Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen X 17 (7820HK, GTX 1080, 120 Hz FHD)

A X marca o lugar. A HP libertou a besta na forma do HP Omen X 17. Com um painel de alta taxa de atualização, uma CPU Core i7 com capacidade para overclock e a GPU móvel mais poderosa atualmente no mercado, o Omen X 17 tem o "X factor" que precisa se afastar da multidão, ou é apenas ruído branco em um nível de desempenho altamente competitivo?

HP Omen X 17-ap0xx (Omen X 17 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7820HK, Quad-core, hyperthreading, 45 W TDP
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1566 MHz, Memoría: 1733 MHz, GDDR5X, Nvidia GeForce Game Ready Driver 388.73, NVIDIA Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666 / PC4-21300, 1333.3 MHz
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HW01, IPS, 120 Hz refresh, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel CM238
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, 256 GB PCIe NVMe SSD + 1 TB 7200 RPM HDD, 1157 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Microphone in, Audio out, Card Reader: SD/SDXC/SDHC Card Reader
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n/ac)
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 36.3 x 425 x 327
Bateria
99 Wh Lítio-Ion, 6-cell
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: Full HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Bang & Olufsen, 2x 2W, Teclado: Mechanical switches, beveled, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Omen Command Center, HP JumpStart, Windows Defender, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
4.867 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.238 kg
Preço
2270 USD

 

