Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Dell Latitude 5580 (i5-7200U, HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 238 cd/m²
Contraste: 449:1 (Preto: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 12.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
59.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.13% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
| Dell Latitude 5580 TN LED, 15.60, 1366x768 | Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE N156HCA-EAA, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Toshiba, TN LED, 15.60, 1366x768 | HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET AU Optronics, TN LED, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 10% | 48% | 1% | 37% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.13 | 44.08 10% | 63.3 58% | 40.6 1% | 55.2 38% |
| sRGB Coverage | 60 | 65.6 9% | 83.6 39% | 61.2 2% | 81.1 35% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.5 | 45.66 10% | 61.1 47% | 41.95 1% | 57 37% |
| Response Times | 4269% | 3431% | -36% | -6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 41.6 ? -39% | 38 ? -27% | 68 ? -127% | 38 ? -27% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.6 ? | 20.8 ? 30% | 29 ? 2% | 26 ? 12% | 27 ? 9% |
| PWM Frequency | 201.6 ? | 26040 ? 12817% | 21000 ? 10317% | 217 ? 8% | 200 ? -1% |
| Screen | 44% | 52% | 5% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle | 238 | 262 10% | 276 16% | 226 -5% | 351 47% |
| Brightness | 216 | 245 13% | 283 31% | 217 0% | 345 60% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 89 7% | 85 2% | 91 10% | 95 14% |
| Black Level * | 0.53 | 0.24 55% | 0.27 49% | 0.58 -9% | 0.65 -23% |
| Contrast | 449 | 1092 143% | 1022 128% | 390 -13% | 540 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.8 | 4.5 58% | 3.92 64% | 9.84 9% | 11.02 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 29.3 | 10.5 64% | 9.13 69% | 16.77 43% | 17.68 40% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12.1 | 3.5 71% | 2.6 79% | 11.1 8% | 13.14 -9% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.32 95% | 2.53 87% | 2.35 94% | 2.7 81% |
| CCT | 14344 45% | 6524 100% | 6561 99% | 11979 54% | 16626 39% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.3 | 42.04 10% | 54.5 42% | 39 2% | 52 36% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.9 | 65.4 9% | 83.7 40% | 61 2% | 81 35% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1441% /
830% | 1177% /
685% | -10% /
-4% | 18% /
19% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 201.6 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3345 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3942 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4390 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Latitude 5580 Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 | HP ProBook 650 G3 Z2N47EA Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 16541% | 10100% | -30% | 7088% | |
| Read Seq | 132.3 | 1318 896% | 498.4 277% | 96.5 -27% | 506 282% |
| Write Seq | 131.1 | 1166 789% | 257.1 96% | 77.9 -41% | 475.2 262% |
| Read 512 | 27.04 | 933 3350% | 309.3 1044% | 20.82 -23% | 435.9 1512% |
| Write 512 | 56.6 | 860 1419% | 264.2 367% | 19.83 -65% | 367.2 549% |
| Read 4k | 0.459 | 56.6 12231% | 30.6 6567% | 0.342 -25% | 41.78 9002% |
| Write 4k | 0.812 | 130.6 15984% | 77.3 9420% | 0.836 3% | 86.1 10503% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 1.1 | 510 46264% | 357.4 32391% | 0.595 -46% | 263.2 23827% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.828 | 426.4 51398% | 254.5 30637% | 0.706 -15% | 90 10770% |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 N005L548014EMEA | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D | |
| Asus PU551LA-XO359G | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 N005L548014EMEA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE | |
| Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Asus PU551LA-XO359G | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 N005L548014EMEA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 N005L548014EMEA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Asus PU551LA-XO359G | |
| Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 N005L548014EMEA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D | |
| Asus PU551LA-XO359G | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 N005L548014EMEA | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Asus PU551LA-XO359G | |
| Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1354 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 47545 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5273 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 621 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 52 | 29 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 19.1 | 11.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32.6 / 32.6 / 32.8 dB |
| HDD |
| 33.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.5 / 34.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
| Dell Latitude 5580 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 | HP ProBook 650 G3 Z2N47EA HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 0% | 2% | -7% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 29.3 -4% | 30.3 -7% | 30.4 -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 32.6 | 29.3 10% | 30.3 7% | 31.8 2% | 32.5 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 32.6 | 29.3 10% | 30.3 7% | 31.8 2% | 33.1 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.8 | 31.2 5% | 30.3 8% | 31.8 3% | 33.7 -3% |
| Load Average * | 33.5 | 35.1 -5% | 35.4 -6% | 31.9 5% | 37 -10% |
| Load Maximum * | 34.7 | 38.7 -12% | 37.2 -7% | 31.8 8% | 42.5 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
Dell Latitude 5580 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.25 / 0.31 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.5 / 6 / 7.3 Watt |
| Carga |
30.8 / 31 Watt |
   
| |
| Dell Latitude 5580 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V 6006U, HD Graphics 520, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60 | HP ProBook 650 G3 Z2N47EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB, podświetlanie diodami LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -18% | -54% | -16% | -40% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 3.6 -3% | 4.9 -40% | 6 -71% | 7 -100% |
| Idle Average * | 6 | 7.7 -28% | 8.1 -35% | 8.7 -45% | 9.2 -53% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.3 | 8.2 -12% | 9.4 -29% | 9.2 -26% | 10.3 -41% |
| Load Average * | 30.8 | 30.8 -0% | 50 -62% | 18.6 40% | 25.8 16% |
| Load Maximum * | 31 | 46.1 -49% | 63.7 -105% | 23.8 23% | 37.5 -21% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 5580 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 72 Wh | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V 6006U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh | HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 7% | -1% | -49% | -10% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1104 | 1167 6% | 765 -31% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 697 | 454 -35% | 688 -1% | 356 -49% | 467 -33% |
| Load | 133 | 201 51% | 177 33% |
Pro
Contra
Verdict
Não há nada de particularmente especial sobre esse Latitude 5580 que ainda não tenhamos mencionado em nossas páginas existentes do E5550/E5570. A longa duração de sua bateria, fácil manutenção, ampla gama de opções, certificação Linux e teclado confortável, todos formam um portátil de negócios atraente e versátil para a maioria dos tipos de trabalhos de escritório.
O preço é o ponto mais atraente do 5580. Enquanto configurações de nível de entrada como a nossa podem iniciar na faixa dos $700 USD, recurso empresariais valorizados como Smart Card, Thunderbolt 3, WWAN, NFC, e leitor de digitais irão subir os preços iniciais para mais de $1.000 USD. Além disso, recomendamos evitar a horrível tela HD e em vez disso, investir na FHD, mas somente o SKU FHD está a partir de $1.100 USD. As configurações com a mais veloz CPU HQ-class estão a partir de $1.000 USD e incluem apenas 4 GB de RAM, a tela HD mencionada anteriormente, e nem sequer um SSD. Esteja preparado para pagar muito mais do que o SKU de nível de entrada castrado, a fim de obter o máximo do que o chassi Latitude 5580 tem para oferecer.
Nós provavelmente daremos uma olhada em um SKU de maior nível do Latitude 5580 em um futuro próximo para ter uma melhor ideia do que a família tem para oferecer. Uma CPU de classe HQ é tem um TDP de quase o dobro ao de uma CPU de classe U, e o painel FHD quase certamente irá oferecer uma melhor experiência. Como esses componentes mais exigentes podem afetar a duração da bateria, ruído do ventilador e desempenho, certamente merece uma olhada de mais perto.
Evite os SKUs de linha de base, pois eles são entregues com telas HD abaixo da média e não possuem quase nenhum recurso especial. Tanto o Thunderbolt 3 como o painel FHD são vitais para uma melhor experiência e para compensar a falta de um E-port.
Dell Latitude 5580
-
05/11/2017 v6(old)
Allen Ngo
Pricecompare
