Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker Key 16 (Clevo P960EN-K): O portátil fino agrada com muito poder de computação

Gamer elegante e fino. O poderoso hardware do Schenker Key 16 é capaz de rodar todos os jogos atuais fluentemente na tela mate de 16,1 polegadas (FHD, IPS, 144 Hz). O Schenker oferece opções de configuração individuais, como até três unidades de armazenamento (2x M.2-2280, 1x 2,5 pol) e até 64 GB de memória de trabalho. Além disso, o BIOS permite a redução da voltagem da CPU e da iGPU.
SCHENKER Key 16
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 735 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, conexão de 256-bits, ForceWare 431.60, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, DDR4-2666, dual-channel, dois slots de memória (ambos ocupados), máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
16.10 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 137 PPI, Chi Mei N161HCA-GA1 (CMN1602), IPS, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, 2 slots M.2 (RAID 0/1), 1 slot 2,5 pol., 890 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Porta para fones, porta para microgone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, MMC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.9 x 380 x 252
Bateria
62 Wh, 3680 mAh Lítio-Ion, 15.2 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: stereo, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 180 Watts, DVD de recuperação, DVD de controladores, pano de limpeza, manual, Control Center, one-year license for Bullguard Internet Security, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
2.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 486 g
Preço
2547 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

380 mm 252 mm 19.9 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg363 mm 275 mm 21 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 2 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER Key 16
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
188 MB/s
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
166 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=103, last 2 years)
99 MB/s -47%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.4 MB/s -58%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER Key 16
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
210 MB/s
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (26 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
122.9 MB/s -41%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.3 MB/s -59%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=7, last 2 years)
1147 MBit/s +70%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
718 MBit/s +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 MBit/s
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
620 MBit/s -8%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
601 (562min - 639max) MBit/s -11%
Alienware m15 P79F
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
387 MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=7, last 2 years)
1391 MBit/s +100%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
694 MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
688 MBit/s -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s -3%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
666 (597min - 686max) MBit/s -4%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s -5%
Alienware m15 P79F
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
652 MBit/s -6%
286
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Chi Mei N161HCA-GA1 (CMN1602) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 296 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 270.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 296 cd/m²
Contraste: 1138:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.72
ΔE Greyscale 2.76 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
SCHENKER Key 16
Chi Mei N161HCA-GA1 (CMN1602), IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Alienware m15 P79F
Samsung SDCA029, 156WR04, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
5%
-0%
-1%
38%
4%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
63.8
67.6
6%
64.2
1%
63.8
0%
99.9
57%
66.9
5%
63.5
0%
sRGB Coverage
94.9
97.5
3%
92.6
-2%
93.4
-2%
100
5%
98.1
3%
93.1
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.9
68.9
5%
65.7
0%
65
-1%
100
52%
68.5
4%
64.5
-2%
Response Times
0%
24%
8%
21%
7%
-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18 ?(8.8, 9.2)
13.6 ?(8, 5.6)
24%
8 ?(4, 4)
56%
14 ?(7, 7)
22%
2.6 ?(1.2, 1.4)
86%
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
29%
16.4 ?(8.8, 7.6)
9%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
12 ?(7.6, 4.4)
-15%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-8%
11 ?(7, 4)
-6%
2.3 ?(1, 1.3)
78%
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
-0%
13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2)
-31%
PWM Frequency
25510 ?(20)
23260 ?(19)
-9%
60.2 ?(100)
-100%
23810 ?(10)
-7%
Screen
3%
-44%
-23%
-29%
-3%
5%
Brightness middle
296
282.3
-5%
304
3%
316
7%
452.1
53%
293
-1%
250
-16%
Brightness
271
269
-1%
299
10%
295
9%
452
67%
270
0%
235
-13%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
89
1%
84
-5%
90
2%
87
-1%
85
-3%
Black Level *
0.26
0.32
-23%
0.27
-4%
0.42
-62%
0.29
-12%
0.29
-12%
Contrast
1138
882
-22%
1126
-1%
752
-34%
1010
-11%
862
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.24
1.17
48%
4.66
-108%
2.7
-21%
6.34
-183%
1.69
25%
1.46
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.04
3.29
19%
9.65
-139%
5.65
-40%
12.97
-221%
3.37
17%
2.47
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.72
1.06
-47%
1.72
-139%
1.58
-119%
1.24
-72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.76
1.3
53%
5.53
-100%
2.35
15%
2.8
-1%
2.3
17%
1.27
54%
Gamma
2.52 87%
2.2 100%
2.5 88%
2.41 91%
2.21 100%
2.3 96%
2.4 92%
CCT
6830 95%
6643 98%
8028 81%
6904 94%
6114 106%
6758 96%
6749 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
63.8
6%
60
0%
60
0%
91
52%
63
5%
60
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
97.5
-2%
93
-6%
93
-6%
100
1%
98.5
-1%
93
-6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 2%
-7% / -27%
-5% / -15%
10% / -4%
3% / 0%
-2% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.8 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 25510 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25510 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18034 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
060120180240300360420480540600660720780840900960102010801140Tooltip
SCHENKER Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (993.22-1135.62)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1110 (975.73-1185.01)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1006 (997.68-1086.13)
Alienware m15 P79F Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1056 (1046.13-1175)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Entertainment Mode)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Entertainment Mode)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=238, last 2 years)
266 Points +56%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points +2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points 0%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=239, last 2 years)
3034 Points +172%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
1192 Points +7%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
1185 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1175 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points +4%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1082 Points -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points -9%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (6257 - 15819, n=23, last 2 years)
9174 Points +39%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
6579 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
6351 Points -3%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (37321 - 112749, n=23, last 2 years)
60072 Points +83%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
33923 Points +3%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
32846 Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=234, last 2 years)
695 Points +67%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
416 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=234, last 2 years)
7288 Points +212%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
2333 Points
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
22635 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
21358 Points -6%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
4163 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
3741 Points -10%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (31241 - 71700, n=26, last 2 years)
48889 Points +111%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
23213 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
18716 Points -19%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5986 - 8936, n=26, last 2 years)
7580 Points +47%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
5146 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
4810 Points -7%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1138 ms * -3%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1137 ms * -3%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
1136 ms * -3%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1107 ms *
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1079 ms * +3%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
847 ms * +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 824, n=213, last 2 years)
522 ms * +53%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (69893 - 111243, n=51, last 2 years)
91890 Points +163%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
37088 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
36865 Points +6%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
34874 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
34660 Points -1%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
33931 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
33659 Points -3%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (357 - 650, n=27, last 2 years)
493 Points +93%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
265.7 Points +4%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
255 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
252.1 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
245.4 Points -4%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
245.1 Points -4%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
218.1 Points -14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6579
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
32846
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7982
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1116 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
108.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 7 Score
6701 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4277 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4037 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5617 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5694 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=202, last 2 years)
7572 Points +33%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5839 Points +3%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5725 Points +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5694 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5609 Points -1%
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5485 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points -6%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4166 - 6657, n=35, last 2 years)
5247 Points +23%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5077 Points +19%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4454 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4380 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
4277 Points
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3570 Points -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4622 - 7085, n=34, last 2 years)
6075 Points +8%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5857 Points +4%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5751 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5749 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points 0%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5617 Points
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4465 Points -21%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Sequential Read: 2251 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1744 MB/s
512K Read: 1095 MB/s
512K Write: 1186 MB/s
4K Read: 63.3 MB/s
4K Write: 135.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 565 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 475.4 MB/s
SCHENKER Key 16
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Alienware m15 P79F
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-7%
-2%
-15%
6%
4%
-14%
Write 4K
112.5
91.3
-19%
93.6
-17%
50.2
-55%
148.4
32%
137.2
22%
97.1
-14%
Read 4K
43.79
40.73
-7%
38.82
-11%
35.32
-19%
49.65
13%
46.82
7%
53.7
23%
Write Seq
1944
1915
-1%
2455
26%
991
-49%
1139
-41%
1221
-37%
1526
-22%
Read Seq
1656
2051
24%
2107
27%
1526
-8%
2353
42%
1217
-27%
2020
22%
Write 4K Q32T1
324.6
308.3
-5%
298.7
-8%
445.1
37%
484.7
49%
527
62%
285.6
-12%
Read 4K Q32T1
407
417.4
3%
338.7
-17%
526
29%
542
33%
614
51%
321.8
-21%
Write Seq Q32T1
3296
1922
-42%
2902
-12%
1647
-50%
1139
-65%
1986
-40%
1533
-53%
Read Seq Q32T1
3555
3395
-5%
3536
-1%
3427
-4%
3108
-13%
3234
-9%
2351
-34%
3D Mark 11 (mains operation)
3D Mark 11 (mains operation)
3D Mark 11 (battery operation)
3D Mark 11 (battery operation)
3DMark 06 Standard Score
36601 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
20298 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
116851 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34938 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17301 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7484 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=242, last 2 years)
29230 Points +42%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20718 Points +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20565 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18962 Points -8%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18443 Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points -14%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
11563 Points -44%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=240, last 2 years)
11928 Points +53%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7840 Points +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7775 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7266 Points -7%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
7105 Points -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points -16%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=238, last 2 years)
39986 Points +49%
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
27762 Points +4%
SCHENKER Key 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
26822 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
24926 Points -7%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
23819 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points -18%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
14723 Points -45%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=235, last 2 years)
115.4 fps +49%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
78.3 fps +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
77.4 fps
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
76.5 (63min) fps -1%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
66.9 fps -14%
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
64.4 fps -17%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
58.3 (48min) fps -25%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
170 fps +3%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
165.7 fps
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
156.9 fps -5%
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
153.7 fps -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
127.7 fps -23%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
115.8 fps -30%
Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (82 - 131, n=5, last 2 years)
103 fps +27%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
81 fps
Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off)
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
91.9 fps
For Honor - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
123.4 fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=250, last 2 years)
100.9 fps +35%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
74.8 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
61.6 fps -18%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
SCHENKER Key 16 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø73.3 (69-80)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø67.7 (62-73)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø76.1 (70-81)
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G: Ø63.5 (59-69)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø72.8 (68-80)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø51.3 (44-61)
GPU measurements during The Witcher-3 test
GPU measurements during The Witcher-3 test
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 297.6 268 255.1 165.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 294.7 236.6 146.6 77.4
For Honor (2017) 267.2 165.2 156.5 123.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 125.2 100.1 75.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 101.9 89.2 74.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 122 103 97 93
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 110 95 90 81
Rage 2 (2019) 204.2 111 93.5 91.9
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 224.8 126.1 88.8 65.5
F1 2019 (2019) 188 165 137 114

