Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 1050 G1 (i7-8750H, 4K, GTX 1050 Max-Q)

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 09/22/2018

Premium Business-Multimedia Combination. O XPS 15 da Dell recebe a atenção que outros fabricantes também gostariam de obter. É claro que a HP também gostaria de competir com o portátil premium da Dell. Por isso, a HP lançou um dispositivo que visa impressionar com uma carcaça monobloco, recursos empresariais e componentes poderosos, no mercado. Descubra em nossa análise, se o novo EliteBook 1050 G1 consegue isso.

HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (EliteBook 1050 G1 Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q - 4096 MB, Análises do: 1139 MHz, Memoría: 1752 MHz, GDDR5, 391.48, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 2 de 2 slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AUO30EB, IPS LED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel CM246
Disco rígido
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, 2048 GB 
, Dois SSDs M.2 2280 (o segundo SSD também é um KXG50PNV2T04), 3610 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Porta combinada de áudio, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões 3-em-1, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.9 x 360 x 254
Bateria
96 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: Câmera infravermelha de 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chclet de 6 filas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Disco de recuperação, HP Thunderbolt 3 Dock 230 W G2, HP Client Security Manager, HP Device Access Manager, HP Connection Optimizer, HP Client Security Manager, HP Jumpstart, HP Power Manager, HP Support Assistant, HP Workwise, Microsoft Office Trial, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
2.06 kg, Suprimento de energia: 319 g
Preço
3799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Right: SD card reader, audio-combo port, HDMI, 2x USB-C / Thunderbolt 3, power
Right: SD card reader, audio-combo port, HDMI, 2x USB-C / Thunderbolt 3, power
Left: 2x USB 3.0 Type-A, Kensington Lock slot
Left: 2x USB 3.0 Type-A, Kensington Lock slot
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
185 MB/s ∼100% +22%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174 MB/s ∼94% +14%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
152.1 MB/s ∼82%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.8 MB/s ∼42% -49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 190, n=150)
57.5 MB/s ∼31% -62%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
210.7 MB/s ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
210 MB/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.4 MB/s ∼41% -59%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=147)
75.2 MB/s ∼36% -64%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Broadcom 802.11ac
817 (min: 664, max: 835) MBit/s ∼100% +126%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
638 MBit/s ∼78% +76%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
632 MBit/s ∼77% +75%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼64% +45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 949, n=109)
495 MBit/s ∼61% +37%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
362 MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
649 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Broadcom 802.11ac
602 (min: 543, max: 628) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
480 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 949, n=108)
466 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
162 MBit/s ∼25% -75%
380
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 440 cd/m² Médio: 389.4 cd/m² Minimum: 37 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 440 cd/m²
Contraste: 1294:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.04 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 2.04
ΔE Greyscale 4.98 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
94% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
APPA040, , 2880x1800, 15.4
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NV156QUM-N44, , 3840x2160, 15.6
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
SHP1445, , 3840x2160, 15.6
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
AUO24ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE
LEN40BD, B156ZAN02.1, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
4%
8%
4%
9%
20%
20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
56 (26, 30)
46.4 (22.8, 23.6)
17%
43.2 (20.4, 22.8)
23%
51.2 (24.4, 26.8)
9%
44.8 (22, 22.8)
20%
42 (20, 22)
25%
40.8 (20.8, 20)
27%
Response Time Black / White *
29 (14, 15)
32 (18, 14)
-10%
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
-8%
29.6 (17.2, 12.4)
-2%
30 (17.2, 12.8)
-3%
25 (14, 11)
14%
25.2 (14, 11.2)
13%
PWM Frequency
980.4 (25)
117000 (75, 150)
952.4 (99)
1497 (50)
Screen
-4%
32%
4%
15%
-20%
10%
Brightness middle
440
494
12%
520
18%
310
-30%
324
-26%
402
-9%
317
-28%
Brightness
389
457
17%
492
26%
283
-27%
338
-13%
383
-2%
309
-21%
Brightness Distribution
83
88
6%
88
6%
87
5%
78
-6%
88
6%
89
7%
Black Level *
0.34
0.34
-0%
0.39
-15%
0.24
29%
0.3
12%
0.41
-21%
0.36
-6%
Contrast
1294
1453
12%
1333
3%
1292
0%
1080
-17%
980
-24%
881
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.04
5.2
-3%
1.2
76%
3.1
38%
1.6
68%
5.25
-4%
2.7
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.99
17.5
-150%
2.3
67%
7.6
-9%
4.6
34%
8.65
-24%
4.1
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.04
2.2
-8%
5.19
-154%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.98
2.7
46%
1.3
74%
2.3
54%
2.5
50%
4
20%
3
40%
Gamma
2.48 89%
2.1 105%
2.18 101%
2.21 100%
2.21 100%
2.68 82%
2.27 97%
CCT
7777 84%
7038 92%
6738 96%
6876 95%
6273 104%
6756 96%
6077 107%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
71.2
17%
59.1
-3%
85.7
40%
58
-5%
87.6
44%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
98.8
5%
90.1
-4%
98.9
5%
89
-5%
99.5
6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
0% / -3%
20% / 27%
4% / 4%
12% / 14%
0% / -14%
15% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z SPD
CPU-Z SPD
GPU-Z Intel UHD 630
GPU-Z Intel UHD 630
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220Tooltip
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1015 (972-1114)
