Notebookcheck

Muito melhor que antes: Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade Pro (17)

O padrão de ouro para portáteis de jogos ultrafinos de 17 polegadas. Pode ter levado algumas tentativas à Razer, mas eles finalmente criaram um portátil Blade quase perfeito e um dos melhores portáteis para jogos de sua categoria de tamanho. Esta última versão do Blade Pro deixa de lado as características não essenciais das gerações anteriores por uma experiência de jogo mais leve, mais eficiente e mais simplificada que todos - e não apenas os fanáticos da Razer - podem apreciar.

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Blade Pro 17 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1090 MHz, Memoría: 1600 MHz, GDDR6, 430.86, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, AUO409D, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
Placa de Som
NVIDIA TU104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
5 USB 3.0, 5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 5 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: Leitor de SD (UHS-III)
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.9 x 395 x 260
Bateria
70 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Razer Synapse, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.75 kg, Suprimento de energia: 790 g
Preço
3200 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

424 mm 281 mm 22.5 mm 3.6 kg412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg410 mm 292.5 mm 23 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 273 mm 26.4 mm 2.9 kg396 mm 259 mm 19 mm 2.3 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader UHS-III, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.0b, Kensington Lock
Right: SD reader UHS-III, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.0b, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, 2.5 Gbit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, 2.5 Gbit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm combo audio
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
176.6 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174.4 MB/s ∼99%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼45% -54%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
50 MB/s ∼28% -71%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207.82 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203.4 MB/s ∼98%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼41% -58%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
52 MB/s ∼25% -74%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
686 MBit/s ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
671 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Alienware m17 P37E
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
670 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
599 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
598 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
697 MBit/s ∼100%
Alienware m17 P37E
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
659 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
605 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
528 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
356 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
305.8
cd/m²
290.9
cd/m²
291.9
cd/m²
289.1
cd/m²
299.3
cd/m²
288.7
cd/m²
292.4
cd/m²
289.9
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 305.8 cd/m² Médio: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14.99 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 299.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 1032:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.55 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 2.9
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
88.7% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3, 3840x2160
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Alienware m17 P37E
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Response Times
-3%
-81%
-547%
-6%
-308%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6.8 (3.4, 3.4)
7.2 (3.6, 3.6)
-6%
15.6 (8, 7.6)
-129%
60.8 (28.8, 32)
-794%
7.6 (3.8, 3.8)
-12%
35.6 (19.6, 16)
-424%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
-0%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-33%
38.4 (22, 16.4)
-300%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
-0%
28 (16, 12)
-192%
PWM Frequency
204.9 (20)
25510 (17)
Screen
13%
-30%
-22%
24%
-29%
Brightness middle
299.3
288
-4%
299.1
0%
230
-23%
355
19%
357.9
20%
Brightness
294
287
-2%
273
-7%
207
-30%
327
11%
347
18%
Brightness Distribution
94
91
-3%
81
-14%
83
-12%
85
-10%
94
0%
Black Level *
0.29
0.2
31%
0.27
7%
0.2
31%
0.26
10%
0.33
-14%
Contrast
1032
1440
40%
1108
7%
1150
11%
1365
32%
1085
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.55
2.33
9%
5.07
-99%
5.62
-120%
1.54
40%
6.57
-158%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.73
5.34
-13%
10.55
-123%
10.24
-116%
3
37%
9.86
-108%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.9
2.47
15%
3.31
-14%
0.77
73%
6.74
-132%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
1.19
66%
6.8
-94%
4.54
-30%
2.19
37%
4.3
-23%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.36 93%
2.42 91%
2.6 85%
CCT
7101 92%
6710 97%
7805 83%
6625 98%
6893 94%
6403 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
57
0%
58.5
3%
88
54%
61
7%
88.4
55%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88.7
88
-1%
89.9
1%
100
13%
95
7%
100
13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / 10%
