Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Cubot King Kong

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/22/2018

Tão forte quanto um gorila? Acessível e robusto, é assim que o Cubot King Kong se apresenta. É um smartphone de 5 polegadas com uma SoC medianamente rápida protegida em uma carcaça pesada, protegida contra água e poeira. Será que isso é suficiente para a dura realidade da vida cotidiana?

Cubot King Kong
Processador
Mediatek MT6580M
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-400 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de 3,5 polegadas, Card Reader: microSD de até 64 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​1700/​1900/​2100), Dual SIM, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 14.85 x 153 x 80.2
Bateria
16.7 Wh, 4400 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, contrast AF, LED flash, videos @720p
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Um só alto-falantes na traseira, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, mini chave de fenda, SAR values: 0.72 W/kg (body), 0.31 W/kg (head); IP68 certified, fanless, ruggedized
peso
246 g, Suprimento de energia: 52 g
Preço
119 Euro

 

Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 939, n=220)
197 MBit/s ∼100% +262%
Oukitel WP5000
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
114 MBit/s ∼58% +110%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 MBit/s ∼50% +81%
Cubot King Kong
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.4 MBit/s ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Mali-T720, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼25% -10%
CAT S31
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.6 MBit/s ∼21% -24%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.8 - 703, n=220)
190 MBit/s ∼100% +229%
Oukitel WP5000
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼57% +89%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼54% +79%
Cubot King Kong
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
57.7 MBit/s ∼30%
CAT S31
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.3 MBit/s ∼21% -32%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Mali-T720, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
37.9 MBit/s ∼20% -34%
GPS Cubot King Kong – overview
GPS Cubot King Kong – overview
GPS Cubot King Kong – woods
GPS Cubot King Kong – woods
GPS Cubot King Kong – bridge
GPS Cubot King Kong – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – woods
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – woods
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
454
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 466 cd/m² Médio: 448.9 cd/m² Minimum: 18.25 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 466 cd/m²
Contraste: 1864:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.03 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
91.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Cubot King Kong
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Oukitel WP5000
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
CAT S31
IPS, 1280x720, 4.7
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Ulefone Armor X
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Screen
-60%
19%
-25%
9%
Brightness middle
466
506
9%
784
68%
445
-5%
564
21%
Brightness
449
503
12%
750
67%
437
-3%
541
20%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
92
2%
88
-2%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.25
0.97
-288%
0.45
-80%
0.67
-168%
0.37
-48%
Contrast
1864
522
-72%
1742
-7%
664
-64%
1524
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.03
9.4
-34%
4.28
39%
6.5
8%
5.1
27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
16.25
19.9
-22%
8.75
46%
10.6
35%
9.6
41%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.1
13
-83%
6.1
14%
7.2
-1%
5.4
24%
Gamma
2.26 106%
2.59 93%
2.49 96%
2.53 95%
2.1 114%
CCT
7244 90%
10219 64%
7175 91%
8274 79%
7755 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 43 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.6 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
23540 Points ∼33%
Oukitel WP5000
57489 Points ∼81% +144%
CAT S31
24865 Points ∼35% +6%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
35379 Points ∼50% +50%
Ulefone Armor X
37586 Points ∼53% +60%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (15185 - 25237, n=7)
21786 Points ∼31% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (23540 - 230421, n=316)
70825 Points ∼100% +201%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
21088 Points ∼19%
Oukitel WP5000
78088 Points ∼70% +270%
Ulefone Armor X
46435 Points ∼42% +120%
Average Mediatek MT6580M
21088 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (42032 - 290397, n=93)
110891 Points ∼100% +426%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
0 Points ∼0%
Oukitel WP5000
4174 Points ∼93%
CAT S31
2300 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
3446 Points ∼77%
Ulefone Armor X
3184 Points ∼71%
Average Mediatek MT6580M
0 Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone (3210 - 8601, n=182)
4480 Points ∼100%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
3041 Points ∼61%
Oukitel WP5000
4947 Points ∼100% +63%
CAT S31
3080 Points ∼62% +1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
