Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus X9 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1070 SLI, QHD)

Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/01/2017

Twin Turbo. Embora a maioria dos fabricantes equipe seus portáteis de jogos com apenas uma unidade gráfica dedicada, a Gigabyte apresentou o novo Aorus X9 de 17 polegadas com duas GPUs Nvidia. Vamos descobrir se é sensato usar uma GeForce GTX 1070 no modo SLI ou se esse recurso tem mais desvantagens do que vantagens.

Aorus X9
Processador
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop) - 2x 8192 MB, Análises do: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 387.92
Memória
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, dois de quatro slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 170 PPI, AUO B173QTN01.3 (AUO1396), TN, QHD, 120 HZ, X-Rite Pantone certified, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB 
, SSD. drive bays: 2x M2 Type 2280 (PCIe/NVMe or SATA-III) & 1x 2,5-polegadas
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: fones (S/PDIF), microfone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30 x 428 x 314
Bateria
94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes de 2-watts + 2 woofers de 2-watts, Teclado: chiclet, RGB, mecânico, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, FOnte de alimentação de 330-watts, adesivo Aorus, pano de limpeza, guia de início rápido, informação da garantia, memória USB com controladores, dobe Reader XI, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, Killer Performance Suite, MS Office 365 Trial, XSplit Broadcaster Trial, XSplit Gamecaster Trial, various tools from manufacturer , 24 Meses Garantia
peso
3.634 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.168 kg
Preço
3600 EUR

 

