Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Guru Fire KS (Clevo P950HP6)

Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/19/2017

Portabilidade vs. resfriamento. As carcaças ultrafinas de portáteis estão cada vez mais populares devido a sua alta portabilidade. O Guru dos jogos avançou essa ideia ainda mais apresentando o Fire KS, um aparelho de 15 polegadas de 18,6-mm (~0,7 pol.) que está equipado com uma Core i7-7700HQ e uma GeForce GTX 1060. Descubra o que esta combinação significa para o aquecimento e o ruído do sistema

Guru Fire KS
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 385.69, Optimus
Memória
8192 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, Single-Channel, 1 de 2 slots ocupado, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, Full-HD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe, 250 GB 
, + Seagate Barracuda ST1000LM048, 1TB HDD @ 5400 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 Typ 2280 (PCIe ou SATA-III) & 1x 2,5 polegadas
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Fones, microfone, Card Reader: MMC,RSMMC,SD,Mini SD,SDHC,SDXC, Slot para cartão SIM
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.6 x 380 x 252
Bateria
55 Wh, 3500 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2.0 MP (FHD)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 150-watt power supply, Windows 10 Key, cleaning cloth, DVD with drivers, user's manual, screws for 2.5-inch slot, RAM packaging, SSD packaging, Control Center, Sound Blaster Connect 2 , 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 473 g
Preço
1529 EUR

 

Size Comparison

left: DC-in, HDMI, 2x Mini-Display Port, 2x USB 3.1 Gen2, 2x USB 3.0
left: DC-in, HDMI, 2x Mini-Display Port, 2x USB 3.1 Gen2, 2x USB 3.0
right: microphone, headphone jack, USB 3.0, card reader, SIM, RJ45-LAN, Kensington Lock
right: microphone, headphone jack, USB 3.0, card reader, SIM, RJ45-LAN, Kensington Lock
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Q5
195.42 MB/s ∼100% +8%
Guru Fire KS
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s ∼93%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77 MB/s ∼39% -57%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.59 MB/s ∼12% -87%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Eurocom Q5
212.26 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Guru Fire KS
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207 MB/s ∼98%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼41% -58%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
20.96 MB/s ∼10% -90%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
701 MBit/s ∼100% +178%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
669 MBit/s ∼95% +165%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼94% +163%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Qualcomm QCA6174
603 MBit/s ∼86% +139%
Guru Fire KS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
252 MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Qualcomm QCA6174
600 MBit/s ∼100% +122%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
594 MBit/s ∼99% +120%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
491 MBit/s ∼82% +82%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
426 MBit/s ∼71% +58%
Guru Fire KS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
270 MBit/s ∼45%
295
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 312 cd/m² Médio: 303.8 cd/m² Minimum: 27 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 312 cd/m²
Contraste: 843:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.16 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.53 | - Ø
83% sRGB (Argyll) 54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.48
Guru Fire KS
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6
Eurocom Q5
ID: LGD04D4, Name: LG Philips LP156UD1-SPB1, 3840x2160, 15.6
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
3840x2160, 15.6
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
AUO42ED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
11%
-15%
-7%
20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40.8 (21.2, 19.6)
32.4 (16, 16.4)
21%
28 (15.6, 12.4)
31%
43.2 (21.2, 22)
-6%
35 (16, 19)
14%
Response Time Black / White *
29.2 (16.8, 12.4)
28.8 (18.8, 10)
1%
23.6 (15.2, 8.4)
19%
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
-7%
22 (12, 10)
25%
PWM Frequency
21370 (95)
1351 (39)
-94%
Screen
-26%
-55%
12%
-22%
Brightness
304
279
-8%
263
-13%
289
-5%
265
-13%
Brightness Distribution
93
87
-6%
92
-1%
86
-8%
91
-2%
Black Level *
0.37
0.65
-76%
0.44
-19%
0.26
30%
0.25
32%
Contrast
843
442
-48%
623
-26%
1169
39%
1104
31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.16
4.5
-8%
8
-92%
3.46
17%
5.06
-22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.53
4.6
-82%
9.1
-260%
2.46
3%
6.25
-147%
Gamma
2.48 97%
2.39 100%
2.24 107%
2.38 101%
1.76 136%
CCT
6667 97%
7393 88%
5020 129%
6915 94%
6873 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
59
9%
45.7
-15%
59
9%
40
-26%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83
92.3
11%
72.1
-13%
91
10%
62
-25%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-8% / -19%
-35% / -44%
3% / 8%
-1% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 21370 Hz95 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 21370 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 95 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 21370 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8604 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼99% 0%
