Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível Samsung Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA (i7-8550U)

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/30/2019

Under 1 kg. O Samsung Notebook 9 Pen de 13,3 polegadas concentra-se em três pontos fortes: peso, brilho e suporte para S Pen. O resultado final é um conversível versátil que é visivelmente mais leve do que a concorrência e com uma tela mais brilhante para melhorar a visibilidade em exteriores. As desvantagens, no entanto, são difíceis de ignorar e vale a pena ter em mente para qualquer um considerando o carro chefe da Samsung de $1300.

Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA (Notebook 9 Serie)
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, DDR4, 25.20.100.6472
Memória
8192 MB 
, 1200 MHz, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
13.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Capacitiva de 10 pontos, native pen support, BOE075E, IPS, BOE NV133FHB-N33, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16.5 x 310.4 x 206.5
Bateria
39 Wh, 5120 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador Micro-USB para USB Type-C, Samsung Update, Notes, Gallery, Recovery, PC Cleaner, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
998 g, Suprimento de energia: 151 g
Preço
1300 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: Spring-loaded S Pen recess
Front: Spring-loaded S Pen recess
Left: AC adapter, HDMI, USB Type-C Gen. 1 w/ DisplayPort support, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, HDMI, USB Type-C Gen. 1 w/ DisplayPort support, 3.5 mm combo audio
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: Power button, MicroSD slot, USB 3.0 Type-A
Right: Power button, MicroSD slot, USB 3.0 Type-A
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
157.2 MB/s ∼100% +95%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
80.5 MB/s ∼51%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
  (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2)
67.37 MB/s ∼43% -16%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
  (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2)
61.6 MB/s ∼39% -23%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
206.9 MB/s ∼100% +131%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
89.65 MB/s ∼43%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
  (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2)
88.07 MB/s ∼43% -2%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
  (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2)
87.2 MB/s ∼42% -3%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
668 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
649 MBit/s ∼97%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
594 MBit/s ∼89% -8%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
484 MBit/s ∼72% -25%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
309 MBit/s ∼46% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
655 MBit/s ∼100% +22%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
539 MBit/s ∼82%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
517 MBit/s ∼79% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
492 MBit/s ∼75% -9%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
471 MBit/s ∼72% -13%
443.4
cd/m²
446.3
cd/m²
430.3
cd/m²
427.9
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
443.3
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
441.7
cd/m²
445.3
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 473 cd/m² Médio: 440.9 cd/m² Minimum: 5.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 473 cd/m²
Contraste: 830:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.72 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 2.14
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
90.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 58.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
BOE075E, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
AU Optronics AUO572D, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Chi Mei (CMN1376), IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
Lenovo LEN40A9, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
-28%
-21%
250%
7%
-34%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
49.2 (33.2, 16)
48 (16.4, 31.6)
2%
52 (24.4, 27.6)
-6%
36 (18, 18)
27%
40.4 (22.4, 18)
18%
41.6 (22.8, 18.8)
15%
Response Time Black / White *
27.6 (17.6, 10)
32.8 (7.6, 25.2)
-19%
37.2 (21.2, 16)
-35%
27 (13, 14)
2%
28.8 (17.2, 11.6)
-4%
34 (20, 14)
-23%
PWM Frequency
3049 (99)
1042 (29)
-66%
25000 (40)
720%
210.1 (99)
-93%
Screen
-14%
21%
7%
-2%
9%
Brightness middle
473
322.6
-32%
389.8
-18%
311
-34%
267.2
-44%
510.7
8%
Brightness
441
306
-31%
396
-10%
278
-37%
239
-46%
481
9%
Brightness Distribution
88
91
3%
88
0%
82
-7%
75
-15%
90
2%
Black Level *
0.57
0.19
67%
0.27
53%
0.2
65%
0.27
53%
0.66
-16%
Contrast
830
1698
105%
1444
74%
1555
87%
990
19%
774
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.72
7.7
-107%
2.72
27%
3.98
-7%
3.5
6%
2.4
35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.83
11.1
-42%
5.49
30%
8.48
-8%
6.4
18%
7.3
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.14
1.25
42%
3.81
-78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.1
7.9
-55%
4.2
18%
5.57
-9%
1.3
75%
2.4
53%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.88 76%
2.1 105%
2.51 88%
2.146 103%
2.23 99%
CCT
7569 86%
7044 92%
7470 87%
7810 83%
6523 100%
6747 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58.9
44.1
-25%
62.2
6%
64
9%
56
-5%
57
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90.8
69.9
-23%
98.2
8%
99
9%
86
-5%
88.1
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-21% / -17%
0% / 15%
129% / 63%
3% / -1%
-13% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 33.2 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 3049 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 3049 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 3049 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9254 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø454 (446.34-529.84)
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø299 (285.69-328.66)
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø597 (581.49-636.79)
Huawei MateBook 13 i7 GeForce MX150, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø581 (538.98-696.8)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
Intel Core i7-8565U
175 Points ∼80% +14%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8550U
165 Points ∼76% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (108 - 172, n=73)
160 Points ∼73% +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-8259U
