Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T570 (Core i7, 4K, 940MX)

Benjamin Herzig (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/01/2017

Alta resolução. Em nosso extenso teste recentemente publicado, o Lenovo ThinkPad T570 conseguiu nos convencer em sua maior parte. No entanto, como na geração anterior, a tela Full HD nos deu motivos de reclamo. Nesta atualização do teste, vamos ver se a variante com tela 4K consegue resolver as fraquezas da configuração mais acessível.

Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 (ThinkPad T570 Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Análises do: 1149.7 MHz, Memoría: 1252.8 MHz, Armazenamento GDDR5, GM108-GPU, 376.54, Optimus
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4 2400, 1 de 2 slots livre
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 3840x2160 pixel 282 PPI, BOE NV156QUM-N44, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, 512 GB 
, 2280 M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD, 448 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm Kombo-Audio, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD 4-em-1, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20.2 x 365.8 x 252.8
Bateria
56 Wh Lítio-Ion, removeable, Duas baterias, interna de 32 Wh, externa de 24 Wh
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo de 2W, Teclado: Teclado chiclet de 6 filas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Lenovo Settings, Lenovo Companion, Office Trial, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
2.019 kg, Suprimento de energia: 351 g
Preço
1599 Euro

 

Lenovo ThinkPad T570
Lenovo ThinkPad T570
Lenovo ThinkPad T570
Lenovo ThinkPad T570
Lenovo ThinkPad T570
Lenovo ThinkPad T570
Lenovo ThinkPad T570
Lenovo ThinkPad T570
Lenovo ThinkPad T570
Lenovo ThinkPad T570

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
76.3 MB/s ∼100%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
74 MB/s ∼97% -3%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
73.2 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
57.3 MB/s ∼75% -25%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
202.8 MB/s ∼100% +124%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
90.7 MB/s ∼45%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
85.39 MB/s ∼42% -6%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
82.6 MB/s ∼41% -9%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac (Klaus I211)
948 MBit/s ∼100% +42%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
674 MBit/s ∼71% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
667 MBit/s ∼70%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
660 MBit/s ∼70% -1%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
588 MBit/s ∼62% -12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac (Klaus I211)
949 MBit/s ∼100% +91%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
641 MBit/s ∼68% +29%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
523 MBit/s ∼55% +5%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
522 MBit/s ∼55% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
498 MBit/s ∼52%
312
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 339 cd/m² Médio: 314.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 339 cd/m²
Contraste: 942:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | - Ø
91% sRGB (Argyll) 59.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.16

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 925.9 Hz90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 925.9 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 925.9 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5069 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
BOE NV156QUM-N44, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
N156HCA-EAA, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Panasonic VVX16T028J00, , 2880x1620, 15.6
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
AUO35ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
2880x1800, 15.4
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
892%
-34%
-30%
-31%
4139%
-64%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.6 (13.2, 28.4)
41.6 (22, 19.6)
-0%
32.8 (17.2, 15.6)
21%
47.2 (26.8, 20.4)
-13%
36 (17.2, 18.8)
13%
47.3 (22.1, 25.2)
-14%
57.2 (27.2, 30)
-38%
Response Time Black / White *
15.2 (2, 13.2)
20.8 (6.8, 14)
-37%
22.4 (11.6, 10.8)
-47%
15.2 (10, 5.2)
-0%
26.4 (15.6, 10.8)
-74%
31.2 (16.7, 14.5)
-105%
39.2 (23.6, 15.6)
-158%
PWM Frequency
925.9 (90)
26040 (40)
2712%
220 (90)
-76%
199.2 (50)
-78%
117000 (80, 200)
12536%
961.5
4%
Screen
-1%
-9%
-64%
5%
42%
7%
Brightness
314
245
-22%
322
3%
341
9%
294
-6%
465
48%
356
13%
Brightness Distribution
89
89
0%
88
-1%
90
1%
84
-6%
92
3%
87
-2%
Black Level *
0.36
0.24
33%
0.32
11%
0.81
-125%
0.27
25%
0.33
8%
0.37
-3%
Contrast
942
1092
16%
1059
12%
417
-56%
1159
23%
1464
55%
1000
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.2
4.5
-7%
5.88
-40%
10.9
-160%
4.5
-7%
1.4
67%
5.3
-26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.1
3.5
31%
7.41
-45%
13.3
-161%
4
22%
1.5
71%
4.6
10%
Gamma
2.16 111%
2.32 103%
2.36 102%
2.11 114%
2.24 107%
2.34 103%
2.31 104%
CCT
6569 99%
6524 100%
6036 108%
16030 41%
6387 102%
6650 98%
6284 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59.4
42.04
-29%
57.14
-4%
53.8
-9%
55.3
-7%
88.3
49%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
65.4
-28%
87.68
-4%
83.4
-8%
84.74
-7%
100
10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
446% / 243%
-22% / -15%
-47% / -55%
-13% / -2%
2091% / 1408%
-29% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