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1034 (1019-1128)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1168 (1123.47-1219.85)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1012 (980.27-1215.12)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
177 Points ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H
177 Points ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=47)
173 Points ∼98% -2%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
170 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Intel Core i7-8550U
163 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 191, n=334)
124 Points ∼70% -30%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8750H
1251 Points ∼100% +11%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8750H
1215 Points ∼97% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Intel Core i7-8750H
1217 Points ∼97% +8%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H
1131 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=50)
1103 Points ∼88% -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
1064 Points ∼85% -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
1057 Points ∼84% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H
953 Points ∼76% -16%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
737 Points ∼59% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Intel Core i7-8550U
660 Points ∼53% -42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=345)
456 Points ∼36% -60%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6811
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
33110
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6643
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6829 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
41831 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
8665 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.99 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.35 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
74.35 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
11.42 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
73.88 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
109.28 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1131 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
177 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5329 Points ∼100% +15%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4643 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
4643 Points ∼87% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
4575 Points ∼86% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4418 Points ∼83% -5%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4408 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=251)
4234 Points ∼79% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4063 Points ∼76% -12%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4093 Points ∼100% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3959 Points ∼97% +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
3735 Points ∼91% +9%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3669 Points ∼90% +7%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3631 Points ∼89% +6%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
3433 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
3433 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1740 - 4693, n=271)
3350 Points ∼82% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3145 Points ∼77% -8%
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5605 Points ∼100% +14%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4920 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
4920 Points ∼88% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
4473 Points ∼80% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4348 Points ∼78% -12%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
3926 Points ∼70% -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1511 - 5823, n=65)
3623 Points ∼65% -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3116 Points ∼56% -37%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2807 Points ∼50% -43%
Productivity
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
7569 Points ∼100% +12%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7037 Points ∼93% +4%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
6770 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
6770 Points ∼89% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6649 Points ∼88% -2%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
6561 Points ∼87% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3113 - 8020, n=66)
5998 Points ∼79% -11%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5795 Points ∼77% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5079 Points ∼67% -25%
Essentials
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
8894 Points ∼100% +7%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
8514 Points ∼96% +3%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
8429 Points ∼95% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8298 Points ∼93% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
8281 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
8281 Points ∼93% 0%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
7262 Points ∼82% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3733 - 9360, n=66)
7222 Points ∼81% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6891 Points ∼77% -17%
Score
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4966 Points ∼100% +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
4805 Points ∼97% +3%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4666 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
4666 Points ∼94% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4428 Points ∼89% -5%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4323 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2046 - 5358, n=66)
3824 Points ∼77% -18%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3517 Points ∼71% -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3425 Points ∼69% -27%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3433 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4643 pontos
Ajuda
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Apple SSD AP0512
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Average Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
 
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-11%
0%
3%
51%
-9%
0%
Write 4k QD32
345.2
351.92
2%