-56% / -38%
-285% / -110%
9% / 19%
-169% / -72%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.4 ms rise
↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18215 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230Tooltip
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1076 (1067.18-1187.86)
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1017 (1007.38-1101.08)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1187 (1126.76-1226.54)
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points ∼95% +18%
Alienware m17 P37E
Intel Core i9-8950HK
191 Points ∼85% +6%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼84% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=79)
183 Points ∼82% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points ∼80%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points ∼79% -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼78% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H
166 Points ∼74% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
158 Points ∼71% -12%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points ∼64% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
2022 Points ∼46% +71%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼39% +46%
Alienware m17 P37E
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1238 Points ∼28% +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
1204 Points ∼28% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1180 Points ∼27%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (932 - 1306, n=82)
1171 Points ∼27% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H
818 Points ∼19% -31%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points ∼18% -32%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
771 Points ∼18% -35%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
757 Points ∼17% -36%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
2.11 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1.96 - 2.19, n=9)
2.09 Points ∼82%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points ∼71%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1.64 Points ∼64%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
18.94 Points ∼43%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (11.3 - 14.1, n=9)
13 Points ∼29%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9.21 Points ∼21%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.39 Points ∼19%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6967 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (6659 - 7214, n=12)
6902 Points ∼64%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4770 Points ∼44%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
42456 Points ∼65%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28251 - 36304, n=12)
33459 Points ∼51%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
20687 Points ∼32%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
197.075 s * ∼2%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
118.733 s * ∼1%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (0.3 - 11365, n=39)
2593 Seconds * ∼12%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
649.703 Seconds * ∼3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
476.493 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
180 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1180 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
119.65 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8419 Points ∼65% +17%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (6675 - 8862, n=9)
7594 Points ∼59% +5%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
7325 Points ∼57% +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7227 Points ∼56% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7219 Points ∼56%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3975 Points ∼31% -45%
Productivity
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8416 Points ∼81% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (7180 - 8200, n=9)
7640 Points ∼73% +2%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
7599 Points ∼73% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7482 Points ∼72%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7331 Points ∼70% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
5259 Points ∼50% -30%
Essentials
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9608 Points ∼84% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9473 Points ∼83%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (8791 - 9927, n=9)
9356 Points ∼82% -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8780 Points ∼77% -7%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
8711 Points ∼76% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
8255 Points ∼72% -13%
Score
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6306 Points ∼78% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (5374 - 6202, n=9)
5842 Points ∼72% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5734 Points ∼71%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
5632 Points ∼69% -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5555 Points ∼68% -3%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3991 Points ∼49% -30%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6004 Points ∼91% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (4755 - 6593, n=9)
