Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 17 (GTX 1060)

Sascha Mölck (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/19/2017

Bem balanceado. Com um preço de quase 1300 Euros (~$1390), o Omen 17 w100ng atualmente é o aparelho mais barato dentro de sua linha. Este modelo de desempenho um pouco mais baixo também roda jogos fluentemente em seu painel mate Full. O Omen oferece uma muito boa duração da bateria para um portátil de jogos.

HP Omen 17-w100ng (Omen Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5 (Samsung), interface de 192 bit, ForceWare 376.33, no Optimus, iGPU deaktiviert
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2400, dual-channel, dois bancos de memória (ambos ocupados)
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, Full HD, G-Sync, 75 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, 128 GB 
, m.2-SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @7200 rpm
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Saída para fones, entrada para microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 33 x 416 x 279
Bateria
95.8 Wh, 0 mAh Lítio-Ion, 6 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Quatro alto falantes, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, PSU: 230 Watts, McAfee LiveSafe (teste), MS Office 365 (teste), diversas ferramentas do fabricante, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
3.23 kg, Suprimento de energia: 811 g
Preço
1300 Euro

 

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
674 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
524 MBit/s ∼99%
326
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 364 cd/m² Médio: 331 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 342 cd/m²
Contraste: 1069:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.35 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.73 | - Ø
86% sRGB (Argyll) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.23
HP Omen 17-w100ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080
MSI GS73VR 6RF
1920x1080
Gigabyte P57X v6
LGD0469, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
Response Times
-1%
41%
1%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35 (14, 21)
38 (12, 26)
-9%
28 (13.2, 14.8)
20%
33.6 (14, 19.6)
4%
37 (13, 24)
-6%
Response Time Black / White *
25 (4, 21)
23 (5, 18)
8%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
62%
25.6 (5.2, 20.4)
-2%
24 (4, 20)
4%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-30%
14%
-9%
2%
Brightness
331
312
-6%
315
-5%
321
-3%
342
3%
Brightness Distribution
84
91
8%
86
2%
93
11%
87
4%
Black Level *
0.32
0.5
-56%
0.308
4%
0.267
17%
0.31
3%
Contrast
1069
652
-39%
1095
2%
1233
15%
1168
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.35
6.3
-45%
2.96
32%
5.93
-36%
4.5
-3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.73
7.37
-98%
2.57
31%
6.72
-80%
3.48
7%
Gamma
2.23 108%
2.37 101%
2.25 107%
2.12 113%
2.23 108%
CCT
6801 96%
7116 91%
7114 91%
7611 85%
6144 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
55
-4%
74.3
30%
57
0%
55
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86
83
-3%
100
16%
87
1%
84
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-16% / -24%
28% / 19%
-4% / -7%
1% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6668 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
HP Omen 17 vs. sRGB (86%)
HP Omen 17 vs. sRGB (86%)
HP Omen 17 vs. AdobeRGB (57%)
HP Omen 17 vs. AdobeRGB (57%)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8258
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
16456
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4815
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
59.61 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.49 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
102.93 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
464 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
132 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼100% +12%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼95% +6%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
136 Points ∼92% +3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼91% +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼91% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
132 Points ∼89%
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
118 Points ∼80% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points ∼100% +46%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼100% +46%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼99% +45%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points ∼94% +37%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
468 Points ∼69% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
464 Points ∼68%
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
461 Points ∼68% -1%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5484 Points ∼100% +14%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5126 Points ∼93% +6%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5026 Points ∼92% +4%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4926 Points ∼90% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
4815 Points ∼88%
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
4759 Points ∼87% -1%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20283 Points ∼100% +23%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points ∼99% +22%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20090 Points ∼99% +22%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16609 Points ∼82% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16456 Points ∼81%
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16161 Points ∼80% -2%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11903 Points ∼100% +28%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
9520 Points ∼80% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
