Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade (2016) FHD

Sascha Mölck (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/18/2017

Sucesso. O fino aparelho de 14 polegadas da Razer está equipado com hardware poderoso que roda todos os jogos modernos na tela Full HD mate. Você também recebe bons dispositivos de entrada e Thunderbolt 3. A estamina do pequeno sistema também não está nada mal.

Razer Blade (2016) FHD (Blade Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, 192-Bit-Anbindung, ForceWare 376.33, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2133, Dual-Channel, soldada, sem slots
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 157 PPI, LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), IPS, Full HD, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: combinado, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18 x 345 x 235
Bateria
70 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força: 165 Watts, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.88 kg, Suprimento de energia: 418 g
Preço
2700 Euro

 

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
677 MBit/s ∼100% +32%
Razer Blade (2016)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
646 MBit/s ∼95% +26%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
513 MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade (2016)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
591 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
561 MBit/s ∼95%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
507 MBit/s ∼86% -10%
296
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 296 cd/m² Médio: 277.1 cd/m² Minimum: 30 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 272 cd/m²
Contraste: 1046:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.28 | - Ø
83% sRGB (Argyll) 55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.23
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), 1920x1080
Razer Blade (2016)
Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), 3200x1800
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
1920x1080
Gigabyte P34W v5
2560x1440
Schenker XMG P406
LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), 1920x1080
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080
Response Times
-15%
20%
7%
-17%
10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47
41
13%
31.6
33%
41.2
12%
56
-19%
40
15%
Response Time Black / White *
26
37
-42%
24.4
6%
25.4
2%
30
-15%
25
4%
PWM Frequency
200
Screen
26%
-6%
-1%
3%
1%
Brightness
277
328
18%
282
2%
270
-3%
266
-4%
296
7%
Brightness Distribution
84
69
-18%
83
-1%
83
-1%
81
-4%
88
5%
Black Level *
0.26
0.22
15%
0.57
-119%
0.38
-46%
0.22
15%
0.33
-27%
Contrast
1046
1491
43%
506
-52%
731
-30%
1282
23%
973
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.59
1.91
58%
2.61
43%
2.71
41%
4.98
-8%
4.42
4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.28
1.69
61%
1.18
72%
2.11
51%
4.08
5%
3.34
22%
Gamma
2.23 108%
2.3 104%
2.24 107%
2.19 110%
2.51 96%
2.4 100%
CCT
6848 95%
6418 101%
6506 100%
6314 103%
5877 111%
6213 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
63
15%
56.4
3%
48.5
-12%
54
-2%
55
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83
97
17%
86.4
4%
76.9
-7%
83
0%
83
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 18%
7% / -1%
3% / 1%
-7% / -1%
6% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4338 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6777
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20639
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5550
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
62.89 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.49 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.68 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
93.61 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
678 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
149 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
149 Points ∼67%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼66% -1%
Razer Blade (2016)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
146 Points ∼65% -2%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼63% -5%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
137 Points ∼61% -8%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
130 Points ∼58% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼37% 0%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼37% 0%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼37% 0%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼36%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
675 Points ∼36% 0%
Razer Blade (2016)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼36% -1%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5550 Points ∼63%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5463 Points ∼62% -2%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5460 Points ∼62% -2%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5348 Points ∼60% -4%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4937 Points ∼56% -11%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20639 Points ∼51%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20528 Points ∼51% -1%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20394 Points ∼51% -1%
Gigabyte P34W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20195 Points ∼50% -2%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points ∼50% -3%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