Left: Kensington lock, USB 3.1 (Gen 1) Type-A, Combo headset, dedicated mic in
Left: Kensington lock, USB 3.1 (Gen 1) Type-A, Combo headset, dedicated mic in
Right: SD Card reader, USB 3.0 (Gen 1) Type-A, DC in
Right: SD Card reader, USB 3.0 (Gen 1) Type-A, DC in
Back: Ethernet, 2x USB 3.1 (Gen 2) Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, mini-DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0 (Gen 1) Type-A
Back: Ethernet, 2x USB 3.1 (Gen 2) Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, mini-DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0 (Gen 1) Type-A
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
700 MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
682 MBit/s ∼97% +15%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
671 MBit/s ∼96% +13%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
662 MBit/s ∼95% +12%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
606 MBit/s ∼87% +2%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
593 MBit/s ∼85%
Aorus X9
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
396 MBit/s ∼57% -33%
Guru Mars K
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
389 MBit/s ∼56% -34%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
611 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
604 MBit/s ∼99%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
558 MBit/s ∼91% -8%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
551 MBit/s ∼90% -9%
Aorus X9
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
536 MBit/s ∼88% -11%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
528 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
Guru Mars K
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
406 MBit/s ∼66% -33%
348.1
cd/m²
357.5
cd/m²
339.6
cd/m²
310.6
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
297.4
cd/m²
318.4
cd/m²
349.3
cd/m²
327.6
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 357.5 cd/m² Médio: 332.4 cd/m² Minimum: 16.04 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 343 cd/m²
Contraste: 980:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.35 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 2.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
88% sRGB (Argyll) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.35
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
AU Optronics B173HW01, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 700
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Alienware 17 R4
TN LED, 17.3, 2560x1440
Eurocom Sky X4C
ID: SHP142A, Name: LQ156D1JX01B, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Guru Mars K
LGD046E, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3, 3840x2160
Aorus X9
AUO B173QTN01.3 (AUO1396), TN, 17.3, 2560x1440
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
2%
46%
10%
16%
76%
-30%
65%
18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 (22, 22)
44.8 (21.2, 23.6)
-2%
30 (18.8, 11.2)
32%
33.6 (19.6, 14)
24%
37.6 (18.8, 18.8)
15%
11.6 (6.4, 5.2)
74%
60.8 (28.8, 32)
-38%
21.6 (11.6, 10)
51%
33.2 (18.4, 14.8)
25%
Response Time Black / White *
31.6 (16, 15.6)
29.6 (15.6, 14)
6%
12.8 (10.8, 2)
59%
33.2 (21.2, 12)
-5%
26.4 (14, 12.4)
16%
6.8 (4.8, 2)
78%
38.4 (22, 16.4)
-22%
6.6 (4.6, 2)
79%
28 (15.6, 12.4)
11%
PWM Frequency
1000 (20)
133300 (95)
25000 (15)
204.9 (20)
Screen
-29%
-33%
-17%
-6%
21%
-18%
-37%
-3%
Brightness middle
343
291
-15%
402.3
17%
324.7
-5%
343
0%
274
-20%
230
-33%
346
1%
307.1
-10%
Brightness
332
277
-17%
372
12%
318
-4%
330
-1%
262
-21%
207
-38%
326
-2%
309
-7%
Brightness Distribution
83
84
1%
86
4%
81
-2%
91
10%
87
5%
83
0%
88
6%
86
4%
Black Level *
0.35
0.22
37%
0.62
-77%
0.26
26%
0.32
9%
0.26
26%
0.2
43%
0.54
-54%
0.35
-0%
Contrast
980
1323
35%
649
-34%
1249
27%
1072
9%
1054
8%
1150
17%
641
-35%
877
-11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.35
5.52
-65%
5.6
-67%
4.67
-39%
3.61
-8%
1.36
59%
5.62
-68%
5.98
-79%
3.4
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.62
10.72
-91%
9.8
-74%
8.16
-45%
8.16
-45%
4.1
27%
10.24
-82%
9.77
-74%
8.2
-46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.5
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
6.59
-175%
4.7
-96%
5.9
-146%
3.03
-26%
0.64
73%
4.54
-89%
5.47
-128%
1.4
42%
Gamma
2.35 102%
2.44 98%
2.14 112%
2.14 112%
2.41 100%
2.19 110%
2.36 102%
2.21 109%
2.19 110%
CCT
6495 100%
7816 83%
7519 86%
7176 91%
6568 99%
6551 99%
6625 98%
7721 84%
6558 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
58
2%
53.7
-6%
61.1
7%
56
-2%
77
35%
88
54%
55
-4%
55.6
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88
89
1%
82.2
-7%
96.1
9%
85
-3%
100
14%
100
14%
84
-5%
85
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-14% / -24%
7% / -20%
-4% / -13%
5% / -2%
49% / 30%
-24% / -20%
14% / -20%
8% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10415 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z: CPU
CPU-Z: CPU
CPU-Z: Caches
CPU-Z: Caches
CPU-Z: Mainboard
CPU-Z: Mainboard
CPU-Z: Memory
CPU-Z: Memory
CPU-Z: SPD
CPU-Z: SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO64
HWiNFO64
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
192 Points ∼93% +19%
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2
Intel Core i5-8600K
181 Points ∼88% +12%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
178 Points ∼86% +10%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
177 Points ∼86% +9%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
174 Points ∼84% +7%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
171 Points ∼83% +6%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
162 Points ∼79%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
160 Points ∼78% -1%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
158 Points ∼77% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼76% -4%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel Core i7-8550U
152 Points ∼74% -6%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
150 Points ∼73% -7%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼70% -11%
Alienware 13 R3 (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050 Ti)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
136 Points ∼66% -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1359 Points ∼46% +76%
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2
Intel Core i5-8600K
988 Points ∼34% +28%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
867 Points ∼29% +13%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
857 Points ∼29% +11%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
837 Points ∼28% +9%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
771 Points ∼26% 0%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
770 Points ∼26%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
758 Points ∼26% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points ∼25% -5%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points ∼25% -5%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
673 Points ∼23% -13%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
669 Points ∼23% -13%
Alienware 13 R3 (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050 Ti)
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
512 Points ∼17% -34%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel Core i7-8550U
489 Points ∼17% -36%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.16 Points ∼92% +17%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
2.02 Points ∼86% +10%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
2.01 Points ∼86% +9%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.97 Points ∼84% +7%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points ∼79%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼78% -1%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points ∼77% -2%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points ∼77% -2%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼77% -2%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.76 Points ∼75% -4%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.69 Points ∼72% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
14.98 Points ∼63% +77%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.53 Points ∼40% +13%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
9.52 Points ∼40% +12%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.19 Points ∼38% +9%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.47 Points ∼35%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.39 Points ∼35% -1%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.34 Points ∼35% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.13 Points ∼34% -4%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.06 Points ∼34% -5%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
7.24 Points ∼30% -15%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel Core i7-8550U
