Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy A20e: Equipamento topo de linha a um preço acessível

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/29/2019

Um bom negócio. Gastar muito dinheiro por um smartphone? Não tem que ser assim, diz a Samsung, apresentando seu acessível Galaxy A20e de nível de entrada por 179 Euros (~$199). É capaz de ganhar pontos com um equipamento surpreendentemente abrangente, oferecendo um SoC octa-core, uma câmera dupla, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, dual SIM e VoLTE, entre outras coisas.

Samsung Galaxy A20e (Galaxy A Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 7884B
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.8 polegadas 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, HD+, Gorilla Glass 3, 16 Million colors, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 21.1 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB (exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de psoição, sensor de aceleração, sensor geomagnético, sensor hall, sensor de proximidade, Wi-Fi Direct, VoLTE, VoWiFi, aptX, DRM Widevine Level 1
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1.900, 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), downloads/uploads up to 150/50 Mbps, head Sar 0.498 W/kg, body SAR 1.303 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 147.4 x 69.7
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix dual camera: 13 MP wide angle (f/1.9, 28 mm) + 5 MP ultra-wide angle (f/2.2, 12 mm), videos em até 1920x1080 pixels @ 60 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, luz de selfie
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Um só alto-falante na borda inferior, Teclado: virtual, Carregador modular de 15 watts (9V/1.67A, 5V/2A), cabo USB (Type-C para Type-A), SIM tool, headset, instruções de início rápido, instruções de garantia, One UI 1.1, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
141 g, Suprimento de energia: 25 g
Preço
179 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