12873 Points ∼41%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
12818 Points ∼41% 0%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3542 Points ∼76%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3459 Points ∼74% -2%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
13058 Points ∼49%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
12974 Points ∼48% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4326 Points ∼79%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4286 Points ∼78% -1%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 38)
250.13 Points ∼1% +1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Edge 38)
247.33 Points ∼1%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
236.39 Points ∼1% -4%
PCMark 7 Score
5874 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4010 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4942 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4920 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
5109 Points ∼78% +4%
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5023 Points ∼77% +2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
4920 Points ∼76%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4796 Points ∼74% -3%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4649 Points ∼71% -6%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4214 Points ∼65% -14%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
4741 Points ∼79% +18%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4016 Points ∼67% 0%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
4010 Points ∼67%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
3706 Points ∼62% -8%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3417 Points ∼57% -15%
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3371 Points ∼56% -16%
Sequential Read: 1977 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1668 MB/s
512K Read: 800.1 MB/s
512K Write: 1030 MB/s
4K Read: 58.08 MB/s
4K Write: 145.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 591.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 508 MB/s
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Razer Blade (2016)
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Gigabyte P34W v5
Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
Schenker XMG P406
Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-25%
-73%
8%
-14%
-58%
Write 4k QD32
508
480
-6%
156.3
-69%
418.9
-18%
287.3
-43%
301.5
-41%
Read 4k QD32
591.9
573.4
-3%
247.4
-58%
621.7
5%
320.5
-46%
246.7
-58%
Write 4k
145.6
139.6
-4%
35.31
-76%
167.3
15%
110.3
-24%
86.25
-41%
Read 4k
58.08
42.22
-27%
17.68
-70%
53.83
-7%
43.82
-25%
25.61
-56%
Write 512
1030
603.5
-41%
246.7
-76%
1483
44%
1285
25%
407.1
-60%
Read 512
800.1
654.8
-18%
223
-72%
936.6
17%
1149
44%
335
-58%
Write Seq
1668
603.4
-64%
299
-82%
1524
-9%
1290
-23%
462.7
-72%
Read Seq
1977
1296
-34%
335.3
-83%
2269
15%
1634
-17%
462.5
-77%
3DMark 06 Standard
25367 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
11616 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
78946 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
21402 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9117 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4873 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3443 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
3576 Points ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
3396 Points ∼95%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11776 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11622 Points ∼99% +8%
Razer Blade (2016)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
10890 Points ∼92% +1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
10791 Points ∼92%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7457 Points ∼63% -31%
Schenker XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7436 Points ∼63% -31%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15387 Points ∼100% +14%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14977 Points ∼97% +11%
Razer Blade (2016)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
13891 Points ∼90% +3%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
13534 Points ∼88%
Gigabyte P34W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9691 Points ∼63% -28%
Schenker XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9649 Points ∼63% -29%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
102.3 fps ∼100% +9%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
102.1 fps ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94 fps ∼92%
Gigabyte P34W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
71.4 fps ∼70% -24%
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
99.8 fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
94 fps ∼94%
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
58.1 fps ∼58% -38%
baixo média alto ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 347.4312.1261.9131.7fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 184.5164.6148.394fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 168.1167.8154.194fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 110.4103.379.228.6fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 85.562.852.827.8fps
The Division (2016) 184.6120.761.248.2fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 67.954.849.4fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 114.493.852.428.1fps

