Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S20 – Smartphone de alta qualidade com peculiaridades

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/26/2020

Sistema estrela compacto. O Galaxy S20 da Samsung é a atualização mais recente de uma das séries de smartphones mais famosas. O tamanho compacto e desempenho poderoso são um dado, mas o mais recente smartphone Galaxy também deve vir com uma câmera aprimorada e maior duração da bateria. Descubra em nossa extensa análise se a Samsung conseguiu ou não fazer isso.

Samsung Galaxy S20 (Galaxy S20 Serie)
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR5
Pantalha
6.2 polegadas 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 566 PPI, Tela capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 120 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: áudio sobre USB-C, Card Reader: microSD de até 1 TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, barômetro
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900); UMTS (1, 2, 4, 5, 8); LTE (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 151.7 x 69.1
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​2.0, phase detection AF, OIS, videos @4320p/​24fps (camera 1); 12 MP, f/​1.8, phase detection AF (dual-pixel), OIS, LED flash(camera 2); 12.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix f/​2.2, detecção de face AF (dual-pixel), vídeos @2160p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes híbridos estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat 20/​18 (2000 Mbps (download), 210 Mbps (upload); SAR: 0.279 W/​kg (head SAR), 1.525 W/​kg (body SAR); eSIM; IP68-certified; A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, fanless, waterproof
peso
163 g, Suprimento de energia: 49 g
Preço
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
163 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.2"3200x1440
87 %
09/2019
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.1"1792x828
87 %
03/2019
Samsung Galaxy S10
Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12
157 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.1"3040x1440
86 %
10/2019
OnePlus 7T
SD 855+, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
89 %
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
83 %
12/2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Galaxy S20

