Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T480s (i7-8550U, MX150 Max-Q)

Ainda mais versátil, graças à GeForce. Recentemente, testamos o ThinkPad T480s, o mais recente modelo de uma longa série de ThinkPads de 14 polegadas da série T de alta qualidade. Agora estamos testando o mesmo modelo - desta vez com uma CPU mais forte e a GeForce MX150 Max-Q. Pode confirmar os fortes resultados dos T480 com preços mais baixos? Descubra na seguinte atualização de teste. Atualização: teste de estresse com BIOS 1.11
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (ThinkPad T480s Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8550U 4 x 1.8 - 4 GHz, Kaby Lake Refresh
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1038 MHz, Memoría: 1252.5 MHz, GDDR5, 388.16, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, 8 GB-DDR4-2400 soldadas, 8 GB SO-DIMM, máx. 24 GB
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 210 PPI, LP140QH2-SPB1, IPS LED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U + iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
, 2280 M.2, PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC3287
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Combo audio, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD 4-em-1, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.45 x 331 x 226.8
Bateria
57 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 watt estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet de 6 filas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
1.347 kg, Suprimento de energia: 356 g
Preço
1500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size comparison

338 mm 237 mm 18.9 mm 1.5 kg331 mm 226.8 mm 18.8 mm 1.4 kg331 mm 226.8 mm 18.45 mm 1.3 kg331 mm 220.9 mm 17.05 mm 1.5 kg323.5 mm 217.1 mm 15.95 mm 1.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
191.2 MB/s +154%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79.3 MB/s +5%
Dell Latitude 7480
  (Toshiba (Exceria Pro SDXC UHS-II 64 GB)
75.8 MB/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
75.2 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (8 - 196.8, n=49, last 2 years)
55.8 MB/s -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
223.9 MB/s +156%
Dell Latitude 7480
  (Toshiba (Exceria Pro SDXC UHS-II 64 GB)
92 MB/s +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.5 MB/s +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.4 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (25 - 173.2, n=43, last 2 years)
65.6 MB/s -25%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Office
  (819 - 1332, n=4, last 2 years)
990 MBit/s +92%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
515 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
511 MBit/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
297 MBit/s -42%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Office
  (721 - 1690, n=4, last 2 years)
1067 MBit/s +71%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
639 MBit/s +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
633 MBit/s +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
623 MBit/s
298
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LP140QH2-SPB1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 321 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 302.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 313 cd/m²
Contraste: 864:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.7
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
LP140QH2-SPB1, , 2560x1440, 14.00
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
LP140QH2-SPB1, , 2560x1440, 14.00
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
B140QAN01.5, , 2560x1440, 14.00
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
B140QAN02.0, , 2560x1440, 14.00
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V22ES ABD
AUO133D, , 1920x1080, 14.00
Dell Latitude 7480
LG Philips LGD0557, , 1920x1080, 14.00
Display
2%
-3%
22%
-5%
-7%
Display P3 Coverage
71.4
72.8
2%
69
-3%
87.7
23%
67.5
-5%
65.4
-8%
sRGB Coverage
96.6
97.9
1%
95.1
-2%
100
4%
92.5
-4%
92.3
-4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
72.1
74.1
3%
69.6
-3%
99.9
39%
67.7
-6%
65.8
-9%
Response Times
-4%
-16%
-44%
12%
-12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36 ?(17.6, 18.4)
38.4 ?(19.6, 18.8)
-7%
46.4 ?(20.4, 26)
-29%
59.2 ?(28.4, 30.8)
-64%
33.6 ?(15.6, 18)
7%
40.8 ?(19.2, 21.6)
-13%
Response Time Black / White *
28 ?(15.6, 12.4)
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
-1%
28.8 ?(16.4, 12.4)
-3%
34.4 ?(16.4, 18)
-23%
23.2 ?(13.2, 10)
17%
31.2 ?(18.8, 12.4)
-11%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-7%
-25%
38%
-5%
6%
Brightness middle
311
352
13%
327
5%
578
86%
289
-7%
344
11%
Brightness
302
343
14%
311
3%
533
76%
274
-9%
321
6%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
88
-3%
84
-8%
82
-10%
85
-7%
Black Level *
0.36
0.46
-28%
0.25
31%
0.38
-6%
0.17
53%
0.32
11%
Contrast
864
765
-11%
1308
51%
1521
76%
1700
97%
1075
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3
3.3
-10%
6.1
-103%
1.9
37%
4.7
-57%
2.6
13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.1
7.3
-20%
12.2
-100%
3.8
38%
8.6
-41%
7.8
-28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.7
0.8
53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4
5.3
-33%
8.8
-120%
3
25%
6.4
-60%
2.6
35%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.22 99%
2.18 101%
2.14 103%
2.22 99%
2.28 96%
CCT
6961 93%
6452 101%
6172 105%
6377 102%
6454 101%
7050 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66.7
68.4
3%
61.56
-8%
88.8
33%
60.3
-10%
65.82
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96.7
98
1%
94.88
-2%
100
3%
92.3
-5%
92.27
-5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / -5%
-15% / -19%
5% / 25%
1% / -3%
-4% / 1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 18.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18034 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z SPD
CPU-Z SPD
GPU-Z Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU-Z Intel UHD Graphics 620
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Office
  (82.6 - 284, n=117, last 2 years)
216 Points +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Core i7-8550U
170 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Core i7-8550U
168 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel Core i7-7600U
162 Points -5%
Dell Latitude 7480
Intel Core i7-7600U
162 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (108 - 172, n=76)
159.6 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Office
  (160.8 - 2642, n=119, last 2 years)
1392 Points +93%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel Core i5-8250U