5755 Points ∼87% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5672 Points ∼86%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5663 Points ∼86% 0%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4765 Points ∼72% -16%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
2486 Points ∼38% -56%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4861 Points ∼80% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (4207 - 5539, n=9)
4603 Points ∼76% +4%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4550 Points ∼75% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
4531 Points ∼74% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4412 Points ∼72%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
3812 Points ∼63% -14%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4412 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5672 pontos
Ajuda
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Alienware m17 P37E
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Razer Blade Pro 2017
2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
AS SSD
-40%
-26%
-10%
-19%
7%
Copy Game MB/s
554.5
647.13
17%
1161.79
110%
Copy Program MB/s
425.46
493.02
16%
608.24
43%
Copy ISO MB/s
2086.06
772.97
-63%
1487.13
-29%
Score Total
4197
1715
-59%
2306
-45%
2784
-34%
2715
-35%
4123
-2%
Score Write
1977
942
-52%
988
-50%
1441
-27%
676
-66%
1558
-21%
Score Read
1468
510
-65%
895
-39%
878
-40%
1414
-4%
1708
16%
Access Time Write *
0.037
0.045
-22%
0.053
-43%
0.04
-8%
0.036
3%
0.039
-5%
Access Time Read *
0.064
0.11
-72%
0.047
27%
0.063
2%
0.051
20%
0.055
14%
4K-64 Write
1695.31
726.69
-57%
775.98
-54%
1212.35
-28%
512.87
-70%
1197.05
-29%
4K-64 Read
1239.5
326.47
-74%
687.04
-45%
727.26
-41%
1116.21
-10%
1366.28
10%
4K Write
107.11
122.81
15%
99.97
-7%
96.04
-10%
104.44
-2%
94.41
-12%
4K Read
45.16
52.43
16%
23.98
-47%
35.05
-22%
37.57
-17%
40.89
-9%
Seq Write
1743.97
927
-47%
1120.94
-36%
1328.15
-24%
587.97
-66%
2667.63
53%
Seq Read
1831.1
1315
-28%
1834.8
0%
1152.78
-37%
2599.35
42%
3004.86
64%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3179 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1859 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 429.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 384.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1115 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1146 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.03 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 100.7 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
5660 Points ∼60% +10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
5148 Points ∼55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (3698 - 5295, n=19)
4531 Points ∼48% -12%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
4100 Points ∼44% -20%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
11099 Points ∼74% +25%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
10243 Points ∼69% +16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8844 Points ∼59%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (6464 - 8844, n=19)
7903 Points ∼53% -11%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
7446 Points ∼50% -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
7431 Points ∼50% -16%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 7820HK
6380 Points ∼43% -28%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7820HK
6101 Points ∼41% -31%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5657 Points ∼38% -36%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
4867 Points ∼33% -45%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3626 Points ∼24% -59%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
27228 Points ∼67% +18%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
25126 Points ∼62% +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
23032 Points ∼57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (18048 - 23032, n=19)
20658 Points ∼51% -10%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
20323 Points ∼50% -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
19236 Points ∼47% -16%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 7820HK
18879 Points ∼46% -18%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7820HK
18505 Points ∼46% -20%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
15088 Points ∼37% -34%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
13355 Points ∼33% -42%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11332 Points ∼28% -51%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9292 Points ∼23% -60%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
8004 Points ∼20% -65%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
7374 Points ∼18% -68%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13883 Points ∼61% +14%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
12538 Points ∼55% +3%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12441 Points ∼55% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12170 Points ∼54%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (9212 - 14894, n=20)
11726 Points ∼52% -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11597 Points ∼51% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 7820HK
10129 Points ∼45% -17%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7820HK
9607 Points ∼42% -21%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9159 Points ∼41% -25%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
8450 Points ∼37% -31%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
7932 Points ∼35% -35%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
6839 Points ∼30% -44%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