351.92
2%

212.44
-38%
264.9
-23%
595.1
72%
338.5
-2%
345
0%
Read 4k QD32
415.8
279.02
-33%

279.02
-33%

525.27
26%
336.2
-19%
645.3
55%
282
-32%
416
0%
Write 4k
112.4
79.45
-29%

79.45
-29%

19.53
-83%
135.3
20%
182
62%
99.15
-12%
112
0%
Read 4k
27.81
29.02
4%

29.02
4%

10.97
-61%
63.93
130%
56.54
103%
31.76
14%
27.8
0%
Write 512
802.3
499.74
-38%

499.74
-38%

1165.66
45%
564.8
-30%
1279
59%
284.9
-64%
802
0%
Read 512
547.3
807.4
48%

807.4
48%

1014.86
85%
555.3
1%
391.4
-28%
913.9
67%
547
0%
Write Seq
1030
523.1
-49%

523.1
-49%

1465.6
42%
924
-10%
1562
52%
393.4
-62%
1030
0%
Read Seq
1733
1804.5
4%

1804.5
4%

1511.4
-13%
943.5
-46%
2229
29%
2069
19%
1733
0%
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
Sequential Read: 1733 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1030 MB/s
512K Read: 547.3 MB/s
512K Write: 802.3 MB/s
4K Read: 27.81 MB/s
4K Write: 112.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 415.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 345.2 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
9079 Points ∼100% +32%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN51050
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7500T
7831 Points ∼86% +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H
7590 Points ∼84% +10%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
6874 Points ∼76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
6874 Points ∼76% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
6115 Points ∼67% -11%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
5515 Points ∼61% -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
4392 Points ∼48% -36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 18234, n=602)
2777 Points ∼31% -60%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
2278 Points ∼100% +43%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H
1614 Points ∼71% +1%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
1596 Points ∼70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
1596 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (281 - 4734, n=41)
1564 Points ∼69% -2%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7428 Points ∼100% +31%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN51050
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7500T
6066 Points ∼82% +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H
5699 Points ∼77% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
5677 Points ∼76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
5677 Points ∼76% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
4843 Points ∼65% -15%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
4118 Points ∼55% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3291 Points ∼44% -42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 14463, n=378)
2679 Points ∼36% -53%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN51050
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i5-7500T
37975 Points ∼100% +9%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
34926 Points ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
34926 Points ∼92% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H
32449 Points ∼85% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
31396 Points ∼83% -10%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
26860 Points ∼71% -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
18916 Points ∼50% -46%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=380)
15883 Points ∼42% -55%
3DMark Vantage - 1280x1024 P GPU no PhysX
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
33189 Points ∼100% +30%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
25577 Points ∼77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
25577 Points ∼77% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
21687 Points ∼65% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (103 - 47227, n=480)
4759 Points ∼14% -81%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
1167 Samples/s ∼100% +21%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
967 Samples/s ∼83%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
967 Samples/s ∼83% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
713 Samples/s ∼61% -26%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
656 Samples/s ∼56% -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (47 - 2460, n=81)
485 Samples/s ∼42% -50%
Sala GPUs-only
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
2100 Samples/s ∼100% +23%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
1712 Samples/s ∼82%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
1712 Samples/s ∼82% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H
1260 Samples/s ∼60% -26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (101 - 4998, n=81)
872 Samples/s ∼42% -49%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
852 Samples/s ∼41% -50%
3DMark 06 Standard
29687 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result
26117 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
7396 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
51461 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
14739 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5114 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
1709 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
74.6 fps ∼100% +20%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
62.1 fps ∼83%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
62.1 fps ∼83% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
51.3 fps ∼69% -17%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
48.8 fps ∼65% -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.62 - 118, n=197)
26.1 fps ∼35% -58%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
26 fps ∼100% +41%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
19.7 (min: 16, max: 22) fps ∼76% +6%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
18.5 fps ∼71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
18.5 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.9 - 51.5, n=75)
18.4 fps ∼71% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
15.7 fps ∼60% -15%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
48.2 fps ∼100% +42%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
34 (min: 29, max: 38) fps ∼71% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
34 fps ∼71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