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 31 / 34 dB
Carga
47 / 49 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
SCHENKER Key 16
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Alienware m15 P79F
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
4%
2%
0%
-10%
11%
-0%
9%
off / environment *
30
28.3
6%
29
3%
30.5
-2%
28.2
6%
28.3
6%
30
-0%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=189, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Minimum *
30
30.4
-1%
30
-0%
32.8
-9%
30.3
-1%
28.8
4%
32
-7%
25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=190, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Average *
31
30.5
2%
32
-3%
32.8
-6%
35.4
-14%
28.8
7%
34
-10%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=190, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Maximum *
34
30.6
10%
34
-0%
32.8
4%
50.3
-48%
29
15%
36
-6%
30.8 ?(21.9 - 47, n=190, last 2 years)
9%
Load Average *
47
37.6
20%
44
6%
42.5
10%
50.3
-7%
33.5
29%
42
11%
43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=190, last 2 years)
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
46
4%
46
4%
50.2
-5%
45
6%
44
8%
Load Maximum *
49
55.1
-12%
47
4%
47.5
3%
50.2
-2%
45.2
8%
48
2%
53.3 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=190, last 2 years)
-9%

* ... smaller is better

 50 °C50 °C51 °C 
 48 °C48 °C41 °C 
 44 °C43 °C30 °C 
Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 45 °C
50 °C57 °C59 °C
42 °C54 °C53 °C
34 °C45 °C43 °C
Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 48.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  43 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44 °C / 111.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-15.1 °C / -27.2 F).
SCHENKER Key 16
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Alienware m15 P79F
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
10%
3%
-0%
-7%
12%
5%
9%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
45.6
11%
49
4%
47.6
7%
55.6
-9%
47
8%
56
-10%
46.3 ?(28.2 - 61, n=189, last 2 years)
9%
Maximum Bottom *
59
53.8
9%
58
2%
59.6
-1%
62.4
-6%
49.2
17%
66
-12%
49.7 ?(30 - 66.3, n=189, last 2 years)
16%
Idle Upper Side *
32
28.6
11%
33
-3%
33.8
-6%
36
-13%
28.6
11%
27
16%
31.5 ?(21.2 - 43, n=189, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Bottom *
36
33.2
8%
33
8%
36.5
-1%
36
-0%
31.4
13%
27
25%
32.7 ?(22.6 - 45, n=189, last 2 years)
9%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.341.92538.244.73130.9354034.435.65029.737.26326.434.18026.130.210025.525.212529.226.416026.332.320023.126.825020.938.331520.146.240019.258.150019.265.163018.471.780017.874.4100017.674.4125018.268.2160017.968200017.572.3250017.771.9315017.771.5400017.672.9500017.671.5630017.672.1800017.769.61000017.667.21250017.457.61600017.466SPL30.283.3N1.456.7median 17.8median 68Delta1.411.943.349.239.641.246.232.134.245.427.334.226.730.824.433.628.536.924.829.124.22725.431.327.136.120.641.519.95018.95617.762.819.564.919.567.317.666.517.463.916.867.817.264.117.662.217.262.417.360.417.160.21761.21758.71760.516.854.730.375.81.435median 17.6median 60.41.910.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER Key 16SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER Key 16 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 1.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10 / 15 / 22 Watt
Carga midlight 88 / 191 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER Key 16
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Alienware m15 P79F
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-30%
-24%
-8%
-3%
-8%
-9%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
10
18.3
-83%
16
-60%
14.7
-47%
10.9
-9%
12.5
-25%
16
-60%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=184, last 2 years)
-38%
Idle Average *
15
22
-47%
22
-47%
18.6
-24%
12.3
18%
15.3
-2%
18
