd/m²
Contraste: 1011:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.77 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.48 | - Ø
84% sRGB (Argyll) 55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.37
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), , 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG P507
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Aorus X5 v6
2880x1620, 15.6
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
8%
-1%
3%
-13%
-10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35 (14, 21)
34 (14, 20)
3%
38 (16, 22)
-9%
36 (12, 24)
-3%
34 (19, 25)
3%
43 (18, 25)
-23%
Response Time Black / White *
25 (5, 20)
22 (5, 17)
12%
23 (5, 18)
8%
23 (5, 18)
8%
32 (8, 24)
-28%
24 (4, 20)
4%
PWM Frequency
198.4
Screen
0%
-14%
-15%
-14%
-14%
Brightness
267
278
4%
290
9%
292
9%
271
1%
287
7%
Brightness Distribution
83
88
6%
85
2%
87
5%
83
0%
91
10%
Black Level *
0.27
0.27
-0%
0.32
-19%
0.3
-11%
0.249
8%
0.36
-33%
Contrast
1011
1011
0%
984
-3%
960
-5%
1126
11%
839
-17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.77
3.67
3%
4.88
-29%
5.1
-35%
4.94
-31%
4.93
-31%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.48
2.73
-10%
4.17
-68%
4.43
-79%
5.13
-107%
3.47
-40%
Gamma
2.37 101%
2.49 96%
2.53 95%
2.46 98%
2.26 106%
2.16 111%
CCT
6854 95%
7029 92%
6683 97%
6687 97%
7433 87%
6622 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
55
0%
55
0%
55
0%
55.9
2%
54
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
84
84
0%
83
-1%
83
-1%
85.9
2%
82
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 2%
-8% / -11%
-6% / -11%
-14% / -14%
-12% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5069 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Wireless connections turned off
Wireless connections turned off
Wireless connections turned on
Wireless connections turned on
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
171 Points ∼88% +20%
Schenker XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼76% +3%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
147 Points ∼75% +3%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
143 Points ∼73% 0%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
143 Points ∼73%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
142 Points ∼73% -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
790 Points ∼37% +20%
Schenker XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
682 Points ∼32% +3%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼31% +2%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼31% +2%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
673 Points ∼31% +2%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
661 Points ∼31%
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.63 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
66.48 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
143 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
661 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
112.27 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 7 - Score
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), LiteOn CV1-8B512, 16384
6520 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, 16384
6138 Points ∼94% -6%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH, 16384
5974 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, 16384
5926 Points ∼91% -9%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), LiteOn CV1-8B512, 16384
5088 Points ∼100%
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 16384
5053 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 32768
5011 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, 16384
4924 Points ∼97% -3%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 16384
4828 Points ∼100% +3%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), LiteOn CV1-8B512, 16384
4692 Points ∼97%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 32768
4651 Points ∼96% -1%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, 16384
4541 Points ∼94% -3%
PCMark 7 Score
6520 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4692 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7680 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5088 pontos
Ajuda
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
LiteOn CV1-8B512
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Schenker XMG P507
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Aorus X5 v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
5%
-20%
150%
140%
13%
Write 4k QD32
273.8
162.2
-41%
256.3
-6%
386.8
41%
358.7
31%
329.1
20%
Read 4k QD32
290.9
350.3
20%
149.4
-49%
694.7
139%
687.9
136%
358.6
23%
Write 4k
72.93
98.84
36%
75.74
4%
167.4
130%
158.8
118%
92.53
27%
Read 4k
27.69
21.86
-21%
21.44
-23%
54.08
95%
52.95
91%
32.46
17%
Write 512
433.7
471.2
9%
287.8
-34%
1239
186%
1221
182%
422.3
-3%
Read 512
355.3
444.7
25%
294.8
-17%
971
173%
989.5
178%
415.9
17%
Write Seq
449.7
485.5
8%
312.4
-31%
1240
176%
1275
184%
455.3
1%
Read Seq
516.5
523
1%
485.4
-6%
1857
260%
1565
203%
509.8
-1%
LiteOn CV1-8B512
Sequential Read: 516.5 MB/s
Sequential Write: 449.7 MB/s
512K Read: 355.3 MB/s
512K Write: 433.7 MB/s
4K Read: 27.69 MB/s
4K Write: 72.93 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 290.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 273.8 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
27685 Points ∼100% +24%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23723 Points ∼86% +7%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22246 Points ∼80%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22195 Points ∼80% 0%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22022 Points ∼80% -1%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14222 Points ∼51% -36%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9845 Points ∼36% -56%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
5294 Points ∼100%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
5247 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
3529 Points ∼67% -33%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21270 Points ∼100% +24%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17869 Points ∼84% +4%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17175 Points ∼81%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17066 Points ∼80% -1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16525 Points ∼78% -4%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11045 Points ∼52% -36%
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7624 Points ∼36% -56%
3DMark 11 Performance
15768 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
118595 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
24262 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12973 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
5013 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
60 fps ∼100%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
58 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
55.2 fps ∼92% -8%
Schenker XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
37.7 fps ∼63% -37%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
97.4 fps ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
96.7 fps ∼99%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
88.7 fps ∼91% -8%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
84.6 fps ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
59.1 fps ∼61% -39%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 110.860fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 116.296.7fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 81.343.2fps
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) 120.3116.1fps

