Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GT75 8RG Titan (i9-8950HK, GTX 1080, Full-HD)

Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/23/2018

Colosso de Jogos. /b> O GT75 8RG Titan marca o relançamento da MSI do seu mais poderoso e massivo portátil de 17 polegadas. O substituto de desktop inclui uma CPU hexa-core, uma tela de 120 Hz e a GPU móvel mais rápida da NVIDIA para o preço de gama alta. Vamos colocar à prova este novato em jogos com o mais difícil dos competidores.

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (GT75 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-8950HK
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1582 MHz, Memoría: 2500 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 390.94
Memória
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual Channel, 2 de 4 slots ocupados, máximo de 64 GB
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, Full-HD, G-Sync, 120 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel CM246
Disco rígido
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), 512 GB 
, NVMe SSDs & HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD @ 7,200 RPM. Drive bays: 3x M.2-2280, 1x 2.5-inch
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
6 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 conector para fones, 1 microfone, 1 linha de entrada, 1 linha de saída, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Aquantia AQtion 10Gbit Network Adapter (10/100/1000/10000MBit), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 58 x 428 x 314
Bateria
75 Wh Lítio-Ion, 8 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD (1080p, 30 fps)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes de 3 W, 1 woofer de 5 W, Teclado: Chiclet, mecânico, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 2 fontes de alimentação de 230 W, Cartão de garantia, Guia de início rápido, Dragon Center and additional manufacturer tools, Killer Performance Suite, XSplit Gamecaster, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
4.564 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.56 kg
Preço
4200 EUR