Size Comparison

160.94 mm 74.44 mm 8.13 mm 190 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g151.7 mm 69.1 mm 7.9 mm 163 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g149.9 mm 70.4 mm 7.8 mm 157 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (min: 912, max: 1092) MBit/s ∼100% +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (min: 468, max: 602) MBit/s ∼53% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
827 (min: 791, max: 846) MBit/s ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (min: 612, max: 683) MBit/s ∼63% -23%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (min: 490, max: 597) MBit/s ∼56% -32%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (min: 374, max: 485) MBit/s ∼43% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (min: 317, max: 341) MBit/s ∼33% -60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1368, n=534)
256 MBit/s ∼25% -69%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (min: 923, max: 995) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (min: 584, max: 715) MBit/s ∼66% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
882 (min: 847, max: 902) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 (min: 558, max: 592) MBit/s ∼60% -34%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (min: 204, max: 603) MBit/s ∼55% -40%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (min: 238, max: 447) MBit/s ∼44% -52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (min: 321, max: 333) MBit/s ∼34% -63%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=534)
242 MBit/s ∼25% -73%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø830 (791-846)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø882 (847-902)
GPS Samsung Galaxy S20 – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy S20 – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy S20 – turnaround
GPS Samsung Galaxy S20 – turnaround
GPS Samsung Galaxy S20 – bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy S20 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – turnaround
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – turnaround
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Galaxy S20 with patch G980FXXU1ATCH applied
Galaxy S20 with patch G980FXXU1ATCH applied
Wide-angle lens photo
Wide-angle lens photo
Standard lens photo
Standard lens photo
3x hybrid-optical zoom photo
3x hybrid-optical zoom photo
Maximum digital zoom photo
Maximum digital zoom photo
ColorChecker
20.8 ∆E
31 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
34 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20: 26.85 ∆E min: 12.77 - max: 36.45 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20: 8.75 ∆E min: 3.08 - max: 13.83 ∆E
743
cd/m²
731
cd/m²
737
cd/m²
750
cd/m²
745
cd/m²
747
cd/m²
741
cd/m²
731
cd/m²
739
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 750 cd/m² Médio: 740.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 745 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.67 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.092
Samsung Galaxy S20
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.2
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S10
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
23%
-25%
-24%
-14%
-44%
Brightness middle
745
679
-9%
701
-6%
693
-7%
592
-21%
625
-16%
Brightness
740
671
-9%
705
-5%
703
-5%
605
-18%
607
-18%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
98
1%
96
-1%
96
-1%
89
-8%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.67
0.8
70%
3.7
-39%
3.42
-28%
2.5
6%
4.38
-64%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.52
2.4
47%
10.3
-128%
6.12
-35%
5.5
-22%
6.83
-51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
1.1
45%
1.4
30%
3.3
-65%
2.6
-30%
4.1
-105%
Gamma
2.092 105%
2.24 98%
2.1 105%
2.265 97%
2.16 102%
2.251 98%
CCT
6240 104%
6610 98%
6553 99%
6799 96%
6173 105%
7251 90%
Contrast
999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).
Geekbench 5.1
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3670 Points ∼91%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4043 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
920 Points ∼23% -75%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3670 - 3804, n=2)
3737 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 4043, n=50)
1696 Points ∼42% -54%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2731 Points ∼89%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1727 Points ∼56% -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=3)
2815 Points ∼92% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (782 - 3531, n=62)
2007 Points ∼66% -27%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
903 Points ∼97%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼84% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼58% -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=3)
929 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 1342, n=62)
574 Points ∼62% -36%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10431 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7595 Points ∼73% -27%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10255 - 10583, n=3)
10423 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=463)
5673 Points ∼54% -46%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14708 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9750 Points ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points ∼70% -30%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (14307 - 14760, n=3)
14592 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=624)
6193 Points ∼42% -58%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3112 Points ∼80%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points ∼90% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼72% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3112 - 3230, n=3)
3181 Points ∼82% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=125)
2605 Points ∼67% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6315 Points ∼80%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points ∼84% +5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼80% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼27% -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6315 - 8783, n=3)
7919 Points ∼100% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=125)
2800 Points ∼35% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5139 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points ∼93% +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼94% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼38% -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5139 - 6355, n=3)
5925 Points ∼100% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6618, n=125)
2526 Points ∼43% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4063 Points ∼73%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼58% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2981 Points ∼53% -27%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points ∼83% +14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼57% -22%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4063 - 4495, n=3)
4335 Points ∼78% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=469)
2110 Points ∼38% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8106 Points ∼92%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼92% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5358 Points ∼61% -34%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points ∼90% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼75% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼28% -70%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8106 - 9190, n=3)
8818 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9389, n=469)
1971 Points ∼22% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6638 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼85% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4551 Points ∼63% -31%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points ∼96% +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼89% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼36% -61%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6638 - 7459, n=3)
7170 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8111, n=470)
1830 Points ∼26% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3935 Points ∼77%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼66% -13%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points ∼88% +15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼62% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3935 - 4455, n=3)
4275 Points ∼83% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=499)
2021 Points ∼39% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11301 Points ∼63%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +58%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points ∼64% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼45% -29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼20% -68%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (9470 - 11301, n=3)
10081 Points ∼56% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=499)
2616 Points ∼15% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7981 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points ∼93% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼77% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼38% -56%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (7563 - 7981, n=3)
