Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia L3

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/11/2019

Um Sony de nível de entrada. O Xperia L3 possui algumas das características de seus predecessores, ao mesmo tempo em que se destaca com um design mais moderno. Por cerca de 200 euros (~225 dólares), os compradores do smartphone fino no formato 2:1 também recebem um sistema de câmera dupla, bem como a opção de usar um cartão microSD e dois cartões SIM simultaneamente. Avaliamos em nosso teste o que mais o Sony Xperia L3 pode oferecer.

Sony Xperia L3 (Xperia Serie)
Processador
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
Placa gráfica
PowerVR GE8320
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.7 polegadas 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, até 512 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, bússola, magnetômetro
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850/900/1800/1900) 3G UMTS HSPA+ (1/2/5/8), 4G LTE (1/2/3/5/7/8/20/38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 154 x 72
Bateria
3300 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13+2 MP, 1/3"+1/5", 1.12+1.74 µm, f/2.2+f/2.4, Camera2 API: legacy
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 1/4", 1.12 µm, f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, fones estéreo, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0,6 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.33 W/kg, fanless
peso
156 g, Suprimento de energia: 55 g
Preço
199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Sony Xperia L3
Sony Xperia L3
Sony Xperia L3
Sony Xperia L3
Sony Xperia L3
Sony Xperia L3
Sony Xperia L3

