Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (Core i9-9900K, RTX 2080) Clevo P775TM1-G

Christian Hintze, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/11/2019

No half-measures. Esse foi provavelmente o lema da Schenker quando a empresa equipou o XMG Ultra 17 de mais de 4.000 Euros (~$4.485) com uma GPU Nvidia RTX 2080, um processador Intel Core i9-9900K e 64 GB de RAM. Leia mais para descobrir se esta fera 4K pode satisfazer as expectativas e como a carcaça da Clevo lida com uma GPU tão poderosa.

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Processador
Intel Core i9-9900K, Socketed
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1380 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 418.81, kein Optimus
Memória
65536 MB 
, 2x 32GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual channel, 2 de 4 slots ocupados
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, G-Sync, 4K / UHD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB 
, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500 GB. Baias: 2 x M.2 Type 2280 & 2 x 2,5 polegadas
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC898 @ Intel Kaby Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Headphones + S/PDIF optical, Microphone, Linha de entrada, Linha de saída, Card Reader: 6-em-1, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 41 x 418 x 295
Bateria
82 Wh Lítio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: Full-HD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.1, Teclado: Teclado gamer RGB com anti-ghosting, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 330 W, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
4.348 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.272 kg
Preço
4,500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

428 mm 314 mm 58 mm 4.6 kg425 mm 319 mm 51 mm 4.7 kg425 mm 327 mm 36.3 mm 4.9 kg418 mm 295 mm 41 mm 4.3 kg428 mm 314 mm 30 mm 3.7 kg
Right-hand side: audio In, microphone, audio Out, headphones/optical, 2 x USB Type-A, Kensington lock slot
Right-hand side: audio In, microphone, audio Out, headphones/optical, 2 x USB Type-A, Kensington lock slot
Left-hand side: Gigabit LAN, USB Type-C/Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C, USB Type-A, USB Type-A (powered), SD card reader
Left-hand side: Gigabit LAN, USB Type-C/Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-C, USB Type-A, USB Type-A (powered), SD card reader
Rear: HDMI 2.0, 2 x miniDP, power connector
Rear: HDMI 2.0, 2 x miniDP, power connector
Front: No connections
Front: No connections
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
190 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
190 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG G703GX
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
180 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=218)
91.6 MB/s ∼48% -52%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG G703GX
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
243 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
206 MB/s ∼85%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204 MB/s ∼84% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=216)
110 MB/s ∼45% -47%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
688 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼99% +2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
673 MBit/s ∼98%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
671 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (132 - 702, n=203)
593 MBit/s ∼86% -12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
712 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
682 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
648 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (131 - 721, n=203)
538 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
325
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 361 cd/m² Médio: 327.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 343 cd/m²
Contraste: 1106:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.03 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 0.86
ΔE Greyscale 6.29 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Asus ROG G703GX
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
AU Optronics B173ZAN (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
70%
-2%
65%
53%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.6 (20.4, 21.2)
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
83%
41.2 (20.8, 20.4)
1%
8 (4, 4)
81%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
60%
Response Time Black / White *
21.6 (9.6, 12)
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
56%
22.4 (10, 12.4)
-4%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
48%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
46%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-10%
2%
-13%
-5%
Brightness middle
343
296
-14%
349
2%
304
-11%
314.7
-8%
Brightness
328
279
-15%
339
3%
299
-9%
312
-5%
Brightness Distribution
82
85
4%
87
6%
89
9%
90
10%
Black Level *
0.31
0.25
19%
0.41
-32%
0.27
13%
0.38
-23%
Contrast
1106
1184
7%
851
-23%
1126
2%
828
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.03
4.77
5%
4.04
20%
4.66
7%
2.56
49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.91
9.08
-15%
6.01
24%
9.65
-22%
4.89
38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.86
1.46
-70%
0.93
-8%
1.72
-100%
1.71
-99%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.29
5.83
7%
4.19
33%
5.53
12%
3.4
46%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.47 89%
2.44 90%
2.5 88%
2.3 96%
CCT
6389 102%
8076 80%
6411 101%
8028 81%
6435 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
60
-32%
87
-1%
60
-32%
60.7
-31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
93
-7%
100
0%
93
-7%
94.6
-5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
30% / 2%
0% / 2%
26% / -1%
24% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.6 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940Tooltip
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1887 (1858.65-1934.33)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1747 (1697.29-1865)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K
209 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
207 Points ∼99%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼84% -15%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼83% -16%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points ∼80% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 212, n=445)
153 Points ∼73% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
1944 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K
1865 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1212 Points ∼62% -38%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points ∼52% -48%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼51% -49%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1979, n=446)
775 Points ∼40% -60%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K
2.38 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
2.38 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=413)
1.684 Points ∼71% -29%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
