Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 (i5-7300U, 256 GB)

Sebastian Jentsch (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/04/2017

Antigo mas dourado. Sem um USB Type-C ou Thunderbolt 3, o modelo 2017 do Microsoft Surface Pro parece ser meio desalinhado. A operação sem ventoinha que já vimos no Alpha 12 da Acer e, infelizmente, o dispositivo se afoga notavelmente. O único benefício que resta é realmente a duração decente da bateria?

Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 (Surface Pro Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7300U
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620
Memória
8192 MB 
, dual-channel, onboard
Pantalha
12.3 polegadas 3:2, 2736x1824 pixel 267 PPI, Multitouch de 10 dedos, native pen support, LG Display LP123WQ112604, IPS, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, 256 GB 
, 191 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSDXC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.5 x 292.1 x 201.4
Bateria
45 Wh Lítio-Ion, SMP M1009169, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 13.5 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix frontal, Windows Hello
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix autofoco, traseira
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Office 365 Trial, One Drive, Xing, Candy Crush, March of Empires, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
1.078 kg, Suprimento de energia: 216 g
Preço
1449 Euro

 

We've tested the Surface Pro - Core i5-7300U, 8 GB of RAM, 256 GB SSD

Size Comparison

bottom: SurfaceConnect docking port
bottom: SurfaceConnect docking port
top: volume rocker, power button
top: volume rocker, power button
3.5 mm combo jack (headset)
3.5 mm combo jack (headset)
power, USB 3.0, MiniDisplayPort
power, USB 3.0, MiniDisplayPort
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
586 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
577 MBit/s ∼98%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
560 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Tri-Band Wireless-AC 18260
513 MBit/s ∼88% -11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (Klaus I211)
459 MBit/s ∼78% -20%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
312 MBit/s ∼53% -46%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
685 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Tri-Band Wireless-AC 18260
662 MBit/s ∼97% +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
618 MBit/s ∼90%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (Klaus I211)
593 MBit/s ∼87% -4%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
446 MBit/s ∼65% -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
440 MBit/s ∼64% -29%
8 MP camera panorama: colors are accurate, noticeable noise, details imperceptible
8 MP camera panorama: colors are accurate, noticeable noise, details imperceptible
Touch matrix
Touch matrix
Subpixel matrix
Subpixel matrix
Some Clouding at the bottom
Some Clouding at the bottom
Long exposure photo of the display
Long exposure photo of the display
395
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 420 cd/m² Médio: 400.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 417 cd/m²
Contraste: 1438:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.63 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.18 | - Ø
99% sRGB (Argyll) 63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 3.09
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
AUO B120YAN01 / AUO106F, , 2880x1920, 12
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
LSN120QL01L01, , 2160 x 1440, 12
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51), , 2880x1920, 12.6
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 12.5
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
BOE06DC, , 1920x1280, 12.3
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.1
Response Times
-39%
5%
-15%
-23%
-35%
-35%
21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (20, 22)
46 (17.2, 28.8, plateau, spikes in between)
-10%
45 (22, 23)
-7%
28.4 (15.2, 13.2)
32%
30 (14, 16)
29%
61 (28, 33)
-45%
42.4 (20.4, 22)
-1%
33.2 (15.2, 18)
21%
Response Time Black / White *
29 (18, 11)
31.2 (6, 25.2, Spikes in between)
-8%
24 (14, 10)
17%
22.8 (13.6, 9.2)
21%
29 (8, 21)
-0%
36 (7, 29)
-24%
30.8 (18, 12.8)
-6%
22.8 (10.4, 12.4)
21%
PWM Frequency
21000
50 (50)
-100%
221.2 (49)
-99%
200 (90)
-99%
210.1
-99%
Screen
-15%
-35%
-39%
-23%
-90%
-24%
-51%
Brightness
401
396
-1%
396
-1%
344
-14%
307
-23%
330
-18%
522
30%
319
-20%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
88
0%
78
-11%
91
3%
86
-2%
88
0%
97
10%
Black Level *
0.29
0.36
-24%
0.3
-3%
0.39
-34%
0.29
-0%
0.63
-117%
0.42
-45%
0.42
-45%
Contrast
1438
1147
-20%
1353
-6%
995
-31%
1090
-24%
562
-61%
1246
-13%
767
-47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.63
3.09
15%
5.28
-45%
4.6
-27%
3.91
-8%
8.28
-128%
4
-10%
6.02
-66%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.18
3.92
-80%
6.71
-208%
6.1
-180%
5.37
-146%
9.15
-320%
5.5
-152%
6.29
-189%
Gamma
3.09 78%
2.3 104%
2.29 105%
2.07 116%
2.36 102%
2.73 88%
2.16 111%
2.4 100%
CCT
6767 96%
7333 89%
6532 100%
7104 91%
7812 83%
5953 109%
7546 86%
7712 84%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
61
-3%
59
-6%
59
-6%
72
14%
40
-37%
64.86
3%
47.8
-24%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
97
-2%
91
-8%
91
-8%
98
-1%
63
-36%
93.97
-5%
73.2
-26%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-27% / -21%
-15% / -27%
-27% / -32%
-23% / -23%
-63% / -79%