6644 Points ∼29% -45%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
39651 Points ∼78% +28%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
30910 Points ∼60%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
28083 Points ∼55% -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (23386 - 30910, n=20)
27852 Points ∼54% -10%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 7820HK
24868 Points ∼49% -20%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7820HK
24425 Points ∼48% -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
24172 Points ∼47% -22%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
20181 Points ∼39% -35%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
17170 Points ∼34% -44%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
13125 Points ∼26% -58%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
12620 Points ∼25% -59%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
9805 Points ∼19% -68%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
9032 Points ∼18% -71%
3DMark 11 Performance
22693 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38597 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18887 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
8460 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
103.4 (min: 81, max: 119) fps ∼100% +18%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
100 fps ∼97% +14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
87.4 fps ∼85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (65.7 - 92.7, n=22)
79.2 fps ∼77% -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
73.1 fps ∼71% -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
71.8 fps ∼69% -18%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
64.9 fps ∼63% -26%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.4 fps ∼62% -26%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
64.2 fps ∼62% -27%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
57.6 (min: 46) fps ∼56% -34%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48.8 fps ∼47% -44%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
40 fps ∼39% -54%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
35.4 (min: 28) fps ∼34% -59%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
27.9 fps ∼27% -68%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
12.6 fps ∼12% -86%
0102030405060708090Tooltip
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø83.5 (31-90)
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 307.6 282.2 252.3 177.7 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 287.9 237.3 152.2 87.4 fps
Rocket League (2017) 249 247.7 248.4 fps
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Noise
-8%
-3%
4%
-7%
-8%
off / environment *
28.2
29
-3%
28.2
-0%
28.3
-0%
30
-6%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
28.2
29
-3%
28.2
-0%
31.5
-12%
30
-6%
31
-10%
Idle Average *
28.2
32
-13%
28.2
-0%
31.6
-12%
31
-10%
32
-13%
Idle Maximum *
30.8
40
-30%
31
-1%
31.6
-3%
33
-7%
41
-33%
Load Average *
42
46
-10%
50.8
-21%
32.3
23%
43
-2%
47
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
51
-0%
50.8
-0%
43
16%
55
-8%
47
8%
Load Maximum *
53
52
2%
50.8
4%
45.5
14%
58
-9%
48
9%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
28.2 / 28.2 / 30.8 dB
Carga
42 / 53 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
 38.2 °C43 °C37.2 °C 
 33.6 °C38 °C31.8 °C 
 31 °C26.8 °C31 °C 
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 30.6 °C
39 °C47.2 °C40.6 °C
33.8 °C42.4 °C36 °C
31 °C35.2 °C32.2 °C
Máximo: 47.2 °C
Médio: 37.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  59 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.7 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 42.4 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.6442538.140.73137.939.34038.939.55037.336.36336.836.48035.337.210034.242.912533.148.416033.558.320032.962.325031.467.831531.171.44003170.150030.271.663029.472.680029.175.7100028.773.8125028.175.3160027.974.6200027.671.1250027.667.7315027.463.1400027.466.3500027.170.9630027.271.1800027.164.3100002759.21250026.956.71600026.954.6SPL40.283.6N3.960.4median 28.1median 67.8Delta1.95.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-QApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.65 / 1.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 16.2 / 20.4 / 26.1 Watt
Carga midlight 96.5 / 214.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro 2017
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
-9%
-47%
13%
-8%
17%
Idle Minimum *
16.2
19
-17%
31
-91%
13
20%
13.9
14%
10
38%
Idle Average *
20.4
22
-8%
36
-76%
17
17%
18.8
8%
15
26%
Idle Maximum *
26.1
29
-11%
44
-69%
23
12%
23.1
11%
22
16%
Load Average *
96.5
102
-6%
107
-11%
90
7%
112.3
-16%
92
5%
Load Maximum *
214.3
231
-8%
258
-20%
215
-0%
291.5
-36%
216
-1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
182.9
190
-4%
212
-16%
147
20%
231
-26%
153
16%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
4h 55min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 26min
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh
Alienware m17 P37E
i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 90 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 2017
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh
Battery Runtime
-4%
16%
-32%
-17%
11%
5%
Reader / Idle
295
372
26%
543
84%
253
-14%
464
57%
WiFi v1.3
280
235
-16%
296
6%
190
-32%
197
-30%
316
13%
294
5%
Load
86
67
-22%
49
-43%
81
-6%
54
-37%
Witcher 3 ultra
52