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
202 MB/s ∼100% +153%
Asus G703
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s ∼90% +128%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 202, n=180)
91.6 MB/s ∼45% +15%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼40%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼39% -1%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73.04 MB/s ∼36% -9%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
241 MB/s ∼100% +177%
Asus G703
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
240 MB/s ∼100% +176%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.9 - 257, n=179)
111 MB/s ∼46% +28%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼37% +2%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.35 MB/s ∼36% 0%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼36%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
681 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
639 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
606 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
593 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=139)
587 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
628 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
604 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
601 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 691, n=139)
517 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
506 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
264
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
240
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
224
cd/m²
240
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 271 cd/m² Médio: 248.3 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 240 cd/m²
Contraste: 1091:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.14 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 1.54
ΔE Greyscale 1.62 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
100% sRGB (Argyll) 77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.28
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080
Aorus X9 DT
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus G703
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
AU Optronics B173HW01, IPS, 1920x1080
Alienware 17 R4
TN LED, 2560x1440
Response Times
-122%
-110%
-432%
-457%
-202%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (4.4, 3.6)
18.4 (9.2, 9.2)
-130%
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
-120%
45 (18, 27)
-463%
44 (22, 22)
-450%
30 (18.8, 11.2)
-275%
Response Time Black / White *
5.6 (3.8, 1.8)
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-114%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-100%
28 (6, 22)
-400%
31.6 (16, 15.6)
-464%
12.8 (10.8, 2)
-129%
PWM Frequency
26000 (19)
Screen
11%
-33%
-31%
-19%
-60%
Brightness middle
240
280
17%
274
14%
380
58%
343
43%
402.3
68%
Brightness
248
262
6%
268
8%
362
46%
332
34%
372
50%
Brightness Distribution
83
86
4%
80
-4%
91
10%
83
0%
86
4%
Black Level *
0.22
0.22
-0%
0.29
-32%
0.37
-68%
0.35
-59%
0.62
-182%
Contrast
1091
1273
17%
945
-13%
1027
-6%
980
-10%
649
-41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.14
1.78
17%
3.99
-86%
4.12
-93%
3.35
-57%
5.6
-162%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.04
3.91
22%
7.33
-45%
8.19
-63%
5.62
-12%
9.8
-94%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.54
1.79
-16%
2.5
-62%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.62
0.74
54%
4.14
-156%
3.95
-144%
2.4
-48%
4.7
-190%
Gamma
2.28 105%
2.43 99%
2.58 93%
2.47 97%
2.35 102%
2.14 112%
CCT
6846 95%
6494 100%
7352 88%
6539 99%
6495 100%
7519 86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77
60
-22%
60
-22%
55
-29%
57
-26%
53.7
-30%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
92
-8%
92
-8%
84
-16%
88
-12%
82.2
-18%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-56% / -11%
-72% / -45%
-232% / -97%
-238% / -86%
-131% / -83%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 1.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 26000 Hz ≤ 19 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 26000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 19 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 26000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10402 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points ∼100%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
185 Points ∼90% -10%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
185 Points ∼90% -10%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
184 Points ∼90% -10%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
171 Points ∼83% -17%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
162 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 206, n=377)
149 Points ∼73% -27%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1388 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points ∼99%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
932 Points ∼67% -32%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
874 Points ∼63% -37%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
867 Points ∼62% -37%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
770 Points ∼55% -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1408, n=378)
714 Points ∼51% -48%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.33 Points ∼100%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.1 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.09 Points ∼90% -10%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.08 Points ∼89% -11%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points ∼79% -21%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.69 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.34, n=383)
1.658 Points ∼71% -29%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.13 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.05 Points ∼99%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
10.33 Points ∼68% -31%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.55 Points ∼63% -37%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.53 Points ∼63% -37%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.47 Points ∼56% -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 15.8, n=484)
7.01 Points ∼46% -53%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
15.05 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
205 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1378 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points ∼100%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6387 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5290 Points ∼81% -19%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5035 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6620, n=80)
4887 Points ∼75% -25%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
6123 Points ∼100% +6%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6055 Points ∼99% +4%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
6016 Points ∼98% +4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5801 Points ∼95%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5450 Points ∼89% -6%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5088 Points ∼83% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=278)
4863 Points ∼79% -16%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5975 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5944 Points ∼99% +4%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
5859 Points ∼98% +2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points ∼96%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5221 Points ∼87% -9%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5064 Points ∼85% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=292)
4174 Points ∼70% -27%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5720 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5801 pontos
Ajuda
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Aorus X9 DT
Transcend TS1TMTE850
Asus G703
2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Alienware 17 R4
SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
AS SSD
-41%
13%
-19%
-18%
-35%
Score Total
4066
2145
-47%
3962
-3%
2581
-37%
2862
-30%
2072
-49%
Score Write
1553
916
-41%
1519
-2%
930
-40%
1029
-34%
858
-45%
Score Read
1691
828
-51%
1633
-3%
1118
-34%
1248
-26%
831
-51%
4K Write
97.68
98.92
1%
148.44
52%
133.79
37%
116.23
19%
113.36
16%
4K Read
38.37
22.23
-42%
47.61
24%
39.52
3%
44.81
17%
35.61
-7%
Seq Write
2196.29
1018.64
-54%
2556.32
16%
1338.19
-39%
1145.25
-48%
734.8
-67%
Seq Read
3058.28
1517.93
-50%
3177.06
4%
2261.03
-26%
2352.48
-23%
1752.03
-43%
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3485 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2440 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 364.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 308.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3321 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2288 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 42.09 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 111.8 MB/s
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22566 Points ∼100% +5%
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22240 Points ∼99% +4%
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22160 Points ∼98% +3%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21846 Points ∼97% +2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21422 Points ∼95%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
20307 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=408)
10109 Points ∼45% -53%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
29109 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28918 Points ∼99%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28595 Points ∼98% -1%
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
27966 Points ∼96% -3%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
27109 Points ∼93% -6%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
26438 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=479)
11548 Points ∼40% -60%
3DMark 11 Performance
23175 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
193287 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
42660 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18738 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
78.1 fps ∼100% +2%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
77.9 fps ∼100% +1%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
77.4 fps ∼99% +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
76.8 fps ∼98%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
68.5 fps ∼88% -11%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
65 fps ∼83% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=177)
45.2 fps ∼58% -41%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 14876.8fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 11060.5fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 427418fps
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 145141fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 139121fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 120113fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32 / 34 / 37 dB
HDD
34 dB
Carga
43 / 62 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Noise
-7%
1%
3%
11%
1%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.3
6%
28.2
6%
Idle Minimum *
32
36
-13%
35
-9%
33
-3%
31.5
2%
35.6
-11%
Idle Average *
34
37
-9%
36
-6%
35
-3%
31.6
7%
35.6
-5%
Idle Maximum *
37
43
-16%
38
-3%
37
-0%
31.6
15%
35.7
4%
Load Average *
43
50
-16%
46
-7%
40
7%
36.8
14%
50.2
-17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
57
57
-0%
48
16%
48.2
15%
50.2
12%
Load Maximum *
62
61
2%
54
13%
50
19%
52.1
16%
50.2
19%