Size Comparison

left side: RJ45 LAN, USB-A 3.0, card reader, headphone jack, microphone jack
left side: RJ45 LAN, USB-A 3.0, card reader, headphone jack, microphone jack
back: power supply
back: power supply
right: 2x USB-A 3.0, Thunderbolt 3, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, Mini-DisplayPort 1.3, HDMI 2.0
right: 2x USB-A 3.0, Thunderbolt 3, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, Mini-DisplayPort 1.3, HDMI 2.0
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X9
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
199 MB/s ∼100%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83 MB/s ∼42% -58%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼40% -60%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼39% -61%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus X9
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
240 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼37% -63%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼37% -63%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼37% -63%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
700 MBit/s ∼100% +77%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
694 MBit/s ∼99% +75%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
681 MBit/s ∼97% +72%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
606 MBit/s ∼87% +53%
Aorus X9
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
396 MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
624 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼94% +10%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
558 MBit/s ∼89% +4%
Aorus X9
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
536 MBit/s ∼86%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
512 MBit/s ∼82% -4%
324
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 346 cd/m² Médio: 325.6 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 346 cd/m²
Contraste: 641:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.98 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.47 | - Ø
84% sRGB (Argyll) 55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.21
Aorus X9
AUO B173QTN01.3 (AUO1396), 2560x1440, 17.3
Alienware 17 R4
2560x1440, 17.3
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus G752VS-BA338T
AU Optronics B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160, 17.3
Response Times
-67%
22%
-181%
-210%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
21.6 (11.6, 10)
30 (18.8, 11.2)
-39%
11.6 (6.4, 5.2)
46%
36 (18, 18)
-67%
50 (24.4, 25.6)
-131%
Response Time Black / White *
6.6 (4.6, 2)
12.8 (10.8, 2)
-94%
6.8 (4.8, 2)
-3%
26 (14.4, 11.6)
-294%
25.6 (11.2, 14.4)
-288%
PWM Frequency
25000 (15)
Screen
2%
40%
9%
32%
Brightness
326
372
14%
262
-20%
300
-8%
328
1%
Brightness Distribution
88
86
-2%
87
-1%
88
0%
84
-5%
Black Level *
0.54
0.62
-15%
0.26
52%
0.32
41%
0.29
46%
Contrast
641
649
1%
1054
64%
959
50%
1183
85%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.98
5.6
6%
1.36
77%
5.53
8%
4.01
33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.47
4.7
14%
0.64
88%
7
-28%
4.7
14%
Gamma
2.21 109%
2.14 112%
2.19 110%
2.48 97%
2.4 100%
CCT
7721 84%
7519 86%
6551 99%
8103 80%
6451 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
53.7
-2%
77
40%
58
5%
88
60%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
84
82.2
-2%
100
19%
90
7%
100
19%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-33% / -12%
31% / 36%
-86% / -29%
-89% / -17%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8586 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.97 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
9.19 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
837 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
174 Points ∼100%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
171 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
160 Points ∼92% -8%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
157 Points ∼90% -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
867 Points ∼100% +4%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
837 Points ∼97%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
758 Points ∼87% -9%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼86% -11%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼84% -13%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.97 Points ∼100%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼93% -7%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points ∼92% -8%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.69 Points ∼86% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.53 Points ∼100% +4%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.19 Points ∼96%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.34 Points ∼88% -9%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.19 Points ∼86% -11%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.09 Points ∼85% -12%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5444 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5410 Points ∼99% +3%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5240 Points ∼96%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5088 Points ∼93% -3%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4541 Points ∼83% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5237 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5103 Points ∼97% +2%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5064 Points ∼97% +1%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5020 Points ∼96%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4395 Points ∼84% -12%
PCMark 10 - Score
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5611 Points ∼100%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼93% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5020 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5240 pontos
Ajuda
Aorus X9
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Alienware 17 R4
SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
AS SSD
-72%
1%
-11%
-26%
Access Time Write *
0.028
0.123
-339%
0.029
-4%
0.027
4%
0.033
-18%
Access Time Read *
0.039
0.042
-8%
0.041
-5%
0.058
-49%
0.052
-33%
4K-64 Write
1175.9
671.01
-43%
924.67
-21%
1185.29
1%
646.46
-45%
4K-64 Read
1213.85
620.48
-49%
1047.94
-14%
744.47
-39%
851.25
-30%
4K Write
134.28
113.36
-16%
128.75
-4%
138.94
3%
120.78
-10%
4K Read
50.63
35.61
-30%
50.12
-1%
49.71
-2%
37.51
-26%
Seq Write
1677.74
734.8
-56%
2352.3
40%
1553.97
-7%
1230.12
-27%
Seq Read
2694.9
1752.03
-35%
3136.95
16%
2824.25
5%
2236.52
-17%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
CDM 5 Read Seq Q32T1: 3450 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq Q32T1: 1705 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K Q32T1: 642.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K Q32T1: 546.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2275 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1694 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K: 55.86 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K: 160.5 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop)
10603 Points ∼100%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
7166 Points ∼68% -32%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
5651 Points ∼53% -47%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
5238 Points ∼49% -51%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop)
32640 Points ∼100%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21846 Points ∼67% -33%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21366 Points ∼65% -35%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
18346 Points ∼56% -44%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16847 Points ∼52% -48%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop)
41469 Points ∼100%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
29109 Points ∼70% -30%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
26438 Points ∼64% -36%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
24349 Points ∼59% -41%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22510 Points ∼54% -46%
3DMark 11 Performance
23326 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
166876 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
32510 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20379 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
8931 pontos
Ajuda
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
69.3 fps ∼100%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
52.6 fps ∼76% -24%
Schenker XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700K
50.4 fps ∼73% -27%
Battlefield 1 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
74.1 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700K
58.7 fps ∼79% -21%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
50.9 (min: 43) fps ∼69% -31%
Titanfall 2 - 3840x2160 High / Enabled AA:TS AF:8x
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
68.4 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700K
56.8 fps ∼83% -17%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
41.7 (min: 30) fps ∼61% -39%
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FX
Schenker XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700K
73.1 fps ∼100% +25%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
58.6 fps ∼80%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
58.3 (min: 43) fps ∼80% -1%
Dishonored 2 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:TX
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
60 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700K
52.3 fps ∼87% -13%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
35.9 (min: 30) fps ∼60% -40%
Watch Dogs 2 - 3840x2160 High Preset
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
59 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700K
41.1 fps ∼70% -30%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
34.6 (min: 31) fps ∼59% -41%
Resident Evil 7 - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FXAA+T
Schenker XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700K
55.6 fps ∼100% +32%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
43.4 (min: 36) fps ∼78% +3%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
42 fps ∼76%
For Honor - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:8x
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
83.9 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700K
53 fps ∼63% -37%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
43.4 (min: 34) fps ∼52% -48%
Ghost Recon Wildlands - 3840x2160 Very High Preset AA:T AF:8x
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
53.1 fps ∼100%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
40.9 fps ∼77% -23%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
32 (min: 24) fps ∼60% -40%
Prey - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:8x
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
79.1 fps ∼100%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
68.2 fps ∼86% -14%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
51.7 (min: 43) fps ∼65% -35%
Rocket League - 3840x2160 High Quality AA:High FX
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
141 fps ∼100%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
110 fps ∼78% -22%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
85.3 (min: 72) fps ∼60% -40%
F1 2017 - 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
58 fps ∼100% +38%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
45 (min: 41) fps ∼78% +7%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
42 fps ∼72%
Ark Survival Evolved - 3840x2160 Epic Preset (100 % Resolution Scale)
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
25.8 fps ∼100%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
17.2 fps ∼67% -33%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
13.8 (min: 13) fps ∼53% -47%
FIFA 18 - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
198 fps ∼100% +6%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
187 fps ∼94%
Asus G752VS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
155 (min: 128) fps ∼78% -17%
baixo média alto ultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 16799.969.3fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 14312974.1fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 14314168.4fps
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) 12211158.6fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 92.478.660fps
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 11190.959fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 14612342fps
For Honor (2017) 17716383.9fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 11268.853.1fps
Prey (2017) 14013779.1fps
Rocket League (2017) 219141fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 11570.4fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 10293.337.1fps
F1 2017 (2017) 1328942fps
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 88.65325.8fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 330310187fps