154 Points ∼71% 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Intel Core i7-8550U
154 Points ∼71%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
144 Points ∼66% -6%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼66% -7%
Honor Magicbook
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
138 Points ∼63% -10%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
132 Points ∼61% -14%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
130 Points ∼60% -16%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
123 Points ∼56% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-8259U
687 Points ∼16% +38%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-8259U
608 Points ∼14% +22%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
Intel Core i7-8565U
650 Points ∼15% +31%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel Core i7-8550U
639 Points ∼15% +29%
Honor Magicbook
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
576 Points ∼13% +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ
Intel Core i5-8250U
576 Points ∼13% +16%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (301 - 761, n=75)
571 Points ∼13% +15%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
501 Points ∼11% +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Intel Core i7-8550U
497 Points ∼11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points ∼7% -34%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
271 Points ∼6% -45%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
258 Points ∼6% -48%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
154 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
497 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
50.68 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3645 Points ∼37% +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
2941 Points ∼30% +6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2770 Points ∼28%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1506 - 3160, n=26)
2744 Points ∼28% -1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
2260 Points ∼23% -18%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
1791 Points ∼18% -35%
Productivity
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7281 Points ∼75% +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7006 Points ∼72%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
6429 Points ∼66% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4962 - 7006, n=26)
6198 Points ∼64% -12%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5745 Points ∼59% -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5099 Points ∼53% -27%
Essentials
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8382 Points ∼79% +16%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6628 - 9291, n=26)
7742 Points ∼73% +7%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
7666 Points ∼72% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7509 Points ∼70% +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7217 Points ∼68%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6741 Points ∼63% -7%
Score
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4344 Points ∼56% +17%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3723 Points ∼48%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2629 - 4072, n=28)
3600 Points ∼46% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3461 Points ∼45% -7%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
3449 Points ∼44% -7%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2945 Points ∼38% -21%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4823 Points ∼74% +12%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
4786 Points ∼73% +11%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4709 Points ∼72% +9%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
HD Graphics 615, 7Y75, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4674 Points ∼72% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3518 - 5154, n=25)
4562 Points ∼70% +6%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK
4463 Points ∼69% +4%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4406 Points ∼68% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4303 Points ∼66%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK
4998 Points ∼52%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4879 Points ∼51%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3381 - 5342, n=17)
4707 Points ∼49%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
4577 Points ∼48%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
HD Graphics 615, 7Y75, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4277 Points ∼45%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3946 Points ∼65% +12%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
3728 Points ∼61% +6%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3616 Points ∼59% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3024 - 4197, n=31)
3608 Points ∼59% +2%
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK
3605 Points ∼59% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3525 Points ∼58%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
HD Graphics 615, 7Y75, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
3134 Points ∼51% -11%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2737 Points ∼45% -22%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3525 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4303 pontos
Ajuda
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
AS SSD
-23%
18%
17%
-53%
Copy Game MB/s
418.59
725.64
73%
971.31
132%
607.46
45%
186.76
-55%
Copy Program MB/s
541.16
263.84
-51%
630.57
17%
233.46
-57%
213.04
-61%
Copy ISO MB/s
1103.44
950.1
-14%
1373.65
24%
917.06
-17%
335.88
-70%
Score Total
3051
1495
-51%
3569
17%
3594
18%
1057
-65%
Score Write
941
375
-60%
823
-13%
1359
44%
350
-63%
Score Read
1420
752
-47%
1833
29%
1487
5%
463
-67%
Access Time Write *
0.036
0.037
-3%
0.037
-3%
0.037
-3%
0.053
-47%
Access Time Read *
0.061
0.045
26%
0.051
16%
0.043
30%
0.066
-8%
4K-64 Write
738.67
204.71
-72%
605.28
-18%
1072.18
45%
223.84
-70%
4K-64 Read
1196.1
586.33
-51%
1620.84
36%
1215.71
2%
379.44
-68%
4K Write
104.1
96.88
-7%
95.93
-8%
102.34
-2%
79.23
-24%
4K Read
41.84
37.69
-10%
42.69
2%
49.11
17%
31.24
-25%
Seq Write
986.15
735.07
-25%
1213.77
23%
1839.98
87%
466.02
-53%
Seq Read
1823.78
1283.12
-30%
1692.57
-7%
2217.93
22%
519.84
