Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus GL702VM-GC102D

Sascha Mölck (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/16/2016

Fino portátil de jogos. A Asus coloca muito poder para jogos dentro de um fino portátil de 17,3- polegadas. Mesmo assim, o portátil não produz muito ruído, nem calor. Devido à GPU integrada desativada, o portátil consome mais energia do que deveria, no modo inativo.

Asus GL702VM-GC102D (GL702 Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1405-1886 MHz, Memoría: 2002 MHz, GDDR5, conexão de 192-bits, ForceWare 375.95
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2132, Single-Channel, dois slots de RAM (um ocupado)
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, IPS, Nvidia G-Sync, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1000 GB 
, 7200 rpm, 930 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24 x 415 x 280
Bateria
76 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
FreeDos
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, DVD de controladores, mouse USB, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.7 kg, Suprimento de energia: 688 g
Preço
1399 Euro

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker XMG P507
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77 MB/s ∼100% +6%
Gigabyte P57X v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76.4 MB/s ∼99% +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼99% +5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.6 MB/s ∼94%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.8 MB/s ∼31% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P57X v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.9 MB/s ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼97% +3%
Schenker XMG P507
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼96% +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.6 MB/s ∼94%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.6 MB/s ∼31% -67%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (RTL GBE)
665 MBit/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG P507
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
642 MBit/s ∼95% -3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
512.058 MBit/s ∼76% -23%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (RTL GBE)
538 MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
536.301 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG P507
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
456 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
318
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 326 cd/m² Médio: 311.9 cd/m² Minimum: 36 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 326 cd/m²
Contraste: 652:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7.37 | - Ø
83% sRGB (Argyll) 55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.37
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Omen 17-w110ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Gigabyte P57X v6
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GS73VR 6RF
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Schenker XMG P507
IPS, 60 Hz, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-1%
1%
42%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38
37
3%
33.6
12%
28
26%
36
5%
Response Time Black / White *
23
24
-4%
25.6
-11%
9.6
58%
23
-0%
PWM Frequency
Screen
26%
21%
34%
17%
Brightness
312
342
10%
321
3%
315
1%
292
-6%
Brightness Distribution
91
87
-4%
93
2%
86
-5%
87
-4%
Black Level *
0.5
0.31
38%
0.267
47%
0.308
38%
0.3
40%
Contrast
652
1168
79%
1233
89%
1095
68%
960
47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.3
4.5
29%
5.93
6%
2.96
53%
5.1
19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.37
3.48
53%
6.72
9%
2.57
65%
4.43
40%
Gamma
2.37 101%
2.23 108%
2.12 113%
2.25 107%
2.46 98%
CCT
7116 91%
6144 106%
7611 85%
7114 91%
6687 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
55
0%
57
4%
74.3
35%
55
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83
84
1%
87
5%
100
20%
83
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
13% / 21%
11% / 17%
38% / 36%
10% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 875 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
The processor is soldered in.
The processor is soldered in.
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5126
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20111
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8238
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
61 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
134 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
678 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
74.03 fps
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼76% +10%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼76% +10%
MSI GP72-2QEi781
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
142 Points ∼73% +6%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼72% +4%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼69% 0%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼69%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GP72-2QEi781
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
694 Points ∼37% +2%
Schenker XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
682 Points ∼37% +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points ∼37% 0%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼36%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼36% -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points ∼34% -6%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5484 Points ∼74% +7%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5126 Points ∼69%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4926 Points ∼67% -4%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20283 Points ∼50% +1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points ∼50%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20090 Points ∼50% 0%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11903 Points ∼38%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2926 Points ∼63%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11033 Points ∼41%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3663 Points ∼67%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
269.16 Points ∼84% +16%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
251.96 Points ∼79% +8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 38)
232.36 Points ∼73%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
230.83 Points ∼72% -1%
PCMark 7 Score
4114 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4670 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6361 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4809 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points ∼83% +12%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points ∼77% +4%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points ∼74%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4774 Points ∼73% -1%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points ∼81% +3%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points ∼78%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points ∼70% -10%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4012 Points ∼67% -14%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 52.7 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 137.9 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 104.7 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 17.4 ms
Índice de Explosão: 92.8 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 2.6 %
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
MSI CX72-7QLi581
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-20%
12720%
7576%
5569%
Write 4k QD32
1.186
1.064
-10%
295.3
24799%
274.9
23079%
167.1
13989%
Read 4k QD32
1.106
0.918
-17%
600.2
54168%
273.9
24665%
251.6
22649%
Write 4k
1.146
1.063
-7%
153.3
13277%
84.59
7281%
42.51
3609%
Read 4k
0.602
0.422
-30%
42.7
6993%
25.93
4207%
20.3
3272%
Write 512
63.33
46.87
-26%
294.7
365%
314.4
396%
254.4
302%
Read 512
44.85
34.83
-22%
616.2
1274%
303.1
576%
242.3
440%
Write Seq
130.6
100.2
-23%
294.9
126%
315.4
142%
319
144%
Read Seq
134.6
102.8
-24%
1156
759%
481.7
258%
334.3
148%
3DMark 06 Standard
19244 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
11159 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
113032 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22619 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9432 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5067 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3536 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
23356 Points ∼46% +63%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20656 Points ∼41% +44%
MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
17738 Points ∼35% +24%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
14904 Points ∼29% +4%
XMG P723 Pro
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, Intel Core i7-4800MQ
14696 Points ∼29% +3%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
14317 Points ∼28%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
14222 Points ∼28% -1%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
8597 Points ∼17% -40%
MSI GL72 6QF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5825 Points ∼11% -59%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
15806 Points ∼40% +40%
MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
11869 Points ∼30% +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11506 Points ∼29% +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11311 Points ∼29%
XMG P723 Pro
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, Intel Core i7-4800MQ
11296 Points ∼29% 0%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11045 Points ∼28% -2%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
5701 Points ∼15% -50%
MSI GL72 6QF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4705 Points ∼12% -58%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
86780 Points ∼53% +10%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
79578 Points ∼49% +1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
79107 Points ∼48%
XMG P723 Pro
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, Intel Core i7-4800MQ
77275 Points ∼47% -2%
Schenker XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
69834 Points ∼43% -12%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
67791 Points ∼41% -14%
MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
66398 Points ∼41% -16%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
34892 Points ∼21% -56%
MSI GL72 6QF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
33474 Points ∼20% -58%
baixo média alto ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 344.9325.4286.2138.4fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 195.1177.3166.498.9fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 180.1167.2151.499.1fps
X-Plane 10.25 (2013) 81.846.624.524.5fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) 147.5130.910985.7fps
GTA V (2015) 122.3117.790.348.2fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 51.249.147.5fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 6561.948.727.3fps
FIFA 17 (2016) 232.7216.2198.6197.9fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 51.347.140.1fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 116.4104.987.479fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 209.3179.6165.1153.9fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 143.414389.380.2fps
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
123.8 fps ∼100% +25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
103.8 (min: 19.8) fps ∼84% +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
100 fps ∼81% +1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
98.9 fps ∼80%
Schenker XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
98.1 fps ∼79% -1%
Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
138.4 fps ∼100%
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
99.1 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
92.9 fps ∼94% -6%
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.933.335.734.637.92537.740.541.239.637.73140.640.942.939.940.64034.431.933.235.234.45034.531.130.532.334.56329.629.930.628.229.68027.127.528.12627.110027.427.327.52627.412529.429.329.825.429.416027.52924.723.327.520026.127.623.923.826.125025.829.722.422.725.83152832.322.321.62840026.830.220.520.226.850023.126.719.919.623.16302429.819.918.62480028.330.12118.628.3100028.133.119.31828.1125030.535.319.117.430.5160031.836.819.917.931.8200033.438.518.817.533.4250032.937.419.117.832.9315027.937.618.217.927.9400023.329.618.91823.350002227.618.618.322630020.625.918.718.420.6800019.924.118.718.419.91000018.821.218.518.418.81250018.519.518.318.218.51600018.318.918.218.418.3SPL40.946.231.530.540.9N3.34.91.61.43.3median 26.8Asus GL702VM-GC102Dmedian 29.6median 19.3median 18.4median 26.8Delta2.93.12.222.9hearing rangehide median Fan Noise