7707 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=499)
2200 Points ∼24% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3963 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼49% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2854 Points ∼58% -28%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points ∼92% +13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼65% -20%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3963 - 4267, n=3)
4137 Points ∼84% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4987, n=549)
2003 Points ∼41% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8411 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5176 Points ∼62% -38%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼27% -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8257 - 8469, n=3)
8379 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=549)
1646 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6732 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4383 Points ∼64% -35%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points ∼93% -6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼89% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼35% -64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6732 - 6896, n=3)
6821 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7190, n=550)
1575 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4015 Points ∼82%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points ∼89% +9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼65% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3889 - 4124, n=3)
4009 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=591)
1870 Points ∼38% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6388 Points ∼59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points ∼100% +69%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼71% +20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼32% -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6388 - 11488, n=3)
8089 Points ∼75% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12394, n=590)
2146 Points ∼20% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5646 Points ∼69%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points ∼100% +44%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼84% +21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼42% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5646 - 8010, n=3)
6451 Points ∼79% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9123, n=593)
1854 Points ∼23% -67%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +62%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
143 fps ∼44% -28%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼57% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼47% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼26% -58%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (199 - 200, n=3)
199 fps ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=751)
42.1 fps ∼13% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼75%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼75% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
60 fps ∼75% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼74% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼75% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼75% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (60 - 119, n=3)
79.7 fps ∼100% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=760)
29.8 fps ∼37% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
108 fps ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +62%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼49% -21%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps ∼64% +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼61% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼23% -62%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (100 - 126, n=3)
111 fps ∼63% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=656)
24.6 fps ∼14% -77%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼63% -37%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (59 - 60, n=3)
59.7 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=664)
21.1 fps ∼35% -65%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps ∼73%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼45% -38%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼68% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼48% -34%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼26% -65%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (72 - 85, n=3)
80.7 fps ∼69% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=519)
19.9 fps ∼17% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼82% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
30 fps ∼41% -49%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps ∼79% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼37% -54%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (58 - 59, n=3)
58.7 fps ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=521)
18.3 fps ∼25% -69%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps ∼37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +173%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼27% -27%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps ∼45% +23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼43% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼17% -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (22 - 33, n=3)
29.3 fps ∼49% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=261)
10.7 fps ∼18% -51%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
20 fps ∼61%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +65%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼52% -15%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps ∼55% -10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼58% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼30% -50%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (20 - 22, n=3)
21.3 fps ∼65% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=259)
7.62 fps ∼23% -62%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps ∼83%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
25 fps ∼42% -50%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% -18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼67% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼27% -68%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (50 - 52, n=3)
51 fps ∼85% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=265)
16 fps ∼27% -68%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
54 fps ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +61%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
44 fps ∼51% -19%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼54% -13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼56% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼21% -67%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (54 - 58, n=3)
56 fps ∼64% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=264)
17.9 fps ∼21% -67%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps ∼68%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
35 fps ∼48% -30%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼64% -6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼56% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼23% -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (50 - 51, n=3)
50.3 fps ∼69% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=444)
13.5 fps ∼18% -73%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
43 fps ∼72%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼38% -47%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼57% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼25% -65%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (43 - 45, n=3)
44 fps ∼73% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=448)
12 fps ∼20% -72%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
504192 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼53% -47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (296746 - 504192, n=3)
433215 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 599843, n=72)
303587 Points ∼60% -40%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
84.06 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
33.04 (min: 9.22, max: 75.78) fps ∼39% -61%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (min: 4.07, max: 95.16) fps ∼34% -65%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17.2 fps ∼20% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (84.1 - 85.6, n=2)
84.8 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼23% -77%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
42.32 fps ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.16 (min: 8.36, max: 61.33) fps ∼52% -36%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (min: 11.09, max: 63.1) fps ∼59% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
14.01 fps ∼27% -67%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (42.3 - 63, n=2)
52.7 fps ∼100% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=63)
16.1 fps ∼31% -62%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
71.58 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.35 (min: 8.77, max: 77.53) fps ∼54% -46%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (min: 9.36, max: 74.72) fps ∼47% -53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15.63 fps ∼22% -78%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (71.5 - 71.6, n=2)
