Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 9

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/26/2017

Chamativo. Tal como acontece com o seu antecessor, o Honor 9 atrai à primeira vista com seu design chamativo de reflexões de luzes dançantes na parte traseira. Mas isso é tudo apenas fumaça e espelhos, ou será que o novo carro-chefe Honor também convence com sua câmera dupla e desempenho rápido? Vamos descobrir no teste.

Honor 9
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 960
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.15 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 428 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS/LTPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Portá de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB (usa o 2do slot SIM), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM 850/​900/​1800/​1900, UMTS B1/B2/B5/B8, LTE B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.5 x 147 x 71
Bateria
12.16 Wh, 3200 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Super Charge
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix Câmera dupla de 20 MP + 12 MP, f/2.2, phase-shift auto-focus, Laser-AF, 2x zoom ótico, dual-LED flash, vídeos @ 2160p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix LED flash, videos @ 1080p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, Telephone Manager, Designs, HiCare, Health, SmartController, Vmall, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat. 6, speed: download max. 300 Mbit/s, upload max. 50 MBit/s; SAR value: 1.26 W/​kg (head), 1.26 W/​kg (body), fanless
peso
155 g, Suprimento de energia: 74 g
Preço
469 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼100% +31%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼83% +9%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s ∼76%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s ∼9% -88%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼100% +285%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼64% +145%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s ∼26%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s ∼6% -78%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Honor 9 – overview
GPS Honor 9 – overview
GPS Honor 9 – crossroads
GPS Honor 9 – crossroads
GPS Honor 9 – bridge
GPS Honor 9 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Picture of reference card
Picture of reference card
Detail of reference card
Detail of reference card
ColorChecker: the target color is displayed in the bottom are of each field.
ColorChecker: the target color is displayed in the bottom are of each field.
546
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 556 cd/m² Médio: 534.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.33 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 550 cd/m²
Contraste: 1310:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.38
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Sony Xperia XZ
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Xiaomi Mi 6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Screen
-26%
-13%
22%
-29%
-29%
3%
Brightness
535
521
-3%
556
4%
431
-19%
633
18%
443
-17%
586
10%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
86
-7%
93
1%
93
1%
93
1%
89
-3%
Black Level *
0.42
0.37
12%
0.43
-2%
0.66
-57%
0.4
5%
0.28
33%
Contrast
1310
1470
12%
1272
-3%
997
-24%
1128
-14%
2214
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.3
5.8
-76%
4.8
-45%
1.6
52%
4.9
-48%
5.4
-64%
4.8
-45%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.6
7.2
-100%
4.5
-25%
1.7
53%
5.8
-61%
6.7
-86%
5.3
-47%
Gamma
2.38 101%
2.18 110%
2.39 100%
2.25 107%
2.26 106%
2.33 103%
2.25 107%
CCT
7226 90%
8619 75%
7194 90%
6329 103%
7840 83%
8262 79%
7473 87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 25.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 9
150276 Points ∼66%
Sony Xperia XZ
129317 Points ∼57% -14%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼61% -7%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼78% +18%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
62484 Points ∼27% -58%
Honor 8
94671 Points ∼42% -37%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 9
6113 Points ∼90%
Sony Xperia XZ
5616 Points ∼82% -8%
Huawei P10
6206 Points ∼91% +2%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼96% +8%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 9
7034 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ
5058 Points ∼61% -28%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼88% +4%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼94% +11%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼82% -4%
Honor 8
6735 Points ∼81% -4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor 9
1069 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia XZ
1066 Points ∼69% 0%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼70% +1%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼83% +20%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼46% -34%
Honor 8
994 Points ∼64% -7%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 9
4126 Points ∼48%
Sony Xperia XZ
4716 Points ∼55% +14%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼48% 0%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼71% +49%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼12% -75%
Honor 8
1703 Points ∼20% -59%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 9
3258 Points ∼74%
Sony Xperia XZ
1434 Points ∼32% -56%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼63% -15%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼100% +36%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼24% -68%
Honor 8
2556 Points ∼58% -22%
System (sort by value)
Honor 9
4154 Points ∼63%
Sony Xperia XZ
3047 Points ∼46% -27%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼58% -8%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼90% +42%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼44% -30%
Honor 8
3952 Points ∼60% -5%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 9
2779 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia XZ
2165 Points ∼57% -22%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼69% -6%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼100% +36%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼32% -56%
Honor 8
2034 Points ∼54% -27%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 9
6527 Points ∼35%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼37% +4%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 9
1869 Points ∼39%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼41% +6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 9
2287 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼55% -27%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼63% -17%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼100% +32%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2109 Points ∼70% -8%
Honor 8
2482 Points ∼82% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 9
2798 Points ∼52%
Sony Xperia XZ
2853 Points ∼53% +2%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼45% -14%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% +34%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
380 Points ∼7% -86%
Honor 8
818 Points ∼15% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 9
2666 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia XZ
2548 Points ∼66% -4%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼59% -15%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼92% +34%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
465 Points ∼12% -83%
Honor 8
961 Points ∼25% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 9
1809 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼55% -8%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼73% +21%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼100% +67%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼70% +17%
Honor 8
2587 Points ∼86% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 9
2990 Points ∼39%
Sony Xperia XZ
4522 Points ∼58% +51%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼36% -6%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼62% +59%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼9% -76%
Honor 8
1112 Points ∼14% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 9
2611 Points ∼52%
Sony Xperia XZ
3275 Points ∼66% +25%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼53% +1%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼85% +62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼17% -68%
Honor 8
1273 Points ∼26% -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 9
15150 Points ∼21%
Sony Xperia XZ
20772 Points ∼29% +37%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼21% +1%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼27% +28%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼22% +6%
Honor 8
15531 Points ∼22% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 9
38979 Points ∼9%
Sony Xperia XZ
32056 Points ∼7% -18%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼8% -8%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼13% +49%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3% -65%
Honor 8
22157 Points ∼5% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 9
28883 Points ∼15%
Sony Xperia XZ
28603 Points ∼15% -1%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼14% -4%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼20% +39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼7% -52%
Honor 8
20235 Points ∼10% -30%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 9
60 fps ∼5%
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼7% +47%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼5% +15%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼9% +92%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼2% -62%
Honor 8
41 fps ∼3% -32%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 9
55 fps ∼12%
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼19% +60%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼12% 0%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼13% +9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼5% -62%
Honor 8
43 fps ∼9% -22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 9
30 fps ∼6%
Sony Xperia XZ
40 fps ∼7% +33%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼6% 0%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +103%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2% -67%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼3% -37%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 9
28 fps ∼8%
Sony Xperia XZ
39 fps ∼11% +39%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼9% +14%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼15% +100%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼3% -65%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼5% -32%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 9
22 fps ∼5%
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼7% +41%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼6% +9%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼10% +91%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼1% -72%
Honor 8
10 fps ∼2% -55%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 9
22 fps ∼13%
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼18% +41%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼14% +14%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼23% +86%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼3% -72%
Honor 8
11 fps ∼6% -50%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 9
15 fps ∼4%
Sony Xperia XZ
20 fps ∼6% +33%
Huawei P10
15 fps ∼4% 0%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼7% +67%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps ∼1% -77%
Honor 8
6.3 fps ∼2% -58%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 9
16 fps ∼0%
Sony Xperia XZ
19 fps ∼1% +19%
Huawei P10
16 fps ∼0% 0%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼1% +56%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps ∼0% -79%
Honor 8
6.9 fps ∼0% -57%