159.21 mm 75.21 mm 8.1 mm 186 g154 mm 72 mm 8.9 mm 156 g153 mm 71.9 mm 8.3 mm 145 g148.95 mm 71.3 mm 8.39 mm 161 g147.4 mm 69.7 mm 8.4 mm 141 g147.3 mm 71.5 mm 7.99 mm 149 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 (min: 327, max: 361) MBit/s ∼100% +483%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=418)
223 MBit/s ∼64% +272%
LG K40
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
221 (min: 107, max: 246) MBit/s ∼63% +268%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 (min: 81, max: 129) MBit/s ∼37% +113%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 47, max: 67) MBit/s ∼17%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼15% -12%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34.8 (min: 27, max: 44) MBit/s ∼10% -42%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
238 (min: 189, max: 285) MBit/s ∼100% +499%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=418)
212 MBit/s ∼89% +434%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 (min: 90, max: 111) MBit/s ∼43% +157%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39.7 (min: 23, max: 50) MBit/s ∼17%
LG K40
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39.6 (min: 10, max: 54) MBit/s ∼17% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼15% -11%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.6 (min: 2, max: 36) MBit/s ∼5% -71%
Samsung Galaxy A20e: overall route
Samsung Galaxy A20e: overall route
Samsung Galaxy A20e: lake
Samsung Galaxy A20e: lake
Samsung Galaxy A20e: turning point
Samsung Galaxy A20e: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
455
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 491 cd/m² Médio: 473.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.33 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 475 cd/m²
Contraste: 1357:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 8.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
Samsung Galaxy A20e
IPS, 1560x720, 5.8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Nokia 4.2
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
LG K40
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Sony Xperia L3
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Motorola Moto G7 Play
IPS, 1512x720, 5.7
Screen
30%
13%
5%
38%
10%
Brightness middle
475
541
14%
445
-6%
475
0%
533
12%
479
1%
Brightness
473
540
14%
424
-10%
467
-1%
533
13%
481
2%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
91
-2%
90
-3%
89
-4%
94
1%
Black Level *
0.35
0.33
6%
0.26
26%
0.32
9%
0.25
29%
0.37
-6%
Contrast
1357
1639
21%
1712
26%
1484
9%
2132
57%
1295
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.8
2.7
60%
5.9
13%
5.95
12%
2.8
59%
4.91
28%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
13.4
4.6
66%
9.3
31%
12.62
6%
5.1
62%
9.47
29%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.7
3.1
64%
6.8
22%
7.9
9%
1.9
78%
6.4
26%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.26 97%
2.2 100%
2.331 94%
2.11 104%
2.108 104%
CCT
9385 69%
6853 95%
8443 77%
8202 79%
6149 106%
7292 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 349.7 Hz ≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 349.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 349.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9428 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3271 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5576 Points ∼100% +70%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3183 Points ∼57% -3%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2638 Points ∼47% -19%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3628 Points ∼65% +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (2832 - 3569, n=3)
3224 Points ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4565 Points ∼82% +40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3714 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5913 Points ∼100% +59%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3267 Points ∼55% -12%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3375 Points ∼57% -9%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
4179 Points ∼71% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (3590 - 4082, n=3)
3795 Points ∼64% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=375)
4601 Points ∼78% +24%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1212 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1639 Points ∼100% +35%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
891 Points ∼54% -26%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
758 Points ∼46% -37%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1194 Points ∼73% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1168 - 1216, n=3)
1199 Points ∼73% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=377)
1374 Points ∼84% +13%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5305 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6187 Points ∼100% +17%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4623 Points ∼75% -13%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3805 Points ∼61% -28%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4912 Points ∼79% -7%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
5930 Points ∼96% +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (5136 - 5309, n=3)
5250 Points ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=373)
5046 Points ∼82% -5%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6902 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6870 Points ∼94% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6228 Points ∼85% -10%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4404 Points ∼60% -36%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6385 Points ∼87% -7%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
7321 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (6316 - 6902, n=3)
6680 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=541)
5537 Points ∼76% -20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2018 Points ∼85%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2172 Points ∼92% +8%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (2018 - 2105, n=3)
2058 Points ∼87% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=56)
2369 Points ∼100% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
498 Points ∼21%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
401 Points ∼17% -19%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (477 - 498, n=3)
485 Points ∼21% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=56)
2333 Points ∼100% +368%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
598 Points ∼29%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
490 Points ∼24% -18%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (576 - 598, n=3)
584 Points ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=59)
2039 Points ∼100% +241%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1628 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2768 Points ∼100% +70%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1500 Points ∼54% -8%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
912 Points ∼33% -44%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
980 Points ∼35% -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1554 - 1628, n=3)
1599 Points ∼58% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=386)
1836 Points ∼66% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
440 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1262 Points ∼79% +187%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
413 Points ∼26% -6%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
431 Points ∼27% -2%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
391 Points ∼24% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (439 - 498, n=3)
459 Points ∼29% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=386)
1605 Points ∼100% +265%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
525 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1436 Points ∼96% +174%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
492 Points ∼33% -6%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
488 Points ∼33% -7%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
451 Points ∼30% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (524 - 588, n=3)
546 Points ∼37% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=389)
1492 Points ∼100% +184%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1624 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2772 Points ∼100% +71%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1516 Points ∼55% -7%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
912 Points ∼33% -44%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
987 Points ∼36% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1624 - 1768, n=3)
1674 Points ∼60% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=401)
1813 Points ∼65% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
659 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2006 Points ∼92% +204%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
712 Points ∼33% +8%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