-20%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=184, last 2 years)
-27%
Idle Maximum *
22
28.8
-31%
32
-45%
22.6
-3%
19
14%
20.7
6%
23
-5%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=184, last 2 years)
-21%
Load Average *
88
93
-6%
89
-1%
90
-2%
96
-9%
90.2
-3%
88
-0%
111.1 ?(32.1 - 202, n=184, last 2 years)
-26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
145
142.6
2%
147
-1%
161.7
-12%
162
-12%
120
17%
Load Maximum *
191
215.9
-13%
173
9%
120
37%
229.1
-20%
209.3
-10%
167
13%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=183, last 2 years)
-31%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 45min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)
5h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 58min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 9min
SCHENKER Key 16
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 62 Wh
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Alienware m15 P79F
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
10%
-23%
-30%
-6%
43%
41%
9%
Reader / Idle
585
335
-43%
301
-49%
953
63%
549
-6%
540 ?(57 - 1290, n=87, last 2 years)
-8%
H.264
358
364
2%
391 ?(56 - 747, n=94, last 2 years)
9%
WiFi v1.3
329
362
10%
190
-42%
197
-40%
309
-6%
393
19%
382
16%
364 ?(57 - 745, n=187, last 2 years)
11%
Load
69
81
17%
69
0%
102
48%
174
152%
85.5 ?(36 - 173, n=149, last 2 years)
24%

Pro

+ Tela IPS mate
+ Painel de 144-Hz
+ Carcaça elegante e fina
+ Peso moderado
+ SSD NMVe
+ Redução de voltagem via BIOS
+ Até 3 unidades de armazenamento
+ Configurações individuais

Contra

- Altamente barulhento e quente sob uso intenso
- A manutenção poderia ser mais simples
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Som medíocre
The Schenker Key 16, test unit provided by Schenker Technologies.
The Schenker Key 16, test unit provided by Schenker Technologies.

Com o Key 16, a Schenker está oferecendo um portátil fino para jogos, capaz de ganhar pontos com uma elegante carcaça de metal. Mesmo que seja usado um monitor com uma diagonal de 16,1 polegadas, o portátil é, no geral, pouco maior do que os dispositivos usuais de 15,6 polegadas.

A combinação de um processador Core i7-8750H e gráficos GeForce GTX 2080 Max-Q é capaz de rodar todos os jogos atuais na tela Full-HD mate. Você sempre pode selecionar configurações de qualidade de gráficos altas a máximas.

A Schenker colocou muito poder de computação em uma carcaça elegante e fina.

Um veloz SSD NVMe garante um sistema veloz e fluente. Também há um slot para um segundo SSD M.2 (NVMe ou SATA). Se você usar dois SSDs NVMe, eles poderão ser unidos em uma configuração RAID (0 ou 1). Além disso, você também pode adicionar um disco de 2,5 polegadas. Qualquer atualização ou manutenção requer a abertura da carcaça, o que acaba sendo bastante complicado.

A tela IPS de 144 Hz tem tempos de resposta curtos, ângulos de visão estáveis, bom contraste e uma ótima reprodução de cores. No entanto, o brilho da tela poderia ter sido melhor. Para usá-lo em interiores, o brilho é suficiente.

Embora a duração da bateria não inspire muito entusiasmo, não há problema em um portátil dessa classe de desempenho. O teclado chiclet (iluminação RGB) provou ser adequado para tarefas diárias. Isso é acompanhado por uma boa quantidade de conexões. No entanto sentimos falta de uma conexão Thunderbolt-3.

SCHENKER Key 16 - 09/20/2019 v7
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
65 / 80 → 81%
Peso
62 / 10-66 → 92%
Bateria
65 / 95 → 69%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
92%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
75 / 95 → 79%
Ruído
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
57%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Médio
74%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker Key 16 (Clevo P960EN-K): O portátil fino agrada com muito poder de computação
Sascha Mölck, 2019-08-21 (Update: 2019-08-23)