Legend

 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
OnePlus 5
71.6 Points ∼100% +22%
Honor 8
64.046 Points ∼89% +9%
Honor 9
58.6 Points ∼82%
Huawei P10
57.9 Points ∼81% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ
54.201 Points ∼76% -8%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
31.118 Points ∼43% -47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 5
11945 Points ∼100% +17%
Honor 8
10692 Points ∼90% +5%
Huawei P10
10236 Points ∼86% 0%
Honor 9
10208 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ
9069 Points ∼76% -11%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4905 Points ∼41% -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
8041.4 ms * ∼100% -155%
Honor 9
3149 ms * ∼39%
Huawei P10
3128.7 ms * ∼39% +1%
Honor 8
2979 ms * ∼37% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ
2768 ms * ∼34% +12%
OnePlus 5
2621.7 ms * ∼33% +17%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
OnePlus 5
161 Points ∼100% +50%
Honor 8
138 Points ∼86% +29%
Huawei P10
136 Points ∼84% +27%
Honor 9
107 Points ∼66%
Sony Xperia XZ
90 Points ∼56% -16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
84 Points ∼52% -21%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 9Sony Xperia XZHuawei P10OnePlus 5Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KLHonor 8
AndroBench 3-5
-24%
114%
67%
1%
-26%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
34.64
29.8
-14%
32.19
-7%
50.07
45%
23.59
-32%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
67.99
33.5
-51%
54.22
-20%
79.22
17%
53.68
-21%
Random Write 4KB
32.7
10.5
-68%
152.31
366%
19.3
-41%
7.4
-77%
31.5
-4%
Random Read 4KB
55.7
71.5
28%
168.42
202%
141
153%
74
33%
34.16
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB
204
138
-32%
189.83
-7%
201.5
-1%
188
-8%
119.25
-42%
Sequential Read 256KB
293
281
-4%
737.65
152%
748
155%
282
-4%
247.46
-16%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high45 fps
Carga Máxima
 44.8 °C45 °C42.8 °C 
 44.9 °C44.7 °C43.7 °C 
 43.4 °C43.8 °C42.4 °C 
Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 43.9 °C
39.4 °C41.5 °C44.4 °C
39.7 °C41.9 °C45.4 °C
40 °C42.3 °C43.4 °C
Máximo: 45.4 °C
Médio: 42 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.32525.430.73125.326.84032.926.45033.630.86331.629.58028.427.81002726.912520.825.31602240.220021.351.725020.854.931521.260.340019.462.550019.56363017.765.780017.967.1100017.866.4125017.368.8160017.470200016.774.7250017.276.5315018.276400017.977.3500017.677630017.776800017.875.31000017.970.81250018.162.91600018.248SPL3085.3N1.363.5median 17.9Honor 9median 66.4Delta1.310.331.632.825.430.425.332.132.933.333.63631.630.128.427.82725.420.825.62229.121.339.620.848.321.254.219.456.819.559.117.758.117.961.117.864.417.365.817.467.416.770.317.27118.277.117.979.117.673.517.772.117.87117.966.418.157.518.253.13084.71.353.4median 17.9Honor 8median 61.11.310.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Honor 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.07 / 0.21 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.13 / 2.25 / 2.3 Watt
Carga midlight 4.89 / 7.99 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ
2900 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-51%
-2%
12%
21%
17%
Idle Minimum *
1.13
1.76
-56%
0.83
27%
0.73
35%
0.83
27%
0.78
31%
Idle Average *
2.25
3.6
-60%
2.1
7%
1.44
36%
2.11
6%
1.89
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
4.06
-77%
2.18
5%
1.5
35%
2.12
8%
2.02
12%
Load Average *
4.89
7
-43%
6.57
-34%
6.91
-41%
3.41
30%
5.28
-8%
Load Maximum *
7.99
9.52
-19%
9.32
-17%
8.51
-7%
5.46
32%
5.44
32%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
23h 19min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
8h 36min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 38min
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ
2900 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-20%
16%
2%
37%
-3%
Reader / Idle
1399
1125
-20%
1540
10%
1534
10%
1502
7%
1487
6%
H.264
564
502
-11%
582
3%
623
10%
905
60%
526
-7%
WiFi v1.3
516
438
-15%
966
87%
518
0%
797
54%
499
-3%
Load
278
187
-33%
176
-37%
247
-11%
352
27%
255
-8%

