Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad A485 (Ryzen 5 Pro)

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, Tanja Hinum-Balaz (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/03/2018

Worse alternative. Uma combinação da bem conhecida série T da Lenovo e dos processadores AMD Ryzen: isso pode realmente dar certo ou não? Descubra nesta revisão abrangente por que, no final, o modelo ThinkPad T480 Intel é uma escolha melhor do que seu irmão AMD, o ThinkPad A485! Atualização 27/09/2018: UEFI versão 1.02

Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
Processador
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2400, 1 de 2 Slots disponível, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, NV140FHM-N46, IPS LED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
AMD CZ FCH
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 GB 
, SSD M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe, 214 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC3287
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio combinado, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões 4-em-1, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.95 x 336.6 x 232.5
Bateria
48 Wh Lítio-Ion, removeable, Bateria externa de 24 Wh e bateria interna de 24 Wh
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p with ThinkShutter
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante estéreo de 2 W, Teclado: Chiclet de 6 filas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Lenovo Vantage, Microsoft Office trial, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
1.636 kg, Suprimento de energia: 356 g
Preço
1369 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Connections

Right: audio combo, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A, HDMI, USB 3.0 Type-A, RJ45 Ethernet, SD card reader, Kensington lock
Right: audio combo, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A, HDMI, USB 3.0 Type-A, RJ45 Ethernet, SD card reader, Kensington lock
Left: 2x USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, Mini-Ethernet/Dockingport, smart card reader
Left: 2x USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, Mini-Ethernet/Dockingport, smart card reader
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
166.4 MB/s ∼100% +124%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.8 MB/s ∼47% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
74.2 MB/s ∼45%
Average of class Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=229)
61.2 MB/s ∼37% -18%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208.2 MB/s ∼100% +143%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.4 MB/s ∼41% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.6 MB/s ∼41%
Average of class Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=206)
78.7 MB/s ∼38% -8%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
625 MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
607 MBit/s ∼97% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
536 MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Office
  (5 - 688, n=170)
462 MBit/s ∼74% -14%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
409 MBit/s ∼65% -24%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
593 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
581 MBit/s ∼98%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
520 MBit/s ∼88% -10%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
511 MBit/s ∼86% -12%
Average of class Office
  (34 - 688, n=170)
427 MBit/s ∼72% -27%
288
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
246
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 288 cd/m² Médio: 271.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 273 cd/m²
Contraste: 1058:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 4.9
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
59.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 38.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
NV140FHM-N46, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
Lenovo LP140WF6-SPB7, , 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
AU Optronics AUO263D, , 1920x1080, 14
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
AUO383D, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
LP140QH2-SPB1, , 2560x1440, 14
Response Times
26%
3%
26%
17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44.8 (22.8, 22)
35.6 (17.6, 18)
21%
46.9 (23.6, 23.3)
-5%
35 (17, 18)
22%
38.4 (19.6, 18.8)
14%
Response Time Black / White *
35.2 (19.6, 15.6)
24.8 (13.2, 11.6)
30%
31.2 (18, 13.2)
11%
25 (15, 10)
29%
28.4 (15.6, 12.8)
19%
PWM Frequency
1000 (99)
Screen
4%
1%
35%
16%
Brightness middle
275
307
12%
227
-17%
421
53%
352
28%
Brightness
272
295
8%
211
-22%
398
46%
343
26%
Brightness Distribution
85
90
6%
88
4%
86
1%
91
7%
Black Level *
0.26
0.25
4%
0.19
27%
0.27
-4%
0.46
-77%
Contrast
1058
1228
16%
1195
13%
1559
47%
765
-28%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.9
5.7
3%
5.6
5%
4.08
31%
3.3
44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
20
21.3
-7%
22.4
-12%
7.48
63%
7.3
63%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.9
4.7
4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.6
3.7
-3%
2.4
33%
2.92
19%
5.3
-47%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.11 104%
2.44 90%
2.32 95%
2.22 99%
CCT
6798 96%
7353 88%
6506 100%
7043 92%
6452 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38.1
37.4
-2%
34.5
-9%
57
50%
68.4
80%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59.6
58.7
-2%
54.4
-9%
87
46%
98
64%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
15% / 7%
2% / 2%
31% / 34%
17% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1000 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8629 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø504 (495-536)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø628 (624.25-657.27)
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA Vega 10, 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G: Ø539 (523-626)
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G: Ø510 (500.53-589.09)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
Intel Core i7-8550U
161 Points ∼100% +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼89% +7%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
143 Points ∼89% +7%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
Intel Core i5-8350U
142 Points ∼88% +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
  (134 - 139, n=2)
