Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Samsung Galaxy Book S: Bateria de longa duração e menos de 1 kg

Mobilidade vs. compatibilidade. O Galaxy Book S da Samsung é um companheiro móvel extremamente leve, que é impulsionado por um processador ARM. Este último oferece vantagens como baixo consumo de energia e conectividade LTE integrada, mas em compensação você não pode usar aplicativos de 64 bits.
Samsung Galaxy Book S (Galaxy Book Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR4X
Pantalha
13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Capacitiva, BOE, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
256 GB NVMe, 256 GB 
, 196 GB livre
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Sensores: Hall Sensor, X24 LTE Modem
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, Qulacomm X24 LTE Modem W-CDMA (3G), FDD-LTE (4G), TDD-LTE (4G), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 11.8 x 305.2 x 203.2
Bateria
42 Wh Lítio-Polímero, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 23 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, AKG, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força de 25W, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
951 g, Suprimento de energia: 91 g
Preço
1099 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.2 %
06/2020
Samsung Galaxy Book S
SD 8cx, Adreno 680
951 g11.8 mm13.30"1920x1080
89.6 %
05/2020
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
i3-1000NG4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
1.3 kg16.1 mm13.30"2560x1600
88.8 %
03/2020
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
1.2 kg14.8 mm13.40"1920x1200
85.9 %
09/2020
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
1.2 kg16.6 mm13.50"2256x1504
84 %
03/2020
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.3 kg14.5 mm13.50"2256x1504

Size Comparison

308 mm 223 mm 14.5 mm 1.3 kg304.1 mm 212.4 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg302 mm 234 mm 16.6 mm 1.2 kg305.2 mm 203.2 mm 11.8 mm 951 g296 mm 199 mm 14.8 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left side: 3.5 mm stereo jack, USB-C 3.1 Gen.1 (charging & Display-Alt mode)
Left side: 3.5 mm stereo jack, USB-C 3.1 Gen.1 (charging & Display-Alt mode)
Right side: Combo tray for microSD & Nano-SIM, USB-C 3.1 Gen.1 (charging & Display-Alt mode)
Right side: Combo tray for microSD & Nano-SIM, USB-C 3.1 Gen.1 (charging & Display-Alt mode)
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
157 MB/s +128%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
68.9 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (18.9 - 193.9, n=18, last 2 years)
67.1 MB/s -3%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
195.6 MB/s +137%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
82.4 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (23.6 - 239, n=18, last 2 years)
81.4 MB/s -1%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1484 (1342min - 1614max) MBit/s +145%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (606 - 1339, n=2, last 2 years)
973 MBit/s +61%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
906 MBit/s +50%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
696 (679min - 711max) MBit/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
606 (307min - 618max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
545 (414min - 604max) MBit/s -10%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (31.2 - 966, n=478)
358 MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1460 MBit/s +173%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1251 (803min - 1358max) MBit/s +134%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (623 - 1690, n=2, last 2 years)
1157 MBit/s +116%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
870 (832min - 928max) MBit/s +63%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
641 (554min - 678max) MBit/s +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
535 (503min - 564max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (32.9 - 1065, n=479)
380 MBit/s -29%
ColorChecker
22.1 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
14 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Book S: 13.88 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 22.33 ∆E
359
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 383 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 355.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 380 cd/m²
Contraste: 1064:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2
Samsung Galaxy Book S
BOE, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
APPA042, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
SHP14CB, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
BOE08BC, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Sharp LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50
Display
Display P3 Coverage
70.3
71.5
70.3
65.7
sRGB Coverage
98
99.4
99.8
98.6
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
71.6
73.5
71.3
67.8
Response Times
390%
-38%
-36%
20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
48.8 ?(22, 26.8)
38.4 ?(20.4, 18)
21%
60 ?(28.4, 31.6)
-23%
50 ?(24, 26)
-2%
59.2 ?(28.4, 30.8)
-21%
Response Time Black / White *
28.4 ?(16.4, 12)
28.4 ?(16, 12.4)
-0%
33.2 ?(16.4, 16.8)
-17%
31 ?(18, 13)
-9%
41.6 ?(23.6, 18)
-46%
PWM Frequency
9524 ?(20)
119000 ?(75)
1149%
2500 ?(20)
-74%
192 ?(90)
-98%
21740 ?(51)
128%
Screen
34%
13%
-5%
28%
Brightness middle
383
416
9%
619
62%
456
19%
403.4
5%
Brightness
355
403
14%
591
66%
432
22%
397
12%
Brightness Distribution
88
95
8%
91
3%
88
0%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.36
0.34
6%
0.35
3%
0.32
11%
0.34
6%
Contrast
1064
1224
15%
1769
66%
1425
34%
1186
11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.1
0.9
71%
3
3%
3.49
-13%
0.94
70%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.3
1.4
74%
8.2
-55%
8.4
-58%
2.92
45%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.6
1
72%
5.2
-44%
5.53
-54%
0.9
75%
Gamma
2 110%
2.2 100%
2.14 103%
2.41 91%
2.13 103%
CCT
6743 96%
6629 98%
6340 103%
6675 97%
6620 98%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.6
1
0.72
0.99
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.9
66.9
65
62.3
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.6
99.3
100
98.7
Total Average (Program / Settings)
212% / 131%
-13% / -1%
-21% / -13%
24% / 26%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 9524 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 9524 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 9524 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18034 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
Geekbench 4.4: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
3DMark 11: 1280x720 Performance GPU
Jetstream 2: Total Score
JetStream 1.1: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Octane V2: Total Score
Speedometer 2.0: Result
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (672 - 2350, n=68, last 2 years)
1686 Points +141%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
1229 Points +76%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
1096 Points +57%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
1081 Points +54%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
1081 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx, Qualcomm Adreno 680
700 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
 
