Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus 17G XB: O teclado mecânico é ótimo

Flecha prateada. Com o Aorus 17G, a Gigabyte apresenta um redesenho completo do portátil de jogos de 17 polegadas. O teclado mecânico é um dos mais importantes recursos introduzidos recentemente. Você pode descobrir se o resto do pacote está ou não no nível esperado, lendo o nossa
Aorus 17G XB (17G Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 930 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 442.53, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, Duas barras de RAM SO-DIMM DDR4-3200 de 8GB funcionando no modo Dual-channel; todos os slots ocupados; máx. capacidade: 64 GB
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, Full-HD, X-Rite Pantone, Brilhante: não, 240 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB 
, Dois slots M.2-2280 (NVMe)
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Comet Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Um conector para fones, uma porta para microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 26 x 405 x 276
Bateria
94 Wh, 6200 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Dois alto-falantes de 2 watts, Teclado: Chaves mecânicas OMRON, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força de 230-watts, Guia de início rápido, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.73 kg, Suprimento de energia: 728 g
Preço
2400 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.5 %
05/2020
Aorus 17G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.7 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
87 %
04/2020
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.7 kg21 mm17.30"3840x2160
84.2 %
03/2020
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.6 kg20.5 mm17.30"1920x1080
84 %
05/2020
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
3 kg25.5 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.7 %
06/2019
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
81.2 %
12/2019
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.7 kg18.7 mm17.30"1920x1080

Size Comparison

412 mm 305 mm 25.5 mm 3 kg405 mm 276 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg399.8 mm 295.5 mm 20.5 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 272 mm 18.7 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 270 mm 21 mm 2.7 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17G XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174.4 MB/s -18%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 17G XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
247 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
245 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203.4 MB/s -18%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1410 MBit/s +12%
Aorus 17G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1260 MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1110 MBit/s -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
697 MBit/s -45%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
691 (668min - 703max) MBit/s -45%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
496 (459min - 531max) MBit/s -61%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1390 MBit/s +10%
Aorus 17G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1260 MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
924 MBit/s -27%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
686 MBit/s -46%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
681 (655min - 689max) MBit/s -46%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
638 (625min - 645max) MBit/s -49%
ColorChecker
17.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Aorus 17G XB: 10.03 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 20.41 ∆E
Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
284
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 293 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 285 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 293 cd/m²
Contraste: 1221:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.06
ΔE Greyscale 1.34 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
Aorus 17G XB
AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B), IPS, 3840x2160
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
AUO_B173HAN03, IPS, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 1920x1080
Display
21%
0%
-8%
-12%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
70.6
86.5
23%
70.8
0%
63.8
-10%
60.6
-14%
70
-1%
sRGB Coverage
97.2
100
3%
98.5
1%
92.7
-5%
89
-8%
96.6
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
72.8
100
37%
72.2
-1%
65.3
-10%
62.1
-15%
72.3
-1%
Response Times
-181%
1%
4%
39%
51%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16 ?(7.6, 8.4)
55.2 ?(26.8, 28.4)
-245%
17.2 ?(8.8, 8.4)
-8%
16 ?(8, 8)
-0%
6.8 ?(3.4, 3.4)
57%
5.6 ?(2.4, 3.2)
65%
Response Time Black / White *
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
26 ?(9.2, 16.8)
-117%
10.8 ?(6, 4.8)
10%
11 ?(6, 5)
8%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
20%
7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)
37%
PWM Frequency
26320 ?(25)
Screen
14%
-5%
-76%
-55%
-28%
Brightness middle
293
487
66%
384.2
31%
310
6%
299.3
2%
288
-2%
Brightness
285
475
67%
357
25%
281
-1%
294
3%
276
-3%
Brightness Distribution
95
95
0%
90
-5%
85
-11%
94
-1%
93
-2%
Black Level *
0.24
0.38
-58%
0.29
-21%
0.31
-29%
0.29
-21%
0.24
-0%
Contrast
1221
1282
5%
1325
9%
1000
-18%
1032
-15%
1200
-2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.27
1.19
6%
1.35
-6%
3.86
-204%
2.55
-101%
1.92
-51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.24
2.43
-8%
3.45
-54%
7.8
-248%
4.73
-111%
4.57
-104%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.06
0.5
53%
1.42
-34%
2.9
-174%
1.14
-8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.34
1.45
-8%
1.2
10%
4.48
-234%
3.5
-161%
3.08
-130%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.21 100%
2.23 99%
2.5 88%
2.28 96%
2.42 91%
CCT
6542 99%
6557 99%
6580 99%
7542 86%
7101 92%
7055 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
73
88
21%
65.5
-10%
60
-18%
57
-22%
65
-11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
100
6%
98.5
5%
93
-1%
88.7
-6%
96
2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-49% / -9%
-1% / -3%
-27% / -52%
-9% / -35%
7% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
 
