Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone BQ Aquaris X Pro

Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/02/2017

Classe média espanhola. Com o Aquaris X Pro, a BQ apresenta um Android de 5,2 polegadas, sem características de assassino, por um lado, mas também não há pontos fracos que merecem destaque no outro. Atualização: A atualização fornece novas correções de segurança.

BQ Aquaris X Pro (Aquaris Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 2.2 GHz
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.2 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 423 PPI, Multitouch de 10 pontos, IPS, 2.5D, Dinorex Glass, Anti-Fingerprint, Quantum Color+, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 54 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de digitais, sensor de proximidade, acelerometro, eCompass, giroscópio, sensor hall, USB OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G quad-band (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz), 3G quad-band (850, 900, 1,900, 2,100 MHz), 4G/LTE Cat. 6 (800, 1,800, 2,100, 2,600 MHz), downloads up to 300 Mbps, uploads up to 50 Mbps, SAR (head) 0.298 W/Kg, SAR (body) 1.780 W/Kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.8 x 146.5 x 72.7
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Samsung S5K2L7SX, f/1.8 aperture, 6 Largan lenses, dual-tone flash, detecção facial, autofoco, vídeos de até 4k @ 30 FPS, câmera lenta (720p @ 120 FPS), suport para fotografias RAW
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix Samsung S5K4H8YX, apertura f/2.0, 3 lentes, flash, vídeos de até 1080p @ 60 FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: Virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Cabo USB 2.0 (Type-C para Type-A), carregador modular, ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, BQ Launcher, BQ Plus, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
158 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
379 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s ∼100% +39%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼64% -12%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.4 MBit/s ∼16% -78%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
298 MBit/s ∼100% +101%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s ∼56% +13%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼50%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.5 MBit/s ∼17% -65%
BQ Aquaris X Pro: total
BQ Aquaris X Pro: total
BQ Aquaris X Pro: apex
BQ Aquaris X Pro: apex
BQ Aquaris X Pro: bridge
BQ Aquaris X Pro: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: total
Garmin Edge 500: total
Garmin Edge 500: apex
Garmin Edge 500: apex
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
507
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 507 cd/m² Médio: 473.3 cd/m² Minimum: 9.68 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 458 cd/m²
Contraste: 898:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 10.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.28
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei Nova Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
18%
46%
18%
20%
Brightness
473
481
2%
542
15%
443
-6%
334
-29%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
93
6%
93
6%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.51
0.5
2%
0.4
22%
Contrast
898
970
8%
1128
26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.1
4.2
41%
1.6
77%
5.4
24%
4.6
35%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
10.5
4.8
54%
1.5
86%
6.7
36%
2.8
73%
Gamma
2.28 105%
2.36 102%
2.28 105%
2.33 103%
2.29 105%
CCT
8951 73%
7568 86%
6422 101%
8262 79%
6612 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5559 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 18.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼29%
Huawei Nova Plus
64601 Points ∼28% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points ∼27% -8%
Honor 8
94671 Points ∼42% +43%
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points ∼54% +85%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼72%
Huawei Nova Plus
4672 Points ∼68% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points ∼59% -17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼71%
Huawei Nova Plus
5724 Points ∼69% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points ∼61% -14%
Honor 8
6735 Points ∼81% +14%
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points ∼60% -16%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼52%
Huawei Nova Plus
754 Points ∼49% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points ∼43% -18%
Honor 8
994 Points ∼64% +23%
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points ∼62% +19%
Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼12%
Huawei Nova Plus
1015 Points ∼12% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points ∼18% +51%
Honor 8
1703 Points ∼20% +68%
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points ∼54% +358%
Memory (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼24%
Huawei Nova Plus
1553 Points ∼35% +48%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points ∼34% +44%
Honor 8
2556 Points ∼58% +144%
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points ∼34% +42%
System (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼53%
Huawei Nova Plus
2132 Points ∼32% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points ∼39% -26%
Honor 8
3952 Points ∼60% +13%
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points ∼50% -5%
Overall (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼35%
Huawei Nova Plus
1262 Points ∼33% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points ∼37% +7%
Honor 8
2034 Points ∼54% +55%
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points ∼57% +65%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
3401 Points ∼40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼27%
Huawei Nova Plus
3148 Points ∼19% -28%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼19%
Huawei Nova Plus
880 Points ∼18% -5%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼70%
Huawei Nova Plus
1773 Points ∼59% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points ∼57% -20%
Honor 8
2482 Points ∼82% +16%
ZTE Axon 7
1783 Points ∼59% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼7%
Huawei Nova Plus
384 Points ∼7% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points ∼13% +87%
Honor 8
818 Points ∼15% +116%
ZTE Axon 7
2528 Points ∼47% +567%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼12%
Huawei Nova Plus
465 Points ∼12% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points ∼21% +76%
Honor 8
961 Points ∼25% +107%
ZTE Axon 7
2500 Points ∼64% +439%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼71%
Huawei Nova Plus
1795 Points ∼60% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points ∼58% -18%
Honor 8
2587 Points ∼86% +22%
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points ∼36% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼9%
Huawei Nova Plus
733 Points ∼9% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points ∼14% +45%
Honor 8
1112 Points ∼14% +53%
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points ∼60% +537%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼17%
Huawei Nova Plus
844 Points ∼17% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points ∼23% +36%
Honor 8
1273 Points ∼26% +50%
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points ∼54% +218%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼25%
Huawei Nova Plus
15823 Points ∼23% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points ∼19% -23%
Honor 8
15531 Points ∼22% -9%
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points ∼30% +20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼3%
Huawei Nova Plus
13412 Points ∼3% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points ∼3% 0%
Honor 8
22157 Points ∼5% +67%
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points ∼5% +83%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼7%
Huawei Nova Plus
13882 Points ∼7% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points ∼7% -5%
Honor 8
20235 Points ∼10% +45%
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points ∼12% +67%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼2%
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps ∼3% +48%
Honor 8
41 fps ∼3% +78%
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps ∼7% +283%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼5%
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼5% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps ∼7% +50%
Honor 8
43 fps ∼9% +95%
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps ∼12% +141%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼2%
Huawei Nova Plus
9.9 fps ∼2% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼3% +53%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼3% +94%
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps ∼7% +298%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼3%
Huawei Nova Plus
10 fps ∼3% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼4% +56%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼5% +98%
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps ∼8% +192%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼2%
Huawei Nova Plus
6.2 fps ∼1% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps ∼2% +42%
Honor 8
10 fps ∼2% +56%
ZTE Axon 7
31 fps ∼7% +384%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼4%
Huawei Nova Plus
6.6 fps ∼4% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps ∼5% +43%
Honor 8
11 fps ∼6% +75%
ZTE Axon 7
16 fps ∼9% +154%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼1%
Huawei Nova Plus
3.7 fps ∼1% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼1% +49%
Honor 8
6.3 fps ∼2% +80%
ZTE Axon 7
18 fps ∼5% +414%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼0%
Huawei Nova Plus
3.4 fps ∼0% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼0% +49%
Honor 8
6.9 fps ∼0% +97%
ZTE Axon 7
9.8 fps ∼0% +180%