Guru Fire KS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼99%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼94% -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
740 Points ∼100% +1%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼99% +1%
Guru Fire KS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points ∼98%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
727 Points ∼98% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
699 Points ∼94% -4%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼100% 0%
Guru Fire KS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼100%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.77 Points ∼97% -3%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.73 Points ∼95% -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.71 Points ∼93% -7%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points ∼100% 0%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼100% 0%
Guru Fire KS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.26 Points ∼89% -11%
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.83 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.14 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
160 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
730 Points
Ajuda
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5348 Points ∼100% +5%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5268 Points ∼99% +3%
Guru Fire KS
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
5100 Points ∼95%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
5096 Points ∼95% 0%
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
4891 Points ∼91% -4%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4858 Points ∼100% +27%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
4177 Points ∼86% +10%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4141 Points ∼85% +9%
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
3829 Points ∼79% 0%
Guru Fire KS
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
3812 Points ∼78%
PCMark 10 - Score
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5119 Points ∼100% +10%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4861 Points ∼95% +5%
Guru Fire KS
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
4646 Points ∼91%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
4474 Points ∼87% -4%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3812 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5100 pontos
Ajuda
Guru Fire KS
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
Eurocom Q5
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
CrystalDiskMark 5.2
33%
-1%
Write 4K
172.5
202.6
17%
156
-10%
Read 4K
45.66
57.19
25%
47.14
3%
Write Seq
1404
2073
48%
1266
-10%
Read Seq
1250
2763
121%
1419
14%
Write 4K Q32T1
493.3
498.7
1%
486
-1%
Read 4K Q32T1
593.7
574.9
-3%
586.4
-1%
Write Seq Q32T1
1463
2075
42%
1246
-15%
Read Seq Q32T1
3071
3381
10%
3431
12%
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
CDM 5 Read Seq Q32T1: 3071 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq Q32T1: 1463 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K Q32T1: 593.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K Q32T1: 493.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1250 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1404 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K: 45.66 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K: 172.5 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Q5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14557 Points ∼100% +28%
Guru Fire KS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11375 Points ∼78%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11261 Points ∼77% -1%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
10349 Points ∼71% -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7683 Points ∼53% -32%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7666 Points ∼53% -33%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Q5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18684 Points ∼100% +30%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14450 Points ∼77% +1%
Guru Fire KS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14356 Points ∼77%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
13279 Points ∼71% -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9450 Points ∼51% -34%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9357 Points ∼50% -35%
3DMark 11 Performance
11559 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
117404 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
24328 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9663 pontos
Ajuda
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
46 fps ∼100% +20%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
39.4 fps ∼86% +3%
Guru Fire KS
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
38.4 fps ∼83%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
34.6 fps ∼75% -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
24.2 fps ∼53% -37%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
76 fps ∼100% +9%
Guru Fire KS
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
69.8 fps ∼92%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
63.2 fps ∼83% -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
47.4 fps ∼62% -32%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 69.838.4fps
Rocket League (2017) 136fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 96.354.2fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 64.147.7fps
F1 2017 (2017) 8160fps
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 35.424fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 167164fps