700 Points 0%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4213 - 12580, n=68, last 2 years)
8912 Points +223%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
4372 Points +58%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
3261 Points +18%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
3261 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx, Qualcomm Adreno 680
2760 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
 
2760 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
2028 Points -27%
Geekbench 4.4 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3460 - 7522, n=11, last 2 years)
6551 Points +98%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
5481 Points +65%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
5224 Points +58%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
4748 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx, Qualcomm Adreno 680
3313 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
 
3313 Points 0%
Geekbench 4.4 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (15240 - 43897, n=11, last 2 years)
32353 Points +193%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
17534 Points +59%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
14733 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx, Qualcomm Adreno 680
11047 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
 
11047 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
9090 Points -18%
3DMark 11 / Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2979 - 16904, n=56, last 2 years)
8225 Points +416%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
4279 Points +169%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
2809 Points +76%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
2578 Points +62%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
1941 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx, Qualcomm Adreno 680
1593 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
 
1593 Points 0%
Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (159 - 478, n=39, last 2 years)
261 Points +255%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
118.2 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx, Qualcomm Adreno 680
73.5 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
 
73.5 Points 0%
JetStream 1.1 / Total Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (last 2 years)
348 Points +160%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
249.8 Points +86%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
249.7 Points +86%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
240 Points +79%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
208.7 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx, Qualcomm Adreno 680
134.1 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
 
134.1 Points 0%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average of class Subnotebook
  (119.2 - 448, n=65, last 2 years)
282 Points +143%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
194 Points +67%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
175 Points +51%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
175 Points +51%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
162 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx, Qualcomm Adreno 680
116 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
 
116 Points 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx, Qualcomm Adreno 680
1464 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
 
1464 ms * -0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1063 ms * +27%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
965 ms * +34%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
924 ms * +37%
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
Intel Core i5-1035G4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
924 ms * +37%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
886 ms * +39%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (363 - 1913, n=69, last 2 years)
593 ms * +59%
Octane V2 / Total Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (49893 - 98093, n=34, last 2 years)
80978 Points +176%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
39043 Points +33%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
35150 Points +20%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
34726 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx, Qualcomm Adreno 680
29364 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
 
29364 Points 0%
Speedometer 2.0 / Result
Average of class Subnotebook
  (154 - 674, n=28, last 2 years)
318 runs/min +436%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
98.8 runs/min +67%
Samsung Galaxy Book S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx, Qualcomm Adreno 680
59.3 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
 