Legend

 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Nova Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Honor 8
64.046 Points ∼100% +139%
ZTE Axon 7
44.754 Points ∼70% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
32.222 Points ∼50% +20%
Huawei Nova Plus
31.3 Points ∼49% +17%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
26.837 Points ∼42%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 8
10692 Points ∼100% +142%
ZTE Axon 7
8062 Points ∼75% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5256 Points ∼49% +19%
Huawei Nova Plus
4730 Points ∼44% +7%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4424 Points ∼41%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
BQ Aquaris X Pro
8741.5 ms * ∼100%
Huawei Nova Plus
8027.7 ms * ∼92% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
6442.4 ms * ∼74% +26%
ZTE Axon 7
3096.5 ms * ∼35% +65%
Honor 8
2979 ms * ∼34% +66%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 8
138 Points ∼100% +60%
ZTE Axon 7
111 Points ∼80% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
89 Points ∼64% +3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
86 Points ∼62%
Huawei Nova Plus
83 Points ∼60% -3%

* ... smaller is better

BQ Aquaris X ProHuawei Nova PlusSamsung Galaxy A5 2017Honor 8ZTE Axon 7
AndroBench 3-5
2%
-19%
7%
52%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
49.77
33.32
-33%
55.98
12%
23.59
-53%
51.34
3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.69
41.64
-47%
73.71
-6%
53.68
-32%
78.39
0%
Random Write 4KB
12.07
30.12
150%
12.13
0%
31.5
161%
16.22
34%
Random Read 4KB
37.97
35.64
-6%
22.41
-41%
34.16
-10%
121.07
219%
Sequential Write 256KB
139.63
82.13
-41%
77.1
-45%
119.25
-15%
150.92
8%
Sequential Read 256KB
270.46
241.57
-11%
182.03
-33%
247.46
-9%
406.49
50%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
comparado com
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 (min)
 3475 Quad, Mali-T720
16
   ...
BlackBerry KeyOne
 625, Adreno 506
30
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
 835, Adreno 540
30
BQ Aquaris X Pro
 626, Adreno 506
30
OnePlus 5
 835, Adreno 540
30
Sony Xperia L1
 MT6737T, Mali-T720 MP2
30
   ...
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L (max)
 Z8500, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
58
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high57 fps
Carga Máxima
 37.9 °C37.9 °C40.1 °C 
 37.6 °C37.5 °C40.5 °C 
 36.6 °C37.4 °C38.6 °C 
Máximo: 40.5 °C
Médio: 38.2 °C
35 °C36.1 °C36.5 °C
33.9 °C35 °C37 °C
33.6 °C35.9 °C37 °C
Máximo: 37 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.634.92525.436.23125.331.14032.928.55033.633.46331.631.18028.423.81002724.812520.829.61602234.620021.342.225020.847.631521.251.940019.45650019.557.963017.759.780017.962.5100017.864.8125017.366.1160017.467.5200016.774250017.274.2315018.271.1400017.977.9500017.681.4630017.778.3800017.875.31000017.9731250018.170.51600018.263.7SPL3086.1N1.360median 17.9BQ Aquaris X Promedian 64.8Delta1.31231.641.125.44025.336.732.93633.635.631.630.628.432.92733.820.841.72244.421.348.420.850.521.256.619.462.519.566.217.766.117.974.217.877.317.374.317.473.816.771.817.269.318.269.517.966.517.661.417.755.817.854.517.959.918.152.218.249.530831.350.1median 17.9Samsung Galaxy A5 2017median 61.41.39.531.64225.437.625.331.432.936.333.651.731.634.328.431.72736.920.8262229.921.341.820.853.921.259.419.463.619.567.417.766.117.970.117.869.817.373.417.474.616.776.717.277.218.278.917.979.617.67617.772.917.873.217.971.118.164.518.257.23087.41.368.4median 17.9Huawei Nova Plusmedian 69.81.310.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
