Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (Clevo X170SM-G): Poder sem fim

Desempenho premium a um preço de luxo. Para aqueles que não querem fazer nenhum compromisso técnico, o Schenker XMG Ultra 17 é o portátil certo ou, mais precisamente, o substituto do desktop. O gigantesco equipamento de 17 polegadas é alimentado por uma CPU de desktop e os chips de portátil mais rápidos da Nvidia. Você pode descobrir se o alto custo vale a pena, em nossa análise.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Notebookcheck), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Processador
Intel Core i9-10900K 10 x 3.7 - 5.3 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 250 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-S
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1560-1740 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 456.55
Memória
131072 MB 
, 4x 32 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 3200, dual-channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AUO B173ZAN03.0 (AUO309B), IPS, 4K/UHD, G-Sync, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Z490 (Comet Lake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB, 2048 GB 
, Slots: 4x M.2 2280
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS
Conexões
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 fone, 1 microfone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 43.5 x 399 x 319
Bateria
97 Wh, 6700 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.1, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 2 adaptadores de força de 280-watts, Cpara para adaptador de força, acessórios M.2, DVD de controladores, unidade USB com software, guia, cartão de garantia, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
4.7 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.756 kg
Preço
4.932 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
10/2020
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
4.7 kg43.5 mm17.30"3840x2160
87 %
10/2020
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
4.2 kg42 mm17.30"3840x2160
85 %
09/2020
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
3 kg20.7 mm17.30"1920x1080
83 %
07/2020
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
2.9 kg26.5 mm17.30"1920x1080

