Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad E570 (Core i5, GTX 950M)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| HP 15-ba077ng | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| HP 15-ba077ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 75 %
iluminação com acumulador: 245 cd/m²
Contraste: 1008:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.39 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
57.66% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.7
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB LG Display LEN40BA / LP156WF6-SPK1, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Latitude 15-3570 LG Philips LGD04AF / 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.60 | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -7% | 3% | 5% | -0% | 10% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.65 | 36.05 -7% | 39.89 3% | 40.61 5% | 38.57 0% | 42.66 10% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58 | 53.2 -8% | 59.5 3% | 61.1 5% | 57.4 -1% | 64.1 11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.94 | 37.4 -6% | 41.24 3% | 41.96 5% | 39.89 0% | 44.08 10% |
| Response Times | -16% | -14% | 10% | -31% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.8 ? | 51 ? -14% | 37 ? 17% | 39 ? 13% | 51 ? -14% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 30 ? -17% | 37 ? -45% | 24 ? 6% | 38 ? -48% | |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 50 ? | ||||
| Screen | -3% | -60% | -80% | -50% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 242 | 332.2 37% | 214 -12% | 202 -17% | 176 -27% | 291 20% |
| Brightness | 243 | 301 24% | 201 -17% | 211 -13% | 169 -30% | 265 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 75 | 80 7% | 77 3% | 88 17% | 91 21% | 86 15% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.4 -67% | 0.43 -79% | 0.62 -158% | 0.47 -96% | 0.23 4% |
| Contrast | 1008 | 831 -18% | 498 -51% | 326 -68% | 374 -63% | 1265 25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.65 | 10.68 -130% | 12.35 -166% | 8.83 -90% | 4.78 -3% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.64 | 18.07 -87% | 19.9 -106% | 14.01 -45% | 9.51 1% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.39 | 11.32 -234% | 13.46 -297% | 8.97 -165% | 3.49 -3% | |
| Gamma | 2.7 81% | 2.26 97% | 2.44 90% | 2.43 91% | 2.58 85% | |
| CCT | 6246 104% | 12204 53% | 15217 43% | 10234 64% | 6013 108% | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.69 | 38 4% | 39 6% | 36.8 0% | 40 9% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57.66 | 59 2% | 61 6% | 57.3 -1% | 64 11% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-5% | -24% /
-42% | -30% /
-54% | -13% /
-32% | -4% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB | |
| Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3550 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4666 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Dell Latitude 15-3570 Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Liteonit CV3-DE256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -70% | -46% | -75% | -33% | |
| Seq Read | 1227 | 489.5 -60% | 493.8 -60% | 489.1 -60% | 479.8 -61% |
| Seq Write | 636 | 169.9 -73% | 315.9 -50% | 130 -80% | 377.8 -41% |
| 4K Read | 37.12 | 17.46 -53% | 17.96 -52% | 17.25 -54% | 32.4 -13% |
| 4K Write | 73.1 | 34.76 -52% | 73.4 0% | 21.57 -70% | 59.7 -18% |
| 4K-64 Read | 654 | 84.6 -87% | 137.1 -79% | 81.8 -87% | 345.5 -47% |
| 4K-64 Write | 232.5 | 33.68 -86% | 195.5 -16% | 19.37 -92% | 203.7 -12% |
| Score Total | 1578 | 305 -81% | 607 -62% | 267 -83% | 951 -40% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4255 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 10297 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3244 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 138.1 | 95.4 | 86.8 | 35.66 |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 47.25 | 40.03 | 27.41 | 16.89 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 71.4 | 40.32 | 21.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29 / 29 / 29 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.3 / 40.1 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.1 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.5 °C / -11.7 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.48 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.8 / 6.3 / 6.9 Watt |
| Carga |
51.6 / 69.7 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB 6500U, Radeon R7 M370, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60 | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-DE256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -29% | -9% | 3% | -41% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 3.6 -29% | 3.8 -36% | 4.9 -75% | 6 -114% | 3.9 -39% |
| Idle Average * | 6.3 | 8.7 -38% | 6.6 -5% | 7.2 -14% | 8.1 -29% | 7.4 -17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.9 | 11.5 -67% | 11.3 -64% | 7.5 -9% | 9.8 -42% | 9.5 -38% |
| Load Average * | 51.6 | 61.9 -20% | 38 26% | 25.4 51% | 52.5 -2% | 41 21% |
| Load Maximum * | 69.7 | 64.8 7% | 45 35% | 28 60% | 81.6 -17% | 48 31% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB 6500U, Radeon R7 M370, 48 Wh | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 45 Wh | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | -3% | 18% | -19% | -40% | |
| Reader / Idle | 883 | 789 -11% | 746 -16% | 1024 16% | 767 -13% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 462 | 513 11% | 542 17% | 451 -2% | 275 -40% | |
| Load | 129 | 123 -5% | 157 22% | 75 -42% | ||
| WiFi | 331 | |||||
| H.264 | 460 |
Pro
Contra
O E570, de fato, tem muitas qualidades que falam pelo primeiro ThinkPad Kaby Lake de 15,6 polegadas no mercado: Os bons dispositivos de entrada são o principal argumento. A Lenovo não comete erros grandes com a tela; o limitado espaço de cores pode ser aceitável em um aparelho de econômico quando a tela se sai bem todas as outras áreas. Fazer a manutenção do E570 é bastante fácil, os bons alto falantes, e a placa de vídeo comparativamente potente adiciona qualidades multimídia ao aparelho. Além disso, descobrimos que o aparelho está sempre frio e silencioso no modo inativo e durante cargas de trabalho leves.
Infelizmente, a Lenovo comete alguns erros: o posicionamento das portas é tudo menos ideal, embora teria sido possível distribuir as interfaces de forma diferente, apesar da unidade de DVD. A CPU e a GPU se afogam massivamente durante o uso intenso, o que sugere um sistema de resfriamento muito fraco. Finalmente, temos que criticar a carcaça: Em particular, o alojamento da tela não convence nem na construção, nem na estabilidade.
É uma pena que a Lenovo cometa tais erros em termos de construção. O E570 é, de fato, um aparelho muito interessante, principalmente para estudantes - no entanto, o E470 menor poderia ser ainda mais atraente.
Apesar de tudo, uma recomendação de compra pode ser outorgada para o E570 devido à boa razão preço-desempenho. Seria interessante principalmente para estudantes e usuários privados que desejam um portátil com bons dispositivos de entrada. No entanto, a razão preço-desempenho não é tão boa para estudantes: As configurações fixas começam a partir dos 750 Euros (~$798) e não oferecem um SSD senão apenas o HD de 1 TB, e eles não têm uma GPU dedicada. Pelo menos, o mais fraco 940MX é instalado quando se faz o pedido diretamente da Lenovo. O HP ProBook 450 G4 começa com um preço baixo, mas também vem com uma tela TN inferior.
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
-
02/03/2017 v6(old)
Benjamin Herzig