Barulho

Ocioso
35 / 36 / 37 dB
Carga
43 / 57 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Razer Blade (2016)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Schenker XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Noise
8%
5%
7%
4%
5%
off / environment *
31
30
3%
29.1
6%
31
-0%
Idle Minimum *
35
31
11%
32
9%
31.6
10%
30
14%
32
9%
Idle Average *
36
33
8%
32
11%
31.6
12%
32
11%
33
8%
Idle Maximum *
37
35
5%
33.5
9%
32.5
12%
40
-8%
34
8%
Load Average *
43
39
9%
50
-16%
46.5
-8%
47
-9%
44
-2%
Load Maximum *
57
51
11%
51.5
10%
52.5
8%
51
11%
53
7%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 53.9 °C49.2 °C54 °C 
 44.3 °C49.5 °C47.5 °C 
 39.2 °C39.9 °C38.1 °C 
Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 46.2 °C
48.5 °C49.4 °C45.3 °C
46.2 °C47 °C40.5 °C
39.8 °C40.2 °C37.5 °C
Máximo: 49.4 °C
Médio: 43.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  49.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Razer Blade (2016)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Schenker XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Heat
-2%
-22%
-11%
-27%
-24%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
52.7
2%
55.6
-3%
59.3
-10%
55
-2%
65.3
-21%
Maximum Bottom *
49.4
48.4
2%
62.4
-26%
56.5
-14%
58.7
-19%
64.4
-30%
Idle Upper Side *
28
29.3
-5%
33.2
-19%
27.8
1%
36.9
-32%
35.4
-26%
Idle Bottom *
26.8
28.4
-6%
37.2
-39%
31.8
-19%
41.7
-56%
31.6
-18%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.834.22534.541.33130.937.3402833.95025.431.16325.927.78023.831.810023.740.71252347.616023.253.620022.355.625020.954.431519.762.140019.16250019.362.963019.664.180020.370.4100019.370.1125019.269.516002067.420001969.7250018.968.7315018.964400018.764.3500018.763.3630018.864.3800018.956.71000019551250018.950.71600018.743.4SPL31.378.8N1.543.8median 19.2Razer Blade (2016) FHDmedian 62.9Delta1.15.636.433.736.43537.133.834.834.134.634.132.532.632.433.13231.230.63129.137.428.745.928.750.527.353.426.955.226.165.425.167.927.265.825.262.724.958.124.459.423.85923.557.523.360.923.564.323.369.523.166.823.169.123.367.123.252.523.437.236.676.72.838.9median 24.9MSI GS43VR 6RE-006USmedian 592.69.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Razer Blade (2016) FHD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.2 / 0.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 14 / 18 / 21 Watt
Carga midlight 70 / 146 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Razer Blade (2016)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
13%
-9%
-5%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
14
9
36%
12.1
14%
12
14%
16
-14%
Idle Average *
18
14
22%
19
-6%
16
11%
19
-6%
Idle Maximum *
21
22
-5%
19.5
7%
22
-5%
23
-10%
Load Average *
70
72
-3%
106.7
-52%
90
-29%
68
3%
Load Maximum *
146
124
15%
159
-9%
170
-16%
157
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 40min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3 (Edge 38)
7h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 59min
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 70 Wh
Razer Blade (2016)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 70 Wh
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 61 Wh
Gigabyte P34W v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 61 Wh
Schenker XMG P406
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 45 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
Battery Runtime
-43%
-10%
-38%
-32%
-21%
Reader / Idle
760
577
-24%
392
-48%
275
-64%
315
-59%
Load
59
78
32%
47
-20%
72
22%
87
47%
WiFi v1.3
427
243
-43%
261
-39%
232
-46%
197
-54%
220
-48%
H.264
312
235
-25%

Pro

+ Carcaça de alumínio rígida
+ Fino e belo
+ Tela IPS mate
+ Resolução Full HD
+ SSD veloz
+ HDMI 2.0
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Muito boas durações da bateria
+ Sem flickering PWM

Contra

- As ventoinhas funcionam o tempo todo
- O rotulado das letras poderia melhorar
- Sem Ethernet
In review: Razer Blade (2016) FHD. Test model courtesy of Razer Germany.
In review: Razer Blade (2016) FHD. Test model courtesy of Razer Germany.

A Razer coloca muito desempenho em um chassi muito atraente e fino. O sistema consegue rodar todos os jogos modernos, mas as taxas de fotogramas são um pouco baixas em comparação com rivais maiores. O desempenho do resfriamento é limitado por causa das pequenas dimensões do chassi, por isso a velocidade da GPU sofre um pouco. Nunca é um portátil muito silencioso – não esperávamos isso. Porém, você ainda pode viver com o ruído do modo inativo. Um muito veloz SSD garante um sistema responsivo. Não é um problema remover o painel inferior, e o portátil está bem preparado para o futuro com suas portas. Somente falta uma porta Gigabit-Ethernet, a qual deve ser adicionada mediante um adaptador USB, se necessária.

O Blade Full HD é o melhor pacote.

A maior diferença com o modelo anteriormente analisado do Blade e a tela. A tela IPS Full HD com amplos ângulos de visão consegue bons resultados de iluminação e uma boa razão de contraste. Positivo: Em comparação com a tela QHD+ do irmão, não podemos determinar qualquer flickering PWM na tela Full HD. Esta última também é mais eficiente em comparação com a tela táctil QHD+ e consegue durações de bateria muito mais longas, como resultado.

Razer Blade (2016) FHD - 12/25/2016 v6
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
93 / 98 → 95%
Teclado
76%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
61 / 81 → 75%
Peso
64 / 66 → 97%
Bateria
85%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
91%
Desempenho da aplicação
92%
Temperatura
82 / 95 → 86%
Ruído
58 / 90 → 64%
Audio
66%
Camera
71 / 85 → 84%
Médio
78%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade (2016) FHD
Sascha Mölck, 2017-01-18 (Update: 2017-02- 4)