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 35 / 38 dB
HDD
34 dB
Carga
43 / 49 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Noise
5%
5%
3%
0%
-7%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
29.3
2%
Idle Minimum *
31
31
-0%
32
-3%
32
-3%
31
-0%
33.4
-8%
Idle Average *
35
32
9%
33
6%
33
6%
32
9%
35.2
-1%
Idle Maximum *
38
36
5%
34
11%
34
11%
38
-0%
35.2
7%
Load Average *
43
40
7%
40
7%
39
9%
46
-7%
53.3
-24%
Load Maximum *
49
47
4%
46
6%
51
-4%
49
-0%
57.6
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 39.2 °C39.6 °C40.5 °C 
 30.2 °C37.3 °C35.5 °C 
 25.7 °C29.9 °C29.9 °C 
Máximo: 40.5 °C
Médio: 34.2 °C
42 °C37.4 °C40.1 °C
35.2 °C35.6 °C26 °C
26.1 °C26.5 °C23.8 °C
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 32.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  43.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Heat
3%
-13%
-19%
-21%
-39%
Maximum Upper Side *
40.5
42.6
-5%
44
-9%
48
-19%
49.3
-22%
57
-41%
Maximum Bottom *
42
38.7
8%
53.1
-26%
46.8
-11%
52.7
-25%
54
-29%
Idle Upper Side *
28.2
27.2
4%
28.8
-2%
33.7
-20%
32.6
-16%
36.2
-28%
Idle Bottom *
24.3
22.8
6%
28.2
-16%
30.5
-26%
29.5
-21%
38
-56%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.740.12540.243.93141.840.54032.737.85030.744.46327.339.58025.541.41002445.412522.852.516025.76120022.564.725021.865.131520.2704001969.450019.272.463020.276.680018.979.3100018.277.2125018.380.4160018.376.8200017.973.4250017.880.4315017.980.1400017.879.350001879.5630018.279.4800018.3781000018.575.11250018.668.21600018.765SPL30.690.3N1.490median 18.6Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Qmedian 75.1Delta1.87.141.64638.439.828.231.130.836.431.234.927.934.928.338.327.134.723.340.323.643.221.15421.156.120.259.219.164.319.46518.366.919.365.718.367.219.966.619.469.51874.217.665.417.567.217.363.517.458.817.353.117.357.817.255.717.258.317.151.130.479.11.442.1median 18.3MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21median 59.21.66.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 18 / 24 / 29 Watt
Carga midlight 86 / 201 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Power Consumption
-9%
-0%
24%
-34%
19%
Idle Minimum *
18
20
-11%
20
-11%
11
39%
25
-39%
12
33%
Idle Average *
24
26
-8%
24
-0%
16
33%
28.9
-20%
16
33%
Idle Maximum *
29
32
-10%
29
-0%
21
28%
30.1
-4%
22
24%
Load Average *
86
100
-16%
86
-0%
80
7%
167.3
-95%
96
-12%
Load Maximum *
201
202
-0%
183
9%
174
13%
222.6
-11%
166
17%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
4h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 58min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 54min
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Battery Runtime
-15%
-40%
2%
-24%
67%
H.264
298
WiFi v1.3
285
246
-14%
196
-31%
274
-4%
182
-36%
476
67%
Load
114
97
-15%
58
-49%
123
8%
100
-12%

Pro

+ Unidade ótica ou ventoinha adicional
+ Alto desempenho
+ 8 GB de VRAM
+ Boa tela IPS com G-Sync
+ Portas modernas
+ Temperaturas sempre convenientes
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada com iluminação e teclas macro
+ Ferramentas úteis
+ Preparado para RV

Contra

- Manutenção limitada
- Leve afogamento da GPU em situações extremas
- Carcaça robusta e pesada
- Durações medíocres da bateria
- O som poderia ser melhor (quase sem baixos)
- Elementos do design questionáveis
- Longo tempo de carga
Acer Predator 15 G9-593. Test model courtesy of Cyberport.
Acer Predator 15 G9-593. Test model courtesy of Cyberport.

O novo Predator 15 G9-593 da Acer é uma boa evolução das dois modelos anteriores – pelo menos em termos de componentes. Suficiente desempenho é garantido pela nova GeForce GTX 1070, a boa tela IPS finalmente suporta G-Sync e as portas também estão atualizadas. Em nossa opinião, que as durações da bateria agora sejam mais curtas do que antes, não é uma grande desvantagem.

A Acer poderia melhorar o sistema de som. As medições não são tão ruins e os módulos também conseguem um bom volume máximo, mas o som resultante infelizmente não é muito convincente devido à falta e baixos. Outra pequena crítica concerne ao SSD, porque a Acer anda utiliza uma unidade SATA-III. O fabricante também poderia considerar telas de maior resolução para futuras iterações, considerando o desempenho aumentado da GPU.

Muito desempenho, baixas temperaturas, boa tela e bons dispositivos de entrada – se você não tiver problemas com o design e planeja utilizar o seu portátil para jogos de forma estacionária a maior parte de tempo, então o Predator 15 G9-593 é uma boa escolha.

Exceto pelo design – onde as opiniões ainda diferirão – a carcaça é muito robusta e pesada, inclusive para um portátil de jogos. E também está o Frost Core, que garante um pousa palmas frio durante os jogos, mas a sua ventoinha é um pouco irritante, na prática. Se não estiver jogando, deve retirá-lo. Em resumo, no entanto, estes são apenas pequenos pontos de crítica, e nós definitivamente tivemos uma impressão positiva depois da análise. O Predator 15 G9-593 é um bom portátil para jogos, embora o nosso modelo de teste com o grande SSD não é uma barganha dentro do grupo de comparação.

Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q - 12/10/2016 v6
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
72 / 98 → 74%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
65 / 81 → 80%
Peso
52 / 66 → 75%
Bateria
80%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
96%
Desempenho da aplicação
93%
Temperatura
92 / 95 → 97%
Ruído
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
75%
Médio
78%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Predator 15 G9-593
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-12-16 (Update: 2017-01- 2)