-71%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3114 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1211 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 330.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 240.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 869.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1049 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.61 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 114.4 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
4163 Points ∼23% +167%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8259U
2683 Points ∼15% +72%
Honor Magicbook
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2597 Points ∼14% +66%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1755 Points ∼10% +12%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1653 Points ∼9% +6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1562 Points ∼9%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (959 - 1968, n=126)
1512 Points ∼8% -3%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1478 Points ∼8% -5%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y75
1313 Points ∼7% -16%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y
872 Points ∼5% -44%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
4514 Points ∼9% +164%
Honor Magicbook
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
3482 Points ∼7% +104%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8259U
3044 Points ∼6% +78%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1915 Points ∼4% +12%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1818 Points ∼4% +6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1709 Points ∼3%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=126)
1691 Points ∼3% -1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1536 Points ∼3% -10%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y75
1370 Points ∼3% -20%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y
1088 Points ∼2% -36%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8259U
624 Points ∼4%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
349 Points ∼2%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (299 - 402, n=21)
347 Points ∼2%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y
226 Points ∼2%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
3586 Points ∼9%
Honor Magicbook
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2328 Points ∼6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8259U
2070 Points ∼5%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1283 Points ∼3%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1225 Points ∼3%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1399, n=98)
1099 Points ∼3%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
967 Points ∼2%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y75
917 Points ∼2%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y
733 Points ∼2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
21260 Points ∼12% +124%
Honor Magicbook
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
15109 Points ∼8% +59%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, 8259U
14343 Points ∼8% +51%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
9974 Points ∼5% +5%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
9533 Points ∼5% 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
9501 Points ∼5%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11294, n=113)
8991 Points ∼5% -5%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
8301 Points ∼4% -13%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y75
7839 Points ∼4% -17%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y
6692 Points ∼4% -30%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
54599 Points ∼7%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
47091 Points ∼6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
46817 Points ∼6%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (30939 - 59483, n=30)
45053 Points ∼6%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y75
42163 Points ∼6%
3DMark 11 Performance
1892 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7928 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 7134.9299.5fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 21.4136.5fps
Rocket League (2017) 5832.420.1fps
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Noise
-1%
1%
2%
-1%
-5%
off / environment *
29
30.13
-4%
27.8
4%
28.4
2%
28
3%
28.6
1%
Idle Minimum *
29
30.13
-4%
27.8
4%
28.4
2%
28
3%
28.6
1%
Idle Average *
29
30
-3%
27.8
4%
28.4
2%
28
3%
28.6
1%
Idle Maximum *
29
30.13
-4%
27.8
4%
28.4
2%
28
3%
28.6
1%
Load Average *
32.6
33.4
-2%
33.9
-4%
33.2
-2%
32.5
-0%
34.2
-5%
Load Maximum *
36.7
33
10%
39.9
-9%
35.2
4%
42.2
-15%
47
-28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 29 / 29 dB
Carga
32.6 / 36.7 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 35.6 °C37.4 °C29.2 °C 
 33.8 °C34.2 °C25.8 °C 
 24.4 °C25.2 °C23.6 °C 
Máximo: 37.4 °C
Médio: 29.9 °C
30 °C40.2 °C37 °C
27.4 °C34.2 °C33.6 °C
26.6 °C29.2 °C29.8 °C
Máximo: 40.2 °C
Médio: 32 °C
alimentação elétrica  37 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (+3.9 °C / 7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.939.62539.2373137.535.54036.5345034.735.76337.435.88033.53410033.333.512532.933.316031.238.820035.444.42503155.231531.160.540030.665.450029.665.663028.862.380028.369.3100028.468.5125027.965.2160027.965.5200027.961.8250027.956.2315027.858400027.867.1500027.962.7630027.771.8800027.671.71000027.669.81250027.561.21600027.462.5SPL40.378.9N3.944.9median 27.9median 62.5Delta1.35.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Notebook 9 NP930QAAApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.2 / 0.68 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.4 / 11.8 / 15.5 Watt
Carga midlight 38 / 39.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Power Consumption
48%
42%
30%
18%
12%
Idle Minimum *
4.4
3.1
30%
1.8
59%
3.2
27%
3
32%
3.8
14%
Idle Average *
11.8
4.3
64%
3.8
68%
6
49%
5.4
54%
11
7%
Idle Maximum *
15.5
4.9
68%
7.7
50%
9.2
41%
7.5
52%
11.3
27%
Load Average *
38
24.3
36%
26.9
29%
29.5
22%
40.1
-6%
35.6
6%
Load Maximum *
39.8
22.8
43%
38.5
3%
35.6
11%
57.1
-43%
37.2
7%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
14h 33min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 38min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 9min
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 39 Wh
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 54.28 Wh
HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 54 Wh
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh
Battery Runtime
79%
146%
87%
67%
-21%
Reader / Idle
873
971
11%
1882
116%
1218
40%
695
-20%
WiFi v1.3
398
686
72%
852
114%
527
32%
651
64%
279
-30%
Load
69
175
154%
212
207%
166
141%
135
96%
60
-13%