Size comparison

399 mm 319 mm 43.5 mm 4.7 kg397 mm 330 mm 42 mm 4.2 kg399 mm 293 mm 26.5 mm 2.9 kg399.8 mm 294.3 mm 20.7 mm 3 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
218 MB/s ∼100%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
212 MB/s ∼97% -3%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
186.9 MB/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 218, n=309)
94.3 MB/s ∼43% -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
236.8 MB/s ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
220 MB/s ∼93%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
197.8 MB/s ∼84% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=307)
111 MB/s ∼47% -50%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1560 MBit/s ∼100%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650w
1384 (1313min - 1423max) MBit/s ∼89% -11%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1337 (684min - 1391max) MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1270 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
  (630 - 1560, n=20)
959 MBit/s ∼61% -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=367)
758 MBit/s ∼49% -51%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1350 MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1279 (982min - 1390max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650w
1182 (613min - 1213max) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1150 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
  (554 - 1410, n=20)
926 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=367)
699 MBit/s ∼52% -48%
ColorChecker
26 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
21 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
24 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake: 18.59 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 26.81 ∆E
432
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AUO B173ZAN03.0 (AUO309B)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 442 cd/m² Médio: 423.4 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 442 cd/m²
Contraste: 1228:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 0.66
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
98% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
AUO B173ZAN03.0 (AUO309B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
LQ173M1JW03 (SHP14DC), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Response Times
50%
51%
75%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
50.4 (23.6, 26.8)
23.2 (12.4, 10.8)
54%
16.8 (11.6, 5.2)
67%
5.8 (2.4, 3.4)
88%
Response Time Black / White *
21.6 (7.6, 14)
11.6 (6.4, 5.2)
46%
14 (7.6, 6.4)
35%
8.4 (4.4, 4)
61%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-29%
4%
-10%
Brightness middle
442
419.5
-5%
338.3
-23%
310
-30%
Brightness
423
413
-2%
325
-23%
311
-26%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
91
-1%
82
-11%
Black Level *
0.36
0.4
-11%
0.27
25%
0.41
-14%
Contrast
1228
1049
-15%
1253
2%
756
-38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.38
3.4
22%
1.88
57%
2.41
45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.85
7.4
32%
3.23
70%
8.59
21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.66
3.28
-397%
1.32
-100%
1.13
-71%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.3
2
73%
2.4
67%
4.3
41%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.14 103%
2.39 92%
2.149 102%
CCT
6906 94%
6858 95%
6572 99%
7059 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
98
84.6
-14%
64.7
-34%
72
-27%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
97.9
0%
97.8
0%
94
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
11% / -17%
28% / 11%
33% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.6 ms rise
↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9717 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000201020202030204020502060207020802090210021102120213021402150216021702180219022002210222022302240225022602270228022902300231023202330234023502360237023802390240024102420243024402450246024702480249025002510252025302540Tooltip
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K, Intel Core i9-10900K: Ø2359 (2290.43-2532.77)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS Intel Core i9-10900K, Intel Core i9-10900K: Ø2464 (2424.1-2512.72)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K
217 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K
  (206 - 224, n=3)
216 Points ∼100% 0%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Core i9-10980HK
208 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
206 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
203 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 234, n=643)
163 Points ∼75% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-10900K
  (2513 - 2620, n=3)
2555 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K
2533 (2290.43min - 2532.77max) Points ∼99%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
2513 (2424.1min - 2512.72max) Points ∼98% -1%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1836 (1770.85min - 1836.46max) Points ∼72% -28%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1737 (1552.73min - 1737.47max) Points ∼68% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=651)
946 Points ∼37% -63%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=108)
378 Seconds * ∼100% -99%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