724 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel Core i5-8250U
716 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Core i7-8550U
723 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Core i7-8550U
708 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Core i7-8550U
648 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (301 - 761, n=78)
576 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel Core i7-7600U
368 Points -49%
Dell Latitude 7480
Intel Core i7-7600U
343 Points -53%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
29780 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
10745 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6437
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22188
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
10464
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
8436 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.94 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
74 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
7.28 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.84 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
72.6 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.72 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
170 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
101.7 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
723 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Office
  (2304 - 4830, n=12, last 2 years)
4261 Points +20%
Dell Latitude 7480
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
3985 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3968 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3752 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (3145 - 4130, n=21)
3656 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3540 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3503 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7480
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
5052 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4909 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
4856 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (4063 - 5228, n=20)
4771 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4664 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4508 Points -8%
Average of class Office
  (1854 - 5610, n=12, last 2 years)
3746 Points -24%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3540 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4909 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
3960 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell Latitude 7480
Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-16%
-25%
-64%
-18%
Read Seq
2588
1760
-32%
2327
-10%
486.5
-81%
2002 ?(922 - 2628, n=28)
-23%
Write Seq
1858
1666
-10%
1808
-3%
418.6
-77%
1656 ?(924 - 2196, n=28)
-11%
Read 512
1799
832
-54%
419.3
-77%
354.3
-80%
1213 ?(419 - 2009, n=28)
-33%
Write 512
1863
1064
-43%
1272
-32%
306.8
-84%
1641 ?(565 - 2692, n=28)
-12%
Read 4k
62.7
53.2
-15%
60.6
-3%
29.25
-53%
61.4 ?(50.4 - 70.2, n=28)
-2%
Write 4k
146.8
167.4
14%
132.9
-9%
90.5
-38%
131.3 ?(89.6 - 176, n=28)
-11%
Read 4k QD32
446.6
630
41%
340.7
-24%
280.2
-37%
407 ?(202 - 612, n=28)
-9%
Write 4k QD32
706
533
-25%
439.7
-38%
252.8
-64%
402 ?(250 - 706, n=28)
-43%
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Sequential Read: 2588 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1858 MB/s
512K Read: 1799 MB/s
512K Write: 1863 MB/s
4K Read: 62.7 MB/s
4K Write: 146.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 446.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 706 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Office
  (1474 - 12230, n=113, last 2 years)
5932 Points +67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (2796 - 4905, n=47)
4191 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3551 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1901 Points -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
1777 Points -50%
Dell Latitude 7480
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
1648 Points -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1633 Points -54%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Office
  (5681 - 58068, n=96, last 2 years)
24181 Points +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (16227 - 22183, n=43)
19512 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
17743 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
10123 Points -43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
9610 Points -46%
Dell Latitude 7480
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
8555 Points -52%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
7658 Points -57%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Office
  (712 - 8815, n=115, last 2 years)
4125 Points +47%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (2323 - 3739, n=44)
3310 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2807 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1283 Points -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
1176 Points -58%
Dell Latitude 7480
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
1008 Points -64%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
963 Points -66%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
12796 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result
7839 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
3922 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
65886 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
12049 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2584 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
157 fps +104%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (59.7 - 98, n=33)
83.5 fps +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
77 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), i5-8250U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
73.5 fps -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), i5-8250U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
21.9 fps -72%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
30.85 fps -60%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 158.3 87 77 28.89
The Witcher 3 (2015) 53 31.47 17.06
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) 78.4 53.8 24.5 21.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 54.6 32.6 16.5
Doom (2016) 60.5 49.6 17.1
Civilization VI (2016) 75.5 42.87 19.47
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) 62.5 23.7
FIFA 18 (2017) 133.9 83.6 78.1 73
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 87.9 54.6 24.5
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 59.3 26.4 22.5 14.6