34 fps ∼71% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
Quadro P1000, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
29.9 fps ∼62% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 93.2, n=86)
27.1 fps ∼56% -20%
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
51.7 fps ∼100% +15%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
45 fps ∼87%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
45 fps ∼87% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
39.2 (min: 36, max: 46) fps ∼76% -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.2 - 91.5, n=27)
30.4 fps ∼59% -32%
baixo média alto ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 285.1172.6150.462.1fps
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 79.771.848.721.87fps
GTA V (2015) 118.7112.962.12726.1fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 103.259.33418.512fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 149.5134.1115.5104.137.1fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 10893.567.562.822.1fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 105.55633.930.312.9fps
The Division (2016) 109.969.832.324.810.9fps
Overwatch (2016) 256.916080.548.926fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 71.552.628.320.39fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 144.789.24541.315.9fps
Civilization VI (2016) 14182.73528.623fps
For Honor (2017) 140.553.549.838.114.7fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 80.635.732.517.110.5fps
Rocket League (2017) 240.3155.498.836.7fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 191.18847.126.215.4fps
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 13612812011855fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 51.433.611.3fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 254.7153.2127.512755.5fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 9744312410fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 82.257.451.638.113.5fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 5940352811fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 144.899.646.736.716.1fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 82.556.548.832.77.4fps
Fortnite (2018) 142.8111.849.436.59.3fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 56.929.320.67.9fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 82.136.829.521.56fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 88.880.965.130.3fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 6635333010fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 423733.410.4fps
Monster Hunter World (2018) 73.73224205.8fps
F1 2018 (2018) 10463472913fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30.25 / 30.25 / 31.8 dB
Carga
44.7 / 42 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203434.833.232.9342538.635.332.940.138.63143.437.936.839.443.44036.231.532.130.536.25035.936.536.534.735.96330.328.330.729.930.38028.530.72926.628.510026.52925.824.926.512528.725.526.225.428.716024.624.725.223.924.6200242424.122.82425022.222.723.12222.231521.724.123.521.321.740020.526.625.119.920.550019.724.424.219.319.763019.927.425.218.919.980020.12927.118.520.1100020.930.929.11820.9125021.431.729.617.621.4160020.532.630.717.520.520002035.132.617.420250019.736.33417.419.7315018.735.632.717.518.7400018.936.532.217.618.950001829.225.617.91863001826.223.11818800018.222.720.11818.21000018.22018.71818.21250018.518.918.417.918.51600018.218.418.117.918.2SPL31.844.74230.331.8N1.54.23.41.21.5median 20median 26.6median 25.2median 18median 20Delta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median 24.9median 22.6median 21.4median 20.6median 19.2median 18.7median 24.92.921.41.30.71.43.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EADell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Carga Máxima
 33.5 °C44.4 °C42.6 °C 
 33.2 °C39.7 °C38.4 °C 
 28 °C26 °C29.3 °C 
Máximo: 44.4 °C
Médio: 35 °C
39.3 °C46.4 °C36.2 °C
34.7 °C40.3 °C33.1 °C
28.3 °C27.9 °C27.2 °C
Máximo: 46.4 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  39 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F, ranging from 21.5 to 82 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.2 °C / 84.6 F (-0.1 °C / -0.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.432.934.42536.640.136.63143.839.443.84035.730.535.75037.734.737.76330.929.930.98035.626.635.610045.824.945.812551.325.451.316055.723.955.720054.422.854.425046.42246.431550.421.350.440063.319.963.350065.719.365.763067.218.967.280070.718.570.71000731873125077.117.677.116006917.569200072.717.472.7250072.217.472.231507117.571400067.817.667.8500070.117.970.1630071.81871.8800070.31870.3100007018701250068.917.968.91600062.217.962.2SPL83.530.383.5N54.51.254.5median 68.9median 18median 68.9Delta61.4633.933.532.632.430.130.831.129.830.627.537.52846.425.557.525.664.625.267.523.966.822.871.521.970.521.872.820.874.320.474.519.771.218.870.318.570.91874.717.471.817.475.317.173.417.570.317.172.917.376.517.269.117.369.117.365.317.264.417.38583.430.270.561.21.4median 70.9median 182.91.838.833.738.841.234.141.242.635.742.64230.54244.437.644.446.328.746.346.426.246.447.32647.348.326.748.35024.85052.223.652.255.123.255.159.222.659.261.922.761.965.42065.472.119.372.173.718.773.769.118.169.169.61869.672.617.972.671.21871.27217.97272.518.272.562.918.562.960.518.660.561.518.761.564.818.964.861.31961.363.919.163.959.519.459.581.73181.7491.449median 62.9median 19median 62.96.61.96.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EAApple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.05 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 1.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6.1 / 10.2 / 13.4 Watt
Carga midlight 82 / 122 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-32%
11%
-50%
12%
17%
45%
0%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
6.1
9.48
-55%
3.4
44%
12.6
-107%
4.02
34%
5.3
13%
2.7
56%
6.1
-0%
11.8 (2.6 - 101, n=903)
-93%
Idle Average *
10.2
16.1
-58%
11
-8%
17.1
-68%
7.2
29%
10.2
-0%
8.1
21%
10.2
-0%
16.3 (4.2 - 122, n=903)
-60%
Idle Maximum *
13.4
16.9
-26%
14.9
-11%
19.3
-44%
11.46
14%
13.6
-1%
10.1
25%
13.4
-0%
19.9 (4.7 - 181, n=903)
-49%
Load Average *
82
90.8
-11%
78.9
4%
88.3
-8%
76.3
7%
58.3
29%
39
52%
82
-0%
59.8 (18.5 - 164, n=882)
27%
Load Maximum *
122
134.4
-10%
91.2
25%
147.3
-21%
154
-26%
65.3
46%
37.2
70%
122
-0%
77.8 (20.1 - 329, n=887)
36%
Witcher 3 ultra *
74.8
74
47.8