Size Comparison

161.4 mm 76.9 mm 7.9 mm 178 g156.9 mm 76.4 mm 8.2 mm 180 g154 mm 72 mm 8.9 mm 156 g154.8 mm 73.6 mm 8 mm 162 g147.3 mm 71.5 mm 7.99 mm 149 g143 mm 70 mm 0.8 mm 161 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=434)
226 MBit/s ∼100% +77%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 (min: 81, max: 129) MBit/s ∼57%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.9 (min: 28, max: 64) MBit/s ∼25% -56%
Honor 10 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
48.4 (min: 42, max: 52) MBit/s ∼21% -62%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48.1 (min: 23, max: 55) MBit/s ∼21% -62%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34.8 (min: 27, max: 44) MBit/s ∼15% -73%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14.8 MBit/s ∼7% -88%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=434)
216 MBit/s ∼100% +112%
Sony Xperia L3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 (min: 90, max: 111) MBit/s ∼47%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.6 (min: 15, max: 59) MBit/s ∼22% -53%
Honor 10 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41.3 (min: 29, max: 56) MBit/s ∼19% -60%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38 (min: 19, max: 52) MBit/s ∼18% -63%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
16.7 MBit/s ∼8% -84%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.6 (min: 2, max: 36) MBit/s ∼5% -89%
GNSS - Sony Xperia L3
GNSS - Sony Xperia L3
GNSS - Sony Xperia L3
GNSS - Sony Xperia L3
GNSS - Sony Xperia L3
GNSS - Sony Xperia L3
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Sony Xperia L3 - Test chart
Sony Xperia L3 - Test chart (detail)
563
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
565
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 565 cd/m² Médio: 532.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19.55 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 533 cd/m²
Contraste: 2132:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11
Sony Xperia L3
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Nokia 3.1 Plus
IPS, 1440x720, 6
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
IPS, 1480x720, 6
Archos Diamond Gamma
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Honor 10 Lite
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Motorola Moto G7 Play
IPS, 1512x720, 5.7
Screen
-49%
-110%
-68%
-24%
-62%
Brightness middle
533
526
-1%
558
5%
310
-42%
467
-12%
479
-10%
Brightness
533
510
-4%
549
3%
313
-41%
446
-16%
481
-10%
Brightness Distribution
89
94
6%
89
0%
89
0%
89
0%
94
6%
Black Level *
0.25
0.17
32%
0.57
-128%
0.23
8%
0.58
-132%
0.37
-48%
Contrast
2132
3094
45%
979
-54%
1348
-37%
805
-62%
1295
-39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.8
6.64
-137%
7
-150%
6.51
-133%
1.5
46%
4.91
-75%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.1
10.02
-96%
13.3
-161%
10.21
-100%
4.5
12%
9.47
-86%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.9
6.4
-237%
9.4
-395%
5.6
-195%
2.4
-26%
6.4
-237%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.344 94%
2.15 102%
2.903 76%
2.22 99%
2.108 104%
CCT
6149 106%
7989 81%
9626 68%
7498 87%
6387 102%
7292 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9370 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
1413 Points ∼30%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
2321 Points ∼50%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3157 Points ∼67%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3628 Points ∼77%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2638 - 3015, n=5)
2764 Points ∼59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=320)
4684 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
1816 Points ∼34%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
2584 Points ∼49%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5266 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
4179 Points ∼79%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3300 - 3660, n=6)
3484 Points ∼66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=379)
4700 Points ∼89%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
652 Points ∼43%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
676 Points ∼44%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1523 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1194 Points ∼78%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (749 - 824, n=6)
778 Points ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=379)
1419 Points ∼93%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4912 Points ∼83%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4838 Points ∼82% -2%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
3214 Points ∼54% -35%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
3707 Points ∼63% -25%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5803 Points ∼98% +18%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
5930 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3805 - 5135, n=8)
4570 Points ∼77% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=371)
5249 Points ∼89% +7%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6385 Points ∼87%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6238 Points ∼85% -2%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
4009 Points ∼55% -37%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
4779 Points ∼65% -25%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7160 Points ∼98% +12%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
7321 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4404 - 6912, n=8)
5762 Points ∼79% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=542)
5678 Points ∼78% -11%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
980 Points ∼47%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1025 Points ∼50% +5%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
1177 Points ∼57% +20%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2070 Points ∼100% +111%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (912 - 1025, n=7)
965 Points ∼47% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4635, n=379)
1957 Points ∼95% +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
391 Points ∼22%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
415 Points ∼24% +6%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
305 Points ∼17% -22%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
839 Points ∼48% +115%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (376 - 434, n=7)
416 Points ∼24% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=379)
1761 Points ∼100% +350%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
451 Points ∼28%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
478 Points ∼29% +6%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
365 Points ∼22% -19%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
967 Points ∼59% +114%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (435 - 493, n=7)
476 Points ∼29% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6875, n=380)
1634 Points ∼100% +262%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
987 Points ∼48%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1015 Points ∼49% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
887 Points ∼43% -10%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
1141 Points ∼55% +16%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2067 Points ∼100% +109%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (900 - 1015, n=8)
961 Points ∼46% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=408)
1866 Points ∼90% +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
663 Points ∼28%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
687 Points ∼29% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
246 Points ∼11% -63%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
532 Points ∼23% -20%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1246 Points ∼53% +88%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (452 - 701, n=8)
655 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=408)
2340 Points ∼100% +253%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
715 Points ∼36%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
740 Points ∼38% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
293 Points ∼15% -59%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
604 Points ∼31% -16%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1367 Points ∼70% +91%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (513 - 747, n=8)
703 Points ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=408)
1966 Points ∼100% +175%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
998 Points ∼43%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1026 Points ∼44% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
1097 Points ∼47% +10%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2326 Points ∼100% +133%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (860 - 1026, n=7)
949 Points ∼41% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4492, n=459)
1864 Points ∼80% +87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
378 Points ∼26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
363 Points ∼25% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
263 Points ∼18% -30%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
683 Points ∼47% +81%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (257 - 378, n=7)
319 Points ∼22% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=459)
1452 Points ∼100% +284%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
439 Points ∼31%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
424 Points ∼30% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
316 Points ∼23% -28%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
810 Points ∼58% +85%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (305 - 439, n=7)