71.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=61)
20.1 fps ∼28% -72%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4786 Score ∼96%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2036 Score ∼41% -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4607 - 4957, n=3)
4783 Score ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7156, n=79)
2537 Score ∼51% -47%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1274 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1385 Points ∼93% +9%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼98% +15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1237 Points ∼83% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (1270 - 1378, n=3)
1307 Points ∼88% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=687)
792 Points ∼53% -38%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10703 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7361 Points ∼68% -31%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3878 Points ∼36% -64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10703 - 10803, n=3)
10762 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=687)
2309 Points ∼21% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4271 Points ∼70%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4570 Points ∼75% +7%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points ∼79% +14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4281 Points ∼70% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3775 - 4497, n=3)
4181 Points ∼68% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7945, n=687)
1707 Points ∼28% -60%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8843 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7476 Points ∼80% -15%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points ∼97% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6445 Points ∼69% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8843 - 9478, n=3)
9201 Points ∼99% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=687)
3252 Points ∼35% -63%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4764 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4320 Points ∼80% -9%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points ∼95% +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3392 Points ∼63% -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4764 - 4915, n=3)
4819 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=687)
1644 Points ∼31% -65%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +147%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼50% +22%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.295 Points ∼49% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
53.863 Points ∼41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 53.9, n=3)
52.1 Points ∼39% -3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼35% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=151)
38.9 Points ∼29% -28%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +214%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.83 Points ∼41% +29%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼39% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
93.499 Points ∼32%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 93.5, n=3)
90.8 Points ∼31% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
84.005 Points ∼29% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼27% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=582)
45.1 Points ∼15% -52%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +209%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼47% +46%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min ∼44% +36%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 63.7, n=3)
59.1 runs/min ∼38% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
54 runs/min ∼34% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chome 80)
50.8 runs/min ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼28% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=138)
42.4 runs/min ∼27% -17%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +90%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼65% +23%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points ∼54% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
97 Points ∼53%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 97, n=3)
89.7 Points ∼49% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼42% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=214)
68.8 Points ∼37% -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +169%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points ∼52% +40%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20286 Points ∼42% +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 19122, n=3)
18459 Points ∼38% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
18162 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼33% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=745)
7422 Points ∼15% -59%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=770)
10102 ms * ∼100% -302%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼27% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
2511.2 ms * ∼25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2345 - 2511, n=3)
2448 ms * ∼24% +3%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021.4 ms * ∼20% +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼19% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1924.2 ms * ∼19% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼6% +77%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S20Samsung Galaxy S10OnePlus 7THuawei Mate 30 ProXiaomi Mi Note 10Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-35%
-45%
7%
-57%
-6%
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
57.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
20%
59.3 (54.5 - 66.4, n=7)
3%
50.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=491)
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
66.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
17%
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
24%
72 (66.3 - 81.6, n=7)
9%
68.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=491)
3%
Random Write 4KB
228.1
24.44
-89%
29.9
-87%
259.21
14%
118.9
-48%
182 (29.9 - 230, n=9)
-20%
29.5 (0.14 - 272, n=828)
-87%
Random Read 4KB
205.3
137.4
-33%
170.1
-17%
226.38
10%
106.2
-48%
194 (170 - 207, n=9)
-6%
54.2 (1.59 - 265, n=828)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
669.9
193.24
-71%
218.4
-67%
401.79
-40%
243.6
-64%
527 (213 - 697, n=9)
-21%
113 (2.99 - 750, n=828)
-83%
Sequential Read 256KB
1541.7
831.94
-46%
1406
-9%
1780.5
15%
480.5
-69%
1511 (1406 - 1632, n=9)
-2%
311 (12.1 - 1781, n=828)
-80%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.17.0: Ø39.4 (35-42)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.17.0: Ø39.6 (32-42)
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø60.1 (59-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø60.1 (59-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.1.2a: Ø57.8 (38-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.1.2a: Ø58.5 (40-61)
Carga Máxima
 45.4 °C44.9 °C41.2 °C 
 46.2 °C45.3 °C41.6 °C 
 46.7 °C45.2 °C41.1 °C 
Máximo: 46.7 °C
Médio: 44.2 °C
37.5 °C41.3 °C41.4 °C
38.8 °C42.3 °C43.3 °C
37.6 °C41.7 °C42.2 °C
Máximo: 43.3 °C
Médio: 40.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  43.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.341.32537.538312933.54031.633.15033.237.36328.328.88023.325.410023.323.812524.231.216020.540.92001945.825017.650.231516.952.540016.255.450016.463.263018.365.180016.166.7100014.772.7125014.276.6160014.777.2200013.976.2250014.377.4315014.975.8400014.873.8500015.369.4630014.965.280001567.41000015.5691250016.462.6160001662.7SPL72.427.585.9N26.1159.7median 16median 65.2Delta210.739.434.728.327.118.722.126.726.333.235.722.629.221.824.224.423.923.834.918.551.817.151.517.858.915.561.314.164.51468.813.86714.770.815.473.415.275.314.375.514.576.413.977.414.678.714.180.314.377.514.575.214.871.614.866.814.8611555.426.8880.872median 14.8median 68.81.510.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S20Samsung Galaxy S10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.5 / 2 Watt
Carga midlight 4.8 / 11.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-9%
16%
-2%
11%
4%
-4%
9%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.56
38%
0.61
32%
0.9
-0%
0.87
3%
0.7
22%
0.887 (0.76 - 1, n=3)
1%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=842)
2%
Idle Average *
1.5
2.99
-99%
1.27
15%
1.4
7%
1.75
-17%
1.8
-20%
1.703 (1.5 - 1.91, n=3)
-14%
1.748 (0.6 - 6.2, n=841)
-17%
Idle Maximum *
2
3.02
-51%
1.3
35%
2.9
-45%
1.83
8%
2.2
-10%
2.09 (1.96 - 2.3, n=3)
-5%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=842)
-2%
Load Average *
4.8
4.17
13%
6.17
-29%
4.7
2%
3.85
20%
5.2
-8%
5.11 (4.72 - 5.8, n=3)
-6%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=836)
15%
Load Maximum *
11.5
5.44
53%
8.55
26%
8.3
28%
6.64
42%
7.5
35%
11.2 (10.2 - 11.8, n=3)
3%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=836)
48%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
35h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 29min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 39min
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Battery Runtime
22%
-29%
10%
8%
43%
Reader / Idle
2105
2765
31%
1259
-40%
2003
-5%
2174
3%
2134
1%
H.264
809
1147
42%
842
4%
967
20%
1098
36%
1423
76%
WiFi v1.3
726
866
19%
427
-41%
896
23%
823
13%
1127
55%
Load
279
267
-4%
170
-39%
283
1%
219
-22%
387
39%