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1613 (1597.83-1832.68)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1572 (1548.11-1671.4)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
499 Points +3%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
486 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
478 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
422 Points -13%
CPU (Multi Core)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
4136 Points +8%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3823 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3431 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
2738 Points -28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
2357 Points -38%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
211 Points +4%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
203 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
195 Points -4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
173 Points -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1833 (1597.83min - 1832.68max) Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1754 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1671 (1548.11min - 1671.4max) Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1225 Points -33%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1180 Points -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
1097 Points -40%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
389.5 Seconds * -34%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
317 Seconds * -9%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
290 Seconds *
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
5413 MIPS +1%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
5345 MIPS
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
4585 MIPS -14%
7z b 4
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
46702 MIPS
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
44829 MIPS -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
33364 MIPS -29%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1293 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1233 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1128 Points -13%
Multi-Core
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
8139 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
7431 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
5909 Points -27%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.1 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
9.47 fps -26%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
84.3 s * -59%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
53.1 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.676 sec * -16%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.583 sec *
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.556 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1833 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
138 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
203 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6571 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6483 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6049 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5922 Points -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5734 Points -13%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5502 Points -16%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6058 μs *
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1933 μs * +68%

* ... smaller is better

Aorus 17G XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-2%
-7%
-10%
-28%
-27%
Write 4K
123.4
123.4
0%
110.6
-10%
101.2
-18%
100.7
-18%
96.1
-22%
Read 4K
45.02
45.59
1%
41.46
-8%
44.61
-1%
41.03
-9%
40.86
-9%
Write Seq
2526
2320
-8%
2378
-6%
2295
-9%
1146
-55%
1317
-48%
Read Seq
2062
2013
-2%
2114
3%
2174
5%
1115
-46%
1030
-50%
Write 4K Q32T1
497.9
489.3
-2%
445.4
-11%
401.2
-19%
384.6
-23%
350.4
-30%
Read 4K Q32T1
579
559
-3%
509
-12%
475.5
-18%
429.5
-26%
404.1
-30%
Write Seq Q32T1
2982
2979
0%
2735
-8%
2397
-20%
1859
-38%
2396
-20%
Read Seq Q32T1
3440
3432
0%
3206
-7%
3337
-3%
3179
-8%
3194
-7%
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3440 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2982 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 579 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 497.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2062 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2526 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.02 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 123.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
23962 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
49917 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18852 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7633 pontos
Ajuda
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø74.5 (70-80)
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
5148 Points +17%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
5092 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4713 Points +7%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
4477 Points +1%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
4411 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4405 Points 0%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8844 Points +20%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8479 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8036 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7597 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7468 Points +1%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7358 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
23032 Points +10%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
22391 Points +7%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
21004 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20917 Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
20914 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18877 Points -10%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
30910 Points +11%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29220 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29052 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
28555 Points +2%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
27955 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
27203 Points -3%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
153.2 fps +8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
152.2 fps +7%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
149.6 fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
145 (127min - 163max) fps +2%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
142 (120min) fps 0%
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
142 (118min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
87.4 fps +19%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
81 (72min - 91max) fps +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
80.7 fps +10%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
78 fps +6%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
75.3 (63min) fps +2%
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
73.6 (62min) fps
baixo média alto ultra
GTA V (2015) 182 177 159 91.1
The Witcher 3 (2015) 142 73.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 163 147 138 129
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 121 104 87.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 110 99
Battlefield V (2018) 136 126
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 151 86.9
Rage 2 (2019) 97.5 94.9
F1 2019 (2019) 152 141
Borderlands 3 (2019) 77.2 58.9
GRID 2019 (2019) 103 69.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 117 99.6
Gears Tactics (2020) 109 82.2
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.933.633.632.634.32535.839.443.141.542.73131.633.234.831.432.14030.234.834.230.632.45033.33429.428.532.66327.63728.726.631.88028.929.626.926.330.910027.928.92725.332.31252929.52724.832.516030.732.230.726.332.720030.930.126.722.931.225031.728.125.821.832.9315332926.12133.940033.630.326.32035.850035.231.626.418.936.863034.129.324.418.135.580034.73125.318.136.5100035.630.525.617.737.712503630.92518.737.7160037.332.524.718.239.9200037.731.82417.639.5250035.829.62417.838.2315034.930.621.517.837400035.2261917.838500030.723.218.81833.1630025.219.918.21828.2800021.118.617.917.922.81000019.818.618.217.921.21250019.618.618.217.819.51600020.319.218.817.920.4SPL46.741.435.430.448.8N5.53.82.31.46.4median 33median 29.5median 24.7median 18.1median 33.9Delta5.23.93.71.25hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAorus 17G XB