137 Points ∼85% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
134 Points ∼83%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 178, n=475)
108 Points ∼67% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel Core i5-8250U
724 Points ∼100% +31%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel Core i5-8250U
716 Points ∼99% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
Intel Core i7-8550U
657 Points ∼91% +19%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
630 Points ∼87% +14%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
Intel Core i5-8350U
599 Points ∼83% +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
  (553 - 589, n=2)
571 Points ∼79% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
553 Points ∼76%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1050, n=479)
316 Points ∼44% -43%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
20209 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
8209 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4204
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
14336
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6955
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
6921 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
30.42 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
5.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
6.04 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
30.22 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.38 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
134 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
553 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
24.5 fps
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5025 Points ∼100% +22%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G
4774 Points ∼95% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4508 Points ∼90% +9%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4403 Points ∼88% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (4123 - 4647, n=2)
4385 Points ∼87% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4123 Points ∼82%
Average of class Office
  (1226 - 5428, n=301)
3947 Points ∼79% -4%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G
3695 Points ∼100% +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3675 Points ∼99% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3503 Points ∼95% +19%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (2937 - 3594, n=2)
3266 Points ∼88% +11%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3155 Points ∼85% +7%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4458, n=352)
3007 Points ∼81% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
2937 Points ∼79%
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3258 Points ∼100% +38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3004 Points ∼92% +27%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2772 Points ∼85% +18%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (2359 - 2924, n=2)
2642 Points ∼81% +12%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 3503, n=94)
2513 Points ∼77% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
2359 Points ∼72%
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6500 Points ∼100% +73%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5739 Points ∼88% +53%
Average of class Office
  (1444 - 7142, n=94)
5363 Points ∼83% +43%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (3759 - 5235, n=2)
4497 Points ∼69% +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
3759 Points ∼58%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3408 Points ∼52% -9%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7358 Points ∼100% +26%
Average of class Office
  (2683 - 8562, n=94)
6770 Points ∼92% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6423 Points ∼87% +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (5848 - 6825, n=2)
6337 Points ∼86% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5848 Points ∼79%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5732 Points ∼78% -2%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3686 Points ∼100% +38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3602 Points ∼98% +35%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4269, n=95)
3120 Points ∼85% +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (2673 - 3376, n=2)
3025 Points ∼82% +13%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Vega 10, 2700U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2712 Points ∼74% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
2673 Points ∼73%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2937 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4123 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-19%
43%
-30%
-3%
16%
Write 4k QD32
205.6
208.4
1%
342.95
67%
300.2
46%
271.4
32%
265 (206 - 325, n=2)
29%
Read 4k QD32
286.5
310.6
8%
444.91
55%
295.6
3%
383.4
34%
344 (287 - 402, n=2)
20%
Write 4k
89.65
97.08
8%
160.65
79%
88.96
-1%
108
20%
115 (89.7 - 140, n=2)
28%
Read 4k
52.15
24.9
-52%
66.88
28%
27.34
-48%
64.39
23%
57.2 (52.2 - 62.3, n=2)
10%
Write 512
1169
298.1
-74%
1715.92
47%
360.7
-69%
566.8
-52%
1283 (1169 - 1396, n=2)
10%
Read 512
764.7
823.4
8%
834.67
9%
410.1
-46%
561.1
-27%
720 (675 - 765, n=2)
-6%
Write Seq
1280
269.7
-79%
1613.2
26%
425
-67%
927.8
-28%
1363 (1280 - 1445, n=2)
6%
Read Seq
1193
1549
30%
1540
29%
465.1
-61%
922
-23%
1535 (1193 - 1876, n=2)
29%
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Sequential Read: 1193 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1280 MB/s
512K Read: 764.7 MB/s
512K Write: 1169 MB/s
4K Read: 52.15 MB/s
4K Write: 89.65 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 286.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 205.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
4300 Points ∼100% +54%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
3608 Points ∼84% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3551 Points ∼83% +27%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1668 - 4317, n=14)
3181 Points ∼74% +14%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
2885 Points ∼67% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
2794 Points ∼65%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1653 Points ∼38% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1633 Points ∼38% -42%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1617 Points ∼38% -42%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 4967, n=600)
