Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Chimera G703 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1080, Full HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus G703 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus G703 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 274 cd/m²
Contraste: 945:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.79
ΔE Greyscale 4.14 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.58
| Asus G703 AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 1920x1080 | Alienware 17 R4 TN LED, 2560x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 30% | -5% | 25% | -9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.5 | 86.4 32% | 66 1% | 90.3 38% | 61.2 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.4 | 100 8% | 83.7 -9% | 99.6 8% | 82.9 -10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.6 | 99.1 49% | 61.2 -8% | 86.8 30% | 60.5 -9% |
| Response Times | -136% | -153% | 37% | -42% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 17.6 ? | 44 ? -150% | 45 ? -156% | 11.6 ? 34% | 30 ? -70% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 24.8 ? -121% | 28 ? -150% | 6.8 ? 39% | 12.8 ? -14% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | ||||
| Screen | 15% | 4% | 26% | -16% | |
| Brightness middle | 274 | 332 21% | 380 39% | 274 0% | 402.3 47% |
| Brightness | 268 | 313 17% | 362 35% | 262 -2% | 372 39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 88 10% | 91 14% | 87 9% | 86 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.28 3% | 0.37 -28% | 0.26 10% | 0.62 -114% |
| Contrast | 945 | 1186 26% | 1027 9% | 1054 12% | 649 -31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.99 | 3.86 3% | 4.12 -3% | 1.36 66% | 5.6 -40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.33 | 5.88 20% | 8.19 -12% | 4.1 44% | 9.8 -34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.79 | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.14 | 4.33 -5% | 3.95 5% | 0.64 85% | 4.7 -14% |
| Gamma | 2.58 85% | 2.41 91% | 2.47 89% | 2.19 100% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 7352 88% | 6595 99% | 6539 99% | 6551 99% | 7519 86% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 88 47% | 55 -8% | 77 28% | 53.7 -10% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 100 9% | 84 -9% | 100 9% | 82.2 -11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-2% | -51% /
-19% | 29% /
27% | -22% /
-18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5944 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6016 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5035 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus G703 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0) | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0) | Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB | Average 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -7% | -30% | -9% | -44% | 0% | |
| Seq Read | 3177 | 2533 -20% | 2261 -29% | 3137 -1% | 1752 -45% | 3177 ? 0% |
| Seq Write | 2556 | 1771 -31% | 1338 -48% | 2352 -8% | 735 -71% | 2556 ? 0% |
| 4K Read | 47.61 | 43.65 -8% | 39.52 -17% | 50.1 5% | 35.61 -25% | 47.6 ? 0% |
| 4K Write | 148.4 | 139.5 -6% | 133.8 -10% | 128.8 -13% | 113.4 -24% | 148.4 ? 0% |
| Score Read | 1633 | 1716 5% | 1118 -32% | 1412 -14% | 831 -49% | 1633 ? 0% |
| Score Write | 1519 | 1615 6% | 930 -39% | 1289 -15% | 858 -44% | 1519 ? 0% |
| Score Total | 3962 | 4173 5% | 2581 -35% | 3392 -14% | 2072 -48% | 3962 ? 0% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 21293 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35865 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17502 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Asus G703 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile (61.7 - 78.1, n=23) | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 148 | 77.9 | ||
| FIFA 18 (2017) | 357 | 348 | ||
| The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 78.3 | 76.1 | ||
| ELEX (2017) | 119 | 104 | ||
| Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) | 145 | 125 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 98 | 83 | ||
| Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 160 | 136 | ||
| Need for Speed Payback (2017) | 144 | 135 | ||
| Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 147 | 124 | ||
| Fortnite (2018) | 216 | 159 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 80 | |||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 100 | 76.4 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 35 / 36 / 38 dB |
| Carga |
| 46 / 54 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 5% | -2% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.2 6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 35 | 34 3% | 33 6% | 33 6% | 35.6 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 36 | 35 3% | 35 3% | 34 6% | 35.6 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 40 -5% | 37 3% | 38 -0% | 35.7 6% |
| Load Average * | 46 | 45 2% | 40 13% | 44 4% | 50.2 -9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 52 -8% | 56 -17% | 50.2 -5% | |
| Load Maximum * | 54 | 60 -11% | 50 7% | 62 -15% | 50.2 7% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
| Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 6% | 6% | -4% | 3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 55 | 41 25% | 44.2 20% | 46 16% | 49.6 10% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 54 | 48 11% | 43 20% | 57 -6% | 56 -4% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 30 -3% | 32.4 -12% | 34 -17% | 29.6 -2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 32 | 35 -9% | 32.8 -3% | 35 -9% | 29.2 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus G703 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.8 / 1.9 Watt |
| Ocioso | 26 / 30 / 37 Watt |
| Carga |
123 / 341 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | 4% | -14% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 26 | 32 -23% | 27 -4% | 34 -31% | 37.5 -44% |
| Idle Average * | 30 | 38 -27% | 32 -7% | 41 -37% | 37.6 -25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 37 | 45 -22% | 41 -11% | 50 -35% | 37.6 -2% |
| Load Average * | 123 | 96 22% | 102 17% | 106 14% | 122.4 -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 257 | 237 8% | 257 -0% | 180.3 30% | |
| Load Maximum * | 341 | 331 3% | 248 27% | 320 6% | 277.4 19% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 71 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700, 82 Wh | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 88.8 Wh | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 75 Wh | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | 58% | 2% | 29% | 138% | |
| Reader / Idle | 200 | 164 -18% | 313 57% | 182 -9% | 276 38% | 544 ? 172% |
| H.264 | 143 | 148 3% | 204 43% | 148 3% | 399 ? 179% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 151 | 142 -6% | 251 66% | 144 -5% | 181 20% | 368 ? 144% |
| Load | 54 | 70 30% | 90 67% | 65 20% | 69 28% | 84.2 ? 56% |
Pro
Contra
No que diz respeito aos substitutos de desktop poderosos, o ROG Chimera G703 pode ocupar um lugar no pódio dos vencedores sem qualquer problema.
A Asus montou um pacote bem sucedido aqui, que não permite erros maiores. Não só lembremos positivamente os dispositivos de entrada de primeira categoria (teclado, incluindo iluminação RGB), mas também as muitas conexões (como o Thunderbolt 3). A tela e a qualidade do som também sabem como convencer. Particularmente, a tela IPS com sua combinação de 144 Hz e G-Sync representa um argumento real para compra.
O desempenho também está além de qualquer reprovação. Para justificar o alto preço de compra, a Asus equipou o aparelho de 17 polegadas com uma abundância de componentes de gama alta, seja ele o GeForce GTX 1080 ou o Core i7-7820HK, que podem oferecer o seu maior desempenho graças ao overclocking. Também vale a pena notar o SSD-RAID e a quantidade de RAM.
Do lado negativo, temos que mencionar o seu alto peso, o design grosso, a baixa duração da bateria e o ruído de fundo na operação 3D (pelo menos quando a função OC está ativa) do G703.
Apesar dessas fraquezas, o ROG Chimera vai pousar em um lugar muito alto em nossa lista Top 10 de Portáteis para Jogos.
Asus G703
-
02/27/2018 v6(old)
Florian Glaser
Pricecompare