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
17h 07min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
8h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 41min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 08min
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 96 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
8550U, GeForce MX150, 105 Wh
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA
E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, 64 Wh
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00
8750H, Quadro P1000, 96 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-1%
19%
9%
-61%
20%
15%
-42%
Reader / Idle
1027
1181
15%
410
-60%
1066
4%
1519
48%
393 (73 - 1810, n=867)
-62%
H.264
581
738
27%
701
21%
565
-3%
627
8%
733
26%
346 (114 - 915, n=98)
-40%
WiFi v1.3
523
576
10%
614
17%
522
0%
201
-62%
556
6%
637
22%
351 (96 - 942, n=219)
-33%
Load
128
76
-41%
158
23%
50
-61%
207
62%
79
-38%
84.8 (32 - 238, n=867)
-34%
Witcher 3 ultra
62
88
75.9 (62 - 94, n=9)

Pro

+ Carcaça metálica de muito alta qualidade
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Tela 4K mate com bom brilho
+ Equipamento de conexão sólido
+ Webcam infravermelho com apertura de privacidade
+ Boas opções de expansão: dois slots SSD M.2
+ A carcaça permanece fria inclusive sob uso intenso
+ Bom alto-falantes
+ Capacidades de alto desempenho
+ Apto para jogos

Contra

- Preço alto
- O modelo maior e mais pesado em sua classe
- GPU mais fraca que no Dell XPS 15
- Afogamento significante no teste de estresse
- Os ventiladores funcionam com muita frequência
- Má distribuição do brilho da tela
- Barulho da bobina muito perceptível
- Mal posicionamento das aberturas de ventilação
- A melhor tela DreamColor permanece reservada para o ZBook similar
- Menos recursos empresariais que o EliteBook 850 G5
- Limites do desempenho no modo de bateria
HP EliteBook 1050 G1, provided by HP
HP EliteBook 1050 G1, provided by HP

Modelos de portátil completamente novos sem um predecessor, como o HP EliteBook 1050 G1, são sempre interessantes. A HP teve sucesso com seu primeiro modelo multimídia real da série EliteBook, e será que é um concorrente digno para o Dell XPS 15?