695 Points ∼32% +5%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
663 Points ∼30% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (646 - 826, n=3)
710 Points ∼32% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=401)
2189 Points ∼100% +232%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
759 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼100% +173%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
807 Points ∼39% +6%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
734 Points ∼35% -3%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
715 Points ∼34% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (746 - 937, n=3)
814 Points ∼39% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=402)
1863 Points ∼90% +145%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1630 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2708 Points ∼100% +66%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1575 Points ∼58% -3%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
881 Points ∼33% -46%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
998 Points ∼37% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1630 - 1747, n=3)
1686 Points ∼62% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=462)
1774 Points ∼66% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
443 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1189 Points ∼89% +168%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼27% -17%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
303 Points ∼23% -32%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
378 Points ∼28% -15%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (443 - 555, n=3)
481 Points ∼36% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=464)
1337 Points ∼100% +202%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
526 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1358 Points ∼100% +158%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
441 Points ∼32% -16%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
355 Points ∼26% -33%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
439 Points ∼32% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (526 - 654, n=3)
570 Points ∼42% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=472)
1275 Points ∼94% +142%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1646 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2834 Points ∼100% +72%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1568 Points ∼55% -5%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
912 Points ∼32% -45%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1026 Points ∼36% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1646 - 1756, n=3)
1692 Points ∼60% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=495)
1682 Points ∼59% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
637 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1925 Points ∼100% +202%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
704 Points ∼37% +11%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
512 Points ∼27% -20%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
624 Points ∼32% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (582 - 766, n=3)
662 Points ∼34% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=495)
1806 Points ∼94% +184%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
737 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼100% +181%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
802 Points ∼39% +9%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
567 Points ∼27% -23%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
684 Points ∼33% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (681 - 876, n=3)
765 Points ∼37% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=503)
1551 Points ∼75% +110%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
12075 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
19087 Points ∼100% +58%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
12390 Points ∼65% +3%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11443 Points ∼60% -5%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11696 Points ∼61% -3%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
16576 Points ∼87% +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (11287 - 13610, n=3)
12324 Points ∼65% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=652)
13700 Points ∼72% +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11427 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
29496 Points ∼100% +158%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13440 Points ∼46% +18%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10531 Points ∼36% -8%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10008 Points ∼34% -12%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
14603 Points ∼50% +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (11335 - 13711, n=3)
12158 Points ∼41% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=652)
20162 Points ∼68% +76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11565 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26308 Points ∼100% +127%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13192 Points ∼50% +14%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10721 Points ∼41% -7%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10340 Points ∼39% -11%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
15000 Points ∼57% +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (11324 - 13688, n=3)
12192 Points ∼46% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=653)
16700 Points ∼63% +44%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
51 fps ∼100% +155%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼45% +15%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼37% -5%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
24 fps ∼47% +20%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (20 - 25, n=3)
21.7 fps ∼43% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=683)
35.2 fps ∼69% +76%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
31 fps ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
44 fps ∼100% +42%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼77% +10%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
26 fps ∼59% -16%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
37 fps ∼84% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (31 - 41, n=3)
34.3 fps ∼78% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=686)
27.2 fps ∼62% -12%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼100% +109%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.8 fps ∼43% -11%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.7 fps ∼42% -12%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
10 fps ∼43% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (10 - 13, n=3)
11.3 fps ∼49% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=602)
19.5 fps ∼85% +77%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
20 fps ∼90% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼81% -10%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
16 fps ∼72% -20%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
20 fps ∼90% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (20 - 27, n=3)
22.3 fps ∼100% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=607)
18 fps ∼81% -10%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6.5 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼94% +131%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼40% -2%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6 fps ∼38% -8%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
6.9 fps ∼43% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (6.5 - 8.1, n=3)
7.03 fps ∼44% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=463)
15.9 fps ∼100% +145%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
14 fps ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼83% -7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼83% -7%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11 fps ∼70% -21%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
15 fps ∼96% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (14 - 19, n=3)
15.7 fps ∼100% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=466)
15.3 fps ∼97% +9%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.8 fps ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.8 fps ∼54% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼44% -19%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼48% -10%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
4.3 fps ∼48% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (4.8 - 6.4, n=3)
5.33 fps ∼60% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=166)
8.92 fps ∼100% +86%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1.4 fps ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼52% +129%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼19% -14%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.3 fps ∼21% -7%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1.3 fps ∼21% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1.4 - 1.8, n=3)