374 Points ∼27% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=460)
1398 Points ∼100% +218%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1026 Points ∼45%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1021 Points ∼45% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
890 Points ∼39% -13%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
1149 Points ∼50% +12%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2282 Points ∼100% +122%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (854 - 1050, n=8)
959 Points ∼42% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=500)
1727 Points ∼76% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
624 Points ∼33%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
575 Points ∼30% -8%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
55 Points ∼3% -91%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
543 Points ∼29% -13%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1137 Points ∼60% +82%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (370 - 624, n=8)
507 Points ∼27% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=499)
1891 Points ∼100% +203%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
684 Points ∼42%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
637 Points ∼39% -7%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
69 Points ∼4% -90%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
615 Points ∼38% -10%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1280 Points ∼78% +87%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (428 - 684, n=8)
566 Points ∼35% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8136, n=502)
1636 Points ∼100% +139%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11696 Points ∼71%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11590 Points ∼70% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
10151 Points ∼61% -13%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
7095 Points ∼43% -39%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
11211 Points ∼68% -4%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
16576 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9674 - 14036, n=8)
11549 Points ∼70% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=661)
14062 Points ∼85% +20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10008 Points ∼46%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10412 Points ∼48% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
5340 Points ∼25% -47%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
10069 Points ∼46% +1%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19546 Points ∼90% +95%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
14603 Points ∼67% +46%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9536 - 10826, n=8)
10350 Points ∼48% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=659)
21674 Points ∼100% +117%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10340 Points ∼59%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10653 Points ∼61% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
5969 Points ∼34% -42%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
9211 Points ∼52% -11%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
16775 Points ∼95% +62%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
15000 Points ∼85% +45%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9835 - 11287, n=8)
10562 Points ∼60% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=659)
17596 Points ∼100% +70%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
20 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
7.6 fps ∼19%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼46%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
39 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
24 fps ∼62%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (17 - 20, n=7)
19 fps ∼49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=682)
37.5 fps ∼96%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
27 fps ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
13 fps ∼35%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
26 fps ∼70%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
36 fps ∼97%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
37 fps ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (24 - 27, n=7)
26 fps ∼70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=691)
27.8 fps ∼75%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.7 fps ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
2.8 fps ∼13%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
7.6 fps ∼35%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
21 fps ∼97%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
10 fps ∼46%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9.1 - 10, n=7)
9.64 fps ∼45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=588)
21.6 fps ∼100%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
17 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
5.5 fps ∼28%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
15 fps ∼75%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼95%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
20 fps ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (15 - 17, n=7)
16.6 fps ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=597)
19.2 fps ∼96%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6 fps ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
fps ∼0%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
4.9 fps ∼28%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
14 fps ∼79%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
6.9 fps ∼39%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.6 - 6.2, n=7)
5.81 fps ∼33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=454)
17.7 fps ∼100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11 fps ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
fps ∼0%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
11 fps ∼66%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
13 fps ∼78%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
15 fps ∼90%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (10 - 11, n=7)
10.6 fps ∼64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=456)
16.6 fps ∼100%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼42%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4 fps ∼39%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
4.3 fps ∼42%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.1 - 4.3, n=7)
4.26 fps ∼42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=172)
10.2 fps ∼100%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.3 fps ∼18%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2.6 fps ∼37%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1.3 fps ∼18%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (1.3 - 1.6, n=7)
1.386 fps ∼20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=171)
7.05 fps ∼100%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.8 fps ∼46%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.4 fps ∼43%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
6.8 fps ∼46%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (6.7 - 6.8, n=7)
6.79 fps ∼46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=176)
14.9 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.6 fps ∼22%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7 fps ∼42%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3.8 fps ∼23%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.5 - 4.7, n=7)
3.79 fps ∼23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=176)
16.6 fps ∼100%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.7 fps ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
fps ∼0%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
2.7 fps ∼22%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7.6 fps ∼63%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3.9 fps ∼32%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2.1 - 2.9, n=7)
2.7 fps ∼22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=379)
12.1 fps ∼100%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
fps ∼0%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5.1 fps ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
fps ∼0%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
5.6 fps ∼52%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.8 fps ∼63%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
7.9 fps ∼73%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.8 - 5.1, n=7)
4.46 fps ∼41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=383)
10.8 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
77798 Points ∼55%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
76153 Points ∼54% -2%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
42138 Points ∼30% -46%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
56895 Points ∼40% -27%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
129928 Points ∼92% +67%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
97294 Points ∼69% +25%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (71347 - 77798, n=8)
74621 Points ∼53% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=290)
141701 Points ∼100% +82%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
57309 Points ∼65%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
55264 Points ∼63% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
37022 Points ∼42% -35%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
42643 Points ∼49% -26%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
76724 Points ∼87% +34%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (52433 - 57309, n=7)
54829 Points ∼62% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5600 - 293444, n=490)