4508 Points ∼91% +48%
Ulefone Armor X
4298 Points ∼87% +41%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2553 - 3041, n=7)
2779 Points ∼56% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (4711 - 10264, n=345)
4696 Points ∼95% +54%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
567 Points ∼64%
Oukitel WP5000
888 Points ∼100% +57%
CAT S31
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
661 Points ∼74% +17%
Ulefone Armor X
7 Points ∼1% -99%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (9 - 640, n=7)
492 Points ∼55% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=420)
673 Points ∼76% +19%
Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
138 Points ∼9%
Oukitel WP5000
1120 Points ∼74% +712%
CAT S31
256 Points ∼17% +86%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
253 Points ∼17% +83%
Ulefone Armor X
188 Points ∼12% +36%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (137 - 145, n=7)
139 Points ∼9% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=420)
1514 Points ∼100% +997%
Memory (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
403 Points ∼33%
Oukitel WP5000
1229 Points ∼100% +205%
CAT S31
328 Points ∼27% -19%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
1066 Points ∼87% +165%
Ulefone Armor X
900 Points ∼73% +123%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (189 - 404, n=7)
318 Points ∼26% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=420)
1115 Points ∼91% +177%
System (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
985 Points ∼31%
Oukitel WP5000
3225 Points ∼100% +227%
CAT S31
899 Points ∼28% -9%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
1396 Points ∼43% +42%
Ulefone Armor X
1491 Points ∼46% +51%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (966 - 1011, n=7)
988 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=420)
2222 Points ∼69% +126%
Overall (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
420 Points ∼30%
Oukitel WP5000
1409 Points ∼100% +235%
CAT S31
1 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
706 Points ∼50% +68%
Ulefone Armor X
206 Points ∼15% -51%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (144 - 432, n=7)
359 Points ∼25% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=423)
1131 Points ∼80% +169%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
773 Points ∼20%
Oukitel WP5000
2663 Points ∼68% +245%
Ulefone Armor X
1416 Points ∼36% +83%
Average Mediatek MT6580M
773 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 14362, n=118)
3891 Points ∼100% +403%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
1237 Points ∼31%
Oukitel WP5000
3943 Points ∼98% +219%
CAT S31
1135 Points ∼28% -8%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
1855 Points ∼46% +50%
Ulefone Armor X
1847 Points ∼46% +49%
Average Mediatek MT6580M
1237 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 10558, n=164)
4032 Points ∼100% +226%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
425 Points ∼35%
Oukitel WP5000
863 Points ∼72% +103%
CAT S31
437 Points ∼36% +3%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
629 Points ∼52% +48%
Ulefone Armor X
662 Points ∼55% +56%
Average Mediatek MT6580M
425 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 4265, n=165)
1200 Points ∼100% +182%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
8112 Points ∼67%
Oukitel WP5000
Points ∼0% -100%
CAT S31
6396 Points ∼53% -21%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
11459 Points ∼95% +41%
Ulefone Armor X
10195 Points ∼84% +26%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (7748 - 8913, n=7)
8032 Points ∼66% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=455)
12109 Points ∼100% +49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
2396 Points ∼15%
Oukitel WP5000
Points ∼0% -100%
CAT S31
5042 Points ∼32% +110%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
3985 Points ∼26% +66%
Ulefone Armor X
3585 Points ∼23% +50%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2396 - 2485, n=7)
2466 Points ∼16% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=455)
15527 Points ∼100% +548%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
2841 Points ∼21%
Oukitel WP5000
Points ∼0% -100%
CAT S31
5291 Points ∼39% +86%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
4661 Points ∼35% +64%
Ulefone Armor X
4188 Points ∼31% +47%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2841 - 2946, n=7)
2914 Points ∼22% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=456)
13411 Points ∼100% +372%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
4.2 fps ∼16%
Oukitel WP5000
24 fps ∼90% +471%
CAT S31
5.6 fps ∼21% +33%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
6.8 fps ∼25% +62%
Ulefone Armor X
5.9 fps ∼22% +40%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.2 - 11, n=7)
5.3 fps ∼20% +26%
Average of class Smartphone (4.2 - 177, n=481)
26.8 fps ∼100% +538%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
7.5 fps ∼24%
Oukitel WP5000
31 fps ∼100% +313%
CAT S31
9.8 fps ∼32% +31%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
11 fps ∼35% +47%
Ulefone Armor X
9.2 fps ∼30% +23%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.4 - 11, n=7)
8.11 fps ∼26% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (7.5 - 120, n=484)
23.4 fps ∼75% +212%