1.533 fps ∼25% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=166)
6.19 fps ∼100% +342%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
7.8 fps ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.6 fps ∼56% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.6 fps ∼49% -15%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.8 fps ∼50% -13%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
6.8 fps ∼50% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (7.8 - 10, n=3)
8.57 fps ∼63% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=167)
13.5 fps ∼100% +73%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼59% +118%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼24% -10%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.7 fps ∼25% -7%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3.8 fps ∼26% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (4 - 5, n=3)
4.33 fps ∼29% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=167)
14.8 fps ∼100% +270%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.2 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9.1 fps ∼85% +117%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.5 fps ∼33% -17%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.8 fps ∼26% -33%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3.9 fps ∼36% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (4.1 - 4.3, n=3)
4.2 fps ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=392)
10.7 fps ∼100% +155%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
8.6 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.8 fps ∼80% -9%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼72% -19%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼41% -53%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
7.9 fps ∼81% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (8.6 - 12, n=3)
9.77 fps ∼100% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=396)
9.7 fps ∼99% +13%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
95464 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
143352 Points ∼100% +50%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
77652 Points ∼54% -19%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
71347 Points ∼50% -25%
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
77798 Points ∼54% -19%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
97294 Points ∼68% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (89089 - 102121, n=3)
95558 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=286)
131662 Points ∼92% +38%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=92)
30.8 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (21.5 - 23.4, n=3)
22.4 Points ∼73% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.488 Points ∼70%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
15.921 Points ∼52% -26%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
13.684 Points ∼44% -36%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=82)
34.6 runs/min ∼100% +60%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.63 runs/min ∼63%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (20.7 - 22.2, n=3)
21.5 runs/min ∼62% -1%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
18.23 runs/min ∼53% -16%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
14.7 runs/min ∼42% -32%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=147)
63 Points ∼100% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
61 Points ∼97% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
48 Points ∼76%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (45 - 48, n=3)
47 Points ∼75% -2%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
38 Points ∼60% -21%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
30 Points ∼48% -37%
LG K40 (Chrome 74)
29 Points ∼46% -40%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
10679 Points ∼100% +43%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
8185 Points ∼77% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
7470 Points ∼70%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (6921 - 7470, n=3)
7152 Points ∼67% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=677)
6359 Points ∼60% -15%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
4810 Points ∼45% -36%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
4422 Points ∼41% -41%
LG K40 (Chrome 74)
4197 Points ∼39% -44%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG K40 (Chrome 74)
11955 ms * ∼100% -116%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
11184.8 ms * ∼94% -102%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=697)
10720 ms * ∼90% -93%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
9768.3 ms * ∼82% -76%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (5546 - 5917, n=3)
5763 ms * ∼48% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
5546.4 ms * ∼46%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
4806 ms * ∼40% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
3948 ms * ∼33% +29%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A20eXiaomi Redmi Note 7Nokia 4.2LG K40Sony Xperia L3Motorola Moto G7 PlayAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
19%
-41%
-15%
-10%
76%
-13%
-9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
57.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
61.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
64.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
49.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=136)
-23%
48.5 (9.5 - 87.1, n=409)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
77.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
80.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
84.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
68.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=136)
-14%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=409)
-16%
Random Write 4KB
13.18
16.06
22%
4.31
-67%
10
-24%
16.36
24%
73
454%
18.4 (0.75 - 77.3, n=179)
40%
20.6 (0.14 - 250, n=725)
56%
Random Read 4KB
79.76
82.94
4%
17.51
-78%
52.6
-34%
28.83
-64%
74
-7%
38.6 (3.59 - 117, n=179)
-52%
45.4 (1.59 - 175, n=725)
-43%
Sequential Write 256KB
103.57
204.72
98%
18.17
-82%
100.5
-3%
87.52
-15%
111
7%
94.7 (14.8 - 189, n=179)
-9%
93 (2.99 - 503, n=725)
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.36
283.36
-6%
220.39
-27%
261.7
-13%
290.89
-3%
289
-4%
235 (25.8 - 452, n=179)
-22%
262 (12.1 - 1468, n=725)
-13%
010203040506070Tooltip
; Dead Trigger 2; 1.6.1: Ø59.8 (49-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 1.6.3a: Ø24.5 (2-29)
Carga Máxima
 34.8 °C33.6 °C32.8 °C 
 35.1 °C35.1 °C33.2 °C 
 34.2 °C34.2 °C33.6 °C 
Máximo: 35.1 °C
Médio: 34.1 °C
30.7 °C31.4 °C32.7 °C
30.7 °C32 °C34.2 °C
30.4 °C31 °C34.3 °C
Máximo: 34.3 °C
Médio: 31.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  24.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.742.72533.637.83134.335.14033.830.6503933.56334.831.4803130.510030.232.112523.228.116022.835.320022.636.925019.844.231520.150.340016.951.950016.856.963015.259.480015.864.9100015.869.3125014.569.316001570.9200014.170250015.369.8315014.971.6400014.969.6500014.770.1630014.769.6800014.970.81000014.873.21250015.361.61600015.452SPL27.881.6N149.8median 15.3median 64.9Delta2.110.836.635.428.224.524.6242124.42834.727.226.825.422.223.621.519.223.92040.816.449.71756.616.560.415.665.214.37012.869.71470.314.67314.276.81476.914.179.514.479.414.277.414.675.514.173.114.666.914.767.715.17314.968.4155726.687.60.869median 14.6median 69.71.69hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A20eXiaomi Redmi Note 7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.66 / 1.63 / 1.67 Watt
Carga midlight 2.77 / 3.66 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
LG K40
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Play
3000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-50%
-17%
-15%
1%
-48%
-14%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.61
8%
0.74
-12%
0.68
-3%
0.57
14%
1
-52%
0.67 (0.65 - 0.7, n=3)
-2%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=751)
-33%
Idle Average *
1.63
1.95
-20%
1.9
-17%
1.53
6%
1.5
8%
1.7
-4%
1.617 (1.6 - 1.63, n=3)
1%
1.732 (0.6 - 6.2, n=750)
-6%
Idle Maximum *
1.67
2.03
-22%
2.21
-32%
1.95
-17%
1.51
10%
2.6
-56%
1.777 (1.66 - 2, n=3)
-6%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=751)
-21%
Load Average *
2.77
4.56
-65%
3.04
-10%
3.5
-26%
3.09
-12%
4.1
-48%
3.73 (2.77 - 5.4, n=3)
-35%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=745)
-47%
Load Maximum *
3.66
9.15
-150%
4.15
-13%
4.9
-34%
4.15
-13%
6.5
-78%
4.67 (3.66 - 6, n=3)
-28%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=745)
-61%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
23h 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 33min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 10min
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
LG K40
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Play
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
18%
-3%
4%
9%
-3%
Reader / Idle
1432
1950
36%
2127
49%
H.264
753
940
25%
750
0%
WiFi v1.3
715
768
7%
696
-3%
745
4%
641
-10%
690
-3%
Load
250
259
4%
242
-3%