Barulho

Ocioso
35 / 37 / 43 dB
Carga
49 / 60 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Noise
7%
5%
14%
11%
off / environment *
30
28.2
6%
30
-0%
30
-0%
31
-3%
Idle Minimum *
35
35.6
-2%
33
6%
30
14%
32
9%
Idle Average *
37
35.6
4%
34
8%
32
14%
35
5%
Idle Maximum *
43
35.7
17%
38
12%
36
16%
38
12%
Load Average *
49
50.2
-2%
44
10%
43
12%
42
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
56
50.2
10%
56
-0%
43
23%
44
21%
Load Maximum *
60
50.2
16%
62
-3%
49
18%
50
17%

* ... smaller is better

 45 °C47 °C46 °C 
 45 °C46 °C46 °C 
 40 °C43 °C44 °C 
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 44.7 °C
61 °C62 °C59 °C
61 °C61 °C56 °C
44 °C52 °C43 °C
Máximo: 62 °C
Médio: 55.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  52 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Heat
2%
-5%
16%
17%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
49.6
-6%
46
2%
41
13%
39.1
17%
Maximum Bottom *
62
56
10%
57
8%
39.3
37%
42.1
32%
Idle Upper Side *
30
29.6
1%
34
-13%
28.8
4%
27.9
7%
Idle Bottom *
30
29.2
3%
35
-17%
27.3
9%
26.1
13%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.750.12537.540.83130.834.14037.7385030.829.96327.329.98026.337.610025.242.812523.242.416021.650.220022.555.625021.760.831520.265.840018.765.150017.566.563017.769.380017.569.910001772.1125017.168.2160017.665.9200017.469.4250017.168.6315017.572.9400017.568500017.569.4630017.468.1800017.359.31000018.2601250017.859.61600017.158.3SPL29.880.9N1.351.8median 17.5Aorus X9median 65.9Delta1.65.238.43834.534.235.135.231.833.23334.431.733.231.234.731.341.130.248.42853.127.551.427.851.52753.527.455.827.166.926.67126.67226.671.826.473.125.569.724.865.623.86822.772.322.47522.172.521.865.121.763.621.658.121.659.521.754.936.782.62.753.7median 26.4Alienware 17 R4median 65.12.58.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Aorus X9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Alienware 17 R4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.99 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 1.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 29 / 35 / 42 Watt
Carga midlight 140 / 334 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Power Consumption
7%
-2%
33%
23%
Idle Minimum *
29
37.5
-29%
34
-17%
21
28%
23
21%
Idle Average *
35
37.6
-7%
41
-17%
27
23%
33
6%
Idle Maximum *
42
37.6
10%
50
-19%
32
24%
40
5%
Load Average *
140
122.4
13%
106
24%
86
39%
94
33%
Load Maximum *
334
277.4
17%
320
4%
206
38%
228
32%
Witcher 3 ultra *
295
180.3
39%
257
13%
165
44%
177
40%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
2h 54min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
2h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 18min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 11min
Aorus X9
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75 Wh
Asus G752VS-BA338T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 90 Wh
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 88 Wh
Battery Runtime
30%
3%
99%
59%
Reader / Idle
174
276
59%
182
5%
445
156%
323
86%
H.264
138
148
7%
257
86%
WiFi v1.3
134
181
35%
144
7%
293
119%
218
63%
Load
71
69
-3%
65
-8%
96
35%
91
28%