59.3 runs/min 0%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
58.1 runs/min -2%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Book S
256 GB NVMe
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
Apple SSD AP0256
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
Average 256 GB NVMe
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
246%
399%
319%
278%
5%
Write 4K
30.59
34.57
13%
121.9
298%
120.6
294%
112.3
267%
35.8 ?(19.1 - 69.2, n=4)
17%
Read 4K
20.26
28.48
41%
50
147%
46.88
131%
42.13
108%
16.2 ?(11.6 - 20.3, n=4)
-20%
Write Seq
421.4
1026
143%
1497
255%
1044
148%
630
50%
362 ?(210 - 429, n=4)
-14%
Read Seq
1232
1109
-10%
2111
71%
1147
-7%
1023
-17%
726 ?(438 - 1232, n=4)
-41%
Write 4K Q32T1
39.17
178.4
355%
365.9
834%
332.4
749%
336.6
759%
63.1 ?(39.2 - 95.8, n=4)
61%
Read 4K Q32T1
41.14
557
1254%
384.6
835%
443.3
978%
399.6
871%
62.7 ?(31.6 - 121.8, n=4)
52%
Write Seq Q32T1
420.9
970
130%
2748
553%
1052
150%
821
95%
455 ?(217 - 729, n=4)
8%
Read Seq Q32T1
1047
1513
45%
3119
198%
2171
107%
2030
94%
761 ?(528 - 1047, n=4)
-27%
AS SSD
25%
205%
137%
66%
1%
Seq Read
1069
1135
6%
2328
118%
1370
28%
1387
30%
984 ?(471 - 1413, n=3)
-8%
Seq Write
382
1090
185%
1137
198%
1019
167%
504
32%
393 ?(382 - 405, n=3)
3%
4K Read
16.64
14.87
-11%
48.07
189%
50.8
205%
42.35
155%
15.6 ?(8.99 - 21.1, n=3)
-6%
4K Write
35.99
26.27
-27%
120.6
235%
111.2
209%
120
233%
38.5 ?(29.8 - 49.9, n=3)
7%
4K-64 Read
415.1
585
41%
899
117%
770
85%
497.4
20%
376 ?(235 - 477, n=3)
-9%
4K-64 Write
229.5
154.6
-33%
1220
432%
713
211%
354.9
55%
256 ?(176 - 364, n=3)
12%
Access Time Read *
0.126
0.085
0.055
0.05767 ?(0 - 0.173, n=3)
Access Time Write *
0.093
0.058
38%
0.033
65%
0.034
63%
0.093
-0%
0.08467 ?(0.076 - 0.093, n=3)
9%
Score Read
539
713
32%
1180
119%
958
78%
678
26%
490 ?(291 - 639, n=3)
-9%
Score Write
304
290
-5%
1455
379%
926
205%
525
73%
334 ?(246 - 453, n=3)
10%
Score Total
1086
1365
26%
3189
194%
2370
118%
1520
40%
1047 ?(683 - 1371, n=3)
-4%
Copy ISO MB/s
764
497
Copy Program MB/s
256.1
307
Copy Game MB/s
368.4
386
Total Average (Program / Settings)
136% / 124%
302% / 291%
228% / 218%
172% / 161%
3% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

256 GB NVMe
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1047 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 420.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 41.14 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 39.17 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1232 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 421.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 20.26 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 30.59 MB/s
Carga Máxima
 42.5 °C43.9 °C40.6 °C 
 40 °C40.6 °C39.1 °C 
 35.2 °C34.1 °C33.4 °C 
Máximo: 43.9 °C
Médio: 38.8 °C
40.3 °C46.8 °C45.7 °C
37.8 °C42.9 °C42 °C
32.4 °C34.5 °C34.9 °C
Máximo: 46.8 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.9 °C / -12.5 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203129.72529293129.7344030.131.25033.130.96325.433.18024.33410025.239.712522.847.816023.45520024.455.925022.257.731522.260.840020.862.450019.862.363019.364.480018.968.310001870.8125017.470.416001768.8200016.466.5250016.668.2315016.267.4400015.966.5500015.965.863001663.5800016.163.51000016.164.3125001655.11600015.843.2SPL29.679.2N1.346.5median 17.4median 63.5Delta35.94244.129.731.131.133.832.332.629.33029.233.325.837.924.548.824.759.724.863.622.261.22261.821.864.820.670.319.56918.862.818.46418.466.118.169.718.267.517.767.117.866.417.964.117.76517.865.217.965.518.16218.158.118.156.218.257.430.578.11.445.9median 18.2median 64.11.23.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Book SApple MacBook Air 2020 i5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Book S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Air 2020 i5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.28 / 0.53 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.61 / 4.3 / 5 Watt
Carga midlight 13.2 / 18.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Book S
SD 8cx, Adreno 680, 256 GB NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
i3-1000NG4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50
Average Qualcomm Adreno 680
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
-54%
-120%
-68%
-154%
-8%
-185%
Idle Minimum *
1.61
2.1
-30%
3.4
-111%
3
-86%
4.4
-173%
1.955 ?(1.61 - 2.3, n=2)
-21%
4.94 ?(1.77 - 11.8, n=63, last 2 years)
-207%
Idle Average *
4.3
6.2
-44%
6
-40%
6.1
-42%
7.5
-74%
4 ?(3.7 - 4.3, n=2)
7%
8.42 ?(4.6 - 17.4, n=63, last 2 years)
-96%
Idle Maximum *
5
7
-40%
10.2
-104%
8.4
-68%
7.8
-56%
5.3 ?(5 - 5.6, n=2)
-6%
10.5 ?(5.1 - 22.4, n=63, last 2 years)
-110%
Load Average *
13.2
24.7
-87%
36.6
-177%
25.7
-95%
41.9
-217%
13.1 ?(13 - 13.2, n=2)
1%
46.1 ?(19.1 - 83.3, n=62, last 2 years)
-249%
Load Maximum *
18.3
30.6
-67%
49.3
-169%
27.6
-51%
63.9
-249%
21.7 ?(18.3 - 25, n=2)
-19%
66.6 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=63, last 2 years)
-264%
Witcher 3 ultra *
40.8