Barulho

Ocioso
35 / 36 / 41 dB
Carga
47 / 49 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Aorus 17G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Noise
-1%
6%
14%
10%
6%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
29.1
3%
30.3
-1%
28.2
6%
30
-0%
Idle Minimum *
35
35
-0%
29.4
16%
30.3
13%
28.2
19%
32
9%
Idle Average *
36
36
-0%
29.4
18%
30.3
16%
28.2
22%
33
8%
Idle Maximum *
41
38
7%
31.5
23%
30.5
26%
30.8
25%
34
17%
Load Average *
47
47
-0%
49.7
-6%
40.8
13%
42
11%
40
15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
49
-2%
49.5
-3%
40.5
16%
51
-6%
49
-2%
Load Maximum *
49
54
-10%
53.3
-9%
40.8
17%
53
-8%
50
-2%

* ... smaller is better

 38 °C40 °C48 °C 
 33 °C39 °C41 °C 
 29 °C30 °C29 °C 
Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 36.3 °C
59 °C58 °C46 °C
57 °C56 °C44 °C
39 °C39 °C37 °C
Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 48.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
Aorus 17G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Heat
-4%
-24%
1%
6%
-7%
Maximum Upper Side *
48
53
-10%
54.2
-13%
40.7
15%
43
10%
50
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
59
59
-0%
61.4
-4%
42.2
28%
47.2
20%
47
20%
Idle Upper Side *
26
27
-4%
37.8
-45%
31.9
-23%
27.2
-5%
33
-27%
Idle Bottom *
29
29
-0%
38.6
-33%
33.9
-17%
30
-3%
34
-17%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.635.42541.543.23131.434.84030.635.35028.541.56326.633.28026.331.610025.331.812524.834.516026.345.620022.956.825021.861.63152161.24002068.750018.970.563018.17880018.180.9100017.778.5125018.773.3160018.270.6200017.671.1250017.867.7315017.868.7400017.873.350001870.963001869.3800017.964.91000017.962.11250017.865.51600017.965SPL30.485.5N1.463.9median 18.1median 68.7Delta1.24.830.635.338.538.929.931.728.336.227.237.226.940.124.235.624.637.923.947.223.444.721.754.920.559.119.960.218.668.118.769.417.977.117.67917.376.819.373.818.773.217.571.517.370.117.372.517.474.517.572.717.373.917.466.517.360.817.364.517.36930.185.61.366.8median 17.6median 69.41.76.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus 17G XBGigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus 17G XB audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 1.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 20 / 23 / 38 Watt
Carga midlight 105 / 243 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Aorus 17G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Power Consumption
8%
-36%
5%
11%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
20
16
20%
24.7
-24%
15.7
21%
16.2
19%
32
-60%
Idle Average *
23
19
17%
35.9
-56%
26.3
-14%
20.4
11%
34
-48%
Idle Maximum *
38
30
21%
69.6
-83%
28
26%
26.1
31%
36
5%
Load Average *
105
109
-4%
141.8
-35%
136
-30%
96.5
8%
95
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
158
167
-6%
185.8
-18%
160
-1%
182.9
-16%
155
2%
Load Maximum *
243
246
-1%
235.4
3%
177
27%
214.3
12%
187
23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 58min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 30min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 14min
Aorus 17G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Battery Runtime
-5%
-47%
-56%
-42%
-56%
Reader / Idle
598
592
-1%
426
-29%
229
-62%
295
-51%
246
-59%
WiFi v1.3
450
372
-17%
290
-36%
178
-60%
280
-38%
182
-60%
Load
134
140
4%
31
-77%
73
-46%
86
-36%
69
-49%
H.264
166
168

Pro

+ Chassi estável e de alta qualidade
+ Certificação X-Rite Pantone
+ Teclado mecânico
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ 240 Hz

Contra

- Produz muito ruído sob uso intenso
In review: Aorus 17G XB. Test device provided courtesy of: Gigabyte Germany.
In review: Aorus 17G XB. Test device provided courtesy of: Gigabyte Germany.

Embora o desempenho da GPU não seja tão notável, o Aorus 17G oferece três características especiais, que tornam o portátil de jogos bastante interessante.

Primeiro está o design. Ao invés de usar um esquema tradicional de cor preta, a Gigabyte oferece um chassi cinza que é muito rígido e parece premium. Outra vantagem é a grande bateria, que garante longos tempos de funcionamento da bateria. 

No entanto, o teclado mecânico é o principal recurso especial. Proporciona uma ótima experiência de digitação. Se você conseguir usar o teclado do Aorus 17G, você nunca mais vai querer voltar a usar os teclados tradicionais de portáteis. 

Aorus 17G XB - 05/14/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
86 / 98 → 87%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
69 / 80 → 86%
Peso
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Bateria
77 / 95 → 81%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
94%
Desempenho da aplicação
94%
Temperatura
82 / 95 → 86%
Ruído
61 / 90 → 67%
Audio
76%
Camera
38 / 85 → 44%
Médio
77%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
Aorus 17G XB
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus 17G XB: O teclado mecânico é ótimo
Florian Glaser, 2020-05-26 (Update: 2021-03-12)