5.35 Points ∼22% -37%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7243 Points ∼67% +19%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6566 Points ∼61% +8%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
6531 Points ∼60% +8%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6062 Points ∼56%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5860 Points ∼54% -3%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
38810 Points ∼78% +68%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
26081 Points ∼52% +13%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
23052 Points ∼46%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22243 Points ∼45% -4%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
21455 Points ∼43% -7%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel Core i7-8550U
435 s * ∼5% -102%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
215.4 s * ∼3%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
211.05 s * ∼2% +2%
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2
Intel Core i5-8600K
188.756 s * ∼2% +12%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
179.449 s * ∼2% +17%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
120.923 s * ∼1% +44%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel Core i7-8550U
601 Seconds * ∼3% -10%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
545.92 Seconds * ∼2%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
539.478 Seconds * ∼2% +1%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
505.9 Seconds * ∼2% +7%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
490.548 Seconds * ∼2% +10%
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2
Intel Core i5-8600K
488.9 Seconds * ∼2% +10%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
465.128 Seconds * ∼2% +15%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11481
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
23052
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6062
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
75.05 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.84 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
162 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
116.5 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
770 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
6015 Points ∼92% +10%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5450 Points ∼84%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5444 Points ∼84% 0%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5358 Points ∼82% -2%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5240 Points ∼80% -4%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼80% -4%
Eurocom Sky X4C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
5181 Points ∼80% -5%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5088 Points ∼78% -7%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
2486 Points ∼38% -54%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X4C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
9222 Points ∼97% +11%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
8306 Points ∼87%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
8272 Points ∼87% 0%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
7653 Points ∼80% -8%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5847 Points ∼96% +12%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5237 Points ∼86% 0%
Eurocom Sky X4C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
5225 Points ∼86% 0%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5221 Points ∼86%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5160 Points ∼85% -1%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5064 Points ∼83% -3%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5020 Points ∼82% -4%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5009 Points ∼82% -4%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
4531 Points ∼74% -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5221 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
8306 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5450 pontos
Ajuda
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Predator Triton 700
2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
Alienware 17 R4
SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
Eurocom Sky X4C
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro 2017
2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Aorus X9
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
AS SSD
9%
-41%
33%
24%
-12%
27%
14%
Copy Game MB/s
982.69
573.6
-42%
1054.98
7%
718.5
-27%
Copy Program MB/s
492.06
446.13
-9%
467.16
-5%
383.33
-22%
Copy ISO MB/s
1834.1
1227.03
-33%
1908.08
4%
1794.95
-2%
Score Total
2862
3282
15%
2072
-28%
4615
61%
3392
19%
2715
-5%
3753
31%
3995
40%
Score Write
1029
1243
21%
858
-17%
1703
66%
1289
25%
676
-34%
1478
44%
1293
26%
Score Read
1248
1350
8%
831
-33%
1945
56%
1412
13%
1414
13%
1534
23%
1818
46%
Access Time Write *
0.032
0.041
-28%
0.123
-284%
0.03
6%
0.029
9%
0.036
-13%
0.028
12%
0.032
-0%
Access Time Read *
0.05
0.062
-24%
0.042
16%
0.032
36%
0.041
18%
0.051
-2%
0.039
22%
0.047
6%
4K-64 Write
798.39
913.1
14%
671.01
-16%
1374.74
72%
924.67
16%
512.87
-36%
1175.9
47%
1034.83
30%
4K-64 Read
967.46
1056.86
9%
620.48
-36%
1645.75
70%
1047.94
8%
1116.21
15%
1213.85
25%
1526.85
58%
4K Write
116.23
92.99
-20%
113.36
-2%
129.64
12%
128.75
11%
104.44
-10%
134.28
16%
117.29
1%
4K Read
44.81
41.47
-7%
35.61
-21%
44.83
0%
50.12
12%
37.57
-16%
50.63
13%
50.15
12%
Seq Write
1145.25
2371.95
107%
734.8
-36%
1988.74
74%
2352.3
105%
587.97
-49%
1677.74
46%
1409.1
23%
Seq Read
2352.48
2517.2
7%
1752.03
-26%
2541.23
8%
3136.95
33%
2599.35
10%
2694.9
15%
2412.19
3%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3450 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1210 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 535 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 444 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1461 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1216 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.64 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 148.8 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
i9-7900X Asus X299 Prime
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 7900X
15444 Points ∼88% +54%
Eurocom Sky X4C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K
13928 Points ∼79% +39%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
11623 Points ∼66% +16%
Guru Mars K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
10459 Points ∼60% +4%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
10349 Points ∼59% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
10129 Points ∼58% +1%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
10020 Points ∼57%
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
9929 Points ∼56% -1%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
9878 Points ∼56% -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q (Nvidia Reference GX501)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
9148 Points ∼52% -9%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
9075 Points ∼52% -9%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
9065 Points ∼52% -10%
MSI GP72MVR 7RFX Leopard Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8738 Points ∼50% -13%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
7573 Points ∼43% -24%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
41469 Points ∼81% +53%
i9-7900X Asus X299 Prime
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 7900X
38335 Points ∼75% +41%
Guru Mars K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
29615 Points ∼58% +9%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
29443 Points ∼58% +9%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
29109 Points ∼57% +7%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
27109 Points ∼53%
Eurocom Sky X4C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K
26912 Points ∼53% -1%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
26438 Points ∼52% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
24868 Points ∼49% -8%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
23694 Points ∼46% -13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q (Nvidia Reference GX501)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
21816 Points ∼43% -20%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
20240 Points ∼40% -25%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18205 Points ∼36% -33%
MSI GP72MVR 7RFX Leopard Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
14958 Points ∼29% -45%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
32640 Points ∼80% +61%
i9-7900X Asus X299 Prime
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 7900X
