Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone HTC U Ultra
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| LG G6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 470 cd/m²
Contraste: 2136:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
| HTC U Ultra SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.70 | Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50 | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50 | LG G6 IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.70 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 25% | 13% | 46% | 21% | |
| Brightness middle | 470 | 557 19% | 402 -14% | 554 18% | 646 37% |
| Brightness | 445 | 553 24% | 408 -8% | 552 24% | 611 37% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 97 10% | 85 -3% | 96 9% | 89 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.35 -59% | 0.23 -5% | ||
| Contrast | 2136 | 1591 -26% | 2809 32% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 1.4 75% | 4 27% | 1.59 71% | 4.5 18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.9 | 3.1 74% | 10.1 15% | 2.56 78% | 8.3 30% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.6 | 1.3 83% | 3.2 58% | 2.01 74% | 6 21% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.01 109% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 7454 87% | 6667 97% | 7037 92% | 6321 103% | 7996 81% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.1 | 82.12 | 67.74 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.83 | 99.98 | 99.05 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17844 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
HTC U Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.12 / 0.28 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1 / 2.41 / 2.46 Watt |
| Carga |
6.8 / 8.9 Watt |
    
| |
| HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | 41% | 33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.77 23% | 0.53 47% | 0.63 37% |
| Idle Average * | 2.41 | 2.04 15% | 1.07 56% | 1.1 54% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.46 | 2.24 9% | 1.12 54% | 1.56 37% |
| Load Average * | 6.8 | 4.69 31% | 5.53 19% | 5.95 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.9 | 8.66 3% | 6.26 30% | 6.7 25% |
* ... smaller is better
| HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | LG G6 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 16% | -8% | 44% | 22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1568 | 1835 17% | 1333 -15% | 1663 6% | 1789 14% |
| H.264 | 605 | 813 34% | 505 -17% | 914 51% | 779 29% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 546 | 587 8% | 505 -8% | 732 34% | 692 27% |
| Load | 214 | 225 5% | 230 7% | 392 83% | 252 18% |
Pro
Contra
Em termos de design, a HTC entrega um excelente aparelho com o seu U Ultra: A parte traseira cintilante é definitivamente chama a atenção. O headset também consegue ganhar pontos em muitos outros aspectos. O headset de gama alta incluído é agradável, a exuberante configuração de memória é um bônus, e as câmeras fazem um trabalho muito bom. O software é atraente e a HTC realmente se esforçou para fazer de seus smartphones algo especial.
Somente a duração da bateria, o lapso na velocidade do WiFi, e o GPU inexato, bem como alguns recursos faltantes, como a carga sem fios ou a proteção contra água e poeira com as quais vem os atuais modelos premium de outros fabricantes, são coisas que colocam o HTC U Ultra em uma má luz. A segunda tela e uma faca de dois gumes: Por outro lado, precisa de poder adicional e nem sempre é a solução mais prática. Por outro lado, é definitivamente agradável ter um reprodutor de música em uma segunda tela pequena. Por isso, o usuário terá que decidir se é útil ou não.
O HTC U Ultra é um gigante: Com uma tela de 5,7polegadas e uma tela secundária, ele possui uma área de superfície de tela única. Um headset inovador e um assistente pessoal também são parte do pacote. É uma pena que a HTC estrague as coisas em sua habilidade chave: Os alto falantes são medíocres apenas.
Em resumo, o HTC U Ultra é, de fato, um smartphone de gama premium graças a suas voas taxas de desempenho, baixas temperaturas, acessórios de alta qualidade, e algumas inovações. No entanto, não consegue competir bem com os modelos top da Apple e Samsung. Para isso falta um pouco de perfeição em algumas áreas.
HTC U Ultra
-
03/23/2017 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer