Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil MSI P65 Creator 8RF (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, 512 GB SSD, 144 Hz)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 238 cd/m²
Contraste: 1068:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.88
ΔE Greyscale 2.32 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus GL504GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE B156ZAN03.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 31% | -0% | 0% | 2% | 31% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.1 | 85.9 32% | 63.6 -2% | 66.4 2% | 66.2 2% | 86.3 33% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.1 | 100 10% | 93.8 3% | 90.2 -1% | 92.1 1% | 100 10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.9 | 99.1 50% | 64.9 -2% | 66 0% | 67.2 2% | 99.4 51% |
| Response Times | -141% | -4% | 38% | -13% | -238% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16 ? | 44 ? -175% | 16.8 ? -5% | 7.2 ? 55% | 17.6 ? -10% | 61.6 ? -285% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11 ? | 22.8 ? -107% | 11.2 ? -2% | 8.8 ? 20% | 12.8 ? -16% | 32 ? -191% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -2% | 18% | 3% | 13% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 235 | 357.6 52% | 313 33% | 271 15% | 254 8% | 396 69% |
| Brightness | 235 | 350 49% | 300 28% | 261 11% | 262 11% | 380 62% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 85 0% | 78 -8% | 86 1% | 89 5% | 90 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.35 -59% | 0.33 -50% | 0.32 -45% | 0.22 -0% | 0.28 -27% |
| Contrast | 1068 | 1022 -4% | 948 -11% | 847 -21% | 1155 8% | 1414 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.82 | 4.12 -46% | 1.29 54% | 2.61 7% | 2.37 16% | 4 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.82 | 9.91 -106% | 2.04 58% | 4.93 -2% | 4.71 2% | 7.6 -58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.88 | 4.23 13% | 2.33 52% | 1.84 62% | 0.9 82% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.32 | 1.8 22% | 0.69 70% | 1.97 15% | 1.58 32% | 6.1 -163% |
| Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.17 101% | 2.43 91% | 2.4 92% | 2.48 89% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6310 103% | 6613 98% | 6550 99% | 6398 102% | 6785 96% | 7786 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 87.5 48% | 60 2% | 59 0% | 60 2% | 88.5 50% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 100 9% | 94 2% | 90 -2% | 92 0% | 100 9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -37% /
-13% | 5% /
11% | 14% /
7% | 1% /
8% | -68% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (7.56 - 9.55, n=5) | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (396 - 486, n=6) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=94, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4446 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5264 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5651 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4910 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus GL504GS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 33% | 21% | 42% | 35% | 71% | |
| Write 4K | 89.2 | 125 40% | 94.4 6% | 97.9 10% | 95.3 7% | 123.7 39% |
| Read 4K | 34.36 | 44.68 30% | 37.65 10% | 41.23 20% | 40.13 17% | 44.07 28% |
| Write Seq | 949 | 1059 12% | 1335 41% | 1852 95% | 1883 98% | 2215 133% |
| Read Seq | 899 | 772 -14% | 1404 56% | 1761 96% | 1322 47% | 2242 149% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 371.4 | 507 37% | 268.6 -28% | 297.7 -20% | 309.9 -17% | 313.9 -15% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 399 | 614 54% | 332.8 -17% | 344.2 -14% | 353.7 -11% | 359.8 -10% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1035 | 1763 70% | 1375 33% | 1864 80% | 1919 85% | 2404 132% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1603 | 2171 35% | 2627 64% | 2738 71% | 2466 54% | 3333 108% |
| AS SSD | 72% | 19% | 83% | 72% | 123% | |
| Seq Read | 850 | 2099 147% | 2213 160% | 1837 116% | 1266 49% | 2703 218% |
