Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil HP ProBook 430 G6 (Core i5-8265U, 8 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (8 - 82.7, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 90.5, n=43, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Average of class Office (819 - 842, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Average of class Office (883 - 972, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 254 cd/m²
Contraste: 1417:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
62.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.87% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA CMN1375, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE LP133WF2-SPL8, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES LGD052D, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA IVO M133NVF3-R0, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell Latitude 7390 AU Optronics AUO462D / B133HAN [DELL P/N:F7VDJ], , 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, , 3840x2160, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -4% | 49% | 51% | 52% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.87 | 40.42 -3% | 40.23 -4% | 64.2 53% | 65.1 55% | 64.7 55% |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.6 | 60.4 -4% | 60.3 -4% | 89.2 42% | 90.8 45% | 93.1 49% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.3 | 41.8 -3% | 41.59 -4% | 65.2 51% | 65.9 52% | 65.3 51% |
| Response Times | 4% | -4% | -22% | -18% | -30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.8 ? | 42.8 ? -5% | 41.6 ? -2% | 36 ? 12% | 48.8 ? -20% | 58 ? -42% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.4 ? | 30 ? 1% | 27.2 ? 11% | 24.8 ? 18% | 35.2 ? -16% | 36 ? -18% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 30490 ? 17% | 20490 ? -21% | 1020 ? -96% | ||
| Screen | -19% | -12% | 19% | 22% | 20% | |
| Brightness middle | 255 | 298 17% | 262 3% | 316 24% | 329 29% | 404 58% |
| Brightness | 238 | 278 17% | 253 6% | 326 37% | 316 33% | 389 63% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 81 -8% | 82 -7% | 85 -3% | 92 5% | 85 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.33 -83% | 0.28 -56% | 0.19 -6% | 0.25 -39% | 0.37 -106% |
| Contrast | 1417 | 903 -36% | 936 -34% | 1663 17% | 1316 -7% | 1092 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 6.5 -20% | 5.7 -6% | 4.5 17% | 4.3 20% | 3.72 31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.5 | 23.9 -23% | 22.4 -15% | 12.1 38% | 7.8 60% | 7.38 62% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.1 | 4.9 -20% | 4.8 -17% | 2.9 29% | 2.5 39% | 2.06 50% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 5.6 -47% | 3.6 5% | 5 -32% | 3.6 5% | 4.44 -17% |
| Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.08 106% | 2.15 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.43 91% | 2.34 94% |
| CCT | 7100 92% | 6669 97% | 7096 92% | 6018 108% | 6928 94% | 7095 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39.4 | 38.4 -3% | 38.3 -3% | 57.9 47% | 59.1 50% | 60 52% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62.5 | 60.1 -4% | 60.1 -4% | 87.3 40% | 90.6 45% | 93 49% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-12% | -7% /
-9% | 15% /
17% | 18% /
22% | 14% /
19% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26040 Hz | ≤ 40 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Office (2304 - 4830, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2747 - 4244, n=24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3132 - 4927, n=23) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| Average of class Office (1854 - 5610, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3342 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4887 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3753 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 24% | -9% | 22% | -14% | -1% | |
| Write 4K | 101.8 | 99.6 -2% | 111.3 9% | 108.5 7% | 84.6 -17% | 118.5 ? 16% |
| Read 4K | 41.35 | 37.22 -10% | 32.46 -21% | 40.53 -2% | 38.52 -7% | 42 ? 2% |
| Write Seq | 929 | 1432 54% | 526 -43% | 1026 10% | 557 -40% | 1123 ? 21% |
| Read Seq | 1388 | 2072 49% | 1430 3% | 2080 50% | 1393 0% | 1208 ? -13% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 453.5 | 439.7 -3% | 516 14% | 451 -1% | 339.5 -25% | 324 ? -29% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 286.2 | 264.8 -7% | 366.6 28% | 269.7 -6% | 255.4 -11% | 322 ? 13% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1302 | 1549 19% | 524 -60% | 1770 36% | 558 -57% | 1091 ? -16% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1751 | 3318 89% | 1783 2% | 3214 84% | 2541 45% | 1729 ? -1% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Office (1474 - 13132, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (5681 - 58068, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (712 - 9228, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1851 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7644 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 969 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 54.7 | 30.19 | 24.32 | 7.36 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 15.2 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 63.8 | 38.2 | 18.1 | 16.2 |
| Civilization VI (2016) | 43.8 | 16 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 30.3 | 22.7 | 19.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.4 / 29.4 / 30 dB |
| Carga |
| 32.5 / 32.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.4 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+2.5 °C / 4.5 F).