21.39 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K
21.2 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
10.98 Points ∼51% -49%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.4, n=514)
7.33 Points ∼34% -66%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
10192 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (2462 - 10192, n=230)
5825 Points ∼57% -43%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
64138 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (4590 - 64138, n=229)
20901 Points ∼33% -67%
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6832 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
64138 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
10192 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
21.39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
89.45 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.38 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
207 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
158.61 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1944 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7050 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
6959 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points ∼83% -17%
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5680 Points ∼81% -19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=143)
5062 Points ∼72% -28%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5697 Points ∼100% +12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼98% +10%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5123 Points ∼90% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5079 Points ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=335)
4967 Points ∼87% -2%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5243 Points ∼100% +12%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4692 Points ∼89%
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4622 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=353)
4244 Points ∼81% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼79% -12%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4692 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5079 pontos
Ajuda
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Asus ROG G703GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-25%
-16%
-15%
-31%
Write 4K
183.2
90.38
-51%
129.6
-29%
93.6
-49%
93.88
-49%
Read 4K
52.38
39.19
-25%
53.35
2%
38.82
-26%
40.56
-23%
Write Seq
1790
1863
4%
1863
4%
2455
37%
1468
-18%
Read Seq
1743
2100
20%
1670
-4%
2107
21%
1540
-12%
Write 4K Q32T1
549.7
260.2
-53%
310
-44%
298.7
-46%
293.5
-47%
Read 4K Q32T1
647.8
297
-54%
397
-39%
338.7
-48%
346
-47%
Write Seq Q32T1
3236
1870
-42%
2739
-15%
2902
-10%
1941
-40%
Read Seq Q32T1
3538
3471
-2%
3495
-1%
3536
0%
3266
-8%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Sequential Read: 1873 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1737 MB/s
512K Read: 2236 MB/s
512K Write: 2677 MB/s
4K Read: 64.05 MB/s
4K Write: 131.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 400.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 332 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5649 Points ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5383 Points ∼95%
Average of class Gaming
  (3020 - 5942, n=16)
4432 Points ∼78% -18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3679 Points ∼65% -32%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
26223 Points ∼100% +14%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
23089 Points ∼88%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
20901 Points ∼80% -9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points ∼69% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=473)
10673 Points ∼41% -54%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
36478 Points ∼100% +9%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
33396 Points ∼92%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28606 Points ∼78% -14%
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points ∼77% -16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points ∼62% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=547)
12476 Points ∼34% -63%
3DMark 11 Performance
26926 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
52716 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20760 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
99.7 fps ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
94.5 fps ∼95%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
76.5 (min: 63) fps ∼77% -19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
68.9 fps ∼69% -27%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K
61.7 fps ∼62% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=247)
46.7 fps ∼47% -51%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
169.6 fps ∼100% +25%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
136 (min: 104) fps ∼80% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
135.6 fps ∼80%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
130.1 fps ∼77% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=209)
79.6 fps ∼47% -41%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
144.3 fps ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
103.9 fps ∼72% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.9 - 159, n=155)
65.6 fps ∼45% -55%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
168.2 fps ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
121.9 fps ∼72% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.6 - 189, n=120)
72.9 fps ∼43% -57%
Doom
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
159.7 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (28.4 - 160, n=62)
102 fps ∼64% -36%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
161.3 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.2 - 169, n=39)
101 fps ∼63% -37%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110Tooltip
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB; The Witcher 3: Ø94.3 (87-101)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB; The Witcher 3: Ø62.5 (57-68)
baixo média alto ultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 335.4266.8135.694.555.8fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 275.8207.8168.2144.364.4fps
Doom (2016) 176.8171.2161.3159.791.8fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 33 / 35 dB
Carga
44 / 58 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Noise
-1%
-5%
6%
14%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
29
3%
28.8
4%
Idle Minimum *
30
30
-0%
33
-10%
30
-0%
28.8
4%
Idle Average *
33
35
-6%
35
-6%
32
3%
28.8
13%
Idle Maximum *
35
41
-17%
43
-23%
34
3%
29.4
16%
Load Average *
44
44
-0%
43
2%
44
-0%
35.7
19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55
51
7%
53
4%
46
16%
42.5
23%
Load Maximum *
58
52
10%
59
-2%
47
19%
45
22%

* ... smaller is better

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 8750H
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Heat
-1%
3%
-8%
7%
Maximum Upper Side *
45
50
-11%
44
2%
49
-9%
49
-9%
Maximum Bottom *
45
50
-11%
45
-0%
58
-29%
49
-9%
Idle Upper Side *
36
30
17%
32
11%
33
8%
25.4
29%
Idle Bottom *
33
33
-0%
33
-0%
33
-0%
27.2
18%