Pro

+ Até 3 dispositivos de armazenamento e 4 de RAM
+ Teclado mecânico com iluminação RGB
+ Carcaça de alta qualidade e bastante fina
+ Ferramentas práticas (incluindo controle da ventoinha)
+ Overclock opcional da CPU e GPU
+ Excelente desempenho
+ Certificação X-Rite Pantone
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Bom som
+ 120 Hz

Contra

- Típicas fraquezas SLI (micro intermitências, dependência nos controladores)
- Painel QHD medíocre (ângulos de visão, valor de preto, contraste)
- As superfícies sujam rapidamente
- O lado inferior da unidade base esquenta
- Problemas com o ruído do sistema
- Curtas Durações da bateria
- Fonte de alimentação muito grande
- Sem G-Sync
Aorus X9, test unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.
Aorus X9, test unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.

Embora o X9 esteja equipado com duas unidades gráficas, a Gigabyte apresentou um portátil de jogos muito fino e, considerando seu desempenho, muito leve, que pode impressionar com sua carcaça metálica de alta qualidade, design brincalhão (queira ou não) e um teclado mecânico.

O último é uma notícia particularmente boa e separa o aparelho de 17 polegadas de muitos outros portáteis de gama alta. Também possui boa conectividade que pode acompanhar a concorrência. Por exemplo, o X9 está equipado com uma moderna porta Thunderbolt 3.

Ficamos menos felizes com a tela QHD, que suporta 120 Hz, tem tempos de resposta curtos e conta com a certificação X-Rite Pantone, mas também tem uma relação de contraste e valor preto fracos, e ângulos de visão instáveis. Também ficamos decepcionados com o tempo de duração da bateria e o ruído do sistema. O aparelho de 17 polegadas simplesmente se torna muito barulhento com aplicativos 3D para nosso gosto. O bom sistema de som não consegue compensar completamente esses problemas.

Escolher usar a tecnologia SLI criou vantagens e dificuldades adicionais. Por um lado, o Aorus X9 pode oferecer desempenho superior em programas compatíveis com Dual-GPU, que inclusive coloca portáteis com a GTX 1080 em ridículo. Por outro lado, a segunda GPU - surpresa, surpresa - tem um impacto negativo no resfriamento (temperatura, ruído do sistema, ...), consumo de energia e mobilidade - além do fato de que nem todos os jogos atuais ainda suportam SLI, tornando a segunda GTX 1070 supérflua nesses casos.

Com a alta dependência de controladores e a tendência para as micro intermitências, os sistemas com duas GPUs são feitos para entusiastas reais mais que para jogadores médio. Se você quiser simplesmente ligar o aparelho e jogar, sem ter que se preocupar com as atualizações constantes do controlador esperando ainda um bom desempenho para resoluções acima de 1920x1080, você deve optar por um portátil com uma só GPU (com uma GeForce GTX 1070 ou GTX 1080) . No geral, o Aorus X9 não é suficientemente bom para entrar nos rankings do nosso Top 10 Gamers.

Aorus X9 - 10/19/2017 v6
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
66 / 81 → 81%
Peso
52 / 66 → 76%
Bateria
64%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
68 / 95 → 72%
Ruído
46 / 90 → 51%
Audio
85%
Médio
75%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus X9 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1070 SLI, QHD)
Florian Glaser, 2017-11- 1 (Update: 2017-11-11)