Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Swift 3 SF315 (i5-7200U, GeForce MX150)

Sven Kloevekorn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/19/2017

Um pouco de tudo. O novato da Acer ganha pontos principalmente com sua compacidade, versatilidade e a nova GeForce MX150. Pequenos problemas com a tela e o som não combinam perfeitamente com suas ambições multimídia, mas graças a bons dispositivos de entrada, recursos de segurança e excelente duração, oferece mobilidade extra para o escritório.

Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 (Swift 3 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030) - 2048 MB, Análises do: 1469 - 1532 MHz, Memoría: 6000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 381.99, Nvidia Optimus
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, dual channel
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE0700 / BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, 128 GB 
, +HDD Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 (1 TB, 5400 rpm), 1024 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac)
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.9 x 370.5 x 255
Bateria
49 Wh, 3220 mAh Lítio-Ion, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: stereo , Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.1 kg, Suprimento de energia: 204 g
Preço
999 EUR

 

Size comparison

Left side: power, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C, audio in/out
Left side: power, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C, audio in/out
Right side: SD-card reader, USB 2.0, Kensington
Right side: SD-card reader, USB 2.0, Kensington
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.8 MB/s ∼100% +260%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
62.5 MB/s ∼75% +168%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.3 MB/s ∼28%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
23.2 MB/s ∼28% 0%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.9 MB/s ∼100% +253%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.71 MB/s ∼93% +228%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
27.6 MB/s ∼31% +11%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.9 MB/s ∼28%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
533 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼99%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
521 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
495 MBit/s ∼93% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
666 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
653 MBit/s ∼98% +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
649 MBit/s ∼97%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
434 MBit/s ∼65% -33%
258
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
190
cd/m²
215
cd/m²
227
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 274 cd/m² Médio: 239.4 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminação: 69 %
iluminação com acumulador: 252 cd/m²
Contraste: 1378:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.85 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.84 | - Ø
57% sRGB (Argyll) 37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.29
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
BOE0700 / BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
BOE, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
32%
38%
7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (22, 20)
43 (24, 19, plateau)
-2%
22 (10, 12)
48%
44.8 (16.4, 28.4)
-7%
Response Time Black / White *
32 (18, 14)
11 (7, 4)
66%
23 (13, 10)
28%
25.6 (6.8, 18.8)
20%
PWM Frequency
1087 (90)
Screen
-19%
-13%
-4%
Brightness
239
215
-10%
257
8%
243
2%
Brightness Distribution
69
91
32%
85
23%
75
9%
Black Level *
0.18
0.46
-156%
0.32
-78%
0.24
-33%
Contrast
1378
489
-65%
878
-36%
1008
-27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.85
3.94
19%
5.16
-6%
4.65
4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.84
2.68
30%
4.57
-19%
3.39
12%
Gamma
2.29 105%
2.35 102%
2.59 93%
2.7 89%
CCT
6790 96%
6709 97%
6931 94%
6246 104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
36
-3%
37
0%
36.69
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57
57
0%
58
2%
57.66
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
7% / -9%
13% / -3%
2% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1087 Hz90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1087 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1087 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8604 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼100% +18%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points ∼97% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼85% +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points ∼85%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼100% +125%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
719 Points ∼98% +121%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼45% +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Intel Core i5-7200U
326 Points ∼44%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
326 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
128 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5040 Points ∼100% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
4666 Points ∼93% +2%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
4577 Points ∼91%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4442 Points ∼88% -3%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
3832 Points ∼100% +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
3719 Points ∼97%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3565 Points ∼93% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
3550 Points ∼93% -5%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3719 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4577 pontos
Ajuda
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Hynix HFS128G39TND
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-11%
-91%
81%
Write 4k QD32
170.6
136.4
-20%
0.893
-99%
319.2
87%
Read 4k QD32
287.9
348.2
21%
0.718
-100%
529.5
84%
Write 4k
73.22
76.76
5%
0.846
-99%
123.4
69%
Read 4k
31.89
29.74
-7%
0.327
-99%
34.3
8%
Write 512
216.6
136.9
-37%
28.31
-87%
414
91%
Read 512
310.3
340.9
10%
28.33
-91%
759
145%