BQ Aquaris X Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.39 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.7 / 1.78 Watt
Carga midlight 4.42 / 6.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Power Consumption
17%
26%
-9%
1%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.49
27%
0.64
4%
0.78
-16%
0.64
4%
Idle Average *
1.7
1.63
4%
1.36
20%
1.89
-11%
0.84
51%
Idle Maximum *
1.78
1.76
1%
1.4
21%
2.02
-13%
0.87
51%
Load Average *
4.42
2.98
33%
2.53
43%
5.28
-19%
6.02
-36%
Load Maximum *
6.3
4.99
21%
3.63
42%
5.44
14%
10.45
-66%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
30h 40min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
12h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 44min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 14min
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Battery Runtime
20%
46%
-17%
-11%
Reader / Idle
1840
2048
11%
2418
31%
1487
-19%
1735
-6%
H.264
644
732
14%
984
53%
526
-18%
704
9%
WiFi v1.3
730
820
12%
843
15%
499
-32%
411
-44%
Load
254
366
44%
467
84%
255
0%
245
-4%

Pro

+ Carcaça elegante e rígida
+ Tela FHD muito brilhante
+ Porta USB Type-C
+ SO Android atual
+ LTE Cat.4
+ GPS preciso
+ Boa câmera
+ Leitor de impressões digitais
+ Desempenho veloz
+ Fonte de alimentação de carga rápida
+ Baixas temperaturas
+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Slot Dual-SIM híbrido
- Cores inexatas
- Alto falante mono
In review: BQ Aquaris X Pro. Review unit courtesy of BQ Spain.
In review: BQ Aquaris X Pro. Review unit courtesy of BQ Spain.

O BQ Aquaris X Pro é um smartphone de gama média muito decente que não tem problemas para se enfrentar com a concorrência. Muito pelo contrário: graças à sua robusta carcaça de metal/vidro de alta qualidade, o smartphone de 5,2 polegadas pode ser facilmente confundido com um dispositivo premium. O mesmo deve ser dito sobre a tela IPS de alta resolução com seu alto brilho e resolução FHD com boa definição.

Além disso, o Aquaris X Pro oferece uma câmera muito boa de 12 MP, um leitor de digitais confiável e rápido e um desempenho geral muito alto, resultando em jogabilidade fluida até mesmo os jogos mais exigentes, finalizando com um sensor GPS preciso, longa duração da bateria, Quick Charge, e uma porta USB Type-C.

O BQ Aquaris X Pro é um smartphone muito bom, com benefícios que compensam claramente suas limitações.

Há apenas algumas desvantagens que vale a pena notar, e eles estão longe estragar o show. Pense neles mais como pequenas falhas cosméticas.

Por um lado, o slot do cartão SIM secundário compartilha seu espaço com o leitor de cartão MicroSD - você pode usar um ou outro. A precisão de cores da tela é medíocre na melhor das hipóteses, mas apenas visível com equipamentos de medição profissionais e não a olho nu. Além disso, o Aquaris X Pro tem apenas um alto-falante, embora um pouco adequado.

BQ Aquaris X Pro - 07/24/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
72 / 75 → 96%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
47 / 60 → 79%
Peso
92%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
28 / 63 → 44%
Desempenho da aplicação
51 / 70 → 73%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
84%
Médio
76%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone BQ Aquaris X Pro
Manuel Masiero, 2017-08- 2 (Update: 2017-08-10)