87858 Points ∼100% +53%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
776 Points ∼74%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
784 Points ∼75% +1%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
636 Points ∼61% -18%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
726 Points ∼69% -6%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1004 Points ∼96% +29%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1045 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (10 - 784, n=7)
542 Points ∼52% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=626)
754 Points ∼72% -3%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
760 Points ∼37%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
754 Points ∼37% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
430 Points ∼21% -43%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
789 Points ∼39% +4%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1470 Points ∼72% +93%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1069 Points ∼53% +41%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (744 - 799, n=7)
769 Points ∼38% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=626)
2035 Points ∼100% +168%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1247 Points ∼42%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1231 Points ∼41% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
647 Points ∼22% -48%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
758 Points ∼26% -39%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2969 Points ∼100% +138%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1068 Points ∼36% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (661 - 1247, n=7)
949 Points ∼32% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=626)
1503 Points ∼51% +21%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2517 Points ∼50%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2423 Points ∼48% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
1220 Points ∼24% -52%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
1758 Points ∼35% -30%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5026 Points ∼100% +100%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3865 Points ∼77% +54%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (2165 - 2619, n=7)
2361 Points ∼47% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=626)
2951 Points ∼59% +17%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1166 Points ∼54%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1152 Points ∼53% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
682 Points ∼31% -42%
Archos Diamond Gamma
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Adreno 505, 3072
935 Points ∼43% -20%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2167 Points ∼100% +86%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1465 Points ∼68% +26%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (323 - 1166, n=7)
878 Points ∼41% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=626)
1478 Points ∼68% +27%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
9423 Points ∼100% +113%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
8185 Points ∼87% +85%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=684)
6701 Points ∼71% +52%
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
4508 Points ∼48% +2%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
4422 Points ∼47%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3312 - 4508, n=8)
4168 Points ∼44% -6%
Archos Diamond Gamma (Chrome 69)
3289 Points ∼35% -26%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98)
3114 Points ∼33% -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Archos Diamond Gamma (Chrome 69)
13316 ms * ∼100% -19%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98)
12935.3 ms * ∼97% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (10846 - 12799, n=8)
11813 ms * ∼89% -6%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
11184.8 ms * ∼84%
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
10887.7 ms * ∼82% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=709)
10602 ms * ∼80% +5%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
4806 ms * ∼36% +57%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
4119.7 ms * ∼31% +63%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=157)
66.9 Points ∼100% +123%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
62 Points ∼93% +107%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
30 Points ∼45%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (26 - 30, n=6)
28.8 Points ∼43% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018 (Chrome 71.0.3578.98)
26 Points ∼39% -13%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=100)
35.5 Points ∼100% +159%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
13.684 Points ∼39%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (12.9 - 13.7, n=2)
13.3 Points ∼37% -3%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=89)
39.6 runs/min ∼100% +169%
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72)
14.7 runs/min ∼37%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
14.7 runs/min ∼37% 0%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia L3Nokia 3.1 PlusSamsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018Archos Diamond GammaHonor 10 LiteMotorola Moto G7 PlayAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
10%
0%
80%
90%
0%
9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
62.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
61.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
66.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
64.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
50.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=140)
-19%
49.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=417)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
80.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
84.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
75.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
84.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
68.9 (8.2 - 96.5, n=140)
-15%
67.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=417)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
16.36
8.33
-49%
13.33
-19%
11.8
-28%
66.06
304%
73
346%
18.3 (0.75 - 77.3, n=181)
12%
21.5 (0.14 - 250, n=734)
31%
Random Read 4KB
28.83
52.37
82%
48.42
68%
27.7
-4%
45.15
57%
74
157%
38.9 (3.59 - 117, n=181)
35%
46.5 (1.59 - 196, n=734)
61%
Sequential Write 256KB
87.52
35.72
-59%
99.58
14%
117.2
34%
190.55
118%
111
27%
94.6 (14.8 - 189, n=181)
8%
95.4 (2.99 - 590, n=734)
9%
Sequential Read 256KB
290.89
272.51
-6%
292.15
0%
276.5
-5%
288.55
-1%
289
-1%
236 (25.8 - 452, n=181)
-19%
269 (12.1 - 1504, n=734)
-8%
PUBG Compare
0102030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø24.3 (3-26)
; Balanced: Ø24.1 (11-27)
Arena of Valor
010203040Tooltip
; min: Ø31.2 (26-33)
; high HD: Ø28.4 (24-32)
Carga Máxima
 32.6 °C31.9 °C31.5 °C 
 31.7 °C32 °C32.3 °C 
 31.3 °C31.3 °C30.2 °C 
Máximo: 32.6 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C
29.8 °C29.8 °C32.9 °C
29.9 °C29.9 °C32.5 °C
29.9 °C30 °C31.6 °C
Máximo: 32.9 °C
Médio: 30.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.238.22527.828.73124.127.34024.924.65033.331.26323.826.58026.230.310026.224.912517.427.416017.238.320017.338.525016.446.331516.252.240015.757.550014.661.263016.366.380013.472.7100013.873.4125014.373.1160013.871.6200014.370.3250014.671315013.775.4400014.579.7500014.479.4630014.373.5800014.669.71000014.667.81250014.568.61600014.850SPL26.786.4N0.863median 14.6median 68.6Delta1.411.739.135.339.135.830.330.834.234.531.438.327.529.421.823.522.823.224.322.520.526.119.335.718.742.917.349.216.755.616.559.716.663.315.66315.162.814.163.314.161.614.462.813.96213.868.213.663.514.666.21466.914.266.413.767.713.763.313.947.163.426.976.616.80.938.5median 14.6median 62.828.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia L3Nokia 3.1 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia L3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 3.1 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.57 / 1.5 / 1.51 Watt
Carga midlight 3.09 / 4.15 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
Nokia 3.1 Plus
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
3300 mAh
Archos Diamond Gamma
3000 mAh
Honor 10 Lite
3400 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Play
3000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-56%
-30%
-121%
-61%
-50%
-16%
-36%
Idle Minimum *
0.57
1
-75%
0.68
-19%
1.7
-198%
1
-75%
1
-75%
0.729 (0.57 - 1, n=8)
-28%
0.877 (0.2 - 3.4, n=769)
-54%
Idle Average *
1.5
2.4
-60%
1.78
-19%
2.6
-73%
2.19
-46%
1.7
-13%
1.576 (1 - 2.4, n=8)
-5%
1.734 (0.6 - 6.2, n=768)
-16%
Idle Maximum *
1.51
2.9
-92%
1.82
-21%
3.8
-152%
2.2
-46%
2.6
-72%
2.02 (1.51 - 2.9, n=8)
-34%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=769)
-34%
Load Average *
3.09
3.7
-20%
4.44
-44%
6.3
-104%
4.64
-50%
4.1
-33%
3.06 (2.18 - 4, n=8)
1%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=763)
-32%
Load Maximum *
4.15
5.5
-33%
6.13
-48%
7.4
-78%
7.7
-86%
6.5
-57%
4.63 (3.43 - 5.9, n=8)
-12%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=763)
-42%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
35h 27min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 30min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 02min
Sony Xperia L3
3300 mAh
Nokia 3.1 Plus
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus 2018
3300 mAh
Archos Diamond Gamma
3000 mAh
Honor 10 Lite
3400 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Play
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
44%
17%
-19%
-28%
8%
Reader / Idle
2127
1730
-19%
1533
-28%
H.264
750
838
12%
502
-33%
WiFi v1.3
641
920
44%
707
10%
518
-19%
484
-24%
690
8%
Load
242
398
64%
178
-26%