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 36 / 44 dB
HDD
31 dB
Carga
48 / 54 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Guru Fire KS
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Noise
8%
9%
8%
12%
off / environment *
29
29
-0%
28.8
1%
30
-3%
30.6
-6%
Idle Minimum *
31
31.5
-2%
33.1
-7%
30
3%
30.6
1%
Idle Average *
36
33.8
6%
33.1
8%
33
8%
30.7
15%
Idle Maximum *
44
33.8
23%
34
23%
37
16%
30.7
30%
Load Average *
48
41.7
13%
37.2
22%
41
15%
43
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
41.7
13%
46.1
4%
42
12%
39.7
17%
Load Maximum *
54
54.2
-0%
47.1
13%
50
7%
45.8
15%

* ... smaller is better

 52 °C47 °C41 °C 
 47 °C45 °C35 °C 
 39 °C39 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 52 °C
Médio: 41.2 °C
47 °C54 °C51 °C
40 °C49 °C50 °C
30 °C41 °C42 °C
Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 44.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  42 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Guru Fire KS
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Heat
-3%
5%
-10%
16%
Maximum Upper Side *
52
56.2
-8%
47
10%
41.1
21%
Maximum Bottom *
54
61.2
-13%
54
-0%
38.8
28%
Idle Upper Side *
28
27.8
1%
28.4
-1%
36
-29%
28.7
-3%
Idle Bottom *
33
29.6
10%
29.6
10%
40
-21%
26.9
18%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.144.42535.536.43129.329.94036.2355026.934.26324.927.48025.830.810024.138.112522.43016021.939.820021.147.325020.45331518.959.640018.165.950017.867.263016.469.180016.971.2100016.774.6125016.473.3160016.273.2200016.875.9250016.671.9315016.869.3400016.868.650001769630016.969.4800016.972.51000016.869.91250016.8631600016.658.3SPL2983.8N1.258.8median 16.9Guru Fire KSmedian 69Delta1.28.237.839.434.837.433.634.533.832.43331.634.436.232.732.130.53130.43228.530.22834.427.345.826.255.125.858.124.959.324.963.227.262.325.263.424.969.623.770.423.866.123.774.123.374.623.17523.170.92372.42369.623.163.722.963.723.256.136.3832.751.8median 24.9MSI GS63VR 7RF-228USmedian 63.41.910.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Guru Fire KS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.98 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6 / 11 / 20 Watt
Carga midlight 79 / 153 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Guru Fire KS
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Power Consumption
-13%
-45%
-60%
22%
Idle Minimum *
6
9
-50%
14.5
-142%
18
-200%
4.1
32%
Idle Average *
11
13.5
-23%
17.3
-57%
23
-109%
6.9
37%
Idle Maximum *
20
13.7
31%
17.4
13%
30
-50%
9.5
52%
Load Average *
79
87.8
-11%
93
-18%
85
-8%
83
-5%
Load Maximum *
153
158.6
-4%
158
-3%
126
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
107
129
-21%
128.8
-20%
96
10%
108
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
10h 01min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
5h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 26min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 00min
Guru Fire KS
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 55 Wh
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 60 Wh
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 65 Wh
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 70 Wh
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, 48 Wh
Battery Runtime
-36%
-35%
-41%
3%
Reader / Idle
601
466
-22%
386
-36%
256
-57%
893
49%
H.264
326
224
-31%
309
-5%
WiFi v1.3
344
258
-25%
232
-33%
198
-42%
400
16%
Load
120
47
-61%
75
-37%
80
-33%
63
-47%

Pro

+ Bom teclado com iluminação de fundo de três zonas
+ Ótima possibilidade de manutenção
+ Materiais de alta qualidade
+ Fonte de alimentação compacta
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Boa tela IPS
+ Baixo peso
+ Carcaça fina
+ Alta conectividade
+ Design especial
+ SSD NVMe

Contra

- Um pouco de afogamento da CPU durante aplicativos 3D exigentes
- As dimensões das brechas das teclas poderia ser mais precisas
- Distribuição das portas não ideal
- Controle ruim da ventoinha
- Desempenho fraco do Wi-Fi
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Som medíocre
- A tampa da tela range
Guru Fire KS, test unit provided by Gaming Guru.
Guru Fire KS, test unit provided by Gaming Guru.

O Guru Fire KS é um portátil de jogos bem feito que tem um pouco de dificuldade lidando com o mal controle da ventoinha.

Ser bastante barulhento durante o uso 3Dé uma coisa. As RPM que mudam continuamente durante o modo inativo e o alto nível de ruído regular são outra, e se tornam bastante irritantes depois de um tempo.

Sem esta desvantagem, definitivamente valeria a pena considerar o aparelho de 15 polegadas. Não apenas a carcaça de metal, mas também os dispositivos de entrada e a tela Full HD são muito bons, exceto por alguns detalhes. Os maiores argumentos para comprar este aparelho são as longas durações da bateria e sua construção compacta. Quase não há portáteis de gama alta que sejam confortáveis para carregar, portanto, você pode querer aceitar alta temperaturas da CPU, em troca por esta vantagem. Mas não esqueçamos que o Core i7-7700HQ tendeu a se afogar durante nossos testes de pois de um período de aplicativos 3D exigentes.

No geral, o sistema de resfriamento parece ser um pouco desafiado pelo equipamento de hardware do aparelho. Se o fabricante de barebone Clevo tem dificuldades criando um sistema de resfriamento adequado para um portátil de jogos ultrafino com GeForce GTX 1060, poderia ser melhor dar ao aparelho um milímetro ou dois para se limitar a si mesmos ao Core i5-7300HQ e GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ou GTX 1060 Max-Q.

Guru Fire KS - 10/12/2017 v6
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
78 / 98 → 79%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
64 / 81 → 79%
Peso
62 / 66 → 92%
Bateria
84%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
92%
Desempenho da aplicação
92%
Temperatura
74 / 95 → 78%
Ruído
57 / 90 → 63%
Audio
65%
Médio
76%
83%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Guru Fire KS (Clevo P950HP6)
Florian Glaser, 2017-10-19 (Update: 2017-10-26)