Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad X395: Uma luta pela hegemonia dos portáteis empresariais

AMD ou Intel? A AMD vem intensificando sua concorrência com a Intel recentemente, à medida que cada vez mais portáteis com Ryzen vêm aparecendo no mercado recentemente. A Lenovo lançou as versões AMD e Intel da série ThinkPad X39 de 13,3 polegadas, cuja versão da AMD será o foco de nossa análise. O ThinkPad X390 impressionou em nossa recente análise. Então, como se sai o X395 equipado com AMD? Continue lendo para descobrir se ele superou o X390, junto com as vantagens e desvantagens de ambos os modelos.
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Processador
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 4 x 2.1 - 3.5 GHz, Zen+
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1200 MHz, Memoría: 1200 MHz, 25.20.14122.15001
Memória
8 GB 
, Dual channel, soldada
Pantalha
13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Sem tela táctil, LP133WF7-SPB1, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
AMD CZ FCH
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, 256 GB 
, 165 GB livre
Placa de Som
AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Dual channel, soldada, Card Reader: microSD, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16.9 x 312 x 217
Bateria
48 Wh Lítio-Ion, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 14.5 h
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: Câmera de 720p HD com ThinkShutter
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, LAN-Dongle, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.281 kg, Suprimento de energia: 370 g
Preço
927 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

#compare_competitor

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.8 %
10/2019
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6
1.3 kg16.9 mm13.30"1920x1080
90.3 %
05/2019
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620
1.3 kg16.9 mm13.30"1920x1080
87.4 %
06/2019
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620
1.3 kg15.95 mm13.30"1920x1080
84.2 %
06/2019
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620
1.3 kg15 mm13.00"2160x1440
89.5 %
08/2018
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620
1.3 kg15.8 mm13.30"1920x1080
84.9 %
Dell Latitude 5300
i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620
1.4 kg19 mm13.30"1920x1080

Size Comparison

312 mm 217 mm 16.9 mm 1.3 kg311.9 mm 217.2 mm 16.9 mm 1.3 kg310.4 mm 219 mm 15.95 mm 1.3 kg306 mm 208 mm 19 mm 1.4 kg305.8 mm 205 mm 15.8 mm 1.3 kg286 mm 211 mm 15 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Right-hand side: Smartcard reader, fan vent, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A (always-on), Kensington lock slot
Right-hand side: Smartcard reader, fan vent, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A (always-on), Kensington lock slot
Left-hand side: USB 3.0 Type-C, USB 3.0 Type-C/proprietary Ethernet port, HDMI, 3.5 mm jack
Left-hand side: USB 3.0 Type-C, USB 3.0 Type-C/proprietary Ethernet port, HDMI, 3.5 mm jack
Rear: microSD card reader
Rear: microSD card reader
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 5300
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
176 MB/s +138%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.4 MB/s +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.1 MB/s +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
 
74.1 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (18.9 - 193.9, n=17, last 2 years)
66.7 MB/s -10%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 5300
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
188.8 MB/s +119%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.5 MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
 