-30% / -27%
-15% / -37%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN gray scales
CalMAN gray scales
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN gray scales (calibrated)
CalMAN gray scales (calibrated)
CalMAN saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN ColorChecker (calibrated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 21000 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 21000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 21000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6577 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
GPU-Z HD Graphics 620
Latency Monitor
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
152 Points ∼100% +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
141 Points ∼93%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
130 Points ∼86% -8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel Core i5-6300U
122 Points ∼80% -13%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Core i7-6500U
117 Points ∼77% -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
115 Points ∼76% -18%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points ∼75% -19%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
111 Points ∼73% -21%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
Intel Core m7-6Y75
99 Points ∼65% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel Core m3-6Y30
86 Points ∼57% -39%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
62 Points ∼41% -56%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
334 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
329 Points ∼99% -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel Core i5-6300U
306 Points ∼92% -8%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
265 Points ∼79% -21%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
255 Points ∼76% -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
234 Points ∼70% -30%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel Core i7-6500U
221 Points ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel Core m3-6Y30
204 Points ∼61% -39%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
Intel Core m7-6Y75
180 Points ∼54% -46%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
172 Points ∼51% -49%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
141 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
334 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
32.49 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4288 Points ∼100% +8%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
4216 Points ∼98% +6%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
4060 Points ∼95% +2%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3996 Points ∼93% 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
3983 Points ∼93%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
3932 Points ∼92% -1%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
3830 Points ∼89% -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3697 Points ∼86% -7%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3510 Points ∼82% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
3311 Points ∼77% -17%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4741 Points ∼100% +61%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3281 Points ∼69% +12%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3186 Points ∼67% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3092 Points ∼65% +5%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
3068 Points ∼65% +4%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
2985 Points ∼63% +2%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
2983 Points ∼63% +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
2936 Points ∼62%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2770 Points ∼58% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
2217 Points ∼47% -24%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Liteon L8H-256V2G
2116 Points ∼45% -28%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2936 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3983 pontos
Ajuda
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Liteon L8H-256V2G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-33%
135%
54%
-33%
-10%
19%
-25%
Write 4k QD32
373
153.6
-59%
420.8
13%
259
-31%
253.8
-32%
316.9
-15%
434.5
16%
268.4
-28%
Read 4k QD32
423
368.3
-13%
504.1
19%
247.9
-41%
245.8
-42%
352.4
-17%
493.3
17%
285
-33%
Write 4k
125
101.5
-19%
162.2
30%
120
-4%
57.65
-54%
89.7
-28%
72.22
-42%
90.27
-28%
Read 4k
46
28.51
-38%
53.62
17%
52.34
14%
26.11
-43%
32.87
-29%
31.75
-31%
28.31
-38%
Write 512
445
154.2
-65%
1288
189%
869
95%
320.3
-28%
422.4
-5%
589.3
32%
295.7
-34%
Read 512
225
266.3
18%
1301
478%
697.5
210%
303.1
35%
412.6
83%
406
80%
351.7
56%
Write Seq
853
154.2
-82%
1702
100%
1259
48%
402
-53%
500.9
-41%
865.2
1%
297.2
-65%
Read Seq
723
666
-8%
2408
233%
1739
141%
398.9
-45%
505
-30%
1294
79%
500.5
-31%
Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
Sequential Read: 723 MB/s
Sequential Write: 853 MB/s
512K Read: 225 MB/s
512K Write: 445 MB/s
4K Read: 46 MB/s
4K Write: 125 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 423 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 373 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
1084 Points ∼100% +22%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
905 Points ∼83% +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
889 Points ∼82%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
797 Points ∼74% -10%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