1218 Points ∼28% -56%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3585 Points ∼100% +104%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2807 Points ∼78% +60%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
2472 Points ∼69% +41%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1095 - 2901, n=12)
1980 Points ∼55% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
1757 Points ∼49%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
1738 Points ∼48% -1%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1009 Points ∼28% -43%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
981 Points ∼27% -44%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
963 Points ∼27% -45%
Average of class Office
  (138 - 4109, n=428)
937 Points ∼26% -47%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
21893 Points ∼100% +111%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
17743 Points ∼81% +71%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
15770 Points ∼72% +52%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (7309 - 18177, n=12)
12904 Points ∼59% +24%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
10604 Points ∼48% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
10370 Points ∼47%
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
8226 Points ∼38% -21%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
8181 Points ∼37% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
7658 Points ∼35% -26%
Average of class Office
  (1208 - 27117, n=472)
6545 Points ∼30% -37%
3DMark 06 Standard
10336 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
2875 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8192 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1585 pontos
Ajuda
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
70.5 fps ∼100% +106%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
54.6 fps ∼77% +60%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
Vega 8, PRO 2500U
42.6 fps ∼60% +25%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (27.7 - 49.3, n=8)
36.2 fps ∼51% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
34.2 fps ∼49%
Average of class Office
  (6.2 - 111, n=94)
26.8 fps ∼38% -22%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
18.1 fps ∼26% -47%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 29.59.8fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 34.210.9fps
Civilization VI (2016) 43.611.1fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29.3 / 29.3 / 29.6 dB
Carga
31.6 / 31.6 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.330.130.32524.627.226.23124.824.626.14022.124.625.35024.323.423.36325.623.321.88022.120.521.810021.620.620.712521.419.720.616020.620.12120020.519.821.125020.519.42231519.320.220.34002019.820.550020.219.420.763019.619.420.680019.31920.410001918.820.3125018.418.120.8160017.817.321200017.516.821.1250016.816.420.3315016.315.920.4400015.915.818500015.715.516.8630015.515.315.9800015.415.315.4100001515.115.21250014.814.814.91600014.714.714.6SPL29.629.331.6N1.31.21.5median 18.4median 18.1median 20.4Delta2.21.81.839.336.332.739.339.237.53539.248.443.237.248.435.337.531.835.332.732.230.332.730.129.230.830.12730.126.62727.227.827.527.226.728.225.526.72525.124.32523.124.723.323.123.724.422.623.722.723.721.822.72222.220.7222121.519.92120.921.719.420.923.623.718.623.624.224.518.424.223.924.117.823.925.725.417.625.7262617.72626.326.517.626.326.12618.126.122.722.918.222.721.721.918.521.719.819.918.519.819.11918.719.11919.118.81919.119.118.919.119.820.219.119.835.93630.735.92.22.21.32.2median 23.1median 23.7median 18.8median 23.12.12.11.82.131.531.131.134.128.93229.334.830.833.331.131.727.129.331.129.226.925.929.728.524.8262626.326.125.626.625.725.625.825.725.624.524.123.924.324.224.223.825.923.622.922.624.721.622.322.424.1212120.422.819.920.918.921.120.421.518.121.920.82317.72320.922.316.722.220.923.216.722.521.323.416.123.521.823.415.722.62123.415.922.521.225.515.923.421.928.215.927.219.32316.322.618.321.316.620.518.12116.920.217.718.517.218.217.718.217.217.918.419.417.317.718.519.517.417.532.535.62934.91.72.21.22.2median 20.9median 22.9median 17.2median 22.61.11.41.71.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGEHP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EALenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
Carga Máxima
 38.6 °C38.8 °C36.2 °C 
 28.7 °C39.1 °C36.5 °C 
 32.3 °C32 °C31.3 °C 
Máximo: 39.1 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C
37.1 °C43.2 °C45.1 °C
35.3 °C49.9 °C45.9 °C
27.6 °C31.3 °C34.5 °C
Máximo: 49.9 °C
Médio: 38.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F, ranging from 22.3 to 71.6 °C for the class Office.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.3 °C / 90.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.130.82527.227.43124.6264024.625.15023.424.36323.323.68020.52310020.623.712519.724.716020.127.520019.835.225019.44331520.252.240019.859.350019.458.863019.459.18001967.7100018.867.1125018.162.5160017.361200016.859.5250016.461.3315015.963.4400015.859.4500015.558630015.360.1800015.361.81000015.155.31250014.852.51600014.749.8SPL29.374.1N1.233median 18.1median 59.1Delta1.8837.932.737.935.83535.840.137.240.133.231.833.232.630.332.628.730.828.729.326.629.329.227.529.232.725.532.736.524.336.544.323.344.341.622.641.654.821.854.86820.76863.919.963.965.319.465.363.318.663.368.718.468.771.217.871.270.817.670.866.917.766.970.917.670.970.118.170.167.518.267.570.118.570.169.818.569.86618.76670.818.870.86718.96758.119.158.18130.78147.71.347.7median 66.9median 18.8median 66.99.81.89.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGEHP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.23 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.31 / 0.69 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.3 / 8.3 / 11.4 Watt
Carga midlight 42 / 48.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
11%
4%
15%
-5%
-0%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
5.3
4.9
8%
3.1
42%
3.3
38%
3.6
32%
5.99 (4.5 - 7.6, n=11)
-13%
7.8 (0.77 - 32, n=909)
-47%
Idle Average *
8.3
8.1
2%
6.8
18%
5.54
33%
7.1
14%
9.01 (7 - 12.9, n=11)
-9%
11.6 (4.2 - 42, n=909)
-40%
Idle Maximum *
11.4
10.6
7%
10.1
11%
6.59
42%
9.5
17%
10.8 (8.1 - 13.7, n=11)
5%
14.1 (5 - 67, n=909)
-24%
Load Average *
42
32.2
23%
48.4
-15%
42.4
-1%
63.9
-52%
38.9 (24.1 - 45.7, n=11)
7%
37.3 (7.43 - 99.3, n=894)
11%
Load Maximum *
48.8
42.3
13%
67.1
-38%
67.6
-39%
67.3
-38%
44.4 (26.5 - 57.1, n=11)
9%
45.8 (12.2 - 129, n=896)
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53.9