9307 Points ∼78%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
3301 Points ∼100% +4%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
3168 Points ∼96%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2926 Points ∼89% -8%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11033 Points ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
10421 Points ∼94%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
3933 Points ∼100%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3663 Points ∼93% -7%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
269.16 Points ∼100% +22%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
251.96 Points ∼94% +14%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
232.36 Points ∼86% +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
230.83 Points ∼86% +5%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
220.38 Points ∼82%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
196.11 Points ∼73% -11%
PCMark 7 Score
5990 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4711 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6858 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5252 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
5252 Points ∼97%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points ∼93% -5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points ∼89% -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4774 Points ∼89% -9%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
4711 Points ∼97%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points ∼97% -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points ∼87% -11%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4012 Points ∼83% -15%
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Sequential Read: 495 MB/s
Sequential Write: 180.2 MB/s
512K Read: 315.5 MB/s
512K Write: 172.4 MB/s
4K Read: 20.25 MB/s
4K Write: 76.14 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 141.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 170.8 MB/s
HP Omen 17-w100ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-80%
13%
43%
122%
Write 4k QD32
170.8
1.186
-99%
167.1
-2%
274.9
61%
295.3
73%
Read 4k QD32
141.6
1.106
-99%
251.6
78%
273.9
93%
600.2
324%
Write 4k
76.14
1.146
-98%
42.51
-44%
84.59
11%
153.3
101%
Read 4k
20.25
0.602
-97%
20.3
0%
25.93
28%
42.7
111%
Write 512
172.4
63.33
-63%
254.4
48%
314.4
82%
294.7
71%
Read 512
315.5
44.85
-86%
242.3
-23%
303.1
-4%
616.2
95%
Write Seq
180.2
130.6
-28%
319
77%
315.4
75%
294.9
64%
Read Seq
495
134.6
-73%
334.3
-32%
481.7
-3%
1156
134%
3DMark 06 Standard
24318 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
10805 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
111645 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
15394 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8654 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4806 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3339 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
15806 Points ∼100% +40%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11506 Points ∼73% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11326 Points ∼72%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11311 Points ∼72% 0%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
86780 Points ∼100% +16%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
79578 Points ∼92% +6%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
79107 Points ∼91% +6%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
74982 Points ∼86%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
67791 Points ∼78% -10%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23356 Points ∼100% +60%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
20656 Points ∼88% +41%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14904 Points ∼64% +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14642 Points ∼63%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14317 Points ∼61% -2%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
123.8 fps ∼100% +25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
103.8 (min: 19.8) fps ∼84% +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
100 fps ∼81% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
99.1 fps ∼80%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
98.9 fps ∼80% 0%
Schenker XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
98.1 fps ∼79% -1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94 fps ∼76% -5%
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
101.5 fps ∼100%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
99.1 fps ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94 fps ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
92.9 fps ∼92% -8%
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
110.1 fps ∼100% +40%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
79 fps ∼72% +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
78.5 fps ∼71%
Anno 2205 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:4x
Schenker XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
81.1 fps ∼100% +25%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
79.2 fps ∼98% +22%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
64.7 fps ∼80%
baixo média alto ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 290.5289.2274.9140fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 197.8176.2164.899.1fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 188.8172.8155.7101.5fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 81.97564.730.2fps
Just Cause 3 (2015) 94.68376.770.4fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 94827359fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 97.19356.529.2fps
FIFA 17 (2016) 276.7270.8222.5227.3fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 136.4117.586.678.5fps
Civilization VI (2016) 58.147.14342.8fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 143.5143.589.780fps

