Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil LG Gram 17Z990 (i7-8565U. WQXGA)

Quase tão leve quanto o XPS 13. O Gram 17 abala a tendência que os portáteis de 17 polegadas devem ser grandes e desajeitados. Com apenas 1,34 kg, o portátil é visivelmente mais leve do que a maioria dos Ultrabooks de 14 e 15 polegadas, oferecendo muitos dos mesmos recursos, incluindo o Thunderbolt 3 e uma bateria de longa duração.
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 (Gram 17 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8565U 4 x 1.8 - 4.6 GHz, Whiskey Lake-U
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 1200 MHz, DDR4, 25.20.100.6325
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4, 1200 MHz, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel, 8 GB soldados, 1x SODIMM
Pantalha
17.00 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 178 PPI, LG Philips LP170WQ1-SPA1, IPS, LGD05F8, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: Leitor de MicroSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 17.8 x 381 x 266.7
Bateria
72 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, USB para RJ-45, LG Reader Mode, Control Center, Update Center, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.338 kg, Suprimento de energia: 262 g
Preço
1500 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

423.3 mm 289.9 mm 28.25 mm 2.9 kg424 mm 281 mm 22.5 mm 3.6 kg418 mm 292.6 mm 24.9 mm 2.8 kg415 mm 278 mm 25 mm 2.5 kg411 mm 273 mm 21 mm 2.3 kg381 mm 266.7 mm 17.8 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, USB 3.1 Type-A, HDMI 1.4, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3
Left: AC adapter, USB 3.1 Type-A, HDMI 1.4, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: MicroSD, 3.5 mm headphones, 2x USB 3.1 Type-A, Kensington Lock
Right: MicroSD, 3.5 mm headphones, 2x USB 3.1 Type-A, Kensington Lock
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
177 MB/s +138%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
74.9 MB/s +1%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
74.4 MB/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
202.7 MB/s +139%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
84.7 MB/s
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84 MB/s -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
35.92 MB/s -58%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s +5%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 MBit/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
552 MBit/s -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
298 MBit/s -54%
iperf3 receive AX12
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
669 MBit/s
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
657 MBit/s -2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
627 MBit/s -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
340 MBit/s -49%
353.9
cd/m²
366.6
cd/m²
360.5
cd/m²
340.7
cd/m²
370.6
cd/m²
372.6
cd/m²
329.8
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG Philips LP170WQ1-SPA1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 372.6 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 356.3 cd/m² Minimum: 26.52 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 370.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1324:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
LG Philips LP170WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 17.00, 2560x1600
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
BOE0685, TN LED, 17.30, 1600x900
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA
AUO B173HW01 V0, , 17.30, 1920x1080
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
LP173WF4-SPF5, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
LG Display, LP173WF4-SPF5, aSi TFT, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.30, 3840x2160
Display
-16%
-2%
-3%
-6%
31%
Display P3 Coverage
64.2
56.9
-11%
66.3
3%
67.9
6%
66.3
3%
88.9
38%
sRGB Coverage
96.3
76.3
-21%
89.9
-7%
86.8
-10%
84.2
-13%
100
4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.3
55.9
-16%
63.5
-4%
61.6
-7%
99.7
50%
Response Times
32%
4%
27%
2%
-34%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 ?(20.4, 21.6)
38.8 ?(20, 18.8)
8%
42.4 ?(21.2, 21.2)
-1%
30.8 ?(15.6, 15.2)
27%
41 ?(19, 22)
2%
60.8 ?(28.8, 32)
-45%
Response Time Black / White *
31.2 ?(18, 13.2)
13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2)
56%
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
9%
23.2 ?(13.2, 10)
26%
31 ?(17, 4)
1%
38.4 ?(22, 16.4)
-23%
PWM Frequency
119000 ?(99)
122000 ?(90)
204.9 ?(20)
Screen
-104%
-25%
-42%
-4%
-16%
Brightness middle
370.6
210.5
-43%
335
-10%
376.2
2%
397
7%
230
-38%
Brightness
356
204
-43%
326
-8%
355
0%
364
2%
207
-42%
Brightness Distribution
89
94
6%
92
3%
89
0%
84
-6%
83
-7%
Black Level *
0.28
0.63
-125%
0.22
21%
0.42
-50%
0.29
-4%
0.2
29%
Contrast
1324
334
-75%
1523
15%
896
-32%
1369
3%
1150
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.28
9.48
-189%
4.7
-43%
4.21
-28%
3.88
-18%
5.62
-71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.85
17.19
-194%
8.7
-49%
8.31
-42%
8.22
-41%
10.24
-75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.03
4.04
-292%
2.7
-162%
3.95
-283%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
12
-145%
6.5
-33%
5.5
-12%
3.1
37%
4.54
7%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.12 104%
2.23 99%
2.335 94%
2.59 85%
2.36 93%
CCT
6376 102%
13874 47%
6108 106%
7056 92%
6570 99%
6625 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60.8
49.4
-19%
58.7
-3%
57
-6%
55
-10%
88
45%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96.6
75.8
-22%
89.7
-7%
87
-10%
84
-13%
100
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-29% / -70%
-8% / -18%
-6% / -26%
-3% / -4%
-6% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 21.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