86.2 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.6 MB/s -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (23.6 - 239, n=17, last 2 years)
81.3 MB/s -6%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
628 (493min - 645max) MBit/s
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
502 MBit/s -20%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
652 (539min - 675max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
646 MBit/s -1%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
627 MBit/s -4%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad X395; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø651 (539-675)
Lenovo ThinkPad X395; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø628 (493-645)
314
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LP133WF7-SPB1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 356 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 335.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 300 cd/m²
Contraste: 2225:1 (Preto: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.92
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
LP133WF7-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
LP133WF7-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 13.30
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Chi Mei CMN1380, , 1920x1080, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
LP133WF7-SPA1, , 1920x1080, 13.30
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
Chi Mei CMN8201, , 2160x1440, 13.00
Dell Latitude 5300
LGD05ED-133WF6, , 1920x1080, 13.30
Display
1%
3%
2%
5%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
64.1
65.3
2%
66.1
3%
65.2
2%
68.1
6%
68.2
6%
sRGB Coverage
95.2
95.9
1%
97.8
3%
97
2%
99.3
4%
94.4
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.8
66.6
1%
67.8
3%
67.3
2%
69.7
6%
68.7
4%
Response Times
-6%
25%
-2%
13%
23%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
55 ?(26, 29)
57.6 ?(28.4, 29.2)
-5%
39.2 ?(20.4, 18.8)
29%
59.2 ?(30, 29.2)
-8%
43.2 ?(23.6, 19.6)
21%
38 ?(19.6, 18.4)
31%
Response Time Black / White *
32 ?(18, 14)
34 ?(18.4, 15.6)
-6%
25.6 ?(14, 11.6)
20%
30.8 ?(16.8, 14)
4%
30.4 ?(17.2, 13.2)
5%
27.2 ?(16, 11.2)
15%
PWM Frequency
26040 ?(62)
60240 ?(30)
Screen
0%
-9%
-21%
-21%
-14%
Brightness middle
356
356
0%
470.1
32%
319
-10%
356
0%
326
-8%
Brightness
336
336
0%
443
32%
306
-9%
346
3%
313
-7%
Brightness Distribution
88
88
0%
88
0%
90
2%
86
-2%
87
-1%
Black Level *
0.16
0.16
-0%
0.38
-138%
0.15
6%
0.35
-119%
0.27
-69%
Contrast
2225
2225
0%
1237
-44%
2127
-4%
1017
-54%
1207
-46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.6
3.6
-0%
2.47
31%
6.1
-69%
3.3
8%
3.2
11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.5
5.5
-0%
5.73
-4%
9.7
-76%
8.7
-58%
6.3
-15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.11
1.1
1%
1.52
-37%
1
10%
1.1
1%
1.6
-44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.7
4.7
-0%
3.7
21%
8.6
-83%
5.8
-23%
3.8
19%
Gamma
2.92 75%
2.48 89%
2.35 94%
2.62 84%
2.21 100%
2.14 103%
CCT
6222 104%
6374 102%
7373 88%
6613 98%
6670 97%
6900 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
61.3
0%
62
2%
61.9
1%
64.1
5%
63.8
5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
95.7
0%
98.2
2%
96.8
1%
99.4
4%
94.8
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -0%
6% / -3%
-7% / -14%
-1% / -12%
4% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U: Ø416 (400.15-479.45)
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø569 (552-686)
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø483 (463.47-532.04)
Dell Latitude 3400 Intel Core i3-8145U, Intel Core i3-8145U: Ø313 (269.14-350.09)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years)
237 Points +88%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel Core i7-8565U
179 Points +42%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
Intel Core i7-8565U
175 Points +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel Core i5-8265U
158 Points +25%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel Core i3-8145U
154 Points +22%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
126 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
  ()
126 Points 0%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years)
1757 Points +265%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel Core i5-8265U
686 (552min - 686max) Points +43%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
Intel Core i7-8565U
685 Points +42%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel Core i7-8565U
623 (498.14min - 623.19max) Points +30%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U
532 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
481 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
  ()
481 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel Core i3-8145U
350 Points -27%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1.38 - 3.33, n=13, last 2 years)
2.88 Points +101%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U
1.63 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
1.43 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
  ()
1.43 Points 0%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (9.23 - 30, n=13, last 2 years)
22.2 Points +302%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
5.52 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
  ()
5.52 Points 0%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U
5.41 Points -2%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11845 - 82102, n=6, last 2 years)
24548 Points +283%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
6410 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
  ()
6410 Points 0%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13726 - 70566, n=6, last 2 years)
51405 Points +127%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
22657 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
  ()
22657 Points 0%
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
7069 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
22657 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
6410 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.52 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
42.86 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.43 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
46.42 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
481 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years)
5879 Points +63%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4138 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4134 Points +15%
Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4086 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3832 Points +6%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
3695 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3606 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  ()
3606 Points 0%
Essentials
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years)
10247 Points +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
9029 Points +23%
Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
8863 Points +21%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8535 Points +16%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
8356 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
7982 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
7351 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  ()
7351 Points 0%
Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years)
7857 Points +43%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7171 Points +31%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
7066 Points +29%
Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
6623 Points +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
6273 Points +14%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
5739 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5484 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  ()
5484 Points 0%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years)
6923 Points +119%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3158 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  ()
3158 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
3154 Points 0%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3142 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3050 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3005 Points -5%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
2855 Points -10%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4730 - 5285, n=3, last 2 years)
5030 Points +54%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3668 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3629 Points +11%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3587 Points +10%
Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
3546 Points +9%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
3453 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3260 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  ()
3260 Points 0%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
5071 Points +16%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4958 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4896 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
4356 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  ()
4356 Points 0%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4336 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2972 - 5271, n=3, last 2 years)
3805 Points -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3260 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4356 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
3606 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
Dell Latitude 5300
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Average Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-2%
-57%
-9%
13%
35%
8%
Write 4K
129.4
120.7
-7%
64.3
-50%
119.2
-8%
144.1
11%
191.2
48%
Read 4K
41.6
58.5
41%
34.13
-18%
41.43
0%
63.5
53%
53.1
28%
Write Seq
2334
1491
-36%
466.4
-80%
1240
-47%
1496
-36%
1768
-24%
2091 ?(1761 - 2343, n=14)
-10%
Read Seq
2151
2760
28%
498.3
-77%
1668
-22%
2677
24%
1710
-21%
Write 4K Q32T1
234
237.5
1%
193.3
-17%
381.7
63%
357.4
53%
575
146%
Read 4K Q32T1
325.7
336.1
3%
179.7
-45%
371.5
14%
482.3
48%
654
101%
Write Seq Q32T1
2348
1512
-36%
396.8
-83%
1369
-42%
1558
-34%
2544
8%
Read Seq Q32T1
3563
3154
-11%
547
-85%
2652
-26%
3021
-15%
3433
-4%
Write 4K Q8T8
1065
989
208 ?()
Read 4K Q8T8
891
883
383 ?()
AS SSD
26%
-63%
-12%
21%
30%
5%
Seq Read
2234
2689
20%
488.2
-78%
2123
-5%
2742
23%
2934
31%
Seq Write
2110
1462
-31%
403.2
-81%
744
-65%
1511
-28%
2407
14%
1486 ?(391 - 2187, n=15)
-30%
4K Read
45.78
63.8
39%
31.07
-32%
43.02
-6%
66.3
45%
48.31
6%
4K Write
102.7
139.8
36%
70.8
-31%
117.4
14%
175.2
71%
179.7
75%
129.5 ?(78 - 188.4, n=15)
26%
4K-64 Read
903
865
-4%
255.1
-72%
680
-25%
873
-3%
1296
44%
683 ?(504 - 947, n=15)
-24%
4K-64 Write
986
1041
6%
156.5
-84%
1039
5%
594
-40%
1459
48%
Access Time Read *
0.064
0.037
42%
0.093
-45%
0.057
11%
0.035
45%
0.103
-61%
0.06433 ?(0.046 - 0.089, n=15)
-1%
Access Time Write *
0.042
0.024
43%
0.048
-14%
0.051
-21%
0.021
50%
0.021
50%
0.04793 ?(0.022 - 0.104, n=15)
-14%
Score Read
1172
1198
2%
335
-71%
935
-20%
1213
3%
1638
40%
Score Write
1300
1328
2%
268
-79%
1230
-5%
920
-29%
1879
45%
1173 ?(593 - 2214, n=15)
-10%
Score Total
3075
3095
1%
781
-75%
2586
-16%
2712
-12%
4334
41%
2598 ?(1649 - 3862, n=15)
-16%
Copy ISO MB/s
1008
1290
28%
208.1
-79%
1725
71%
Copy Program MB/s
237.6
436.5
84%
74.3
-69%
418.3
76%
426 ?(71 - 847, n=10)
79%
Copy Game MB/s
572
1147
101%
164.5
-71%
687
20%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
12% / 16%
-60% / -61%
-11% / -11%
17% / 18%
33% / 32%
7% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Sequential Read: 2496 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2325 MB/s
512K Read: 1710 MB/s
512K Write: 530 MB/s
4K Read: 41.06 MB/s
4K Write: 117.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 295.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 216.7 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2979 - 16904, n=55, last 2 years)
8227 Points +147%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
3325 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (2986 - 3325, n=3)
3101 Points -7%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1927 Points -42%
Dell Latitude 5300
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8365U
1926 Points -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1841 Points -45%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1806 Points -46%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1738 Points -48%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13768 - 65911, n=39, last 2 years)
29386 Points +75%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (15850 - 18140, n=3)
16926 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
16787 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
10322 Points -39%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
10255 Points -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
10126 Points -40%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9478 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2837 - 12349, n=59, last 2 years)