| Seq Write | 869 | 1729 99% | 1163 34% | 1730 99% | 1834 111% | 2336 169% |
| 4K Read | 36.43 | 37.78 4% | 23.36 -36% | 53.3 46% | 48.94 34% | 56.8 56% |
| 4K Write | 84.4 | 100.9 20% | 80.4 -5% | 105.7 25% | 107.2 27% | 130.9 55% |
| 4K-64 Read | 839 | 1431 71% | 847 1% | 1305 56% | 1170 39% | 1805 115% |
| 4K-64 Write | 602 | 1273 111% | 742 23% | 1704 183% | 1760 192% | 1782 196% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.104 | 0.04 62% | 0.119 -14% | 0.049 53% | 0.073 30% | 0.034 67% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.044 | 0.036 18% | 0.046 -5% | 0.035 20% | 0.035 20% | 0.028 36% |
| Score Read | 960 | 1679 75% | 1092 14% | 1542 61% | 1346 40% | 2132 122% |
| Score Write | 773 | 1547 100% | 939 21% | 1983 157% | 2051 165% | 2147 178% |
| Score Total | 2233 | 4065 82% | 2536 14% | 4318 93% | 4122 85% | 5355 140% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 53% /
55% | 20% /
20% | 63% /
66% | 54% /
56% | 97% /
101% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 33475 pontos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 44090 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 14492 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 80916 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29275 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12573 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 6589 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4763 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (46 - 55.3, n=19) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| MSI WS63 7RF-290US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (32 - 153, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (58 - 61, n=3) | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE | |
| F1 2018 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (70 - 76, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE | |
| Forza Horizon 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (78 - 80, n=2) | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 249.1 | 222.1 | 204.7 | 118 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 218.5 | 156.7 | 93.2 | 51.5 | 27.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 131.1 | 126.7 | 85.7 | 77.1 | 32.1 |
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 123.2 | 105.5 | 91.5 | 90.7 | 39.1 |
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 70 | 64 | 62 | 53 | 26 |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 103 | 81 | 77 | 74 | 27 |
| F1 2018 (2018) | 163 | 130 | 100 | 76 | 59 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 91 | 65 | 62 | 58 | 20 |
| Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 127 | 101 | 95 | 78 | 43 |
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 64 | 62 | 52 | 39 | 21 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32.1 / 32.1 / 32.4 dB |
| Carga |
| 39 / 40.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A) | ||
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus GL504GS Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI WS63 7RF-290US Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 6% | -9% | -13% | -2% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 30.7 | 28 9% | 28.8 6% | 29 6% | 29 6% | 30 2% | 28.1 8% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32.1 | 28.6 11% | 28.8 10% | 30 7% | 32 -0% | 30 7% | 28.1 12% |
| Idle Average * | 32.1 | 29.9 7% | 28.8 10% | 31 3% | 33 -3% | 31 3% | 28.1 12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.4 | 30.5 6% | 31.3 3% | 35 -8% | 40 -23% | 34 -5% | 32 1% |
| Load Average * | 39 | 42.5 -9% | 36.4 7% | 49 -26% | 49 -26% | 43 -10% | 38 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 40.2 | 44.8 -11% | 39.2 2% | 54 -34% | 53 -32% | 44 -9% | 47.2 -17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.8 | 36.4 | 51 | 51 | 42 | 35.8 |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.6 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107.1 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-12.9 °C / -23.3 F).
