Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone BQ Aquaris X Pro
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 458 cd/m²
Contraste: 898:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 10.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.28
| BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 20% | 47% | 17% | 8% | |
| Brightness middle | 458 | 485 6% | 539 18% | 451 -2% | 328 -28% |
| Brightness | 473 | 481 2% | 542 15% | 443 -6% | 334 -29% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 93 6% | 93 6% | 88 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.5 2% | 0.4 22% | ||
| Contrast | 898 | 970 8% | 1128 26% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 4.2 41% | 1.6 77% | 5.4 24% | 4.6 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.5 | 7.9 46% | 2.6 82% | 9.9 32% | 14.7 -1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.5 | 4.8 54% | 1.5 86% | 6.7 36% | 2.8 73% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.36 93% | 2.28 96% | 2.33 94% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 8951 73% | 7568 86% | 6422 101% | 8262 79% | 6612 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | Huawei Nova Plus | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | Honor 8 | ZTE Axon 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 2% | -19% | 7% | 52% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 270.5 | 241.6 -11% | 182 -33% | 247.5 -9% | 406.5 50% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 139.6 | 82.1 -41% | 77.1 -45% | 119.3 -15% | 150.9 8% |
| Random Read 4KB | 37.97 | 35.64 -6% | 22.41 -41% | 34.16 -10% | 121.1 219% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.07 | 30.12 150% | 12.13 0% | 31.5 161% | 16.22 34% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 78.7 | 41.64 -47% | 73.7 -6% | 53.7 -32% | 78.4 0% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 49.77 | 33.32 -33% | 56 13% | 23.59 -53% | 51.3 3% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 57 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
BQ Aquaris X Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.17 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.67 / 1.7 / 1.78 Watt |
| Carga |
4.42 / 6.3 Watt |
    
| |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | 26% | -9% | 1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.67 | 0.49 27% | 0.64 4% | 0.78 -16% | 0.64 4% |
| Idle Average * | 1.7 | 1.63 4% | 1.36 20% | 1.89 -11% | 0.84 51% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.78 | 1.76 1% | 1.4 21% | 2.02 -13% | 0.87 51% |
| Load Average * | 4.42 | 2.98 33% | 2.53 43% | 5.28 -19% | 6.02 -36% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.3 | 4.99 21% | 3.63 42% | 5.44 14% | 10.45 -66% |
* ... smaller is better
| BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 20% | 46% | -17% | -11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1840 | 2048 11% | 2418 31% | 1487 -19% | 1735 -6% |
| H.264 | 644 | 732 14% | 984 53% | 526 -18% | 704 9% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 730 | 820 12% | 843 15% | 499 -32% | 411 -44% |
| Load | 254 | 366 44% | 467 84% | 255 0% | 245 -4% |
Pro
Contra
O BQ Aquaris X Pro é um smartphone de gama média muito decente que não tem problemas para se enfrentar com a concorrência. Muito pelo contrário: graças à sua robusta carcaça de metal/vidro de alta qualidade, o smartphone de 5,2 polegadas pode ser facilmente confundido com um dispositivo premium. O mesmo deve ser dito sobre a tela IPS de alta resolução com seu alto brilho e resolução FHD com boa definição.
Além disso, o Aquaris X Pro oferece uma câmera muito boa de 12 MP, um leitor de digitais confiável e rápido e um desempenho geral muito alto, resultando em jogabilidade fluida até mesmo os jogos mais exigentes, finalizando com um sensor GPS preciso, longa duração da bateria, Quick Charge, e uma porta USB Type-C.
O BQ Aquaris X Pro é um smartphone muito bom, com benefícios que compensam claramente suas limitações.
Há apenas algumas desvantagens que vale a pena notar, e eles estão longe estragar o show. Pense neles mais como pequenas falhas cosméticas.
Por um lado, o slot do cartão SIM secundário compartilha seu espaço com o leitor de cartão MicroSD - você pode usar um ou outro. A precisão de cores da tela é medíocre na melhor das hipóteses, mas apenas visível com equipamentos de medição profissionais e não a olho nu. Além disso, o Aquaris X Pro tem apenas um alto-falante, embora um pouco adequado.
BQ Aquaris X Pro
-
07/24/2017 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero
Pricecompare