Outdoors: sun
Outdoors: sun
Outdoors: shade
Outdoors: shade

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43.4 ms).
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z: cache
CPU-Z: cache
CPU-Z: main board
CPU-Z: main board
CPU-Z: memory
CPU-Z: memory
CPU-Z: SPD
CPU-Z: SPD
GPU-Z: Intel HD 620
GPU-Z: Intel HD 620
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
157 Points ∼81% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points ∼75%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼72% -3%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points ∼66% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
128 Points ∼66% -12%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points ∼65% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼34% +97%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
666 Points ∼31% +79%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
Intel Core i7-7500U
373 Points ∼17%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼15% -11%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼15% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼15% -12%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
373 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
146 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4606 Points ∼100% +18%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4426 Points ∼96% +14%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
4422 Points ∼96% +14%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4330 Points ∼94% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3892 Points ∼84%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
3637 Points ∼100% +19%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
3588 Points ∼99% +18%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3542 Points ∼97% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3523 Points ∼97% +16%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
3320 Points ∼91% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3049 Points ∼84%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3049 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3892 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN256HCHP
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Apple SSD SM0256L
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-50%
-29%
-47%
-16%
4%
19%
Write 4k QD32
474.4
278.9
-41%
297.5
-37%
256.7
-46%
443
-7%
398.1
-16%
532.8
12%
Read 4k QD32
558.9
346.9
-38%
495
-11%
402.8
-28%
630
13%
509.1
-9%
629.8
13%
Write 4k
144.1
85.64
-41%
138.4
-4%
88.37
-39%
13
-91%
134.1
-7%
167.4
16%
Read 4k
58.42
33.4
-43%
41.79
-28%
36.43
-38%
9.8
-83%
45.14
-23%
53.15
-9%
Write 512
903.4
305.5
-66%
298.8
-67%
321.7
-64%
945
5%
1119
24%
1064
18%
Read 512
788.7
450.6
-43%
672.7
-15%
414.3
-47%
842
7%
977.4
24%
832.3
6%
Write Seq
1134
306.1
-73%
298.6
-74%
488.4
-57%
1343
18%
1106
-2%
1666
47%
Read Seq
1210
512.6
-58%
1245
3%
509.3
-58%
1298
7%
1684
39%
1760
45%
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Sequential Read: 1210 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1134 MB/s
512K Read: 788.7 MB/s
512K Write: 903.4 MB/s
4K Read: 58.42 MB/s
4K Write: 144.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 558.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 474.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
AMD Radeon Pro 450, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4502 Points ∼100% +65%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2727 Points ∼61%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6600U
2360 Points ∼52% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1431 Points ∼32% -48%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1417 Points ∼31% -48%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1309 Points ∼29% -52%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6074 Points ∼100% +165%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
AMD Radeon Pro 450, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3252 Points ∼54% +42%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2294 Points ∼38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6600U
1651 Points ∼27% -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
822 Points ∼14% -64%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
792 Points ∼13% -65%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
31274 Points ∼100% +137%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
AMD Radeon Pro 450, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
21533 Points ∼69% +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
13181 Points ∼42%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6600U
8764 Points ∼28% -34%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7030 Points ∼22% -47%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6840 Points ∼22% -48%
3DMark 11 Performance
2931 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8308 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2098 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
152.5 fps ∼100% +137%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
64.3 fps ∼42%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
GeForce 940MX, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN256HCHP
43.9 fps ∼29% -32%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
20.5 fps ∼13% -68%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
20.2 fps ∼13% -69%
baixo média alto ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 137.972.4564.321.5fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 42.525.711.5fps
Civilization VI (2016) 52.130.716.412.610.1fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29.3 / 29.3 / 31.1 dB
Carga
35.2 / 41.3 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.333.234.632.42532.432.73337.33130.330.932.733.84028.328.829.930.15026.127.828.730.56325.427.928.428.38026.527.827.428.110025.725.925.526.212524.725.724.726.916023.22322.924.420022.722.522.724.825021.822.220.924.531521.721.520.524.840020.520.219.622.650020.219.918.922.863021.619.618.225.380022.619.917.627.1100023.920.91728125023.419.416.527.3160024.62016.129.5200023.318.515.828.8250024.518.515.830.4315026.319.416.135.3400023.11816.430.7500020.51716.626.463002016.916.725.7800018.916.916.921.91000019.316.916.920.91250020.6171722.61600022.317.317.421SPL35.231.129.241.3N2.21.51.23.4median 22.6Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00median 19.6median 17median 25.7Delta1.52.12.3237.533.234.336.931.434.137.832.933.236.331.330.931.328.328.82927.626.728.127.72726.523.425.126.825.327.124.42323.623.523.92424.826.224.522.622.423.221.62122.62019.721.12018.722.12019.623.920.319.824.52016.92319.714.922.519.614.321.519.714.120.317.513.819.717.314.119.215.514.11815.214.115.71514.114.915.214.415.114.614.214.814.614.114.4312933.11.51.21.8median 20HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ETmedian 16.9median 22.12.73.92.9hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carga Máxima
 41.6 °C42.5 °C39 °C 
 43.1 °C42.4 °C39.2 °C 
 38.1 °C39.6 °C36.9 °C 
Máximo: 43.1 °C
Médio: 40.3 °C
47.4 °C54.5 °C54.6 °C
43.5 °C55.4 °C54.9 °C
29.8 °C26.8 °C26.1 °C
Máximo: 55.4 °C
Médio: 43.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.24 / 0.33 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.7 / 9.9 / 10.9 Watt
Carga midlight 56.1 / 75 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450, Apple SSD SM0256L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Power Consumption
31%
39%
33%
2%
-83%
Idle Minimum *
4.7
3.6
23%
3.58
24%
3.96
16%
2.9
38%
11.9
-153%
Idle Average *
9.9
7.7
22%
5.97
40%
7.74
22%
9.7
2%
17.1
-73%
Idle Maximum *
10.9
8.2
25%
6.81
38%
8.64
21%
10.1
7%
17.3
-59%
Load Average *
56.1
30.8
45%
29.4
48%
28.8
49%
65
-16%
94.7
-69%
Load Maximum *
75
46.1
39%
39.7
47%
32
57%
89.5
-19%
122
-63%
Witcher 3 ultra *
104.8