6026 Points +168%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
2245 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (2064 - 2312, n=3)
2207 Points -2%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1339 Points -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1278 Points -43%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1266 Points -44%
3DMark 11 Performance
3425 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
10619 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2025 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook
  (37 - 249, n=53, last 2 years)
102.1 fps +169%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (38 - 39, n=2)
38.5 fps +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
38 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
17.7 fps -53%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
17.2 fps -55%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
16.9 fps -56%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.2 - 92, n=56, last 2 years)
34.9 fps +260%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
9.7 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (7.4 - 9.7, n=2)
8.55 fps -12%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
6.5 fps -33%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1024x768 Lowest Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
37.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (29.8 - 37.5, n=2)
33.7 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
25.7 fps -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
23.3 fps -38%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
20.7 fps -45%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
12.4 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (9.7 - 12.4, n=2)
11.1 fps -10%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
6.6 fps -47%
Rocket League
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
138.1 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (52.6 - 138.1, n=2)
95.4 fps -31%
1920x1080 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
78.9 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (42.2 - 78.9, n=2)
60.6 fps -23%
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
47.9 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (26.9 - 47.9, n=2)
37.4 fps -22%
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
27.7 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (17.4 - 27.7, n=2)
22.6 fps -18%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 38 9.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 37.5 12.4
Rocket League (2017) 138.1 47.9 27.7
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Noise
2%
6%
1%
4%
5%
off / environment *
30.2
29.2
3%
28.5
6%
29.2
3%
29.2
3%
28.8
5%
Idle Minimum *
30.2
29.2
3%
28.5
6%
29.2
3%
29.2
3%
28.8
5%
Idle Average *
30.2
29.2
3%
28.5
6%
29.2
3%
29.2
3%
28.8
5%
Idle Maximum *
30.2
29.2
3%
28.5
6%
29.2
3%
29.2
3%
29.8
1%
Load Average *
34.3
34.8
-1%
31.3
9%
35
-2%
31.7
8%
31.7
8%
Load Maximum *
34.3
34.8
-1%
33.5
2%
35
-2%
33
4%
33.2
3%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB
Carga
34.3 / 34.3 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.731.833.730.7253231.232.6323135.632.934.735.64031.130.433.231.15032.330.733.432.36329.828.327.929.88029.329.926.229.310032.12827.332.112531.124.82731.116024.424.523.624.420024.322.723.324.325022.922.322.722.931521.821.621.321.840021.321.820.221.350020.620.219.320.663019.52018.319.580020.620.41820.610002121.317.721125020.720.617.220.7160021.621.917.221.6200023.223.717.223.22500232317.52331502424.117.424400024.824.817.824.8500023.223.317.923.263002120.817.921800019.519.51819.51000018.718.71818.71250018.218.117.818.21600018.218.117.718.2SPL34.434.430.234.4N2.121.42.1median 21.6median 21.8median 18median 21.6Delta21.81.52hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo ThinkPad X395
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Heat
4%
-4%
-11%
2%
-5%
Maximum Upper Side *
38.4
44.6
-16%
38
1%
41.7
-9%
39.7
-3%
43
-12%
Maximum Bottom *
39.7
41.1
-4%
45.4
-14%
50.1
-26%
44.4
-12%
53
-34%
Idle Upper Side *
28.1
23.2
17%
26.4
6%
27.8
1%
24.7
12%
23.9
15%
Idle Bottom *
28
22.8
19%
30
-7%
30.2
-8%
25.3
10%
24.7
12%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 32 °C38.4 °C37 °C 
 30.5 °C36.9 °C36.7 °C 
 27.9 °C28.5 °C31 °C 
Máximo: 38.4 °C
Médio: 33.2 °C
38.8 °C39.7 °C33.4 °C
31.8 °C36.4 °C31.7 °C
29.2 °C30.1 °C28.8 °C
Máximo: 39.7 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  34 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.733.733.72535.932.635.93135.434.735.44030.933.230.95035.333.435.36328.127.928.18028.126.228.110029.427.329.412530.52730.516037.923.637.920040.123.340.125045.522.745.531559.321.359.340063.720.263.750057.619.357.663056.418.356.4800711871100068.317.768.3125062.117.262.1160059.117.259.1200060.217.260.225006417.564315060.617.460.6400064.417.864.4500059.517.959.5630058.617.958.680006118611000061.21861.21250058.817.858.8160005017.750SPL75.530.275.5N361.436median 59.3median 18median 59.3Delta6.11.56.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad X395Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.55 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4 / 6.3 / 9.3 Watt
Carga midlight 34 / 42 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 2160x1440, 13.00
Dell Latitude 5300
i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
-10%
4%
-14%
-20%
-12%
-13%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
4
3.4
15%
3.8
5%
3.46
13%
3.84
4%
3.8
5%
5.15 ?(4 - 6.3, n=2)
-29%
Idle Average *
6.3
5.6
11%
7.5
-19%
5.88
7%
7.68
-22%
6.9
-10%
7.75 ?(6.3 - 9.2, n=2)
-23%
Idle Maximum *
9.3
8.7
6%
8.6
8%
9.12
2%
9.36
-1%
7.5
19%
9.45 ?(9.3 - 9.6, n=2)
-2%
Load Average *
34
43.6
-28%
33.1
3%
45.6
-34%
43.2
-27%
41.4
-22%
36 ?(34 - 38, n=2)
-6%
Load Maximum *
42
65
-55%
31.8
24%
65.9
-57%
64.8
-54%
63.1
-50%
44 ?(42 - 46, n=2)
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
18h 23min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 55min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
8h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 20min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 47min
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6, 48 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh
Dell Latitude 5300
i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 41.7 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
-20%
0%
-24%
-29%
-23%
-3%
Reader / Idle
1103
1381
25%
1416
28%
H.264
620
764
23%
600
-3%
WiFi v1.3
655
499
-24%
602
-8%
500
-24%
492
-25%
419
-36%
Load
227
94
-59%
189
-17%
91
-60%
88
-61%