 
0306090120150180210240270300330360390420450480510540570Tooltip
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø508 (504.9-529.32)
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø456 (442.93-580.91)
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø454 (446.34-529.84)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 2-LQN-00004 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø551 (528.17-577.63)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (138.3 - 193, n=51)
172.5 Points +5%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H
171 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
Intel Core i7-8550U
166 Points +1%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
Intel Core i7-8565U
165 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Core i7-8565U
153 Points -7%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
148 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points -12%
LG Gram 15Z975
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points -13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 2-LQN-00004
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points -15%
HP 17-ca0013ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
136 Points -18%
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
27 Points -84%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H
805 Points +52%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
670 Points +27%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (452 - 815, n=52)
612 Points +16%
HP 17-ca0013ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
605 Points +14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 2-LQN-00004
Intel Core i5-8250U
590 Points +12%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
Intel Core i7-8565U
581 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
Intel Core i7-8550U
551 Points +4%
LG Gram 15Z975
Intel Core i5-8250U
533 Points +1%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
Intel Core i7-8565U
529 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points -36%
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
95 Points -82%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
165 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
529 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
51.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Score
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4488 Points +12%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
4000 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3916 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2486 - 4178, n=21)
3906 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
3339 Points -17%
Essentials
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
8430 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5450 - 9029, n=21)
8273 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
8253 Points -2%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
7881 Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
5448 Points -35%
Productivity
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
7171 Points +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
6961 Points 0%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
6948 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3381 - 7588, n=21)
6707 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
5989 Points -14%
Digital Content Creation
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4147 Points +40%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
3096 Points +4%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
2971 Points 0%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
2967 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2264 - 3370, n=21)
2926 Points -1%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4245 Points +26%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3910 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
3724 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2577 - 4179, n=20)
3539 Points +5%
HP 17-ca0013ng
Vega 8, R5 2500U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
3449 Points +3%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3363 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5343 Points +15%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
5193 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
4837 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3596 - 5189, n=19)
4762 Points +3%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
4642 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3363 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4642 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
4000 pontos
Ajuda
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Razer Blade Pro 2017
2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
LG Gram 15Z975
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
AS SSD
140%
-24%
121%
-48%
Seq Read
454.5
2339
415%
494.2
9%
2599
472%
488.1
7%
Seq Write
461
1409
206%
404.2
-12%
588
28%
248.5
-46%
4K Read
30.18
49.78
65%
25.78
-15%
37.57
24%
26.24
-13%
4K Write
71
122.1
72%
71.4
1%
104.4
47%
67.6
-5%
4K-64 Read
369.6
1329
260%
234.6
-37%
1116
202%
366.5
-1%
4K-64 Write
305.5
828
171%
259.1
-15%
513
68%
246.7
-19%
Access Time Read *
0.084
0.056
33%
0.081
4%
0.051
39%
0.08
5%
Access Time Write *
0.05
0.03
40%
0.057
-14%
0.036
28%
0.232
-364%
Score Read
445
1612
262%
310
-30%
1414
218%
442
-1%
Score Write
423
1091
158%
371
-12%
676
60%
339
-20%
Score Total
1106
3488
215%
844
-24%
2715
145%
1003
-9%
Copy ISO MB/s
816
1733
112%
300.4
-63%
197.5
-76%
Copy Program MB/s
614
305.8
-50%
157.4
-74%
141.2
-77%
Copy Game MB/s
414.9
405.5
-2%
221.7
-47%
179.8
-57%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 545 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 509 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 340.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 321.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 454.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 422.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 36.59 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 89.7 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U
7640 Points +321%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U
4792 Points +164%
HP 17-ca0013ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U
3538 Points +95%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U
3080 Points +70%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 2-LQN-00004
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1852 Points +2%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1813 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1144 - 3432, n=244)
1749 Points -4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
1709 Points -6%
LG Gram 15Z975
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1517 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U
1489 Points -18%
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
348 Points -81%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U
6889 Points +278%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U
4273 Points +135%
HP 17-ca0013ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U
2667 Points +46%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U
1945 Points +7%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1821 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 2-LQN-00004
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1741 Points -4%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (927 - 2505, n=244)
1578 Points -13%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
1562 Points -14%
LG Gram 15Z975
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1265 Points -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U
1193 Points -34%
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
385 Points -79%
3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U
36413 Points +270%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U
19545 Points +99%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U
10773 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 2-LQN-00004
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
9946 Points +1%
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
9844 Points
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
9501 Points -3%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6205 - 16400, n=225)
9262 Points -6%
LG Gram 15Z975
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
7760 Points -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U
7285 Points -26%
3DMark 11 Performance
2037 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8468 pontos
Ajuda
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
HP 17-ca0013ng
Vega 8, R5 2500U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
Noise
-5%
-5%
-3%
-20%
-9%
off / environment *
28.1
28.6
-2%
28.3
-1%
29.4
-5%
30
-7%
30.6
-9%
Idle Minimum *
28.1
29
-3%
28.3
-1%
30.1
-7%
30
-7%
32.8
-17%
Idle Average *
28.1
29
-3%
29
-3%
30.1
-7%
31
-10%
32.8
-17%
Idle Maximum *
28.1
31.8
-13%
29
-3%
29.7
-6%
33
-17%
32.8
-17%
Load Average *
35
34.8
1%
36.7
-5%
34.4
2%
43
-23%
34.2
2%
Load Maximum *
37.4
40.8
-9%
42.8
-14%
34.4
8%
58
-55%
36.4
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.9
44.7
55