286 Seconds * ∼76% -51%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Core i9-10980HK
239 Seconds * ∼63% -26%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K
190 Seconds * ∼50%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
179 Seconds * ∼47% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K
  (167 - 190, n=3)
179 Seconds * ∼47% +6%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K
69987 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K
  (67252 - 70968, n=3)
69402 MIPS ∼99% -1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
67252 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Core i9-10980HK
46659 MIPS ∼67% -33%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
45938 MIPS ∼66% -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=109)
37724 MIPS ∼54% -46%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K
5811 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K
  (5349 - 5954, n=3)
5705 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5493 MIPS ∼95% -5%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
5349 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5336 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5811, n=109)
4973 MIPS ∼86% -14%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K
524 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K
  (493 - 532, n=3)
516 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
493 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
489 Points ∼93% -7%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Core i9-10980HK
465 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 560, n=154)
457 Points ∼87% -13%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
6181 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K
  (5825 - 6381, n=3)
6129 Points ∼99% +5%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K
5825 Points ∼94%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Core i9-10980HK
4487 Points ∼73% -23%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3883 Points ∼63% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=155)
3061 Points ∼50% -47%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K
11393 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K
  (10725 - 11414, n=3)
11177 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
10725 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8666 Points ∼76% -24%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7991 Points ∼70% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=92)
6652 Points ∼58% -42%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K
1428 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K
  (1336 - 1449, n=3)
1404 Points ∼98% -2%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1351 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
1336 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1302 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1428, n=92)
1237 Points ∼87% -13%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
19.8 fps ∼100% +9%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K
  (18.2 - 21, n=3)
19.7 fps ∼99% +8%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K
18.2 fps ∼92%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Core i9-10980HK
14.6 fps ∼74% -20%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.5 fps ∼63% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 19.8, n=108)
10.4 fps ∼53% -43%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average Intel Core i9-10900K
  (46.2 - 76, n=3)
56.8 s * ∼100% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 95.8, n=84)
56 s * ∼99% -16%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
51.9 s * ∼91% -8%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Core i9-10980HK
49.5 s * ∼87% -3%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K
48.1 s * ∼85%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
46.2 s * ∼81% +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.512 - 1.088, n=89)
0.61 sec * ∼100% -15%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.581 sec * ∼95% -9%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
0.567 sec * ∼93% -7%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.564 sec * ∼92% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K
  (0.528 - 0.567, n=3)
0.542 sec * ∼89% -2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K
0.531 sec * ∼87%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2533 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
226 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
217 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
7461 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
  (7358 - 7461, n=2)
7410 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
7358 Points ∼99% -1%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
6594 Points ∼88% -12%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
5556 Points ∼74% -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=323)
5365 Points ∼72% -28%
PCMark 10 Score
7461 pontos
Ajuda
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
10615.5 μs * ∼100% -7397%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
5066.3 μs * ∼48% -3478%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
637.3 μs * ∼6% -350%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
141.6 μs * ∼1%