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
13h 19min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3 (Edge)
6h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 04min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 51min
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 56 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Fujitsu LifeBook U757
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450, 76 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 97 Wh
Battery Runtime
24%
22%
6%
-5%
-10%
Reader / Idle
799
1167
46%
1081
35%
831
4%
H.264
484
587
21%
637
32%
516
7%
WiFi v1.3
414
454
10%
530
28%
440
6%
602
45%
434
5%
Load
171
201
18%
160
-6%
55
-68%
103
-40%

O T570 mais caro, consegue nos convencer, assim como o modelo mais acessível. Ele possui características muito boas que a nossa unidade de teste inicial também teve: a carcaça robusta e relativamente compacta, os confortáveis dispositivos de entrada, bem como as muitas opções de conexão. Recursos práticos como PowerBridge ou a câmera com infravermelhos, tornam o T570 em um portátil muito flexível. Além das vantagens do acessível T570, agora também vem a tela 4K de uma qualidade convincente e a GPU NVIDIA, que, apesar de ser um modelo mais antigo, é consideravelmente mais poderosa que a GPU da Intel integrada na CPU.

No entanto, este modelo também não é impecável. Nosso maior reclamo e a redução forçado do desempenho da CPU durante a operação com bateria. Durante a operação na tomada, conseguimos evitar as flutuações do desempenho neste modelo com uma modificação nas configurações, mas o desempenho durante a operação com bateria não pode ser incrementado desta forma. Um novo problema adicional é o aquecimento no lado inferior durante o uso intenso, que provavelmente possa ser atribuído à GPU da Nvidia. Em termos deste problema, o T560 se saiu um pouco melhor, talvez por causa de sua carcaça mais grossa e maior. Elém disso, o preço para a versão não-estudante do T570, com tela 4K e GPU Nvidia não é muito acessível, e a fonte de energia fornecida não é suficiente durante o uso intenso.