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
28.1 / 28.1 / 28.1 dB
Carga
35 / 37.4 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 28.6 °C38.8 °C29 °C 
 25.4 °C34.2 °C22.8 °C 
 23.4 °C23.4 °C22.2 °C 
Máximo: 38.8 °C
Médio: 27.5 °C
28.2 °C36.2 °C29.2 °C
24.2 °C28.2 °C27.2 °C
23.4 °C25 °C25.6 °C
Máximo: 36.2 °C
Médio: 27.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  36 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.2 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.4 °C / 74.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+5.4 °C / 9.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.644.32539.639.13138.638.24037.236.85036.136.76339.437.38035.535.310034.134.112532.934.816032.137.720031.243.225030.74931529.954.440029.658.85002962.663028.466.680027.872.110002871.7125027.569.9160027.468.9200027.267.7250027.161.9315026.763.5400026.768.4500026.665.4630026.467.3800026.659.21000026.461.21250026.264.81600025.969SPL39.579.5N3.645.4median 27.5median 63.5Delta1.68.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.11 / 0.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.7 / 8.1 / 10.2 Watt
Carga midlight 32.7 / 34.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, WDC Blue WD10SPZX-24Z10T0, TN LED, 1600x900, 17.30
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, aSi TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Razer Blade Pro 2017
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.30
HP 17-ca0013ng
R5 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Power Consumption
-56%
-50%
-518%
-75%
-38%
Idle Minimum *
2.7
4.7
-74%
4.1
-52%
31
-1048%
7.6
-181%
4.4
-63%
Idle Average *
8.1
9.2
-14%
9.3
-15%
36
-344%
12.9
-59%
11.8
-46%
Idle Maximum *
10.2
10.6
-4%
9.8
4%
44
-331%
13.7
-34%
15.5
-52%
Load Average *
32.7
56.3
-72%
64
-96%
107
-227%
44
-35%
38
-16%
Load Maximum *
34.8
75.3
-116%
66.4
-91%
258
-641%
57.1
-64%
39.8
-14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55
212