Pro

+ Carcaça elegante e estável
+ Bluetooth 5.0 + aptX
+ Dual-SIM + microSD
+ VoLTE e VoWiFi
+ NFC
+ DRM Widevine L1
+ Sólido desempenho
+ Boa imagens com a luz do dia
+ Carregador rápido

Contra

- WLAN lento
- Adware pré instalado
- Câmera de selfies fraca
- Apenas IPS em vez de uma tela AMOLED
- Os jogos rodam com limitações

Veredicto - Muito smartphone por pouco dinheiro

Testing the Samsung Galaxy A20e. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Testing the Samsung Galaxy A20e. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Aqueles que planejaram apenas um pequeno orçamento para o seu novo smartphone terão muito valor pelo seu dinheiro com o Samsung Galaxy A20e. Claro, a carcaça é de plástico liso e você tem que gostar do formato pequeno. No entanto, se você ainda decidir pelo peso leve de 141 gramas, será recompensado com um equipamento abrangente e desempenho rápido.

Um negócio bem completo: O Samsung Galaxy A20e, que custa oficialmente 179 euros (~US$199), oferece equipamento surpreendentemente abrangente e recompensa os compradores com acabamento e sensação táctil agradável.

Com o seu SoC Exynos 7884B octa-core e 3 GB of RAM, o Galaxy A20e oferece suficiente desempenho para usar aplicativos cotidianos como YouTube e Whatsapp. Em termos de tecnologia de comunicação, está bem equipado com dual SIM, VoLTE, VoWiFi, NFC e Bluetooth 5.0, incluindo suporte para aptX. No entanto, não suporta uma grande quantidade de bandas LTE, mas a cobertura de frequencias é completamente suficiente para utilizá-lo na Europa.

Um bom recurso extra é o suporte do DRM Widevine L1, permitindo que o Galaxy A20e também transmita vídeos HD de provedores de streaming, como a Netflix. Outras vantagens são uma câmera dupla que tira fotos boas durante o dia e o carregador rápido incluído que pode recarregar a bateria completamente em 1,5 horas.

Por outro lado, você tem que se contentar com velocidades WLAN lentas no Galaxy A20e, e também com uma câmera selfie que só pode oferecer qualidade de fotografia instantânea na melhor das hipóteses. A Samsung também usa apenas uma tela IPS no dispositivo de entrada acessível. Embora faça um bom trabalho, é inferior à tecnologia dos painéis AMOLED nos modelos Galaxy-A mais caros.

Samsung Galaxy A20e - 07/24/2019 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
80%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
39 / 60 → 64%
Peso
93%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
28 / 63 → 45%
Desempenho da aplicação
56 / 70 → 79%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
60%
Médio
72%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy A20e: Equipamento topo de linha a um preço acessível
Manuel Masiero, 2019-07-29 (Update: 2019-07-30)