Pro

+ HDMI 2.0
+ Excelentes dispositivos de entrada
+ Slot para Smart Card
+ Diversos recursos de segurança
+ Tela rica em brilho e contraste
+ Três anos de garantia
+ Silencioso e frio
+ Baixo consumo de energia
+ Melhor desempenho gráfico que em modelos Intel
+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Slot para cartão microSD de difícil acesso
- O desempenho da CPU é reduzido rapidamente sob uso intenso
- O sistema reduz o desempenho da CPU com a bateria
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- RAM soldada
- Ventilação mal posicionada
- Tempos de resposta lentos da tela

Veredicto - Um excelente subportátil com afogamento de CPU tolerável

The Lenovo ThinkPad X395 laptop review. Test device courtesy of Lenovo.
The Lenovo ThinkPad X395 laptop review. Test device courtesy of Lenovo.

O ThinkPad X390 e sua CPU Intel obtiveram 90% quando analisamos em abril, 1% a mais do que o ThinkPad X395. Isso não torna o primeiro melhor do que o último, já que passamos para um novo sistema de classificação desde abril. O ThinkPad X390 e o X395 são tão bons quanto os outros, mas ambos têm suas idiossincrasias.

Os dois dispositivos compartilham os mesmos excelentes dispositivos de entrada e excelente tela, junto com o slot para cartão microSD com posicionamento desconfortável. A Lenovo equipou ambos os dispositivos com RAM soldada e um respiradouro do ventilador no lado direito do chassi também, o qual expulsará o ar quente sobre a mão segurando o mouse se você for destro.

No entanto, o X395 oferece mais recursos de segurança do que o X390, além de desempenho gráfico significativamente melhor, além de usar menos energia sob uso intenso. Portanto, o X395 pode ficar à frente do X390 em uma comparação direta.

Dito isso, embora o X395 ofereça melhor desempenho da GPU que o X390, ele também afoga sua CPU mais fortemente sob uso intenso contínuo. A Lenovo parece ter feito isso para manter o X395 funcionando silenciosamente, de forma fria e econômica, embora à custa do desempenho da CPU. Aliás, o X395 também não possui uma porta Thunderbolt 3, que atualmente permanece como uma interface proprietária da Intel, mas possui HDMI 2.0 em vez do padrão 1.4 mais antigo.

O Lenovo ThinkPad X395 é um ótimo subportátil para escritório que revelou poucas fraquezas durante nossos testes. A máquina impulsionada por AMD é pelo menos igual à irmã Intel, mas funciona de forma mais silenciosa, fria e econômica. O X395 também tem um desempenho de GPU mais potente que o X390, o que é um bônus.

Atualmente, a Lenovo vende nossa configuração de teste por cerca de 927 Euros (~US$ 1.022), mas varejistas terceirizados poderão em breve começar a oferecer o X395 a preços mais acessíveis. No geral, recomendamos o X395 não apenas para empresas, mas também para particulares que buscam um sólido subportátil de 13,3 polegadas.

Lenovo ThinkPad X395 - 10/14/2019 v7
Christian Hintze

Acabamento
87 / 98 → 89%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
64 / 75 → 85%
Peso
72 / 20-75 → 94%
Bateria
87%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
56 / 78 → 72%
Desempenho da aplicação
77 / 85 → 91%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
97%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
37 / 85 → 44%
Médio
77%
89%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad X395: Uma luta pela hegemonia dos portáteis empresariais
Christian Hintze, 2019-10-19 (Update: 2019-10-22)