Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Apple MacBook Pro 15 (Late 2016, 2.6 GHz i7)

J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum, Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/03/2017

Melhor por um toque? A Apple afina o MacBook Pro 15 de forma bastante radical e reduz o peso para cerca de 1,8 kg com uma espessura de apenas 16 milímetros. O portátil profissional, que inclusive ganhou clientes do Pro de 17 polegadas no passado, agora é uma verdadeira alternativa para os usuários do anterior MBP 13.

Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) (MacBook Pro 15 2016 Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon Pro 450
Memória
16384 MB 
, RAM de 2133 MHz LPDDR3 soldada
Pantalha
15.4 polegadas 16:10, 2880x1800 pixel 220 PPI, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-H
Disco rígido
Apple SSD SM0256L,  GB 
Conexões
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 4 Thunderbolt, Conexões Audio: Headset, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac (ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16 x 349 x 241
Bateria
76 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Apple macOS 10.12 Sierra
Camera
Webcam: 720p FaceTime HD camera
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
Released
11/25/2016
peso
1.807 kg, Suprimento de energia: 369 g
Preço
2699 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Left side: 2x Thunderbolt 3 (with power delivery)
Left side: 2x Thunderbolt 3 (with power delivery)
Right side: 2x Thunderbolt 3 (with power delivery), headset port
Right side: 2x Thunderbolt 3 (with power delivery), headset port
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac
948 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10
Broadcom 802.11ac
762 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
682 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
674 MBit/s ∼71% -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
637 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (I219-LM)
482 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac
949 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10
Broadcom 802.11ac
768 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
653 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (I219-LM)
596 MBit/s ∼63% -37%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
587 MBit/s ∼62% -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
534 MBit/s ∼56% -44%
465
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 483 cd/m² Médio: 465.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 483 cd/m²
Contraste: 1464:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.34
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
2880x1800, 15.4
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
APPA034, , 2560x1600, 13.3
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05
APPA02E, , 2880x1800, 15.4
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-33%
-48%
16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47.3
47.2
-0%
64
-35%
40
15%
Response Time Black / White *
31.2
51.6
-65%
50
-60%
26
17%
PWM Frequency
117000
Screen
-21%
-25%
-111%
-100%
Brightness
465
564
21%
315
-32%
356
-23%
316
-32%
Brightness Distribution
92
89
-3%
82
-11%
92
0%
80
-13%
Black Level *
0.33
0.57
-73%
0.34
-3%
0.252
24%
0.35
-6%
Contrast
1464
1053
-28%
1003
-31%
1474
1%
931
-36%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.5
-7%
2.07
-48%
5.55
-296%
5.49
-292%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
2
-33%
1.9
-27%
7.1
-373%
4.84
-223%
Gamma
2.34 103%
2.27 106%
2.62 92%
2.1 114%
2.23 108%
CCT
6650 98%
6855 95%
6514 100%
5971 109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77
58
63.4
53
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
91
97.9
80
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-27% / -24%
-25% / -25%
-80% / -95%
-42% / -71%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.7 ms rise
↘ 14.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.1 ms rise
↘ 25.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 117000 Hz80 % brightness setting
200 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 117000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % (200 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 117000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