Pro

+ Thunderbolt 3, Ethernet de 2,5 Gbit e leitor de cartão SD UHS-III
+ Manutenção simples; 2x SODIMM + 2x M.2 2280
+ Desempenho do RTX 2080 Max-Q acima da média
+ Adaptador de CA pequeno e leve
+ Design Razer fino, clássico
+ Integração com Windows Hello
+ O Wi-Fi 6 vem como padrão
+ Silencioso sob uso leve
+ Iluminação RGB por tecla
+ Base e tampa rígidas

Contra

- O Core i7-9750H não é mais veloz que o Core i7-8750H
- Webcam mais fraca que a do Blade Pro 2017 (1 MP vs. 2 MP)
- Poderia ser mais silencioso durante os jogos em Alto Desempenho
- Resposta fraca do teclado e clickpad
- Menor capacidade da bateria que a do Blade Pro 2017
- O cabo grosso do adaptador de CA é difícil de manusear
- Sem 4K UHD, 240 Hz, ou OLED
- Sem subwoofer ou leitor de digitais
- Garantia estendida é cara
- Sem baia SATA III de 2,5 polegadas
- Sem G-Sync
In review: Razer Blade Pro 17 RZ09-0287. Test model provided by Razer
In review: Razer Blade Pro 17 RZ09-0287. Test model provided by Razer

Historicamente, os portáteis Razer Blade Pro sempre tiveram recursos inovadores para se distinguirem dos concorrentes. O Blade Pro 2015, por exemplo, tinha um teclado exclusivo, enquanto o Blade Pro 2017 tinha teclas mecânicas, luzes do trackpad, certificação THX e uma roda de volume. O 2019 Blade Pro 17 deixa de lado todos esses recursos sofisticados para focar no básico e o resultado é o melhor portátil Blade que já saiu da Razer. As melhorias “geração a geração” são realmente tangíveis e não apenas marginais ou superficiais; ele é 22 por cento mais leve, 24 por cento menor, 30 por cento mais brilhante, e 14 por cento mais energeticamente eficiente durante os jogos, tudo isso oferecendo um desempenho gráfico até 39 por cento mais veloz que o Blade Pro 2017 GTX 1080 da última geração. Acrescente a memória RAM e armazenamento facilmente atualizáveis e você tem um portátil para jogos que aparentemente verifica todas as caixas de verificação certas.

Existem vários aspectos que achamos que poderiam tornar o Blade Pro 17 ainda melhor. Teclas do teclado mais firmes e profundas, como as teclas SteelSeries em portáteis MSI, melhorariam a o tato, enquanto o teclado esponjoso poderia certamente tirar algumas dicas do MacBook Pro. O ruído do ventilador em Alto Desempenho é mais silencioso que no Blade Pro 2017, mas ainda é alto em mais de 50 dB(A). Teclas macro para alternar entre os modos Balanceado e Alto Desempenho tornariam muito mais rápido e fácil do que ter que abrir e clicar no Synapse cada vez. A integração de um subwoofer dedicado poderia melhorar a qualidade do áudio sem precisar da certificação THX em primeiro lugar. Enquanto isso, o cabo do adaptador de CA é muito grosso e pode ser mais fino e flexível para facilitar o transporte. Essas desvantagens não são suficientes para derrubar o que, de outra forma, é um excelente portátil para jogos, por seu tamanho de tela e categoria ultrafina.

O preço provavelmente será um ponto de contenção que fará com que os gamers duvidem em pular para dentro. Por $2.500 USD, os usuários podem comprar um Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH com a mesma Core i7-9750H e GPU RTX 2080 Max-Q que o nosso Blade Pro 17 de $3200. Se o preço premium vale ou não o design do chassi objetivamente mais forte e possivelmente mais luxuoso do Razer é algo que só você pode responder por si mesmo. Para o nosso dinheiro, no entanto, definitivamente vale a pena considerar agora mais do que nunca por causa de todos os refinamentos significativos sobre o Blade Pro 2017.

A Razer simplificou sua série Blade Pro para uma experiência de jogo mais forte em geral. Se você está no mercado à procura de um portátil para jogos fino de 17 polegadas, pule o Blade Pro 2017 inchado e considere o mais enxuto Blade Pro 17. Vai custar um pouco mais do que alguns concorrentes, mas vai se sentir e se desempenhar um pouco melhor também.

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q - 09/20/2019 v7
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
94 / 98 → 96%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
69 / 80 → 87%
Peso
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Bateria
62 / 95 → 65%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
95%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
87 / 95 → 92%
Ruído
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
80%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
78%
88%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Muito melhor que antes: Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade Pro (17)
Allen Ngo, 2019-06-24 (Update: 2019-06-27)
Allen Ngo
Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - US Editor in Chief