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI WS63 7RF-290US Quadro P3000, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | 7% | -6% | -17% | 3% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46.6 | 42.4 9% | 45.4 3% | 53 -14% | 55 -18% | 49 -5% | 46.4 -0% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 56.6 | 50.8 10% | 53.4 6% | 65 -15% | 55 3% | 63 -11% | 62 -10% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.8 | 33 -15% | 26.3 9% | 26 10% | 36 -25% | 24 17% | 28.2 2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.5 | 35.2 -24% | 26.2 8% | 30 -5% | 36 -26% | 25 12% | 28.8 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 1.35 / 1.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7.4 / 11.7 / 16.8 Watt |
| Carga |
94 / 177 Watt |
   
| |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus GL504GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI WS63 7RF-290US i7-7700HQ, Quadro P3000, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -24% | 2% | -34% | -124% | -3% | -6% | -23% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.4 | 11.7 -58% | 7.6 -3% | 14 -89% | 29 -292% | 7 5% | 11 -49% | 11.4 ? -54% | 7.32 ? 1% |
| Idle Average * | 11.7 | 18.5 -58% | 14.8 -26% | 18 -54% | 32 -174% | 11 6% | 14.2 -21% | 15.7 ? -34% | 11.8 ? -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 16.8 | 22.8 -36% | 17.6 -5% | 22 -31% | 38 -126% | 20 -19% | 14.6 13% | 20.7 ? -23% | 14.6 ? 13% |
| Load Average * | 94 | 97.5 -4% | 86 9% | 91 3% | 100 -6% | 98 -4% | 77.7 17% | 98.1 ? -4% | 77.9 ? 17% |
| Load Maximum * | 177 | 111.1 37% | 118.9 33% | 173 2% | 217 -23% | 182 -3% | 161.7 9% | 173.8 ? 2% | 120.8 ? 32% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 102.9 | 85 | 142 | 170 | 132 | 89.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 71 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 80 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Asus GL504GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 66 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 22% | 23% | 54% | -50% | -2% | 64% | |
| Reader / Idle | 447 | 842 88% | 691 55% | 762 70% | 176 -61% | 507 13% | 933 ? 109% |
| H.264 | 353 | 371 5% | 504 43% | 150 -58% | 356 1% | 698 ? 98% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 428 | 375 -12% | 384 -10% | 513 20% | 146 -66% | 362 -15% | 568 ? 33% |
| Load | 85 | 76 -11% | 119 40% | 156 84% | 71 -16% | 81 -5% | 97.3 ? 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 63 | 81.8 ? |
Pro
Contra
Como o nome já sugere, o P65 8RF Creator da MSI baseia-se no GS65 8RF. No entanto, destina-se principalmente ao público criativo que usa o Adobe Photoshop ou o Adobe Premiere na estrada. A Edição Limitada oferece mais do que apenas sua carcaça branca, como uma GPU potente e uma embalagem de alta qualidade, incluindo uma capa protetora. Além disso, uma extensão de garantia gratuita para um total de 36 meses está disponível mediante o registro do produto com a MSI.
A questão é: para quem este dispositivo foi feito? Se você estiver procurando por um dispositivo estiloso e pouco comum, o P65 8RF pode ser o portátil certo para você. Ele oferece um ótimo visual durante as apresentações sem sacrificar o desempenho dos jogos, e sua falta de detalhes gamers resultam em uma aparência muito séria. É aqui que o P65 8RF realmente brilha.
O MSI P65 8RF é como ter seu bolo e comê-lo também. Durante o dia, ele desempenha seu papel como um dispositivo empresarial comum. À noite, ele pode ser usado para rodar até mesmo os últimos jogos, sem problemas, em 1080p, com detalhes máximos.
A carcaça é um compromisso bem feito entre mobilidade e rigidez. O material usado é muito premium, mas gostaríamos de ter um design mais robusto. A tela deixa uma impressão confusa. Por um lado, oferece um painel de 144 Hz e tempos de resposta rápidos. Por outro, é muito escuro e praticamente inutilizável em exteriores. O teclado também não era o melhor. A rotulagem foi incrivelmente difícil de ler e o layout incomum leva mais tempo para se acostumar do que aquele com o que nos sentimos confortáveis.
O desempenho, por outro lado, está, sem dúvida, em um nível que você nunca esperaria de um dispositivo tão fino e leve. O Core i7-8750H da Intel funcionou muito bem, apesar do fato de que seu desempenho sofreu um pouco sob carga sustentada, e a GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q da Nvidia ofereceu um desempenho incrível considerando o design fino.
Com mais de $ 2.300, ele custa tanto quanto o GS65 8RF, mas oferece alguns extras, como o leitor de digitai ou a garantia estendida. Se você deseja evitar o design preto típico e bling-bling RGB, você pode querer considerar a P65.
Se você decidir comprar o P65 Creator até o 31/12/2018, a MSI lançará um pacote de software com valor de mais de $300 para iniciar sua viagem na pista da criação de conteúdo.
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
-
11/10/2018 v6(old)
Sebastian Bade
Pricecompare