753 Points ∼69% -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
728 Points ∼67% -18%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
8850 Points ∼100% +22%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
7455 Points ∼84% +3%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7307 Points ∼83% +1%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
7270 Points ∼82% 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
7265 Points ∼82%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
6308 Points ∼71% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
6164 Points ∼70% -15%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
6137 Points ∼69% -16%
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5420 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
805 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
11.2 fps ∼100% +18%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
9.5 fps ∼85%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
20 fps ∼100% +36%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
17 fps ∼85% +16%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
16.7 fps ∼84% +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
14.7 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
fps ∼0% -100%
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
32.8 fps ∼100% +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
32.15 fps ∼98%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
30 fps ∼91% -7%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
29 fps ∼88% -10%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
28.6 fps ∼87% -11%
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
26.9 (min: 12.1) fps ∼82% -16%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
24.6 fps ∼75% -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
21 fps ∼64% -35%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
18.8 fps ∼57% -42%
Thief - 1024x768 Very Low Preset
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
21.7 fps ∼100% +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
21.3 fps ∼98%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 42.932.1528.3fps
Thief (2014) 21.313.811.4fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 9.57fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 14.79.7fps
Inatividade
 30 °C31 °C31 °C 
 31 °C30 °C31 °C 
 35 °C37 °C34 °C 
Máximo: 37 °C
Médio: 32.2 °C
30.7 °C31.7 °C31 °C
31 °C32 °C30.7 °C
32.1 °C32.3 °C31.8 °C
Máximo: 32.3 °C
Médio: 31.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  33.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203635362537.428.237.43135.825.435.8403729.8375037.928.537.96340.728.940.78040.429.140.410040.928.940.912543.528.443.516045274520048.723.848.72505022.75031556.721.956.740058.320.958.350058.120.558.163062.219.562.280064.918.464.9100060.818.260.8125060.917.860.9160061.21861.2200067.817.867.8250065.217.865.2315060.317.960.340005817.958500055.81855.8630056.71856.7800057.117.957.11000056.117.856.11250045.117.745.11600042.517.842.5SPL7430.774N32.31.532.3median 57.1Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5median 18median 57.1Delta5.92.15.933.335.233.333.538.433.536.738.536.731.432.131.430.829.330.826.926.626.928.725.728.733.726.433.740.726.140.745.323.745.346.722.746.739.921.639.948.320.848.363.82063.863.519.463.562.518.862.563.218.363.256.717.656.75417.85455.317.555.34717.54752.317.452.351.917.851.954.417.954.461.318.161.358.718.358.752.918.452.947.518.447.542.418.342.433.618.333.669.830.469.8261.426median 52.3Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKBmedian 18.3median 52.35.71.95.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.19 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.6 / 8.1 / 8.7 Watt
Carga midlight 25.5 / 23.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2880x1920, 12
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160 x 1440, 12
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 2880x1920, 12.6
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.1
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12
Power Consumption
-4%
-5%
7%
-39%
12%
-6%
-2%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
3.6
4.4
-22%
3.5
3%
5
-39%
6.7
-86%
4.3
-19%
2.85
21%
3.7
-3%
7.3
-103%
Idle Average *
8.1
9
-11%
7.2
11%
6.3
22%
10.3
-27%
6.1
25%
6.76
17%
6.8
16%
10
-23%
Idle Maximum *
8.7
10.7
-23%
7.9
9%
7.8
10%
13.5
-55%
8.9
-2%
6.91
21%
7.6
13%
10.15
-17%
Load Average *
25.5
19.6
23%
29.6
-16%
19.5
24%
26
-2%
16.3
36%
32.88
-29%
22.5
12%
25.2
1%
Load Maximum *
23.5
19.9
15%
30.8
-31%
19.6
17%
28.8
-23%
18.6
21%
37.41
-59%
34.5
-47%
29.3
-25%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
17h 34min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
12h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 48min
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 38 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh
Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 39 Wh
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 72 Wh
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 43 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 39.5 Wh
Battery Runtime
-31%
-40%
-33%
-56%
8%
-23%
-31%
-43%
-30%
-12%
Reader / Idle
1054
899
-15%
713
-32%
662
-37%
426
-60%
1075
2%
732
-31%
640
-39%
681
-35%
1110
5%
WiFi v1.3
744
427
-43%
345
-54%
441
-41%
223
-70%
804
8%
486
-35%
443
-40%
321
-57%
364
-51%
525
-29%
Load
168
111
-34%
111
-34%
134
-20%
102
-39%
105
-37%
130
-23%
112
-33%
161
-4%
H.264
206
432
468
515

