Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Dell Latitude 5580 (Full-HD, i5-7300U)

Nino Ricchizzi (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/08/2017

Toma dois, ação! Esta é a segunda vez que analizamos o Dell Latitude 5580. A última vez, sua impressão geral foi obscurecida por um painel TN decepcionante. Desta vez, o Latitude de 15 polegadas está se apresentando com o painel Full-HD IPS e uma CPU melhorada.

Dell Latitude 5580
Processador
Intel Core i5-7300U
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620, Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 1067 MHz, 21.20.16.4627 WHQL
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4, single channel, 1/2 slots em uso
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NV15N42, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Toshiba MQ01ACF050, 500 GB 
, 7200 rpm
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado, Card Reader: SD, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, slot WWAN
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 23.25 x 376 x 250.65
Bateria
68 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
2.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 290 g
Preço
1040 Euro

 

243
cd/m²
231
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
221
cd/m²
205
cd/m²
217
cd/m²
207
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 243 cd/m² Médio: 223.6 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 234 cd/m²
Contraste: 1300:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4 | - Ø
60% sRGB (Argyll) 39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.46
Dell Latitude 5580
BOE NV15N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Latitude 5580
1366x768, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
B140QAN01.5, , 2560x1440, 14
Response Times
-13%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43 (23, 20)
30 (19.2, 10.8)
30%
46.4 (20.4, 26)
-8%
Response Time Black / White *
33 (19, 14)
29.6 (21.2, 8.4)
10%
28.8 (16.4, 12.4)
13%
PWM Frequency
1020 (90)
201.6 (99)
-80%
Screen
-72%
-2%
Brightness
224
216
-4%
311
39%
Brightness Distribution
84
83
-1%
88
5%
Black Level *
0.18
0.53
-194%
0.25
-39%
Contrast
1300
449
-65%
1308
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.3
10.8
-104%
6.1
-15%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4
12.1
-203%
8.8
-120%
Gamma
2.46 98%
2.25 107%
2.18 110%
CCT
6441 101%
14344 45%
6172 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
38.3
-2%
61.56
58%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
60
59.9
0%
94.88
58%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-43% / -56%
1% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1020 Hz
90 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 1020 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1020 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

Flickering occurs at relatively low brightness settings, so extended use at this brightness setting or lower can cause eyestrain.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5289
Intel Core i5-7300U
145 Points ∼100% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
143 Points ∼99% +1%
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel Core i5-7300U
142 Points ∼98%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
141 Points ∼97% -1%
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points ∼88% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
369 Points ∼100% +13%
Dell Latitude 5289
Intel Core i5-7300U
340 Points ∼92% +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
334 Points ∼91% +2%
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel Core i5-7300U
328 Points ∼89%
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel Core i5-7200U
327 Points ∼89% 0%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
142 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
328 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
97.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
38.11 %
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4999 Points ∼100%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
4803 Points ∼96%
Dell Latitude 5580
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15
4390 Points ∼88%
HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630
4118 Points ∼82%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
3983 Points ∼80%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3987 Points ∼100% +21%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
3774 Points ∼95% +14%
Dell Latitude 5580
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15
3345 Points ∼84% +1%
Dell Latitude 5580
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
3300 Points ∼83%
HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630
3149 Points ∼79% -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
2936 Points ∼74% -11%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
2854 Points ∼72% -14%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3300 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
1777 Points ∼100% +23%
Dell Latitude 5289
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
1627 Points ∼92% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
1578 Points ∼89% +10%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
1476 Points ∼83% +3%
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
1440 Points ∼81%
Dell Latitude 5580
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1281 Points ∼72% -11%
BioShock Infinite
1366x768 Medium Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
31.7 fps ∼100% +34%
Dell Latitude 5580
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15
29 fps ∼91% +23%
Dell Latitude 5580
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
23.6 fps ∼74%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
54.6 fps ∼100% +38%
Dell Latitude 5580
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15
52 fps ∼95% +31%
Dell Latitude 5580
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
39.7 fps ∼73%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 39.723.619.6fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32.8 / 32.8 / 33.6 dB
Carga
37.6 / 37.6 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 32.3 °C35.4 °C26.4 °C 
 32.4 °C33 °C26.5 °C 
 26.2 °C25.4 °C28.1 °C 
Máximo: 35.4 °C
Médio: 29.5 °C
39.9 °C26.4 °C34 °C
26.5 °C30.3 °C41.8 °C
28.4 °C26 °C26.3 °C
Máximo: 41.8 °C
Médio: 31.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  34 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.41 / 0.57 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.3 / 10.1 / 11.8 Watt
Carga midlight 32 / 29 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Latitude 5580
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 5580
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-3%
19%
17%
Idle Minimum *
4.3
4.8
-12%
3.5
19%
4
7%
Idle Average *
10.1
6.6
35%
6
41%
6.9
32%
Idle Maximum *
11.8
7
41%
7.3
38%
7.6
36%
Load Average *
32
39.2
-23%
30.8
4%
29
9%
Load Maximum *
29
44.8
-54%
31
-7%
28.7
1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
10h 13min
Dell Latitude 5580
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 68 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Dell Latitude 5580
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 68 Wh
HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
Battery Runtime
-21%
14%
-24%
Reader / Idle
1062
1104
765
WiFi v1.3
613
487
-21%
697
14%
467
-24%
Load
172
133
177
H.264
402

Pro

+ Thunderbolt opcional
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ 3 baias de armazenamento; suporte para NVMe
+ Carcaça com certificação MIL STD 810G
+ Leitor de cartões SD veloz
+ Bom preço

Contra

- Níveis de brilho medíocres
- Ventoinhas de resfriamento sempre audíveis
- Sem melhoria no desempenho desde a versão com i5-7200U
- Sem E-Port (docking)

A diferença com o modelo Latitude 5580 que já testamos pode não parecer grande à primeira vista. Mas particularmente, a tela Full-HD faz a diferença e completa o pacote. Já admiramos os bons dispositivos de entrada do dispositivo na última análise, que são adequados para sessões longas de digitação no trabalho ou em casa. Particularmente para o setor empresarial, o Dell Latitude 5580 oferece alguns padrões de segurança importantes.

A atualização do processador nessa configuração não teve êxito. Nossos benchmarks não mostraram uma melhora no desempenho notável. Ele ainda está fica uma hora atrás no tempo de duração da bateria.

O Dell Latitude demonstra ser um companheiro estável, seja como um portátil de negócios de nível básico ou um parceiro de escritório para uso diário.

No entanto, também vale a pena dar uma olhada no Lenovo ThinkPad T470s, que possui um armazenamento SSD ais veloz e se desempenhou melhor em nossos benchmarks.

Dell Latitude 5580 - 07/02/2017 v6
Nino Ricchizzi

Acabamento
84 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
88%
Mouse
90%
Conectividade
61 / 80 → 77%
Peso
62 / 67 → 89%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
54 / 68 → 80%
Desempenho da aplicação
85 / 92 → 93%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
86%
Audio
56%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Médio
75%
86%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Dell Latitude 5580 (Full-HD, i5-7300U)
Nino Ricchizzi, 2017-07- 8 (Update: 2017-07-10)