Pro

+ Muito boa razão de preço-desempenho
+ Carcaça muito bonita e estável
+ Operação veloz com muitas opções
+ Suporte para dois SIM
+ USB-OTG
+ Software extensamente configurável
+ WLAN veloz
+ GPS preciso
+ Fotos nítidas da câmera
+ Tela brilhante
+ Alto desempenho do sistema
+ Bom alto falante
+ Duração da bateria adequada na prática

Contra

- Apenas flash eMMC lenta
- Muito bloatware pré instalado
- Relativamente poucas bandas LTE
- Esquenta bastante
- Afogamentos sob uso estendido
In the test: Honor 9. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.
In the test: Honor 9. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.

Sim, assim é a vida com filhas lindas: às vezes a mãe pode ficar ciumenta. Pelo menos, a Huawei não facilita as coisas para que o seu carro-chefe P10 se levante perante o Honor 9, um pouco mais fino. Por pouco mais de 100 Euros a menos (~ $118, dependendo do preço do dia), você realmente recebe muito pelo seu dinheiro com o Honor 9. Inclusive o OnePlus 5 deve ter cuidado.

Comparado com o Honor 8, a carcaça bonita melhorou novamente, o desempenho está no mesmo nível que o do Huawei P10, e as câmeras tiram fotos que são quase igual de boas. Somente no armazenamento rápido, na duração da bateria e na variedade e velocidades das conexões LTE, o Honor 9 fica atrás da do carro-chefe da Huawei. Além disso, a Huawei oferece uma garantia de 36 meses para o P10.

Carcaça linda, boa câmera, duração decente da bateria - dificilmente encontramos qualquer motivo para reclamar do Honor 9. Se o SoC não se afogasse sob carga, nossa recomendação ficaria ainda mais clara, mas mesmo assim, o Honor 9 oferece uma excelente relação preço-desempenho.

Você poderia culpar a Huawei por não prestar mais atenção à qualidade das chamadas, pois, no melhor dos casos é apenas medíocre. As altas temperaturas da carcaça e o só que se afoga durante cargas prolongadas, são irritantes. No entanto, além disso, devemos prestar homenagem ao Honor 9. É uma grande oferta na gama média que os interessados não devem passar.

Para aqueles que desejam economizar, o Honor 8, que, basicamente, oferece os mesmos módulos de câmera e não está muito atrás em termos de desempenho, é uma excelente barganha por cerca de 100 Euros (~$118) a menos.

Honor 9 - 08/17/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
92%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
48 / 60 → 80%
Peso
92%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
58 / 63 → 92%
Desempenho da aplicação
62 / 70 → 89%
Temperatura
83%
Ruído
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
76%
Médio
78%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 9
Florian Wimmer, 2017-08-26 (Update: 2017-09- 4)