Legend

 
Cubot King Kong Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel WP5000 Mediatek Helio P25, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
CAT S31 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Armor X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=339)
34.4 Points ∼100% +169%
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66)
26.91 Points ∼78% +110%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
20.988 Points ∼61% +64%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
18.148 Points ∼53% +42%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (12.8 - 14.5, n=7)
13.9 Points ∼40% +9%
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66)
12.789 Points ∼37%
CAT S31
12.442 Points ∼36% -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66)
5132 Points ∼100% +132%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=475)
5013 Points ∼98% +127%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
3151 Points ∼61% +43%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
3133 Points ∼61% +42%
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66)
2208 Points ∼43%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2075 - 2280, n=7)
2157 Points ∼42% -2%
CAT S31
2010 Points ∼39% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66)
18388.4 ms * ∼100%
CAT S31
17827.9 ms * ∼97% +3%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
15875.7 ms * ∼86% +14%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (14579 - 18388, n=7)
15401 ms * ∼84% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=494)
11873 ms * ∼65% +35%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
11130 ms * ∼61% +39%
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66)
10209.2 ms * ∼56% +44%

* ... smaller is better

Cubot King KongOukitel WP5000CAT S31Samsung Galaxy XCover 4Ulefone Armor XAverage 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
177%
159%
172%
203%
90%
164%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
10.3 (Kingston 32GB)
20.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
99%
59.5
478%
55.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
440%
62.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
507%
35.2 (51.5 - 64.3, n=95)
242%
42.8 (20.8 - 87.1, n=250)
316%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
20.6 (Kingston 32GB)
21.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
81.8
297%
68.97 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
235%
81.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
296%
53.8 (79.7 - 87.7, n=95)
161%
61.1 (36.5 - 96.5, n=250)
197%
Random Write 4KB
7
9.89
41%
14.81
112%
11.9
70%
10.17
45%
7.12 (0.49 - 37.9, n=210)
2%
13.3 (0.14 - 164, n=528)
90%
Random Read 4KB
17.2
66.88
289%
14.28
-17%
21.8
27%
14.7
-15%
19 (2.49 - 61.7, n=210)
10%
34 (1.59 - 173, n=528)
98%
Sequential Write 256KB
32.6
162.14
397%
62.13
91%
73.6
126%
82.85
154%
40.7 (8.74 - 128, n=210)
25%
70.1 (2.99 - 216, n=528)
115%
Sequential Read 256KB
77.3
257.52
233%
71.06
-8%
181.6
135%
255.34
230%
153 (9.66 - 284, n=210)
98%
208 (12.1 - 832, n=528)
169%
Carga Máxima
 34 °C32.5 °C33.1 °C 
 34.9 °C32.4 °C33.6 °C 
 34.7 °C32.5 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 34.9 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C
31.4 °C31.6 °C34.9 °C
31.3 °C31.7 °C36.9 °C
31.7 °C32.1 °C35.4 °C
Máximo: 36.9 °C
Médio: 33 °C
alimentação elétrica  35.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
The maximum temp on the upper side is 34.9 °C, compared to the average of 35.9 °C ranging from 21.1 °C to 71 °C for class Smartphone.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.740.5253537.63135.637.24033.128.4503430.66332.328.58019.823.510019.222.612517.821.916014.121.720014.82525012.630.331511.339.240010.847.650010.252.76309.459.1800964.110008.364.712508.363.216008.262.62000861.925008.162.33150863.74000864.750007.964.66300860.880008.353.4100008.349.7125008.343.7160008.326.8SPL68.32174.4N21.60.331.4median 8.3Cubot King Kongmedian 53.4Delta1.814.231.634.125.433.425.332.332.927.633.628.131.634.428.430.12736.520.833.42241.221.347.620.852.121.255.219.457.419.560.317.765.417.968.617.87017.370.617.47216.771.317.269.718.27117.972.417.666.317.761.417.857.917.95818.149.218.246.63080.41.347.4median 17.9Samsung Galaxy XCover 4median 60.31.310.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Cubot King Kong audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.05 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.6 / 1.8 Watt
Carga midlight 3.8 / 5.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Cubot King Kong
4400 mAh
Oukitel WP5000
5200 mAh
CAT S31
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
2800 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6580M
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-28%
-4%
0%
-30%
-12%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1.18
-69%
0.73
-4%
0.56
20%
1.22
-74%
0.737 (0.56 - 0.92, n=7)
-5%
0.86 (0.2 - 3.4, n=556)
-23%
Idle Average *
1.6
2.17
-36%
2.21
-38%
1.57
2%
2.07
-29%
1.871 (1.36 - 2.26, n=7)
-17%
1.694 (0.6 - 6.2, n=555)
-6%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.26
-26%
2.25
-25%
1.68
7%
2.14
-19%
2.04 (1.38 - 2.39, n=7)
-13%
1.934 (0.74 - 6.6, n=556)
-7%
Load Average *
3.8
3.68
3%
2.99
21%
4.6
-21%
4.92
-29%
4.87 (3.11 - 6.97, n=7)
-28%
3.96 (0.8 - 10.8, n=550)
-4%
Load Maximum *
5.5
6.06
-10%
4.12
25%
5.92
-8%
5.4
2%
5.44 (3.59 - 7.03, n=7)
1%
5.58 (1.2 - 14.2, n=550)
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18h 18min
Cubot King Kong
4400 mAh
Oukitel WP5000
5200 mAh
CAT S31
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
2800 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Battery Runtime
8%
-2%
-39%
-23%
Reader / Idle
1388
WiFi v1.3
1098
1189
8%
1074
-2%
668
-39%
845
-23%
Load
205
H.264
681