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 29 / 29 dB
Carga
36.5 / 38.2 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.631.628.131.231.132.52533.228.529.129.629.329.13130.33032.231.231.130.8403030.529.529.931.129.55027.226.828.82829.727.26326.326.326.225.72626.58026.125.124.72626.625.910026252525.525.724.812523.924.6252423.925.216025.125.12323.323.824.120023.324.522.222.722.62425022.823.421.521.322.422.931521.720.920.820.720.422.240020.620.320.320.218.921.450022.420.521.119.718.12263022.319.621.619.117.722.380021.519.520.21916.721.5100023.119.92219.716.723.2125025.220.624.422.116.125.5160027.723.627.12415.727.2200029.42327.122.915.929.3250028.822.126.923.315.928.1315028.320.525.720.715.928.140002920.126.921.116.328.5500024.718.422.318.616.624.363002017.619.217.916.919.9800018.417.618.317.717.218.3100001817.818.318.117.218125001818.218.518.917.317.9160001918.520.521.217.418.6SPL38.232.836.533.22938N2.61.82.31.81.22.6median 23.1median 20.5median 22median 20.7median 17.2median 23.2Delta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median 19median 23.1median 22.1median 20.5median 17.2median 17.51.633222.230.131.232.132.832.331.231.3323032.230.931.232.732.529.635.528.229.727.930.328.127.225.628.127.926.825.929.4262525.726.523.623.223.525.721.922.822.224.122.122.722.324.224.124.323.925.622.521.520.22321.219.718.921.622.120.618.921.921.620.118.121.822.621.819.323.324.42320.424.125.923.417.625.526.323.614.72626.323.514.626.126.924.414.226.829.726.714.229.228.524.517.528.527.123.114.626.524.420.916.124.120.817.215.220.218.115.915.317.715.815.114.415.61615.814.515.138.135.229.137.82.72.21.22.7median 23.6median 22.8median 17.6median 24.12.92.53.42.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
 39.5 °C43 °C49.2 °C 
 37.1 °C42.7 °C45.7 °C 
 30.9 °C35.2 °C34 °C 
Máximo: 49.2 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C
42.5 °C48.2 °C42.6 °C
43.8 °C45.3 °C37.9 °C
33.1 °C34.7 °C30.4 °C
Máximo: 48.2 °C
Médio: 39.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-7.5 °C / -13.5 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.129.52529.328.63131.1314031.130.15029.727.1632624.78026.623.710025.724.912523.928.616023.837.920022.645.825022.451.731520.454.840018.956.650018.16663017.772.180016.774.4100016.770.8125016.161.6160015.761.9200015.961.7250015.959.1315015.958400016.364.2500016.668.5630016.968.1800017.260.91000017.2601250017.358.21600017.454.4SPL2978.9N1.242.9median 17.2median 60Delta1.96.3353934.235.634.531.532.733.231.231.930.630.930.530.630.137.828.443.227.246.326.647.226.352.125.651.524.651.324.549.523.751.523.758.223.560.823.456.222.956.622.860.123.162.12365.52365.222.961.922.962.623.168.12368.523.162.623.266.535.4752.533.7median 23.4median 58.215.734.83330.328.135.438.130.332.226.631.825.827.624.725.123.926.524.833.424.141.923.94821.85120.155.318.261.117.366.61770.316.578.416.57515.868.915.770.615.467.615.569.21672.916.268.616.7701771.217.272.217.470.917.365.817.256.228.983.61.258.7median 17.2median 68.627.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00Dell Latitude 7480Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell Latitude 7480 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.34 / 0.69 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.4 / 7.5 / 10.8 Watt
Carga midlight 55.4 / 70.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 14.00
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
Dell Latitude 7480
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Power Consumption
8%
4%
-0%
26%
Idle Minimum *
3.4
3.1
9%
4.64
-36%
3.8
-12%
4.32
-27%
Idle Average *
7.5
6.8
9%
8.93
-19%
8.9
-19%
6.27
16%
Idle Maximum *
10.8
10.1
6%
9.12
16%
11.9
-10%
6.35
41%
Load Average *
55.4
48.4
13%
42.2
24%
47.5
14%
29.82
46%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34
Load Maximum *
70.3
67.1
5%
47.3
33%
52.5
25%
30.64
56%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 46min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)
8h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 10min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 16min
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V22ES ABD
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Dell Latitude 7480
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
32%
-15%
9%
9%
61%
25%
Reader / Idle
1366
787
-42%
1328
-3%
1662
22%
1435 ?(527 - 2359, n=22, last 2 years)
5%
H.264
550
721
31%
454
-17%
566
3%
699 ?(348 - 1112, n=39, last 2 years)
27%
WiFi v1.3
530
537
1%
417
-21%
519
-2%
578
9%
719
36%
594 ?(300 - 1137, n=106, last 2 years)
12%
Load
76
124
63%
93
22%
106
39%
171
125%
119.4 ?(56 - 218, n=65, last 2 years)
57%