27582 Points ∼68% +36%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
21846 Points ∼54% +8%
Guru Mars K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
21778 Points ∼54% +7%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
21366 Points ∼53% +5%
Eurocom Sky X4C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K
20909 Points ∼51% +3%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
20307 Points ∼50%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
20268 Points ∼50% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
18879 Points ∼46% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18120 Points ∼45% -11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q (Nvidia Reference GX501)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
17151 Points ∼42% -16%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
16165 Points ∼40% -20%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
14394 Points ∼35% -29%
MSI GP72MVR 7RFX Leopard Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11780 Points ∼29% -42%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
10715 Points ∼26% -47%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
152370 Points ∼83% +72%
Guru Mars K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
134669 Points ∼73% +52%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
132575 Points ∼72% +50%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
130202 Points ∼71% +47%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
129042 Points ∼70% +46%
Eurocom Sky X4C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K
124077 Points ∼67% +40%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
115579 Points ∼63% +31%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
107807 Points ∼58% +22%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
107110 Points ∼58% +21%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
95118 Points ∼52% +8%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
88432 Points ∼48%
MSI GP72MVR 7RFX Leopard Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
82368 Points ∼45% -7%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
48409 Points ∼26% -45%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K
390417 Points ∼53% +109%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
349270 Points ∼48% +87%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
244900 Points ∼34% +31%
MSI GP72MVR 7RFX Leopard Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
205498 Points ∼28% +10%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
191265 Points ∼26% +3%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
186545 Points ∼26%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
57405 Points ∼8% -69%
3DMark 06 Standard
30283 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
18904 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
123400 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
27204 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15409 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
8786 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6145 pontos
Ajuda
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Eurocom Sky X4C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
181.2 fps ∼68% +20%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
181 fps ∼68% +20%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
162.9 fps ∼61% +8%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
151 fps ∼57%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
131.6 fps ∼50% -13%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
109.6 fps ∼41% -27%
MSI GP72MVR 7RFX Leopard Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
106.7 fps ∼40% -29%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
86.71 fps ∼33% -43%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
118.3 fps ∼73% +9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q (Nvidia Reference GX501)
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
114.2 fps ∼71% +5%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
112 (min: 105, max: 124) fps ∼70% +3%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
112 (min: 105) fps ∼70% +3%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
112 fps ∼70% +3%
Eurocom Sky X4C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
111.7 fps ∼69% +2%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
109 fps ∼68%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
85.9 fps ∼53% -21%
Resident Evil 7 - 1920x1080 Very High / On AA:FXAA+T
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
163 fps ∼53%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
152 fps ∼49% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
142 fps ∼46% -13%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
123 fps ∼40% -25%
Rocket League - 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
240 fps ∼96% +3%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
239 fps ∼96% +3%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
233 fps ∼93%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
230 fps ∼92% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
228 fps ∼91% -2%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
219 fps ∼88% -6%
Ark Survival Evolved - 1920x1080 Epic Preset (100 % Resolution Scale)
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
53 fps ∼83%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
44.7 fps ∼70%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
39.6 fps ∼62%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
38.6 fps ∼61%
Hitman 2016 - 1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:SM AF:16x
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q (Nvidia Reference GX501)
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
105.3 fps ∼100% +39%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
78 (min: 61, max: 96) fps ∼74% +3%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
76 fps ∼72%
Assassin´s Creed Origins - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
44 fps ∼51%
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
97 (min: 71, max: 110) fps ∼88% +5%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
93.4 fps ∼85% +2%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
93.3 fps ∼85% +1%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
92 fps ∼84%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
90.1 fps ∼82% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
84.4 fps ∼77% -8%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
81.8 fps ∼74% -11%
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
147 (min: 132, max: 155) fps ∼93%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
129 fps ∼82%
Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
196 (min: 164, max: 231) fps ∼65% +5%
Eurocom Sky X4C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
195.6 fps ∼65% +5%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
188 fps ∼63% +1%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
187 fps ∼62%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
81.3 fps ∼27% -57%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
99.9 fps ∼87% +54%
i9-7900X Asus X299 Prime
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 7900X
97 (min: 80, max: 112) fps ∼84% +49%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
78.1 fps ∼68% +20%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
76.4 (min: 64, max: 85) fps ∼66% +18%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
75.9 fps ∼66% +17%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
75.9 fps ∼66% +17%
Eurocom Sky X4C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
75.3 fps ∼65% +16%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
65 fps ∼57%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
64.9 fps ∼56% 0%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
62.9 fps ∼55% -3%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
51 fps ∼44% -22%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
50.2 fps ∼44% -23%
MSI GP72MVR 7RFX Leopard Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
37.8 fps ∼33% -42%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 151fps
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 67fps
Thief (2014) 111fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 65fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 136fps
Just Cause 3 (2015) 127fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 109fps
Hitman 2016 (2016) 76fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 64fps
Overwatch (2016) 187fps
No Man's Sky (2016) 95fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 52fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 66fps
Civilization VI (2016) 83fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 163fps
Rocket League (2017) 233fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 92fps
F1 2017 (2017) 108fps