Pro

+ Muito boas durações da bateria
+ Baixo consumo de energia
+ Boa qualidade das chamadas
+ Certificação IP68
+ Preço acessível
+ Android puro
+ Tela de alto contraste

Contra

- Fotos embaçadas e granuladas da câmera
- Longos tempos de carga
- Sem LTE
- Desempenho relativamente lento
- Tela relativamente desprotegida
- Apenas botões tácteis para a operação
- Software desatualizado
- A tela tem uma tonalidade visível
Review: Cubot King Kong
Review: Cubot King Kong

Não deixe o Cubot King Kong te enganar: Apesar de sua carcaça pesada, a tela está pouco protegida, e os botões tácteis dificultam o uso com luvas. Também oferece baixo desempenho e não é ideal para usar em ambientes claros. Outros fabricantes oferecem dispositivos que realmente merecem o nome de "smartphone para exteriores". Mas leve em conta que este dispositivo tem uma certificação IP68, longas durações de bateria e Android puro.

Este aqui onde suas expectativas sobre este smartphone devem terminar. A câmera tira fotos desbotadas, na melhor das hipóteses, e o alto-falante não é digno de seu nome - é muito baixo, embora o som que produz seja bom. A falta de suporte para LTE pode ser considerado um problema por muitas pessoas.

Certas limitações não podem ser evitadas nessa faixa de preço. No entanto, o Cubot King Kong oferece tempos de duração de bateria muito bons e é resistente à água e à poeira.

Se você estiver procurando por um dispositivo que possa ser usado em ambientes hostis, talvez você queira gastar um pouco mais de dinheiro e obter um dispositivo mais potente que possa ser usado em qualquer lugar. No entanto, se você é simplesmente desajeitado e o design pesado agrada a você, você terá um smartphone decente por pouco dinheiro.

Cubot King Kong - 06/19/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
87%
Conectividade
31 / 60 → 51%
Peso
87%
Bateria
100%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
4 / 63 → 7%
Desempenho da aplicação
24 / 70 → 34%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
39%
Médio
66%
76%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Cubot King Kong
Florian Wimmer, 2018-06-22 (Update: 2018-07- 3)