Flickering occurs even at high brightness setting and may have an effect on the user during everyday use.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4396 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
146 Points ∼65% +4%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05
Intel Core i7-4870HQ (Windows 8.1)
144 Points ∼65% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05
Intel Core i7-4870HQ (OS X)
143 Points ∼64% +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼63%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points ∼58% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U (Windows 10)
126 Points ∼57% -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U (macOS)
124 Points ∼56% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼37% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (macOS)
666 Points ∼36%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05
Intel Core i7-4870HQ (Windows 8.1)
594 Points ∼32% -11%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05
Intel Core i7-4870HQ (OS X)
589 Points ∼32% -12%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
326 Points ∼18% -51%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U (macOS)
309 Points ∼17% -54%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U (Windows 10)
309 Points ∼17% -54%
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.23 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.53 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
666 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
141 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
69.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.5 %
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
5003 Points ∼77% +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
4755 Points ∼73% +7%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
4696 Points ∼72% +6%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05
Radeon R9 M370X, 4870HQ, Apple SSD SM0512G
4638 Points ∼71% +5%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
4503 Points ∼69% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
4442 Points ∼68% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4426 Points ∼68%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4341 Points ∼67% -2%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4176 Points ∼64% -6%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
4076 Points ∼63% -8%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4047 Points ∼62% -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
3853 Points ∼59% -13%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Apple SSD AP0256
3636 Points ∼56% -18%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points ∼54% -20%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10
Iris Graphics 5100, 4258U, Apple SSD SM0256F
3269 Points ∼50% -26%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
4066 Points ∼68% +12%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
3946 Points ∼66% +8%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05
Radeon R9 M370X, 4870HQ, Apple SSD SM0512G
3821 Points ∼64% +5%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
3753 Points ∼63% +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
3637 Points ∼61%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
3542 Points ∼59% -3%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
3452 Points ∼58% -5%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3370 Points ∼56% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
3280 Points ∼55% -10%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3162 Points ∼53% -13%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
2979 Points ∼50% -18%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
2855 Points ∼48% -22%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Apple SSD AP0256
2651 Points ∼44% -27%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points ∼43% -30%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10
Iris Graphics 5100, 4258U, Apple SSD SM0256F
2457 Points ∼41% -32%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3637 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4426 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7926 Points ∼28% +61%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
AMD Radeon Pro 460, Intel Core i7-6920HQ
6963 Points ∼24% +42%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
AMD Radeon Pro 450, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4914 Points ∼17%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6500U
4732 Points ∼16% -4%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4579 Points ∼16% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05
AMD Radeon R9 M370X, Intel Core i7-4870HQ
3942 Points ∼14% -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i5-6360U
2561 Points ∼9% -48%
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5179 Points ∼22% +71%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
AMD Radeon Pro 460, Intel Core i7-6920HQ
4104 Points ∼18% +36%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3939 Points ∼17% +30%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6500U
3651 Points ∼16% +21%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
AMD Radeon Pro 450, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3027 Points ∼13%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2917 Points ∼12% -4%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05
AMD Radeon R9 M370X, Intel Core i7-4870HQ
2350 Points ∼10% -22%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i5-6360U
1354 Points ∼6% -55%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
AMD Radeon Pro 460, Intel Core i7-6920HQ (Windows 10)
16.5 fps ∼14% +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
AMD Radeon Pro 460, Intel Core i7-6920HQ (OS X)
16.4 fps ∼14% +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
AMD Radeon Pro 450, Intel Core i7-6700HQ (macOS)
14.2 (min: 8.7) fps ∼12%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i5-6360U (macOS)
8.7 fps ∼8% -39%
3DMark 06 Standard
24189 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result
14245 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
4914 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
14305 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3027 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
1440 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
1074 pontos
Ajuda
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
23.8 fps ∼100% +14%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
21 fps ∼88% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L (DX11)
20.9 (min: 19) fps ∼88%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L (DX12)
20.7 (min: 18) fps ∼87% -1%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
18.8 fps ∼79% -10%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
6.2 fps ∼26% -70%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
5.3 fps ∼22% -75%
1024x768 Lowest Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L (DX11)
66.6 (min: 58) fps ∼100%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