* ... smaller is better

 37 °C37 °C47 °C 
 34 °C35 °C44 °C 
 27 °C30 °C28 °C 
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 35.4 °C
53 °C36 °C44 °C
50 °C36 °C42 °C
29 °C26 °C26 °C
Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 38 °C
alimentação elétrica  49 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Heat
-2%
-13%
-5%
14%
-9%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
43
9%
55
-17%
44.2
6%
35.6
24%
49.6
-6%
Maximum Bottom *
53
55
-4%
54
-2%
43
19%
39
26%
56
-6%
Idle Upper Side *
26
27
-4%
29
-12%
32.4
-25%
24.2
7%
29.6
-14%
Idle Bottom *
27
29
-7%
32
-19%
32.8
-21%
27.4
-1%
29.2
-8%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.442.52537.237.33130384035.538.45027.136.36327.338.38027.247.310028.253.212525.154.316022.464.220023.370.42502273.931520.676.740018.877.950019.372.363018.363.780017.866.9100018.371.8125017.681.2160017.184.4200017.285.9250017.183.7315017.179.5400017.272.7500017.180.663001779.4800017.177.11000017.170.71250017.2651600016.966.4SPL29.892.7N1.394.7median 17.6MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titanmedian 72.7Delta1.96.541.441.235.834.629.827.736.933.428.727.325.832.627.443.225.947.124.645.821.753.221.958.522.663.219.867.319.170.717.968.217.764.917.66417.964.817.465.517.165.517.168.117.468.117.46917.463.817.766.817.56217.552.417.452.817.552.817.254.129.8781.344.1median 17.6Aorus X9 DTmedian 641.66.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Aorus X9 DT audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 1.8 / 2.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 31 / 35 / 45 Watt
Carga midlight 130 / 374 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
7%
11%
17%
31%
9%
Idle Minimum *
31
28
10%
26
16%
27
13%
21.6
30%
37.5
-21%
Idle Average *
35
37
-6%
30
14%
32
9%
26.4
25%
37.6
-7%
Idle Maximum *
45
40
11%
37
18%
41
9%
26.6
41%
37.6
16%
Load Average *
130
109
16%
123
5%
102
22%
95.6
26%
122.4
6%
Load Maximum *
374
353
6%
341
9%
248
34%
199.6
47%
277.4
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
268
256
4%
257
4%
221.7
17%
180.3
33%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
3h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 54min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 03min
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75 Wh
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 71 Wh
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 88.8 Wh
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Battery Runtime
17%
-14%
33%
71%
17%
Reader / Idle
225
252
12%
200
-11%
313
39%
348
55%
276
23%
H.264
174
143
-18%
204
17%
Load
63
77
22%
54
-14%
90
43%
117
86%
69
10%
WiFi v1.3
190
151
251
333
181

Pro

+ mechanical keyboard with RGB lighting
+ many upgrade and maintenance options
+ a wealth of connectivity
+ fast 120 Hz panel
+ very high performance
+ practical manufacturer tools
+ good sound
+ NVMe SSDs
+ G-Sync

Contra

- Alto ruído do ventilador em aplicativos 3D
- Ruído de bobina ocasional no modo inativo
- Duas fontes de alimentação necessárias para a CPU i9-8950HK
- A carcaça é muito grossa e pesada
- Curta duração da bateria
MSI GT75 8RG Titan, test device courtesy of MSI Deutschland.
MSI GT75 8RG Titan, test device courtesy of MSI Deutschland.

Se você aceitar o seu tamanho e peso, o MSI GT75 8RG é um substituto de desktop de alta qualidade, bem equipado e incrivelmente poderoso que lembra os clássicos PCs de torre. O GT75 tem extensas opções de manutenção e atualização e muitas conexões, entre outras coisas.

Além disso, a MSI integra uma tela de 120 Hz com alta velocidade e cores precisas e um sistema de som decente. Os dispositivos de entrada são igualmente impressionantes Um dos destaques do GT75 é seu teclado mecânico; cuja experiência de digitação está muito afrente da concorrência.

No entanto, não podemos recomendar totalmente o GT75 8RG. Como no seu predecessor, o ruído do ventilador é um verdadeiro ponto de atrito. Embora o dispositivo de 17 polegadas tenha praticamente 6 cm de espessura, os ventiladores são extremamente barulhentos sob uso intenso. Eles são tão barulhentos que você precisará usar fones de ouvido quando estiver jogando. O mesmo é verdade para o Aorus X9 DT, mas este dispositivo tem apenas 3 cm de espessura. Esse desempenho comparável mostra que o sistema de resfriamento da MSI é um pouco deficiente.

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan - 05/16/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
71 / 81 → 87%
Peso
43 / 10-66 → 59%
Bateria
67%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
100%
Desempenho da aplicação
100%
Temperatura
85 / 95 → 90%
Ruído
55 / 90 → 61%
Audio
84%
Médio
78%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

MSI GT75 8RG Titan
MSI GT75 8RG Titan
MSI GT75 8RG Titan
MSI GT75 8RG Titan
MSI GT75 8RG Titan
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GT75 8RG Titan (i9-8950HK, GTX 1080, Full-HD)
Florian Glaser, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-06- 1)