* ... smaller is better

 45 °C45 °C38 °C 
 45 °C45 °C37 °C 
 27 °C31 °C25 °C 
Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 37.6 °C
45 °C41 °C44 °C
39 °C39 °C37 °C
24 °C30 °C28 °C
Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 36.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  49 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-2.3 °C / -4.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.845.42537.738.33129.833.14034.234.9503231.16327.434.98031.636.110029.845.512524.749.616023.158.320023.863.625025.564.631522.668.140019.273.950018.675.563017.968.880017.468.710001866.5125018.863.616001864.6200017.467.4250017.567.7315017.765.6400017.662.8500017.761.2630017.461.2800017.5621000017.458.91250017.355.61600017.248.6SPL30.378.8N1.447.1median 17.9median 63.6Delta2.64.438.741.935.640.829.132.133.940.42730.625.927.427.236.228.451.42452.723.959.226.961.926.260.421.168.120.176.918.977.417.672.8187118.366.71962.117.461.917.165.817.367.617.265.817.264.417.362.417.362.917.262.417.260.417.158.61751.830.380.21.449.3median 17.6median 62.42.83.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Ultra 17 TuringSchenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 1.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 39 / 45 / 55 Watt
Carga midlight 122 / 346 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Asus ROG G703GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
9900K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator Triton 500
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
27%
19%
45%
54%
40%
Idle Minimum *
39
5
87%
33
15%
16
59%
10.4
73%
20 (3.8 - 113, n=633)
49%
Idle Average *
45
24
47%
42
7%
22
51%
14.6
68%
25.5 (6.8 - 119, n=633)
43%
Idle Maximum *
55
42
24%
49
11%
32
42%
16.3
70%
30.6 (8.3 - 122, n=633)
44%
Load Average *
122
112
8%
93
24%
89
27%
88.5
27%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=624)
15%
Load Maximum *
346
320
8%
293
15%
173
50%
182.4
47%
168 (21.9 - 590, n=623)
51%
Witcher 3 ultra *
259
284
-10%
156
40%
147
43%
155.4
40%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
2h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 15min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 05min
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Asus ROG G703GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 96 Wh
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
9900K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
61%
1%
56%
178%
73%
Reader / Idle
165
301
82%
171
4%
335
103%
682
313%
334 (39 - 1174, n=615)
102%
H.264
135
226
67%
245 (88 - 506, n=130)
81%
WiFi v1.3
135
238
76%
116
-14%
190
41%
387
187%
251 (78 - 622, n=296)
86%
Load
65
78
20%
73
12%
81
25%
88
35%
78.6 (18 - 202, n=582)
21%

Pro

+ E/S abundantes
+ Fácil de reparara e manter
+ Boas opções de atualização
+ Teclado iluminado
+ Tela 4K convincentes
+ Alto desempenho
+ SSDs velozes
+ Temperaturas moderadas da superfície

Contra

- Descontroladamente caro
- Trackpad trava em jogos
- Tempos de resposta lentos da tela
- CPU fortemente limitada com a bateria
- Ventiladores barulhentos
- Alto consumo de energia
- Duração de bateria pobre
The Schenker XMG Ultra 17 laptop review. Test device courtesy of Schenker Tech.
The Schenker XMG Ultra 17 laptop review. Test device courtesy of Schenker Tech.

O Schenker XMG Ultra 17 é uma excelente opção para quem procura uma alternativa para um PC de desktop para jogos. Nossa unidade de análise está repleta dos componentes mais potentes do mercado, enquanto a CPU com soquete deixa espaço para atualizações que poucos outros portáteis oferecem atualmente.

No entanto, teríamos esperado mais de um dispositivo tão caro. Nossa unidade de teste se afoga demais para nosso gosto, quando opera com bateria; apesar de apreciarmos que poucas pessoas deixariam o Ultra 17 desconectado de qualquer maneira, por causa de sua curta duração de bateria.

O Schenker XMG Ultra 17 é uma atualização valiosa sobre o seu antecessor e oferece desempenho de jogos de primeira classe. No entanto, ao nosso parecer ele decepciona com seus ventiladores barulhentos, seu preço exorbitante e seu afogamento pesado com a bateria.

A Schenker deve consertar o problema do trackpad, já que é quase inutilizável ao jogar, devido às frequentes quedas de conexão. Os alto-falantes também estão abaixo do esperado, assim como os tempos de reação da tela. Além disso, enquanto nossa unidade de análise gerencia bem suas temperaturas, ela faz isso com ventiladores barulhentos, intrusivamente e muitas vezes desnecessariamente altos.

Dito isso, o Ultra 17 oferece excelente desempenho em jogos, inúmeras portas, opções de manutenção excepcionais, um teclado decente e uma tela 4K impressionante. Resumindo, a Schenker acertou em cheio com o seu novo Ultra 17, mas perdeu as nossas melhores notas por causa de algumas falhas frustrantes.

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing - 03/06/2019 v6
Christian Hintze

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
75 / 81 → 93%
Peso
46 / 10-66 → 64%
Bateria
64%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
100%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
88 / 95 → 92%
Ruído
62 / 90 → 69%
Audio
82%
Médio
79%
88%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (Core i9-9900K, RTX 2080) Clevo P775TM1-G
Christian Hintze, 2019-03-11 (Update: 2019-03-11)