45.2 fps ∼68% -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
24.9 (min: 23) fps ∼37% -63%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
21.8 fps ∼33% -67%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
14.1 fps ∼21% -79%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
11 fps ∼17% -83%
Fallout 4
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
31 fps ∼100% +29%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
24.1 (min: 19) fps ∼78%
1280x720 Low Preset AA:FX
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
70 (min: 50) fps ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
23.2 (min: 14) fps ∼33% -67%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
10.1 fps ∼14% -86%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
fps ∼0% -100%
XCOM 2 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:FX AF:2x
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L (Win 10)
24.2 (min: 21) fps ∼100%
Deus Ex Mankind Divided
1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L (DX12)
18.3 (min: 15) fps ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L (DX11)
17.4 (min: 9) fps ∼95% -5%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
17.1 fps ∼93% -7%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
14.2 fps ∼78% -22%
1280x720 Low Preset AF:1x
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L (DX12)
51.2 (min: 39) fps ∼100%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
38.1 fps ∼74% -26%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
30.9 fps ∼60% -40%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256 (DX11)
20.5 (min: 3) fps ∼40% -60%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256 (DX12)
16.7 (min: 13) fps ∼33% -67%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
9.1 fps ∼18% -82%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 40.920.3fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 67.2fps
World of Warships (2015) 44.6fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 8718.3fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 7024.1fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 39.634.1fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 66.620.7fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 63.724.215.55.6fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 292617fps
The Division (2016) 7721.615.8fps
Doom (2016) 53.420.4fps
Overwatch (2016) 1535739.5fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 51.218.37.5fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 28.3fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 10124.221.7fps
Civilization VI (2016) 6125.8fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 63.424.7fps
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) 58.736fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 29.5fps
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 47.417.6fps
For Honor (2017) 82.329.327.919.4fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 48.221.318.58fps
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) 68.226.516.4fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB
Carga
34.7 / 46.3 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.135.737.436.138.434.62532.129.331.93232323131.93131.529.832.531.84034.333.534.633.733.134.35031.530.731.232.832.433.36330.630.23530.730.529.68027.928.234.42828.429.310032.129.733.32826.628.812526.627.731.125.725.625.916024.926.22724.324.824.520024.9272824.124.424.725023.927.828.923.12323.731524.932.32821.922.623.8400293933.523.621.725.750029.340.233.520.920.623.763024.338.128.519.919.722.380024.635.227.119.618.921.8100023.635.226.41917.921.8125024.536.228.518.117.920.4160025.839.530.717.917.421.9200026.540.430.617.617.321250026.143.732.717.517.221315020.138.924.217.317.218.240001936.721.817.317.117.4500017.733.419.917.317.317.3630017.430.11817.217.317.5800017.527.117.817.417.417.51000017.523.817.517.417.417.51250017.421.417.517.417.317.41600017.418.617.517.417.417.4SPL35.950.140.330.730.332.6N2.46.73.31.51.41.8median 24.5Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)median 33.4median 28median 18.1median 17.9median 21.8Delta3.55.94.72.62.73.5hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carga Máxima
 41 °C43 °C40 °C 
 41 °C42 °C32 °C 
 28 °C27 °C27 °C 
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 35.7 °C
39 °C40 °C39 °C
33 °C38 °C36 °C
29 °C31 °C28 °C
Máximo: 40 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.134.52531.132.83132.631.44037.534.55037.335.2634730.48047.928.71005728.512564.525.516056.524.620067.824.425069.224.331566.922.940077.522.850075.821.363074.820.38006719.6100071.519.3125077.918.5160079.418.4200073.117.8250073.718.1315070.317.4400070.817.4500070.517.663007417.580006717.61000067.317.51250061.117.51600065.117.5SPL86.130.9N71.41.5median 70.3Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)median 18.5Delta3.72.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.445.140.533.833.233.232.735.136.73232.234.433.236.333.148.830.159.828.2512661.824.565.123.368.221.966.721.366.919.875.719.371.418.972.718.275.617.671.517.373.217.370.717.468.617.269.51766.717.167.217.36717.367.117.466.617.367.717.283.230.459.51.5median 67.2Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016median 17.62.52.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.33 / 0.63 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.9 / 9.7 / 10.1 Watt
Carga midlight 65 / 89.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450, Apple SSD SM0256L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
6360U, Iris Graphics 540, Apple SSD AP0256, , 2560x1600, 13.3
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Apple SSD AP0256, , 2560x1600, 13.3
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05
4870HQ, Radeon R9 M370X, Apple SSD SM0512G, IPS-Panel, 2880x1800, 15.4
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03
5257U, Iris Graphics 6100, Apple SSD SM0128G, IPS-Panel, 2560x1600, 13.3
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB, IGZO WLED 330 cd/m² 1000:1 Hard Coating 3H, 3840x2160, 15.6
Power Consumption
21%
23%
-40%
18%
-127%
Idle Minimum *
2.9
3
-3%
2.1
28%
6
-107%
2.8
3%
12.5
-331%
Idle Average *
9.7
8.9
8%
7.6
22%
12.8
-32%
7.8
20%
19.6
-102%
Idle Maximum *
10.1
8.9
12%
8.2
19%
13.3
-32%
8.1
20%
22.8
-126%
Load Average *
65
43.4
33%
56.4
13%
82.4
-27%
52.4
19%
102
-57%
Load Maximum *
89.5
42.1
53%
59.8
33%
91.8
-3%
62.8
30%
107
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
10h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 36min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 55min
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450, 76 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
6360U, Iris Graphics 540, 54 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05
4870HQ, Radeon R9 M370X, 100 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 84 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, 48 Wh
Battery Runtime
39%
14%
42%
9%
Reader / Idle
2557
1039
979
816
Load
55
101
84%
105
91%
106
93%
95
73%
WiFi v1.3
602
686
14%
432
-28%
544
-10%
430
-29%
H.264
516
620
20%
413
-20%
428
-17%