Barulho

Ocioso
31.4 / 31.4 / 31.5 dB
HDD
31.5 dB
Carga
40.9 / 46.2 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Noise
-9%
-9%
-7%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
31.4
33
-5%
33.2
-6%
31.9
-2%
31
1%
Idle Average *
31.4
34
-8%
33.2
-6%
32
-2%
32
-2%
Idle Maximum *
31.5
35
-11%
33.2
-5%
34
-8%
38
-21%
Load Average *
40.9
45
-10%
47.5
-16%
47
-15%
46
-12%
Load Maximum *
46.2
52
-13%
52.5
-14%
49.4
-7%
49
-6%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 40.2 °C53.1 °C41 °C 
 27.1 °C47.2 °C26 °C 
 27.9 °C27.3 °C27.5 °C 
Máximo: 53.1 °C
Médio: 35.3 °C
42.2 °C44.9 °C44.1 °C
36.3 °C36.3 °C30.6 °C
23.5 °C25.1 °C28.7 °C
Máximo: 44.9 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  46.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Heat
5%
-13%
0%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
53.1
45
15%
59
-11%
50.8
4%
49.3
7%
Maximum Bottom *
44.9
54.3
-21%
66
-47%
60
-34%
52.7
-17%
Idle Upper Side *
32.9
29.6
10%
33.2
-1%
27.4
17%
32.6
1%
Idle Bottom *
33.4
28.6
14%
30.6
8%
28.8
14%
29.5
12%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.334.639.32541.739.641.73142.839.942.84037.235.237.25037.532.337.56341.828.241.88030.32630.310040.72640.712548.325.448.316049.623.349.620047.623.847.62505222.75231558.221.658.240063.920.263.95005719.65763056.618.656.680057.218.657.2100056.51856.5125054.817.454.8160057.117.957.1200058.117.558.1250058.217.858.231506017.960400066.21866.2500059.818.359.8630053.418.453.4800048.518.448.51000048.918.448.91250048.718.248.71600043.418.443.4SPL71.330.571.3N28.31.428.3median 56.5Asus GL702VM-GC102Dmedian 18.4median 56.5Delta4.424.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus GL702VM-GC102D audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 29%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.44 / 0.57 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 15.6 / 20.2 / 21.4 Watt
Carga midlight 90 / 147 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
-24%
-39%
-40%
9%
Idle Minimum *
15.6
19
-22%
18.4
-18%
22.6
-45%
11
29%
Idle Average *
20.2
25
-24%
22.8
-13%
32.7
-62%
16
21%
Idle Maximum *
21.4
31
-45%
24
-12%
32.8
-53%
21
2%
Load Average *
90
90
-0%
175.5
-95%
114.7
-27%
80
11%
Load Maximum *
147
193
-31%
229.5
-56%
167.9
-14%
174
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
5h 53min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3 (Edge 38)
4h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 27min
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 76 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 95 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Schenker XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 60 Wh
Battery Runtime
11%
5%
-13%
22%
Reader / Idle
353
432
22%
418
18%
353
0%
409
16%
Load
87
115
32%
103
18%
66
-24%
123
41%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
250
247
-1%
201
-20%
213
-15%
274
10%
H.264
262
233
-11%