Com a tela 4K, o T570 apresenta um bom pacote geral e é um candidato promissor no segmento de 15,6 polegadas, dado que oferece uma combinação interessante de recursos empresariais e características multimídia.

Em resumo, o T570 com uma tela 4K, pode ser claramente recomendado. Com esta tela, ele melhorou muito em uma área crucial, onde a unidade de teste inicial tinha decepcionado. Se não fosse pela redução do desempenho durante a operação com bateria, teria atingido uma recomendação "muito boa". Aqui reduzimos a avaliação final em dois pontos percentuais. Com isto, a redução é um pouco menor que para a primeira unidade de teste, dado que desta vez, a GPU não é afetada pela redução do desempenho e a operação na tomada é estável.

Existe infinidade de alternativas com uma tela de 15,6 polegadas, enquanto o setor empresarial, em particular, está mais concentrado no formato de 14 polegadas. O MacBook Pro 15 e o Dell XPS 15 são fortes concorrentes, que não oferecem os recursos empresariais e o excelente teclado do T570, mas opções de GPU e CPU bastantes mais poderosas.

Pro

+ Carcaça estável com bom acabamento
+ Excelentes dispositivos de entrada
+ Tela 4K mate, brilhante e vibrante
+ Diversas conexões
+ Thunderbolt 3/USB-C
+ Boas opções de manutenção
+ 3 anos de garantia
+ WLAN veloz
+ Operação quase totalmente silenciosa
+ Pronto para WWAN
+ Bom desempenho da CPU
+ Preparado para jogos básicos

Contra

- Redução considerável do desempenho da CPU com a bateria
- Longo tempo de carga
- A fonte de energia não conta com o poder suficiente
- Esquenta no lado inferior durante o uso intenso
- Caro
In the test: Lenovo ThinkPad T570. Test unit provided by Campuspoint.
In the test: Lenovo ThinkPad T570. Test unit provided by Campuspoint.

The more expensive T570 can convince us just as much as the more affordable model. It has many good characteristics that our initial test unit also had: the robust, relatively compact case, the comfortable input devices, as well as the many connection options. Practical features such as PowerBridge or the infrared camera turn the T570 into a very flexible laptop. In addition to the advantages from the affordable T570, now also come the 4K display of a convincing quality and the NVIDIA GPU, which, despite being an older model, is considerably more powerful than the Intel GPU integrated into the CPU.

However, this model is also not without problems. Our biggest complaint is the enforced CPU performance reduction during battery operation. During mains operation, we could avoid the performance fluctuations in this model with a settings change, but the performance during battery operation cannot be raised in this way. An added, new problem is the heat development on the bottom during load, which can probably be attributed to the Nvidia GPU. In terms of this problem, the T560 did a little better, perhaps due to its thicker and larger case. In addition, the price for the non-student version of the T570 with 4K display and Nvidia GPU is not really very affordable, and the supplied power supply is not sufficiently sized for operation during load.

With the 4K display, the T570 presents a good overall package and is a promising candidate in the 15.6-inch segment, since it offers an interesting combination of business features and multimedia characteristics.

In summary, the T570 with a 4K display can be clearly recommended. With this display, it was markedly improved in a crucial area where the initial test unit had disappointed. If it were not for the performance reduction during battery operation, it would have achieved a "very good" recommendation. Here we reduce the end note by two percentage points. With this, the reduction is slightly less than for the first test unit, since at this time, the GPU is not affected by the performance reduction and the performance in mains operation is stable.

There are countless alternatives with a 15.6-inch display, whereas the business sector in particular is more concentrated on the 14-inch format. The MacBook Pro 15 and the Dell XPS 15 are strong competitors, which do not offer the business features and the excellent keyboard of the T570, but considerably stronger GPU and CPU options, instead.

Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 - 04/25/2017 v6
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
88 / 98 → 90%
Teclado
94%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
73 / 80 → 91%
Peso
63 / 67 → 91%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
68 / 68 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperatura
84%
Ruído
88%
Audio
71%
Camera
53 / 85 → 62%
Impressão
-2%
Médio
74%
87%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T570 (Core i7, 4K, 940MX)
Benjamin Herzig, 2017-05- 1 (Update: 2017-05- 6)