Barulho

Ocioso
31.5 / 31.6 / 31.6 dB
Carga
36.8 / 52.1 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
Eurocom Sky X4C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
Noise
-6%
-11%
-1%
-13%
-13%
-6%
-19%
7%
off / environment *
28.3
31
-10%
28.2
-0%
28.6
-1%
29
-2%
30
-6%
30
-6%
30
-6%
28.5
-1%
Idle Minimum *
31.5
33
-5%
35.6
-13%
28.6
9%
36
-14%
33
-5%
30
5%
35
-11%
28.5
10%
Idle Average *
31.6
34
-8%
35.6
-13%
28.6
9%
37
-17%
34
-8%
31
2%
37
-17%
28.5
10%
Idle Maximum *
31.6
40
-27%
35.7
-13%
31.1
2%
40
-27%
38
-20%
33
-4%
43
-36%
30.1
5%
Load Average *
36.8
41
-11%
50.2
-36%
42.2
-15%
45
-22%
44
-20%
43
-17%
49
-33%
35.2
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48.2
43
11%
50.2
-4%
53.8
-12%
50
-4%
56
-16%
55
-14%
56
-16%
41.7
13%
Load Maximum *
52.1
48
8%
50.2
4%
50
4%
55
-6%
62
-19%
58
-11%
60
-15%
48.8
6%