Pro

+ Chassi de alta qualidade
+ Excelentes periféricos
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Muito bom painel mate WQHD
+ Combinação de portas modernas e estabelecidas
+ Pronto para WWAN
+ 3 anos de garantia
+ Hardware com bom desempenho
+ SSD muito rápido
+ Muitos recursos de segurança
+ MX150 adequado para jogadores casuais

Contra

- i7 mais lento que o i5, sob uso intenso contínuo
- Gerenciamento de desempenho de CPU não refinado (corrigido com BIOS 1.11)
- Afogamento da CPU no mod de bateria
- Altas temperaturas da superfície
- Alto-falantes ruins
- A capa da câmera ThinkShutter somente incluída com a webcam HD ruim
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s, supplied by Campus Point
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s, supplied by Campus Point

O desempenho da CPU, por exemplo, é excelente com o i7, mas o teste mostra que o limite do desempenho foi alcançado com este sistema de resfriamento – isto provoca que o i7, supostamente mais rápido, seja mais lento sob uso intenso contínuo que o i5 dentro do T480s mais barato. Além disso, como com o ThinkPad X280 menor, o desempenho imaturo do gerenciador da CPU faz com que o processador fique adormecido durante o teste de estresse. Outra similaridade com o X ThinkPad: A CPU é afogada no modo bateria. Sua crítica adicional é compartilhada com o T480s testado anteriormente: a temperatura no exterior é comparativamente alta (embora o MX150 não aumente ainda mais), os alto-falantes são ruins e a tampa da câmera ThinkShutter não está disponível em combinação com a câmera infravermelha para Windows Hello.

A Lenovo a quase conseguiu marcar todas as caixas de verificação com o T480s. Os pontos positivos superam por muito os negativos, motivo pelo qual também recomendamos o T480s com MX150.

Esta é uma crítica válida, embora seja confrontada com uma longa lista de pontos positivos do T480s, como os seus confortáveis dispositivos de entrada, o chassis premium, a boa selecção de portas, a boa duração da bateria e a tela IPS WQHD mate, brilhante e precisa. Com tudo isso em mente, podemos recomendar de todo o coração o T480s com MX150.

Seus principais concorrentes são o Dell Latitude 7490, o HP EliteBook 840 G5 e o ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018 mais caro como concorrente interno – vamos testar o Latitude e o EliteBook no futuro próximo também. Todos os três vêm com suas próprias vantagens em comparação com o T480s, o Latitude poderia, por exemplo, oferecer uma duração de bateria mais longa com sua tela IPS de baixa potência, enquanto o EliteBook tem opções de tela significativamente mais brilhantes. O X1 Carbon, por outro lado, é consideravelmente mais leve e compacto e vem com uma opção de tela HDR. Dito isso, o T480s realmente não precisa se esconder de seus concorrentes, a Lenovo criou um ótimo mix de recursos.

Atualização 24.03.2018: A nova versão do Bios 1.11 resolve o adormecimento do prcecessador.

Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 - 03/19/2018 v6(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
94 / 98 → 96%
Teclado
94%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
70 / 80 → 88%
Peso
71 / 20-67 → 100%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
73 / 68 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
96%
Audio
68%
Camera
46 / 85 → 54%
Médio
81%
91%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T480s (i7-8550U, MX150 Max-Q)
Benjamin Herzig, 2018-04- 2 (Update: 2018-04- 9)