Write Seq
409.9
136.2
-67%
100.6
-75%
468.1
14%
Read Seq
462.2
503.7
9%
101.5
-78%
1140
147%
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
Sequential Read: 462.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 409.9 MB/s
512K Read: 310.3 MB/s
512K Write: 216.6 MB/s
4K Read: 31.89 MB/s
4K Write: 73.22 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 287.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 170.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
9768 Points ∼100% +115%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7664 Points ∼78% +69%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-7200U
4547 Points ∼47%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4243 Points ∼43% -7%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7791 Points ∼100% +116%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6094 Points ∼78% +69%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-7200U
3603 Points ∼46%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3545 Points ∼46% -2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
46362 Points ∼100% +119%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
37469 Points ∼81% +77%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
21835 Points ∼47% +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), Intel Core i5-7200U
21160 Points ∼46%
3DMark 11 Performance
4507 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
9757 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3104 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 42.321.8fps
Rocket League (2017) 68.843.2fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 71.427.2fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB
Carga
36.9 / 36 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.934.93335.531.92533.636.735.838.633.63142.745.349.748.242.74033.834.439.235.633.85029.934.933.93429.96328.729.830.732.228.78027.329.130.628.227.310026.430.527.12726.412524.826.526.524.324.816024.724.124.723.224.720024.324.123.222.824.325022.922.722.722.322.93152323.620.821.52340022.622.720.420.222.650022.322.119.819.222.363022.8231918.922.880027.628.31918.427.6100025.426.61817.925.4125026.327.4181826.3160024.325.217.917.624.3200024.625.51817.524.6250024.125.21817.924.1315025.92718.21825.9400021.422.418.418.221.4500021.822.918.518.521.8630020.22118.518.620.2800019.319.718.818.819.3100001919.318.918.7191250019.119.51918.919.11600019.52019.319.119.5SPL3636.930.930.736N2.42.61.51.52.4median 23Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9median 23.6median 19median 18.8median 23Delta1.71.91.61.81.748.34242.435.148.341.340.53933.841.336.539.233.830.636.533.832.933.728.633.833.432.131.428.633.433.634.93130.633.632.631.932.327.232.632.93428.726.532.929.929.426.42629.930.730.427.225.130.728.527.926.323.928.528.928.425.122.228.9302825.622.33029.9282621.429.930.928.223.120.430.931.428.822.419.631.434.931.92318.734.93632.722.418.23633.531.120.71833.537.735.220.117.937.740.33719.617.540.337.933.719.117.237.93531.719.217.23530.726.1191730.728.42419.117.228.42621.91917.12623.220.618.917.123.2212018.917.12120.119.618.816.920.120.119.61916.920.146.943.732.930.346.95.24.11.91.45.2median 30.7Asus FX553VD-DM249Tmedian 28.4median 20.7median 18median 30.73.53.932.83.53532.932.231.43529.930.632.632.529.933.730.13836.333.728.529.529.128.928.53230.929.3313227.438.127.829.427.431.931.632.425.531.932.832.233.524.932.824.825.824.525.124.824.125.223.823.224.124.52422.722.924.523.624.92221.423.624.426.621.421.124.425.428.420.32025.422.124.919.919.222.122.624.819.518.622.627.328.82218.327.326.428.720.918.126.426.329.618.317.626.327.932.519.417.627.9273318.217.82725.63218.617.925.624.330.318.217.824.322.327.518.318.122.321.727.218.318.321.719.523.818.518.419.518.820.518.518.518.81919.518.518.61918.718.718.418.418.719.718.618.418.419.736.841.331.430.436.82.53.61.61.42.5median 24.3Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15median 26.6median 19.4median 18.4median 24.32.32.72.51.82.3hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carga Máxima
 36 °C42.6 °C39.6 °C 
 33.1 °C39.2 °C30.1 °C 
 25.5 °C34.9 °C25.6 °C 
Máximo: 42.6 °C
Médio: 34.1 °C
29.6 °C37.2 °C33.3 °C
27.7 °C32.8 °C29.4 °C
25.5 °C26.6 °C26.8 °C
Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 29.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.535.536.52533.738.633.73137.648.237.64033.735.633.75032.13432.16329.432.229.48027.528.227.510026.12726.112528.424.328.416040.523.240.520044.722.844.725056.922.356.931559.121.559.140062.320.262.350064.519.264.563072.518.972.58007618.476100074.317.974.3125073.31873.3160073.217.673.2200074.517.574.5250075.717.975.7315076.41876.4400077.518.277.5500074.318.574.3630070.318.670.3800058.618.858.61000062.818.762.81250073.518.973.51600070.419.170.4SPL86.130.786.1N65.61.565.6median 70.4Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9median 18.8median 70.4Delta9.51.89.53531.43534.332.534.335.936.335.930.628.930.631.53131.528.529.428.533.325.533.336.224.936.243.525.143.551.723.251.752.922.952.958.321.458.36421.16466.12066.163.919.263.965.918.665.971.318.371.365.218.165.264.817.664.868.417.668.469.217.869.268.617.968.667.717.867.770.718.170.772.618.372.672.218.472.272.418.572.472.718.672.767.818.467.858.518.458.581.730.481.754.41.454.4median 66.1Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15median 18.4median 66.15.51.85.530.331.130.331.73133.229.23029.131.328.429.534.133.538.236.831.333.625.539.726.354.825.266.926.670.824.368.222.764.319.461.119.656.518.657.518.764.518.570.918.27618.37118.566.920.96520.364.819.563.619.764.219.756.820.554.219.652.332.480.71.945.7median 19.7Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000median 64.23.25.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.37 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.7 / 6.2 / 8.4 Watt
Carga midlight 50 / 65.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
7200U, GeForce MX150, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Hynix HFS128G39TND, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-31%
-74%
6%
Idle Minimum *
3.7
4
-8%
7
-89%
2.8
24%
Idle Average *
6.2
6.7
-8%
10.2
-65%
6.3
-2%
Idle Maximum *
8.4
9.6
-14%
14
-67%
6.9
18%
Load Average *
50
81
-62%
78
-56%
51.6
-3%
Load Maximum *
65.2
107
-64%
127
-95%
69.7
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
90