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.32 / 0.46 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.5 / 5.76 / 8.3 Watt |
| Carga |
34.8 / 45.7 Watt |
   
| |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell Latitude 7390 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.30 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -10% | -12% | -19% | -3% | -25% | -8% | -21% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 3.8 -9% | 4.5 -29% | 4.5 -29% | 2.34 33% | 4.8 -37% | 3.81 ? -9% | 4.3 ? -23% |
| Idle Average * | 5.76 | 6.8 -18% | 6.8 -18% | 6.4 -11% | 5.6 3% | 8.6 -49% | 6.94 ? -20% | 7.35 ? -28% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.3 | 9.8 -18% | 8.8 -6% | 9.2 -11% | 6.5 22% | 10.4 -25% | 8.75 ? -5% | 9.15 ? -10% |
| Load Average * | 34.8 | 32.4 7% | 36.8 -6% | 35.7 -3% | 43 -24% | 37.9 -9% | 35 ? -1% | 41.1 ? -18% |
| Load Maximum * | 45.7 | 52 -14% | 46.2 -1% | 65.4 -43% | 67.4 -47% | 48.5 -6% | 47.5 ? -4% | 58.1 ? -27% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 49 Wh | Dell Latitude 7390 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -16% | -27% | -15% | 24% | -3% | 16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 969 | 974 1% | 766 -21% | 1660 71% | 1032 7% | 1436 ? 48% | |
| H.264 | 546 | 566 4% | 481 -12% | 749 37% | 705 ? 29% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 569 | 419 -26% | 418 -27% | 424 -25% | 498 -12% | 594 ? 4% | |
| Load | 145 | 83 -43% | 140 -3% | 92 -37% | 141 -3% | 117.7 ? -19% |
Pro
Contra
Resumindo, o HP ProBook 430 G6 é um triunfo. Assemelha-se aos seus irmãos EliteBook mais caros, mantendo-se acessível, mas a HP manteve os compromissos ao mínimo, o que é ainda mais impressionante, considerando o abismo de preços entre o ProBook 430 G6 e o EliteBook 830 G5.
O ProBook 430 G6 possui muitos pontos fortes, um destaque destes é sua excelente capacidade de atualização, com sua RAM SSD e baia de 2,5 polegadas substituíveis. O portátil de nível de entrada inclusive supera alguns portáteis maiores e mais caros. Além disso, o ProBook também pode superar a concorrência com seu leitor de cartões SD de tamanho completo, que nem o EliteBook 830 G5 nem o Lenovo ThinkPad L390 oferecem. Nossa unidade de teste também possui excelente duração de bateria graças ao baixo consumo de energia. Outros pontos positivos incluem sua carcaça sólida, seus dispositivos de entrada decentes e suas baixas temperaturas. Além disso, a nova CPU Whiskey Lake supera também seus predecessores Kaby Lake R, que impulsionam o ProBook 430 G5 e o EliteBook 830 G5.
O maior ponto fraco do ProBook 430 G6 é sua tela. O painel IPS é muito escuro para nosso gosto e sua cobertura de espaço de cor é decepcionantemente ruim. A HP também não oferece uma tela melhor, o que é uma pena. Infelizmente, também temos algumas outras queixas menores. A garantia de 1 ano é muito curta para um portátil de negócios e é uma jogada barata da HP, embora teria sido bom que a empresa tivesse pelo menos listado um bastão apontador como uma opção configurável.
Além disso, estão faltando alguns recursos empresariais como um leitor de cartão inteligente. Finalmente, o trackpad na nossa unidade de análise foi mal instalado, mas assumimos que isso é apenas um descuido e não um problema generalizado. Ainda assim, é desanimador.
O HP ProBook 430 G6 é uma excelente opção para estudantes e pequenas empresas. Sua duração de bateria, capacidade de atualização e design leve e robusto nos impressionaram durante nossos testes, mas é prejudicado pela sua tela escura.
O importante é que você deve comprometer uma tela abaixo da média em comparação com concorrentes como o ThinkPad L390, mas o ProBook 430 G6 oferece melhor duração de bateria, capacidade de atualização e temperaturas mais baixas, além de um leitor de cartão SD de tamanho normal. O L390 possui dispositivos de entrada um pouco melhores e uma tela mais brilhante, mas o ProBook é mais abrangente para nós.
HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA
-
09/26/2019 v7
Benjamin Herzig
Pricecompare