* ... smaller is better

 35.6 °C33.6 °C26.2 °C 
 24 °C26 °C26.4 °C 
 22.4 °C21.6 °C22.4 °C 
Máximo: 35.6 °C
Médio: 26.5 °C
37.8 °C32.4 °C34.2 °C
27.2 °C39 °C23.8 °C
19.2 °C20.4 °C19 °C
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 28.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
Eurocom Sky X4C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
Heat
-46%
-28%
-22%
-23%
-36%
-41%
-31%
-22%
Maximum Upper Side *
35.6
61
-71%
49.6
-39%
43.8
-23%
46
-29%
46
-29%
53
-49%
47
-32%
54.4
-53%
Maximum Bottom *
39
69
-77%
56
-44%
49.6
-27%
46
-18%
57
-46%
53
-36%
62
-59%
41.2
-6%
Idle Upper Side *
24.2
29
-20%
29.6
-22%
29.4
-21%
32
-32%
34
-40%
35
-45%
30
-24%
31.2
-29%
Idle Bottom *
27.4
32
-17%
29.2
-7%
31.8
-16%
31
-13%
35
-28%
37
-35%
30
-9%
27.6
-1%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.737.22533.530.93133.831.54032.331.65031.632.86332.530.58029.33010029.530.312527.63416027.441.520026.545.425025.748.531525.851.240024.951.350024.551.763024.760.880025.164.410002463.9125023.760160024.259.9200023.660.4250023.362.3315023.459.9400023.464.6500023.661630023.559.5800023.265.71000023.261.51250023.258.5160002453.2SPL3673.8N2.633.2median 24HP Omen X 17-ap0xxmedian 59.9Delta1.5640.253.133.156.829.258.330.657.727.557.925.559.626.56125.762.323.764.123.167.52273.822.276.720.379.318.681.218.277.517.476.217.279.217.180.417.283.217.486.517.388.817.39017.388.217.288.417.386.817.581.517.277.717.77717.873.417.270.429.797.91.3130.6median 17.4MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Promedian 79.21.85.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (98 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.09 / 0.95 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 21.6 / 26.4 / 26.6 Watt
Carga midlight 95.6 / 199.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Predator Triton 700
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
Eurocom Sky X4C
8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Guru Mars K
7700, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0), TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro 2017
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3
Aorus X9
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, TN, 2560x1440, 17.3
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-15%
-34%
-23%
-41%
-48%
-30%
-45%
21%
Idle Minimum *
21.6
28
-30%
37.5
-74%
30.2
-40%
31
-44%
34
-57%
31
-44%
29
-34%
19.1
12%
Idle Average *
26.4
33
-25%
37.6
-42%
34.7
-31%
37
-40%
41
-55%
36
-36%
35
-33%
20.8
21%
Idle Maximum *
26.6
41
-54%
37.6
-41%
37.8
-42%
44
-65%
50
-88%
44
-65%
42
-58%
21.8
18%
Load Average *
95.6
94
2%
122.4
-28%
130.3
-36%
116
-21%
106
-11%
107
-12%
140
-46%
73.7
23%
Load Maximum *
199.6
222
-11%
277.4
-39%
217.7
-9%
312
-56%
320
-60%
258
-29%
334
-67%
173.1
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
221.7
160
28%
180.3
19%
172.2
22%
259
-17%
257
-16%
212
4%
295
-33%
130.2
41%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
5h 48min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 33min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 57min
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 700
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 54 Wh
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Eurocom Sky X4C
8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Guru Mars K
7700, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 82 Wh
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 2017
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Aorus X9
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh
Battery Runtime
-51%
-36%
-44%
-26%
-50%
-33%
-50%
-49%
Reader / Idle
348
150
-57%
276
-21%
182
-48%
200
-43%
182
-48%
253
-27%
174
-50%
229
-34%
WiFi v1.3
333
144
-57%
181
-46%
156
-53%
144
-57%
197
-41%
134
-60%
147
-56%
Load
117
70
-40%
69
-41%
81
-31%
107
-9%
65
-44%
81
-31%
71
-39%
49
-58%

Pro

+ Excelente sensação do teclado graças ao sistema mecânico
+ Tela G-Sync de 120 Hz com movimento e experiência de jogos muito fluente
+ Chassi bem construído
+ Boas opções de manutenção
+ O chassi permanece frio durante os jogos
+ Bom desempenho de jogos
+ Excelente duração da bateria (para um portátil de jogos)
+ Muitas opções de iluminação RGB
+ Precisão aceitável das cores de fábrica