Pro

+ Conexão USB Type-C
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ DualSIM + microSD
+ Sensor de digitais confiável

Contra

- Apenas 32 GB de armazenamento interno
- Amazon e Netflix sem HD
- Somente LTE Cat. 4

Verdict - Sony retires the brick design

Testing the Sony Xperia L3. Test units provided by Sony Germany and notebooksbilliger.de
Testing the Sony Xperia L3. Test units provided by Sony Germany and notebooksbilliger.de

Com o Xperia L3, a Sony oferece um smartphone com uma boa relação preço-desempenho. O hardware integrado é adequado para a faixa de preço e o desempenho é suficiente para todas as tarefas comuns do dia a dia. A câmera dupla pode tirar fotos aceitáveis e o alto-falante é adequado para reprodução ocasional de mídia. A duração da bateria também está ao nível da concorrência e, em termos de design, a Sony finalmente deu um grande passo à frente. 

No entanto, o teste também revelou alguns pontos fracos que podem ser rastreados até o software. Vários programas de benchmark não conseguiram rodar ou não reconheceram a conexão ativa com a internet. Se estes são problemas que também se tornam geralmente perceptíveis, os usuários só descobrirão durante o uso constante. No entanto, uma atualização de software no futuro pode facilmente aliviar quaisquer problemas que possam surgir.

Embora o Sony Xperia L3 seja um bom smartphone de nível básico, ele está lutando com alguns problemas de software menores. 

Sony Xperia L3 - 04/09/2019 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 69%
Peso
92%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
27 / 63 → 43%
Desempenho da aplicação
50 / 70 → 72%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
61%
Médio
73%
83%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia L3
Mike Wobker, 2019-04-11 (Update: 2019-04-11)