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
15h 16min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
8h 29min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 26min
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
7200U, GeForce MX150, 49 Wh
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 48 Wh
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 52.5 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh
Battery Runtime
-42%
-50%
-8%
Reader / Idle
916
587
-36%
322
-65%
883
-4%
WiFi v1.3
509
360
-29%
302
-41%
462
-9%
Load
146
56
-62%
81
-45%
129
-12%

Pro

+ Várias opções de equipamento disponíveis
+ Fino, leve e compacto
+ Acabamento impecável
+ Bom posicionamento das portas
+ TPM 2.0, sensor de digitais
+ Muito bom ClickPad
+ Muito boa razão de contraste
+ Silencioso, frio e frugal

Contra

- Muito sensível às impressões digitais
- Difícil de limpar
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Leitor de cartões muito lento
- Manutenção difícil
- Teclado numérico muito pequeno
- Tela muito escura
- Medida da distribuição de brilho, muito ruim
- Cobertura insuficiente dos espaços de cores
- Tempos de reação da tela lentos
- Som insatisfatório
The Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 - provided by notebooksbilliger.de
The Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 - provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Se você considerar o preço elevado de atualmente cerca de 950 Euros (~$1116) do novo Acer Aspire Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9, tela apenas sub-ótima - o que não significa que seja ruim - e, em particular, o som muito ruim de o recém-chegado está abaixo da faixa de preços. Visualmente, tudo seria ótimo, se não fosse por essas impressões digitais incomodas e difíceis de limpar. Mas talvez o aparelho bem novamente depois de realmente ter tocado em todos os lugares. 

Se você ignorar as superfícies, a carcaça ganha pontos com dimensões relativamente pequenas e um peso limitado, diferenciando-se assim de boa parte da concorrência. Também não há nada que reclamar do acabamento. Graças aos bons e bons dispositivos de entrada, TPM, sensor de digitais e uma duração decente, o leve, compacto, silencioso e fresco  Swift 3 é muito adequado para o uso de escritório móvel. E finalmente, com a nova Nvidia GeForce MX150, existe, finalmente, um sucessor utilizável da antiga 940MX a bordo, de modo que os jogos casuais são possíveis com imagens visuais boas ou pelo menos aceitáveis.

Com o novo Swift 3, a Acer traz para o mercado um poli funcional bem sucedido com ambições de jogo, que certamente encontrará alguns compradores com a combinação de uma carcaça compacta e leve e recursos de segurança, mesmo que não esteja livre de fraquezas.

Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 - 10/04/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento
74 / 98 → 76%
Teclado
80%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
48 / 81 → 59%
Peso
62 / 67 → 90%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
80%
Desempenho do jogos
76 / 85 → 89%
Desempenho da aplicação
87 / 92 → 95%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
95 / 95 → 100%
Audio
50%
Camera
43 / 85 → 51%
Médio
75%
84%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Swift 3 SF315 (i5-7200U, GeForce MX150)
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-10-19 (Update: 2017-10-27)