Contra

- Robusto e pesado
- Fonte de alimentação desconfortável
- As ventoinhas emitem um ruído de frequência alta irritante
- Os componente internos (especialmente a CPU) esquenta durante os jogos/sob uso intenso
- Taxas de transferência regulares do cartão SD
- Capacidade limitada de overclock
- O som dos alto-falantes é fino e anêmico
- Layout das portas não ideal
- As dobradiças se balançam sob uso normal e se estendem somente até 110 graus
In review: HP Omen X 17 (7820HK, GTX 1080, 120 Hz FHD). Review unit courtesy of CUKUSA.com. Use code NBC10 for $10 off
In review: HP Omen X 17 (7820HK, GTX 1080, 120 Hz FHD). Review unit courtesy of CUKUSA.com. Use code NBC10 for $10 off

A HP acertou em cheio com o Omen X 17. A marca Omen evoluiu de estar em uma obscuridade para um grande concorrente de jogos em poucos anos, e o X 17 é o pináculo da linha até agora. Há várias coisas que o Omen X 17 faz certo, mas também há algumas que ficam aquém do alvo.

O teclado mecânico é excelente e uma das melhores implementações que já vimos em um portátil até agora. O deslocamento das teclas a e a resistência estão muito bem definidas, e enquanto os veteranos digitadores de portátil podem precisar de algum tempo para se acostumar com a forma de tecla chanfrada, muitos gostarão do teclado. Os modos de iluminação RGB são divertidos para brincar e adicionam um toque agradável ao chassi, de outra forma, incolor. Esse chassi é sólido, rígido e se sente como um tanque premium que suportará o teste do tempo. A bateria 99 Wh tem uma boa duração considerando a concorrência. Enquanto a maioria dos portáteis de jogos tem sorte de durar 2 horas, o tempo de duração de mais de 5 horas do Omen X permite que usuários possam trabalhar na estrada (quando necessário). 

A tela de 120 Hz G-Sync é uma grande vantagem. Juntamente com os componentes internos poderosos, a tela permite uma jogabilidade suave e fluente. Jogadores e entusiastas competitivos encontrarão que a taxa de atualização de 120 Hz aumenta sua experiência de jogo para o próximo nível, tanto que voltar a um painel padrão de 60 Hz pode ser difícil. O excelente sistema de resfriamento também mantém o corpo do portátil perfeitamente confortável durante essas longas sessões de jogo. 

Infelizmente, o Omen X sofre dos mesmos males que outros portáteis de jogos de gama alta. O dispositivo é maciço, e sua fonte de alimentação é quase ridiculamente grande. Isso torna o Omen X 17 mais de um "substituto de desktop" do que um portátil; O Omen X 17 é uma máquina que provavelmente passará a maior parte do tempo em uma mesa do que na estrada. A CPU com capacidade de overclock é uma bela opção, mas o overclocking é limitado pelo pobre desempenho térmico da CPU quando está sob uso intenso. Não tem muito sentido gastar dinheiro extra em uma CPU com overclock se não pode usar esse recurso, mas lembre-se que nem todas as CPUs têm o mesmo nível. Outros usuários podem ter mais sorte.

Tendo dito isso, o HP Omen X 17 é um tipo de portátil de jogos "Poli funcional" que marca quase todas as caixas de verificação neste lado do mercado. O desempenho dos jogos não é o melhor na sua classe, mas deve ser bom o suficiente. Considere a tela com taxa de atualização alta, o chassi bem construído que permanece frio sob pressão, e o excelente teclado, e o Omen X 17 deve ser considerado um dos pacotes mais completos no mercado, hoje em dia.

HP Omen X 17-ap0xx - 02/12/2018 v6
Sam Medley

Acabamento
88 / 98 → 90%
Teclado
88%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
64 / 81 → 79%
Peso
39 / 10-66 → 52%
Bateria
85%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
97%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
94 / 95 → 99%
Ruído
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
64%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Médio
78%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen X 17 (7820HK, GTX 1080, 120 Hz FHD)
Sam Medley, 2018-02-21 (Update: 2018-03- 7)