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
34h 45min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 53min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 53min
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-17IKB 81DM
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 34 Wh
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 42 Wh
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 2017
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh
HP 17-ca0013ng
R5 2500U, Vega 8, 40.6 Wh
Battery Runtime
-54%
-58%
-47%
-63%
-68%
Reader / Idle
2085
507
-76%
560
-73%
253
-88%
WiFi v1.3
713
231
-68%
265
-63%
377
-47%
197
-72%
225
-68%
Load
113
92
-19%
53
-53%
89
-21%
81
-28%

Pro

+ Desempenho sem afogamentos com a bateria
+ 2 slots NVMe M.2 2280, 1 slot SODIMM DDR4
+ Relação de alto contraste com cores precisas
+ Botão de poder com leitor de digitais
+ Tela WQXGA viva de alta qualidade
+ Fino e muito leve
+ Carregamento USB Tipo C
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Clickpad grande
+ Ventoinha mais silenciosa

Contra

- Desempenho de CPU abaixo da média; Turbo Boost breve
- Somente leitor de MicroSD, sem leitor SD grande
- Qualidade de áudio abaixo da média; graves fracos
- Sem reforço de Gorilla Glass; tampa muito flexível
- Sem opções de tela táctil ou 4K UHD
- Teclas e clickpad suaves
- Sem opções de GPU discretas
- Tempo de recarga lento
- Difícil manutenção
- Sem opções SIM
- Caro
In review: LG Gram 17990-R.AAS7U1
In review: LG Gram 17990-R.AAS7U1

O LG Gram 17 é melhor para os usuários que desejam uma tela grande de 17 polegadas, mas que se desanimam pelas suas dimensões normalmente incômodas. É extraordinariamente leve e resistente para torná-lo um dos melhores portáteis em sua categoria de tamanho para os viajantes. Se você acha que a maioria dos Ultrabooks não oferece espaço suficiente na tela, então o Gram 17 deve estar na sua lista.

O preço a pagar por um portátil tão leve de 17 polegadas será alto. Apesar de sua composição em liga de metal e especificações MIL-STD 810G, o Gram 17 está longe de ser tão rígido quanto o XPS 15, o Spectre x360 15, ou mesmo a maioria dos outros Ultrabooks. Os proprietários terão que ter cuidado para não danificar a tampa frágil durante as viagens.

Outras desvantagens notáveis incluem as teclas e o clickpad suaves, a capacidade de manutenção não amigável para o usuário, a qualidade média de áudio e o desempenho do Core i7 abaixo da média. A LG poderia ter reduzido o preço de entrada, incluindo uma opção Core i5 e um SSD menor, sem afetar o desempenho geral do sistema. Por $ 1.500 USD, os usuários podem comprar um sistema mais robusto e significativamente mais rápido Dell XPS 15 para fazer que o Gram 17 pareça atraente. Se a grande tela 17 polegadas não lhe agradar, então poderia estar melhor com um Ultrabook tradicional e 13 ou 15 polegadas.

Muito mais leve do que outros Ultrabooks menores no mercado, oferecendo uma tela WQXGA de 17 polegadas. A LG criou um nicho confortável no relativamente impopular espaço de portáteis de 17 polegadas. O Gram 17 é uma solução multimídia e de escritório leve, ideal para viajantes que desejam explorar a espaçosa tela de 17 polegadas.

LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 - 04/19/2019 v6(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
68 / 98 → 69%
Teclado
79%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
57 / 81 → 70%
Peso
71 / 20-67 → 100%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
64 / 85 → 75%
Desempenho da aplicação
90 / 92 → 97%
Temperatura
96%
Ruído
96 / 95 → 100%
Audio
50%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Médio
75%
84%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil LG Gram 17Z990 (i7-8565U. WQXGA)
Allen Ngo, 2019-04-22 (Update: 2019-04-25)