Barulho

Ocioso
35 / 36 / 37 dB
Carga
44 / 54 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Noise
10%
6%
4%
4%
off / environment *
31
30.5
2%
28.4
8%
29.7
4%
30
3%
Idle Minimum *
35
31.4
10%
31.9
9%
33.2
5%
33
6%
Idle Average *
36
31.4
13%
32
11%
33.2
8%
34
6%
Idle Maximum *
37
31.5
15%
34
8%
33.2
10%
35
5%
Load Average *
44
40.9
7%
47
-7%
47.5
-8%
45
-2%
Load Maximum *
54
46.2
14%
49.4
9%
52.5
3%
52
4%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 41.5 °C39.1 °C39.3 °C 
 37.1 °C37.4 °C33.4 °C 
 32.5 °C33.5 °C29.9 °C 
Máximo: 41.5 °C
Médio: 36 °C
44.9 °C42.4 °C45.5 °C
30.2 °C35.3 °C37.7 °C
23.3 °C27.7 °C24.5 °C
Máximo: 45.5 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Heat
-11%
-9%
-24%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.5
53.1
-28%
50.8
-22%
59
-42%
45
-8%
Maximum Bottom *
45.5
44.9
1%
60
-32%
66
-45%
54.3
-19%
Idle Upper Side *
31.8
32.9
-3%
27.4
14%
33.2
-4%
29.6
7%
Idle Bottom *
29.6
33.4
-13%
28.8
3%
30.6
-3%
28.6
3%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.937.82539.544.63133.238.44028.830.75025.227.16326.126.98025.328.710024.829.21252430.216025.140.920021.655.125022.26431521.167.540019.968.150019.567.66301971.780020.474.1100018.770.9125019.468.8160019.674.2200018.172.9250017.871315017.875400017.976.3500017.975.5630017.977.480001876.11000017.981.41250017.8791600017.769.6SPL30.887N1.572.4median 19HP Omen 17-w100ngmedian 71Delta2.17.239.334.639.341.739.641.742.839.942.837.235.237.237.532.337.541.828.241.830.32630.340.72640.748.325.448.349.623.349.647.623.847.65222.75258.221.658.263.920.263.95719.65756.618.656.657.218.657.256.51856.554.817.454.857.117.957.158.117.558.158.217.858.26017.96066.21866.259.818.359.853.418.453.448.518.448.548.918.448.948.718.248.743.418.443.471.330.571.328.31.428.3median 56.5Asus GL702VM-GC102Dmedian 18.4median 56.54.424.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Omen 17-w100ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Asus GL702VM-GC102D audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 17 / 22 / 29 Watt
Carga midlight 72 / 141 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC940
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
3%
-35%
-40%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
17
15.6
8%
22.6
-33%
18.4
-8%
19
-12%
Idle Average *
22
20.2
8%
32.7
-49%
22.8
-4%
25
-14%
Idle Maximum *
29
21.4
26%
32.8
-13%
24
17%
31
-7%
Load Average *
72
90
-25%
114.7
-59%
175.5
-144%
90
-25%
Load Maximum *
141
147
-4%
167.9
-19%
229.5
-63%
193
-37%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 03min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3 (Edge 38)
6h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 13min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 25min
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 95.8 Wh
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 76 Wh
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 95 Wh
Battery Runtime
-31%
-43%
-32%
-25%
Reader / Idle
543
353
-35%
353
-35%
418
-23%
432
-20%
H.264
313
262
-16%
233
-26%
WiFi v1.3
363
250
-31%
213
-41%
201
-45%
247
-32%
Load
145
87
-40%
66
-54%
103
-29%
115
-21%

Pro

+ Boa razão preço-desempenho
+ Conector M.2 com suporte para NVMe
+ Suporte G-Sync
+ Painel IPS mate
+ SSD+HDD

Contra

- O touchpad deixa uma impressão inferior
- Sem USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C
In review: HP Omen 17-w100ng. Test model courtesy of Nvidia
In review: HP Omen 17-w100ng. Test model courtesy of Nvidia

O modelo de nível de entrada da linha Omen não possui uma CPU Core i7 mas oferece "apenas" um processador Core i5-6300HQ . Consequentemente, o comprador "apenas" deve gastar 1300 Euros (~$1390). No entanto, o processador instalado tem mais que suficiente poder de cômputo para todos os cenários de aplicação comuns. A combinação do 6300HQ e a unidade gráfica GeForce GTX 1060  roda quase todos os jogos atuais em resolução Full HD utilizando configurações de qualidade altas e, as vezes inclusive máximas. A tecnologia G-Sync da Nvidia garante uma imagem fluente na tela de 75-Hz.

A fluência do sistema deve-se ao SSD SATA III. No entanto, ainda há espaço para melhorias. O SSD poderia ser substituído por um modelo PCIe/NVMe muito mais veloz. Também seria possível substituir o disco rígido de 1 TB instalado. O painel IPS mate agrada com seu alto brilho, alto contraste, e ângulos de visão estáveis.

Como o Omen 17 w100ng, a HP lança um modelo de nível de entrada bem balanceado no mundo dos portáteis para jogos.

O Omen não está livre de reclamos: A HP deveria, por exemplo, trabalhar mais na produção de ruído. O portátil produz mais ruído do necessário. O sistema de resfriamento parece estar feito para a combinação do Core i7-6700 com a GeForce GTX 1070. Uma atualização do BIOS poderia melhorar as coisas aqui. O portátil também não pode oferecer Thunderbolt 3 ou portas USB 3.1 Gen2. Esperamos essa porta em um portátil 2016/2017 desta faixa de preços.

HP Omen 17-w100ng - 01/18/2017 v6
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
77%
Mouse
72%
Conectividade
60 / 81 → 74%
Peso
55 / 66 → 80%
Bateria
85%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
91%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
89 / 95 → 94%
Ruído
60 / 90 → 67%
Audio
70%
Camera
69 / 85 → 81%
Médio
76%
82%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 17 (GTX 1060)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-02-19 (Update: 2017-02-28)