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
11h 11min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
5h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 08min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 08min
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 48 Wh
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA
2700U, Vega 10, 50 Wh
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00
8550U, GeForce MX150, 72 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
18%
116%
124%
80%
17%
Reader / Idle
671
639
-5%
1556
132%
1671
149%
557 (101 - 1857, n=768)
-17%
H.264
368
426
16%
791
115%
638
73%
721
96%
412 (139 - 791, n=148)
12%
WiFi v1.3
330
394
19%
897
172%
794
141%
537
63%
405 (105 - 964, n=292)
23%
Load
68
95
40%
97
43%
159
134%
124
82%
101 (37 - 259, n=713)
49%

Pro

+ Muito bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Carcaça robusta
+ Equipamento extenso
+ Operação quase totalmente silenciosa
+ Sistema PowerBridge flexível

Contra

- Desempenho da CPU pior do que no ThinkPad T480
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Falta uma opção de tela QHD
- Duração ruim da bateria
- Parte inferior da carcaça difícil de remover
- Baixa cobertura do espaço de cores
Lenovo ThinkPad A485, provided by campuspoint.de
Lenovo ThinkPad A485, provided by campuspoint.de

O Lenovo ThinkPad A485 realmente tinha um alto potencial: A série ThinkPad T, na qual o ThinkPad A se baseia, é extremamente popular, e há uma grande demanda por bons portáteis Ryzen. No entanto, este ThinkPad Ryzen nos decepciona no teste.

Por um lado, isso é porque a Lenovo desnecessariamente omite a tela QHD do ThinkPad A485, e o A485 também não tem Thunderbolt 3. Além disso, o desempenho da CPU permanece muito atrás do modelo irmão ThinkPad T480 da Intel. Pior ainda é o fato de que o consumo é muito alto, resultando em uma bateria extremamente ruim em comparação. Isso é apenas parcialmente culpa da Lenovo, já que os portáteis com a Ryzen geralmente enfrentam um consumo maior em comparação com os modelos baseados na Intel.

Claro que o Lenovo ThinkPad A485 também tem muitos lados positivos, levando à boa pontuação de avaliação. Estes incluem, por exemplo, a carcaça robusta, os excelentes dispositivos de entrada e o extenso equipamento de conexão. Mas você também pode conseguir tudo isso no ThinkPad T480. Apenas no desempenho gráfico o A485 está na frente, mas só comparado com o T480 com a iGPU. O modelo com a GeForce MX150 também é melhor neste aspecto.

Não recomendado: Tudo o que torna o ThinkPad A485 um bom portátil, o ThinkPad T480 também pode fazer, enquanto também proporciona um melhor desempenho da CPU e melhor duração da bateria do que o A485.

Então, finalmente, não podemos realmente dar uma recomendação para o ThinkPad A485. Na prática, o Lenovo ThinkPad T480 é realmente a melhor opção em todos os aspectos. Por outro lado, se você quiser evitar os processadores da Intel em geral, você deveria escolher o HP EliteBook 745 G5, que tem uma duração de bateria que não é tão ruim e o painel LCD também é melhor até certo ponto neste modelo.

Atualização UEFI versão 1.02: Conseguimos testar novamente o ThinkPad A485 com uma versão mais recente do BIOS UEFI. A duração da bateria agora melhorou um pouco, e o desempenho da CPU sob uso intenso também é maior com o firmware mais novo. Portanto, ajustamos a pontuação da avaliação e também queremos modificar um pouco nosso veredicto: Embora o ThinkPad T480 continue a superar o A485, o ThinkPad A485 pode ser uma opção interessante devido ao seu preço relativamente acessível, especialmente se você precisar de um pouco mais de desempenho da GPU.

Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE - 09/27/2018 v6
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
87 / 98 → 89%
Teclado
94%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
67 / 80 → 84%
Peso
67 / 20-67 → 100%
Bateria
86%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
64 / 68 → 94%
Desempenho da aplicação
81 / 92 → 88%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
96%
Audio
62%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Médio
77%
89%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad A485 (Ryzen 5 Pro)
Benjamin Herzig, 2018-10- 3 (Update: 2018-10-10)