Pro

+ As superfícies mate disfarçam muito bem as digitais
+ Tela brilhando no "Modo exteriores"
+ Base e tampa relativamente fortes
+ S Pen integrada
+ Extremamente leve
+ Geralmente muito silencioso
+ Resposta firme das teclas
+ Leitor de MicroSD

Contra

- Potencial Turbo Boost muito limitado; desempenho da CPU abaixo da média
- Baixa capacidade da bateria; duração média da bateria
- A S Pen pequena é desconfortável de segurar
- PWM em quase todos os níveis de brilho
- Sem WLAN de 1,73 Gbps ou Bluetooth 5
- WLAN e RAM não atualizáveis
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Clickpad pequeno
In review: SAMSUNG Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA-K01US
In review: SAMSUNG Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA-K01US

As maiores razões para possuir um Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA sobre alternativas como o HP Spectre x360 13 ou o Lenovo Yoga C930 são sua S Pen integrada, tela muito brilhante e peso extremamente leve. Os usuários que trabalham frequentemente durante viagens ou em movimento, acharão que o Samsung é mais versátil do que a popular série XPS 13 ou Spectre.

A Samsung teve que cortar alguns cantos para criar um conversível tão leve. Como a solução de resfriamento é tão pequena, o desempenho do Turbo Boost da CPU é limitado, e abaixo da média. Componentes e SKUs também são limitados, pois a RAM e a WLAN estão soldadas e não são atualizáveis. A capacidade da bateria é menor do que o normal para uma duração de bateria menor que a da concorrência. Por fim, a base e a tampa são ligeiramente mais flexíveis do que as do Spectre 13, Zenbook UX333 ou Blade Stealth. Estes são sacrifícios que os proprietários em potencial terão que ter em mente se quiserem a versatilidade do conversível Samsung.

Um aspecto que achamos que no Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA poderia ter sido melhor é a sua S Pen. A caneta é muito pequena e fina para uso confortável. Tomar notas nesta máquina para aula ou de outra forma é significativamente mais complicado do que no Surface ProEliteBook x360, ou inclusive no Yoga C930. Se você pretende usar o NP930QAA como um burro de anotações, recomendamos testar o S Pen antes de se comprometer com a compra de $1300.

Mais brilhante e mais leve do que muitos concorrentes no mercado hoje, o versátil Samsung Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA é um companheiro de trabalho quase perfeito para o uso em exteriores e viajantes frequentes. A pequena e desconfortável S Pen coloca um enorme amortecedor no sistema em comparação com os stylus mais fortes e maiores do Surface Pro, EliteBook x360 ou Yoga C930.

Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA - 01/30/2019 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
82 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
77%
Conectividade
45 / 80 → 56%
Peso
75 / 35-78 → 93%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
58 / 68 → 86%
Desempenho da aplicação
88 / 87 → 100%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
95%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
40 / 85 → 46%
Médio
75%
85%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Samsung Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA (i7-8550U)
Allen Ngo, 2019-01-30 (Update: 2019-02- 1)