Pro

+ Design sólido e elegante
+ Silencioso
+ Muito boa duração da bateria (12 - 17 horas)
+ Boa câmera com suporte para Windows Hello
+ Muito bom microfone
+ Painel brilhante com boa cobertura sRGB
+ Carrega em 2 horas
+ Muito bom desempenho em explosões curtas <2 minutos

Contra

- Significante afogamento em cenários de estresse contínuo
- Sem USB Tipo C
- Capa tipo Signature (2017) opcional
- Caneta Surface (2017) opcional
- Preço alto
Microsoft Surface Pro (Core i5-7300U): without the Surface Dock, port availability is very limited.
Microsoft Surface Pro (Core i5-7300U): without the Surface Dock, port availability is very limited.

A diferença mais notável entre o antigo Surface Pro 4 e o novo Surface Pro 2017 é a duração melhorada da bateria deste último: mais de 12 em vez de 7 horas em nosso teste Wi-Fi. Nenhum outro concorrente conseguiu chegar perto.

O Core i5-7300U sem ventoinha é capaz de funcionar no máximo desempenho durante rajadas curtas graças ao resfriamento da câmara de vapor. Depois de um curto período de tempo, a CPU começa a se afogar. Os usuários avançados podem estar melhor com o Dell Latitude 12 5285 (i7-7600U, 10% de perda de desempenho em nosso Cinebench loop) ou o IdeaPad Miix 720 (i7-7500U, 9% de perda de desempenho). Embora eles também sofram de afogamentos, não é tão ruim quanto no Surface Pro 2017 (33%)

Isso significa que um dos principais benefícios do Surface Pro 2017 - portátil de desempenho sem ventoinha - desapareceu no ar. O desempenho não é ruim, mas não é permanente. Além disso, não conseguimos verificar o ganho de desempenho de 50% em relação ao seu antecessor imediato, que a Microsoft prometeu. Também não possui USB Type-C e Thunderbolt 3, o que teria feito que o Surface Pro esteja muito mais preparado para o futuro.

No lado positivo, ele tem câmeras decentes que suportam Windows Hello, um microfone muito bom e uma tela brilhante com cobertura sRGB decente. Pode obter tudo isso por $1299. Consideramos que o tablet é muito caro, especialmente porque o preço não inclui nada além do tablet e um carregador.

Alternativas

Os seguintes três tablets vêm à mente ao procurar alternativas ao Surface Pro. Todos os três são impulsionados por SoCs de 15 W SoCs, foram avaliados de forma similar por nós (Dell), e não se afogam tão massivamente quanto o Surface Pro faz, graças a suas ventoinhas. Eles também são mais baratos.

·Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 (1275 Euros/~$1458, 88%)

·Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 720-12IKB 1 (1145 Euros/~$1309, 85%)

·Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA (1100 Euros/~$1258, 86%)

O Latitude 12 possui apenas uma tela FHD, mas é mais brilhante. Todos os três possuem portas USB Type-C, os tablets da Lenovo e da Asus ainda suportam Thunderbolt 3. Infelizmente, o último apenas durou 3:43 horas em nosso teste Wi-Fi e a CPU é incapaz de utilizar todo o seu potencial.

Isso deixa o IdeaPad Miix 720 como a única alternativa real. Apesar das escassas 5:45 horas que durou no nosso teste Wi-Fi, ele também tem os seus pontos fortes: limitou-se a uma perda de apenas 10%, tem um bom teclado com resposta decente e uma ótima tela de 2880x1920.

Caso você realmente não precise da duração da bateria Surface Pro, o Miix 720 e o Transformer 3 Pro oferecem uma melhor razão de preço-desempenho. Afinal, teríamos que adicionar a base do teclado, uma caneta e uma base externa de  USB para obter um dispositivo totalmente equipado com mais do que o mínimo de portas.

 

 

Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 - 06/26/2017 v6
Sebastian Jentsch

Acabamento
90 / 98 → 91%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
51 / 80 → 63%
Peso
74 / 78 → 91%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
54 / 68 → 79%
Desempenho da aplicação
75 / 87 → 86%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
86 / 91 → 95%
Camera
71 / 85 → 83%
Médio
81%
90%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 (i5-7300U, 256 GB)
Sebastian Jentsch, 2017-07- 4 (Update: 2017-07- 7)