Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 675 cd/m²
Contraste: 1467:1 (Preto: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.36
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.65 | BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Honor 10 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84 | Motorola Moto Z3 Play AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.00 | Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00 | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -31% | 15% | -10% | 15% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 675 | 458 -32% | 555 -18% | 446 -34% | 458 -32% | 541 -20% |
| Brightness | 650 | 473 -27% | 537 -17% | 451 -31% | 463 -29% | 538 -17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 88 -4% | 94 2% | 93 1% | 92 0% | 96 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.51 -11% | 0.39 15% | 0.22 52% | ||
| Contrast | 1467 | 898 -39% | 1423 -3% | 2082 42% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 7.1 -20% | 2.3 61% | 6.58 -12% | 4 32% | 5.8 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.5 | 14.5 -53% | 6 37% | 11.94 -26% | 7.4 22% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.6 | 10.5 -59% | 3.9 41% | 3.6 45% | 4.7 29% | 2.7 59% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.28 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.199 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.07 106% |
| CCT | 7846 83% | 8951 73% | 6212 105% | 7116 91% | 7425 88% | 6570 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2315 Hz | ≤ 46 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 46 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 () | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6X | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (349 - 353, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=12) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=14) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=13) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (47 - 63, n=9) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67) | |
* ... smaller is better
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro | BQ Aquaris X Pro | Nokia 7 Plus | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | Motorola Moto Z3 Play | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -18% | 7% | 2% | 75% | 15% | 729% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 280.8 | 270.5 -4% | 283.1 1% | 299.9 7% | 271.7 -3% | 273 ? -3% | 1505 ? 436% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 204.8 | 139.6 -32% | 211.6 3% | 104.2 -49% | 182.5 -11% | 176.8 ? -14% | 1112 ? 443% |
| Random Read 4KB | 51.3 | 37.97 -26% | 54.7 7% | 82.6 61% | 60.6 18% | 59.1 ? 15% | 247 ? 381% |
| Random Write 4KB | 15.43 | 12.07 -22% | 19.62 27% | 14.69 -5% | 84.1 445% | 31.7 ? 105% | 271 ? 1656% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.3 ? | 78.7 ? -6% | 82.2 -1% | 77.9 ? -6% | 83.7 0% | 77.4 ? -7% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 61.1 ? | 49.77 ? -19% | 62.3 2% | 62.3 ? 2% | 62.7 3% | 58.3 ? -5% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| HD | 30 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.13 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.63 / 2.16 / 2.18 Watt |
| Carga |
4.48 / 7.87 Watt |
    
| |
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro 3100 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 4% | -14% | 27% | -30% | -3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.63 | 0.67 -6% | 0.65 -3% | 1.3 -106% | 0.67 -6% | 1.052 ? -67% | 0.897 ? -42% |
| Idle Average * | 2.16 | 1.7 21% | 1.76 19% | 2 7% | 1.02 53% | 2.62 ? -21% | 1.452 ? 33% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.18 | 1.78 18% | 1.78 18% | 2.7 -24% | 1.1 50% | 2.88 ? -32% | 1.629 ? 25% |
| Load Average * | 4.48 | 4.42 1% | 4.47 -0% | 3.7 17% | 3.86 14% | 5.1 ? -14% | 5.55 ? -24% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.87 | 6.3 20% | 9.13 -16% | 5.1 35% | 5.97 24% | 9.08 ? -15% | 8.31 ? -6% |
* ... smaller is better
| BQ Aquaris X2 Pro 3100 mAh | Honor 10 3400 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X2 3100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 11% | 32% | 6% | 13% | 34% | 2% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1374 | 1162 -15% | 1840 34% | 1245 -9% | 1703 24% | 1546 13% | |
| H.264 | 658 | 662 1% | 644 -2% | 648 -2% | 706 7% | 908 38% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 605 | 663 10% | 730 21% | 595 -2% | 672 11% | 646 7% | 617 2% |
| Load | 145 | 216 49% | 254 75% | 199 37% | 158 9% | 260 79% |
Pro
Contra
A BQ decidiu tornar os dois modelos da nova série X2 mais semelhantes e equipou ambas as versões com as mesmas câmeras. Portanto, as únicas diferenças estão no material do carcaça, no armazenamento e memória, e no processador. Se você comparar as duas versões de 64 GB entre si, a única diferença perceptível é o material da parte traseira do telefone, o SoC e 50 Euros (~$60). No final, é uma questão de escolha - as opções são vidro ou plástico. A menos que você também espere que seu smartphone possa rodar jogos exigentes. Nesse caso, você terá que optar pela versão Pro. Pessoalmente, achamos que o cargo adicional de cerca de 120 Euros (~$140) é um pouco alto demais pela memória maior (6 GB de RAM) e armazenamento interno (128 GB) - não temos certeza se a versão Pro realmente terá sucesso.
O Aquaris X2 Pro é uma atualização bem-sucedida do smartphone mais caro da BQ, mas ele precisa aceitar algumas críticas.
O X2 Pro nos impressionou com seus recursos, sua tela brilhante, longa duração da bateria e boas câmeras. O novo módulo de câmera dupla tira ótimas fotos - é uma pena que não use mais o sensor superior da Samsung. Se a BQ não tivesse feito essa mudança, as câmeras poderiam ter sido ainda melhores. O fabricante também poderia ter adicionado uma opção para escolher uma reprodução de cor mais natural para a tela.
Ficamos muito felizes com a qualidade das chamadas do BQ Aquaris X2 Pro. É uma pena que a taxa de transferência seja limitada ao LTE Cat. 6, mas ainda podemos viver com isso. No entanto, não podemos entender por que um fabricante europeu não suporta todas as bandas de frequência usadas na UE e por que o VoLTE e o VoWifi não são suportados desde o lançamento do telefone. Teríamos também esperado algumas bandas mais básicas fora das regiões europeias.
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
-
07/26/2018 v6(old)
Daniel Schmidt
Pricecompare