Pro

+ Excelente chassi
+ Muito boa tela
+ Enorme trackpad com ótima precisão
+ Silencioso e com bom resfriamento
+ Altas taxas de transferência WLAN
+ Bons alto falantes

Contra

- Nem USB-A, nem saída HDMI
- Alto falantes defeituosos devido ao BootCamp
- Problemas com o WLAN de 2,4 GHz com aparelho USB-C conectado
- As ventoinhas são (um pouco) audíveis durante o modo inativo
- Muito caro – especialmente as atualizações
Apple MacBook Pro 15 Late 2016 2.6 GHz
Apple MacBook Pro 15 Late 2016 2.6 GHz

O novo Apple MacBook Pro 15 aumenta ainda mais as vantagens do predecessor e é um dos melhores aparelhos que você pode comprar no momento, em alguns aspectos. Isto definitivamente inclui o excelente chassi, onde a dieta não afetou a qualidade ou a estabilidade. A Apple também foi capaz de melhorar a tela ainda mais e ultrapassar o modelo anterior em todas as áreas. O trackpad agora é muito maior que antes e ainda muito melhor que todos os rivais Windows.

É mais complicado obter um veredicto sobre o teclado, assim como do touchpad. Similar aos dois modelo menores de 13-polegadas, a Apple utiliza suas própria segunda geração de switches Butterfly. O resultado é um deslocamento muito preciso das teclas, mas leva um tempo para se acostumar, em combinação com o deslocamento extremamente curto. Nós realmente gostamos do sensor de digitais dentro do botão de energia. O Touch Bar, bastante anunciado, foi bem implementado pela Apple, mas a usabilidade depende principalmente do suporte para software. Na prática, ele inclusive consegue fazer ações comuns (como controle de brilho ou volume, por exemplo) mais complicadas graças a um toque adicional. Em seu estado atual, achamos que é apenas um "gimmick".

Uma olhada no desempenho mostra que a Apple utiliza o melhor hardware em termos de processador móvel quad-core e GPUs mainstream que está disponível agora. No entanto, com os correspondentes chips Kaby Lake e GPUs mainstream da geração Pascal bem  na volta da esquina, o MacBook Pro 15 pode ficar desatualizado muito em breve. Isto obviamente não é uma ótima perspectiva, especialmente para um aparelho que custará pelo menos $2399. Estamos um pouco surpresas de que a menor capacidade da bateria tenha sido compensada tão bem. A duração é afetada quando você realmente estressa o sistema, mas a Apple, de fato, conseguiu melhorar as durações nos testes práticos.

Em nossa opinião, os maiores problemas além do preço são os bugs e a situação das portas. Atualmente existem problemas com as conexões WLAN em redes de 2,4 GHz quando um aparelho com USB-C é conectado. Similar ao irmão menor, isto resulta na dedução de um ponto da avaliação final (- 2%). Também pode haver problemas com os alto falantes quando você instala Windows via BoootCamp (nosso modelo de teste foi afetado) e a placa de vídeo pode provocar erros. Ambos os problemas devem ser resolvidos com atualizações futuras ou que já foram liberadas, segundo a Apple.

Um ponto que não pode ser resolvido por uma atualização, é a situação da portas. Quatro portas Thunderbolt 3 – todas as quais podem utilizar toda a largura da banda, à diferença de seu irmão menor – são muito versáteis e também preparadas para o futuro, mas esta abordagem radical é simplesmente inconveniente na prática, no futuro próximo, porque precisará dos adaptadores correspondentes. Achamos que a Apple poderia ter encontrado uma solução mais elegante e melhor para os clientes.

Em resumo, o novo MacBook Pro 15 se sente como uma solução interina. Agora, recebemos um novo design com algumas modificações, antes do seguinte modelo (provavelmente) fornecerá mais desempenho e resolverá todos os problemas (o qual nos faz lembrar os iPhones). O MacBook ainda é um portátil multimídia muito bom e muitos clientes certamente estarão contentes com ele, mas você bem poderia pular este modelo e esperar pela atualização do próximo ano se não precisar realmente de um novo sistema neste momento.

Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) - 12/09/2016 v6
J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum, Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
93 / 98 → 95%
Teclado
90%
Mouse
100%
Conectividade
51 / 81 → 63%
Peso
65 / 67 → 96%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
92%
Desempenho do jogos
75 / 85 → 88%
Desempenho da aplicação
89 / 92 → 97%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
88 / 95 → 93%
Audio
91%
Camera
53 / 85 → 62%
Impressão
-2%
Médio
76%
88%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Apple MacBook Pro 15 (Late 2016, 2.6 GHz i7)
J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum, Andreas Osthoff, 2017-01- 3 (Update: 2017-01-18)