* ... smaller is better

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-9%
-19%
-18%
Write 4K
172
116.4
-32%
68.03
-60%
125.8
-27%
Read 4K
47.3
43.85
-7%
42.04
-11%
52.86
12%
Write Seq
2980
2927
-2%
2221
-25%
1795
-40%
Read Seq
2790
1997
-28%
2202
-21%
2315
-17%
Write 4K Q32T1
481.8
467.6
-3%
494.5
3%
407.1
-16%
Read 4K Q32T1
564.5
537.8
-5%
539.5
-4%
411.9
-27%
Write Seq Q32T1
3295
3362
2%
2623
-20%
2844
-14%
Read Seq Q32T1
3550
3558
0%
3159
-11%
3130
-12%
AS SSD
-50%
-187%
-59%
Score Total
6232
4573
-27%
3997
-36%
3456
-45%
Score Write
2768
1819
-34%
1600
-42%
1492
-46%
Score Read
2304
1807
-22%
1578
-32%
1327
-42%
Access Time Write *
0.023
0.102
-343%
0.411
-1687%
0.036
-57%
Access Time Read *
0.039
0.041
-5%
0.057
-46%
0.145
-272%
4K-64 Write
2346.77
1423.72
-39%
1307.22
-44%
1228.66
-48%
4K-64 Read
1953.75
1524.69
-22%
1337.03
-32%
1032.13
-47%
4K Write
163.15
108.84
-33%
63.14
-61%
119.36
-27%
4K Read
52.7
41.51
-21%
35.39
-33%
49.48
-6%
Seq Write
2585.41
2867.3
11%
2296.83
-11%
1436.04
-44%
Seq Read
2980.46
2405.87
-19%
2060.1
-31%
2450.27
-18%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-30% / -33%
-103% / -116%
-39% / -42%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3550 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3295 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 564.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 481.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2790 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2980 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 172 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470148014901500151015201530154015501560157015801590160016101620163016401650166016701680169017001710172017301740175017601770178017901800181018201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010202020302040205020602070208020902100211021202130214021502160217021802190220022102220223022402250226022702280229023002310232023302340235023602370238023902400241024202430244024502460247024802490250025102520253025402550256025702580259026002610262026302640265026602670268026902700271027202730274027502760277027802790280028102820283028402850286028702880289029002910292029302940295029602970298029903000301030203030304030503060307030803090310031103120313031403150316031703180319032003210322032303240325032603270328032903300331033203330334033503360337033803390340034103420343034403450346034703480349035003510352035303540Tooltip
: Ø3518 (3323-3533.07)
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
36838 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
  (34021 - 36838, n=4)
35153 Points ∼95% -5%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
35128 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
34623 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
34021 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=734)
14980 Points ∼41% -59%
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
6633 Points ∼100%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
6621 Points ∼100% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
  (5903 - 6633, n=3)
6386 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
5903 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 6633, n=124)
4202 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
10938 Points ∼100%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
10718 Points ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
  (9638 - 10938, n=4)
10301 Points ∼94% -6%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
9908 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
9638 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=279)
6104 Points ∼56% -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
25597 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
25504 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
  (24211 - 25597, n=4)
24932 Points ∼97% -2%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
24416 Points ∼95% -4%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
24211 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=664)
12487 Points ∼49% -51%
3DMark 11 Performance
31493 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22606 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
11211 pontos
Ajuda
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120Tooltip
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB: Ø110 (105-115)
The Witcher 3
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K
80.5 (74min - 95max) fps ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K
75.6 (7.77min, 65.6P1 - 405max) fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
  (66.4 - 80.5, n=3)
74.2 fps ∼92% -2%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
66.4 (54min) fps ∼82% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.3 - 89.2, n=75)
45.9 fps ∼57% -39%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K
113.2 (106min - 129max) fps ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K
109 (7.68min) fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
  (93.4 - 113, n=4)
103 fps ∼91% -6%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
97.7 (93min - 103max) fps ∼86% -10%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
93.4 (78min) fps ∼83% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=432)
54.6 fps ∼48% -50%
baixo média alto ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 187 182 179 98.9 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 209 109 75.6 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 190 172 167 156 145 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 145 127 103 88.2 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 142 126 87.5 47.1 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 168 152 126 76.2 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 107 89.8 65.4 37.1 fps
Hunt Showdown (2020) 133 92.4 85.6 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 222 219 176 96.5 fps
Gears Tactics (2020) 154 125 82.1 43.2 fps
F1 2020 (2020) 234 161 122 72.5 fps
Death Stranding (2020) 149 147 108 60 fps
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 127 104 80 45 fps
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) 64.6 47.1 37.8 23.8 fps
Serious Sam 4 (2020) 113 95 84.2 54.4 fps
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 122 83.4 45.2 fps
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) 263 243 175 105 fps
FIFA 21 (2020) 278 278 274 238 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.540.539.139.643.42537.542.239.336.7393144.747.947.543.750.74032.134.436.131.337.55031.929.336.723.146634331.543.627.949.68033.926.146.821.952.110032.628.439.824.137.912536.831.138.724.940.416037.637.939.81841.32003926.640.123.241.925039.323.34120.243.531541.823.244.320.445.540040.422.143.214.446.450041.828.742.812.248.263044.221.944.111.247.980044.920.345.810.549.8100047.220.647.810.552.8125049.821.750.210.755.3160048.215.848.711.553.4200046.713.847.711.353.1250044.113.444.311.751.2315040.913.140.112.247.9400037.213.53712.644.8500035.917.736.812.843.7630031.713.133.313.339.6800029.213.328.413.137.31000025.913.124.912.834.71250022.213.721.212.432.21600016.812.317.111.827.3SPL56.532.15725.162.3N10.11.710.80.715.3median 39.3median 20.3median 40.1median 12.6median 44.8Delta6.16.55.33.34.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSchenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake

Barulho

Ocioso
27 / 32 / 57 dB
Carga
56 / 62 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
12%
10%
1%
9%
off / environment *
25
26.4
-6%
26.5
-6%
25
-0%
28.9 (24 - 32, n=420)
-16%
Idle Minimum *
27
27.5
-2%
27.8
-3%
33
-22%
31.2 (24 - 42, n=843)
-16%
Idle Average *
32
27.5
14%
27.8
13%
38
-19%
32.5 (24.4 - 46.6, n=843)
-2%
Idle Maximum *
57
29.8
48%
27.8
51%
45
21%
34.7 (24.4 - 57, n=843)
39%
Load Average *
56
30.9
45%
52.1
7%
54
4%
41.3 (28 - 59, n=844)
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55
60.7
-10%
51.8
6%
50
9%
Load Maximum *
62
66.6
-7%
59.1
5%
55
11%
48.7 (38.9 - 66.6, n=844)
21%

* ... smaller is better

 37 °C32 °C39 °C 
 32 °C31 °C32 °C 
 30 °C30 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
45 °C43 °C46 °C
33 °C36 °C30 °C
31 °C35 °C29 °C
Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 36.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
8%
-26%
-10%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
39
36.4
7%
54
-38%
59
-51%
46 (28 - 68.8, n=809)
-18%
Maximum Bottom *
46
43
7%
58.4
-27%
52
-13%
49.9 (25.9 - 78, n=807)
-8%
Idle Upper Side *
32
28
12%
40
-25%
30
6%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=760)
4%
Idle Bottom *
35
33.4
5%
39.4
-13%
29
17%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=758)
9%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.841.22535.439.93145.747.64032.141.85039.8446333.251.78025.254.110024.362.812528.87216028.572.920024.766.825024.568.831517.869.140014.87350013.275.86301377.38001175.910001175.4125010.879.416001178.3200011.178.9250011.479315012.179.7400012.483.4500012.585.4630012.788.7800012.878.11000012.579.91250012.173.61600011.568.7SPL2693.7N0.8109.6median 12.5median 75.9Delta3.53.433.735.633.733.133.733.128.626.828.626.725.626.729.125.129.13923.53937.624.237.647.322.247.358.723.458.760.822.260.859.121.559.165.52165.568.523.568.565.224.465.267.222.767.272.822.872.872.418.272.465.917.765.972.616.572.673.215.373.269.516.469.572.416.272.468.115.968.167.814.567.86514.86570.716.570.772.714.172.774.813.974.875147570.813.370.883.229.883.260.41.360.4median 68.5median 16.5median 68.54.33.54.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet LakeMSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 1.9 / 2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 34 / 40 / 47 Watt
Carga midlight 130 / 512 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
6%
4%
26%
41%
Idle Minimum *
34
25.9
24%
33.6
1%
16
53%
18.7 (1.9 - 113, n=803)
45%
Idle Average *
40
38
5%
43.9
-10%
25
37%
24.1 (6 - 119, n=803)
40%
Idle Maximum *
47
53.2
-13%
59
-26%
35
26%
29.7 (8.3 - 122, n=803)
37%
Load Average *
130
123.8
5%
134.9
-4%
177
-36%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=795)
20%
Witcher 3 ultra *
318
312.5
2%
242
24%
227
29%
Load Maximum *
512
459.8
10%
320
37%
280
45%
177 (21.9 - 590, n=794)
65%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
4h 51min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 13min
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 97 Wh
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 90 Wh
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 86 Wh
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 66 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-36%
-27%
62%
18%
Reader / Idle
291
221
-24%
602
107%
367 (39 - 1399, n=744)
26%
WiFi v1.3
228
146
-36%
191
-16%
356
56%
271 (62 - 683, n=470)
19%
Load
73
43
-41%
89
22%
80 (18 - 243, n=714)
10%

Pro

+ Tela UHD brilhante e colorida
+ Temperaturas moderadas da carcaça
+ Configuração moderna das portas
+ Bateria acessível desde o exterior
+ Desempenho excepcional
+ Bom sistema de som
+ CPU trocável

Contra

- Carcaça massiva e pesada
- Altas emissões de ruído
- Alto consumo de energia
- Dois adaptadores de força
- Duração pobre da bateria
- Muito caro
XMG Ultra 17 (Clevo X170SM-G): Test device provided by Schenker Technologies
XMG Ultra 17 (Clevo X170SM-G): Test device provided by Schenker Technologies

O XMG Ultra 17 é um substituto de desktop em uma classe própria.

Potência de ponta em uma carcaça grande com muitas conexões: É assim que a Schenker deseja conquistar usuários famintos por poder, para os quais o dinheiro é uma consideração secundária. A tela UHD colorida (embora com tempos de resposta um pouco mais fracos) e os dispositivos de entrada também são agradáveis.

No entanto, você terá que dizer adeus à ideia de mobilidade. As grandes dimensões, o peso pesado e a duração relativamente curta da bateria prendem os usuários às suas mesas. No final, o XMG Ultra 17 foi projetado apenas para uso estacionário; isso levanta a questão de por que não se deve recorrer diretamente a um PC desktop real, que é mais barato e, acima de tudo, mais silencioso.

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake - 10/13/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
71 / 80 → 89%
Peso
41 / 10-66 → 56%
Bateria
57 / 95 → 59%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
98%
Desempenho da aplicação
96%
Temperatura
88 / 95 → 93%
Ruído
39 / 90 → 44%
Audio
87%
Camera
43 / 85 → 51%
Médio
74%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (Clevo X170SM-G): Poder sem fim
Florian Glaser, 2020-10-16 (Update: 2020-10-20)