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 83.0.478.45)
15h 53min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 83.0.478.45)
9h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 52min
Carga (máximo brilho)
6h 9min
Samsung Galaxy Book S
SD 8cx, Adreno 680, 42 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3
i3-1000NG4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 49.9 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 52 Wh
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS
i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 54.5 Wh
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 45 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
-40%
-35%
-32%
-59%
-48%
H.264
1312
666
-49%
866
-34%
786 ?(426 - 1153, n=31, last 2 years)
-40%
WiFi v1.3
953
661
-31%
703
-26%
648
-32%
495
-48%
624 ?(303 - 1144, n=65, last 2 years)
-35%
Load
369
205
-44%
112
-70%
114.8 ?(61 - 197, n=48, last 2 years)
-69%

Pro

+ Chassi estável e leve
+ Durações de bateria muito longas
+ LTE integrado
+ Ótimos alto-falantes
+ Desempenho decente no dia a dia

Contra

- Não compatível com aplicativos de 64 bits
- Apenas USB-C
- A iluminação do teclado é muito escura

Veredicto - Companheiro móvel com seleção limitada de aplicativos

In review: Samsung Galaxy Book S ARM. Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy Book S ARM. Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.

O Samsung Galaxy Book S deixou uma boa impressão geral durante nossa análise. Gostamos muito da combinação do chassi extremamente leve, longos tempos de duração da bateria e o modem LTE integrado, o que faz muito sentido se você viaja muito e precisa de um dispositivo para feiras comerciais, por exemplo. Se você usa principalmente aplicativos web e o Microsoft Office Suite, dificilmente notará as limitações do processador ARM. Recomendamos ainda verificar se existem versões compatíveis dos aplicativos que você planeja utilizar antes da compra.

A solução de resfriamento passivo e os excelentes alto-falantes são outros dois destaques. Os dispositivos de entrada são médios, mas a iluminação do teclado só é utilizável na escuridão total, porque é muito suave e se ativa após um pequeno atraso. Definitivamente, isso requer algum ajuste fino. A tela também não é ruim, mas a concorrência só usa painéis melhores e o próprio Galaxy Book S da Samsung com o processador Intel também é muito mais brilhante, de acordo com as especificações oficiais.

O Samsung Galaxy Book S é um excelente companheiro móvel com um chassi extremamente leve, LTE integrado e tempos de duração de bateria muito longos. Você deve considerar as limitações da seleção de aplicativos devido ao processador ARM antes da compra.

Já estamos ansiosos para ver como o Galaxy Book S com o processador híbrido Intel irá funcionar. Ele deve oferecer mais desempenho e compatibilidade, mas tem tempos de duração mais curtos em troca e também não possui um modem LTE.

Samsung Galaxy Book S - 06/22/2020 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
84 / 98 → 86%
Teclado
80%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
60 / 75 → 80%
Peso
76 / 20-75 → 100%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
46 / 78 → 59%
Desempenho da aplicação
69 / 85 → 81%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
84 / 91 → 92%
Camera
34 / 85 → 40%
Médio
76%
86%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Samsung Galaxy Book S: Bateria de longa duração e menos de 1 kg
Andreas Osthoff, 2020-06-25 (Update: 2020-06-28)