Com o GL702VM, a Asus oferece um portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas relativamente fino. Mas não se engane pelo exterior fino; o portátil vem com uma boa dose de poder de processamento. Um quad-core Core i7 e um núcleo gráfico GeForce GTX 1060da Nvidia formam uma dupla que pode rodar todos os jogos atuais em resolução Full HD com configurações de qualidade altas ou máximas. A tecnologia G-Sync da Nvidia se encarrega da imagem suave. Apesar do poderoso hardware, a produção de calor está dentro dos limites. O ruído do portátil também é aceitável.

Com o GL702VM, a Asus entrega um sólido portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas.

Graças ao disco rígido de 1TB, o armazenamento é amplo, no entanto, pode ser substituído. Isto requereria retirar a bandeja inferior, que também seria uma oportunidade de equipar o portátil com um SSD M.2 (SATA ou NVMe), dado que há um slot livre. A tela IPS mate deleita com seus ângulos de visão estáveis e brilho suficiente. O contraste poderia ser mais alto O teclado instalado cumpre com as demandas do uso doméstico. Se você escreve muito, no entanto, deveria procurar outro modelo. Por causa da GPU integrada desativada, o consumo de energia é mais alto em um modo inativo. Consequentemente, a duração da bateria é pior do que poderia ser. Isto, no entanto, é secundário quando se trata de portáteis de jogos.

Pro

+ Tela IPS mate
+ Resolução Full HD
+ G-Sync
+ Muito armazenamento
+ Slot M.2 livre
+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- iGPU desativada
- Sem exaustão plena do Turbo
- Consumo de energia relativamente alto no modo inativo
- O click pad nem sempre funciona corretamente
In review: Asus GL702VM-GC102D. Test model provided by Notebook.de
In review: Asus GL702VM-GC102D. Test model provided by Notebook.de

Com o GL702VM, a Asus oferece um portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas relativamente fino. Mas não se engane pelo exterior fino; o portátil vem com uma boa dose de poder de processamento. Um quad-core Core i7 e um núcleo gráfico GeForce GTX 1060da Nvidia formam uma dupla que pode rodar todos os jogos atuais em resolução Full HD com configurações de qualidade altas ou máximas. A tecnologia G-Sync da Nvidia se encarrega da imagem suave. Apesar do poderoso hardware, a produção de calor está dentro dos limites. O ruído do portátil também é aceitável.

 

Com o GL702VM, a Asus entrega um sólido portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas.

 

Graças ao disco rígido de 1TB, o armazenamento é amplo, no entanto, pode ser substituído. Isto requereria retirar a bandeja inferior, que também seria uma oportunidade de equipar o portátil com um SSD M.2 (SATA ou NVMe), dado que há um slot livre. A tela IPS mate deleita com seus ângulos de visão estáveis e brilho suficiente. O contraste poderia ser mais alto O teclado instalado cumpre com as demandas do uso doméstico. Se você escreve muito, no entanto, deveria procurar outro modelo. Por causa da GPU integrada desativada, o consumo de energia é mais alto em um modo inativo. Consequentemente, a duração da bateria é pior do que poderia ser. Isto, no entanto, é secundário quando se trata de portáteis de jogos.

 

Asus GL702VM-GC102D - 12/05/2016 v5.1
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
69 / 81 → 85%
Peso
58 / 66 → 86%
Bateria
76%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
93%
Desempenho da aplicação
86%
Temperatura
88 / 95 → 93%
Ruído
82 / 90 → 91%
Audio
63%
Camera
23 / 85 → 27%
Médio
74%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Português - página inicial > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Sascha Mölck, 2016-12-16 (Update: 2017-01- 2)