A HP definitivamente teve sucesso com a carcaça e o design do EliteBook 1050: qualidade extremamente alta, muito resistente e visualmente atraente - adequado para a faixa de preço. Também não há nada que reclamar dos dispositivos de entrada. A HP usa um touchpad de vidro que pode ser operado de forma confortável e um bom teclado (mesmo que não seja perfeito). Quanto à tela, a HP oferece um LCD UHD 4K, que é uma opção que nenhum dos concorrentes pode oferecer. Esta tela também possui bons valores de brilho de quase 400 cd / m². O equipamento de conexão é sólido e significativamente mais extenso do que, por exemplo, no Apple MacBook Air 15. Embora a webcam não seja melhor que a do Dell XPS 15, pelo menos está posicionada corretamente acima do monitor. Ele também oferece mais funções com sua abertura de privacidade e sensores infravermelhos. Graças a um segundo slot M.2-2280, o EliteBook 1050 G1 também é mais expansível do que o Dell XPS 15. Além disso, o EliteBook permanece significativamente mais frio em comparação, e também possui bons alto-falantes (para um portátil).

No entanto, isso é suficiente para enfrentar os concorrentes? Provavelmente não, dado que o EliteBook 1050 G1 não só é consideravelmente mais caro, mas também tem alguns pontos fracos. Estes incluem, por exemplo, o fato de que, embora a carcaça seja bastante resistente, ela também é relativamente pesada e há grandes marcos acima e abaixo da tela. O EliteBook 1050 G1 não é apenas o modelo mais pesado da sua classe, também não é tão compacto como o Dell XPS 15. Além disso, seu desempenho geral é mais baixo que o do concorrente da Dell: Embora o GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q em combinação com o processador hexacore da Intel o torna basicamente apto para jogos, o Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q no Dell XPS 15é notoriamente mais rápido. Além disso, o EliteBook é significativamente afogado no teste de estresse - a desvantagem de manter as temperaturas baixas. Também não gostamos do nível de ruído do EliteBook. O ventilador funciona muito frequentemente e com um ruído de frequência muito alta, e é relativamente barulhento; há também alguns ruídos de bobina no topo, e os ventiladores sopram o ar quente nas mãos dos usuários do mouse, devido ao posicionamento não ideal das aberturas de ventilação.

Também temos algumas reclamações sobre a tela, como a distribuição de brilho que é bastante desigual. Mas o que é mais sério é que a HP retém a tela DreamColor 4K-UHD consideravelmente mais brilhante e vibrante do EliteBook 1050 G1, apesar de ser oferecida no HP ZBook Studio G5, equipado de forma idêntica. Esta decisão é incompreensível para um portátil tão caro. No geral, também gostaríamos de ter mais recursos empresariais, como um PointStick, um leitor de cartões smart, ou Ethernet. Esta é uma chance perdida de transformar o EliteBook 1050 G1 em um verdadeiro poli funcional empresarial.

Muito bom às vezes não é bom o suficiente: O HP EliteBook 1050 G1 é um portátil multimídia empresarial de alta qualidade que, no entanto, é inferior ao Dell XPS 15 em geral.

Finalmente, o HP EliteBook 1050 G1 consegue um resultado muito bom de 89% em nossa avaliação. Embora isso possa parecer surpreendente à primeira vista, considerando nossas reclamações, é claro que nossos pontos críticos estão em um nível alto. Afinal, o preço é correspondentemente alto e os concorrentes são muito fortes. O Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 alcança uma avaliação de 90% e o Dell XPS 15 9570 alcança até 92% – e isso como uma variante mais acessível. Enquanto o HP EliteBook 1050 G1 recebe nossa recomendação, não há muitas razões claras para preferi-lo sobre os concorrentes. O Dell XPS 15, em particular, oferece simplesmente uma melhor relação preço-desempenho. Então, enquanto a Dell não precisa temer o EliteBook, pode se tornar interessante nesta categoria, já que o Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme alcançará o mercado em breve. A nossa próxima análise provavelmente irá dizer se ele pode se tornar mais perigoso para o XPS 15.

HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA - 09/18/2018 v6
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
92 / 98 → 94%
Teclado
86%
Mouse
87%
Conectividade
69 / 81 → 86%
Peso
63 / 20-67 → 91%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
85 / 85 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
88 / 92 → 95%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
82 / 95 → 86%
Audio
71%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Médio
79%
89%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 1050 G1 (i7-8750H, 4K, GTX 1050 Max-Q)
Benjamin Herzig, 2018-09-22 (Update: 2018-09-30)