Pro

+ Carcaça fina e leve
+ Software atualizado
+ Suporte para banda larga LTE
+ Suporte para vídeos 8K
+ Excelente e muito brilhante tela de 120 Hz
+ Jogos em 60 Hz
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ 5G opcional

Contra

- Contra
- Sem aptX HD
- Serviços de localização não precisos às vezes
- Muitos recursos de vídeo apenas até FHD/30fps
- SoC Exynos se afoga notavelmente
- Altas temperaturas sob uso intenso
- Sel lente telephoto real

Veredicto – Muito bom, mas não o melhor

In review: Samsung Galaxy S20. Review united provided by notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy S20. Review united provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Quase se tornou uma tradição para os smartphones Galaxy S serem excelentes dispositivos de gama alta que não conseguem alcançar seus concorrentes em todos os aspectos da vida dos smartphones. Por exemplo, a navegação na Web é mais lenta, a duração da bateria é menor, o carregamento leva mais tempo, o desempenho do Wi-Fi é menor e outros smartphones oferecem mais armazenamento pelo mesmo preço. Os clientes europeus com dispositivos S20 baseados em Exynos sofrem um impacto extra, pois esses SKUs oferecem um desempenho inferior ao de seus irmãos Snapdragon e um suporte 5G menos flexível para inicializar.

Dito isto, o Samsung Galaxy S20 continua sendo um smartphone de gama alta muito bom, com uma carcaça fina e estreita que as pessoas com mãos pequenas apreciarão muito. Também oferece um design moderno e quase conservador, além de um baixo peso.

Seu software atual e bonito é uma beleza de usar, oferece uma variedade muito ampla de frequências LTE suportadas e um modem 4G ou 5G muito rápido. Sua câmera tira ótimas fotos, principalmente com pouca luz, e a última atualização corrigiu muitos dos problemas relatados pelos primeiros usuários. Sua câmera flexível de lente tripla com zoom óptico híbrido finamente ajustável pode ser considerada de qualidade ordinária no segmento de smartphones de gama alta, mas isso não nos impediu de realmente gostar dela. Muito. A tela é mais uma vez excelente e pode facilmente ofuscar todos os seus concorrentes com facilidade, e o brilho e a precisão das cores foram aprimorados em relação ao seu antecessor.

Não gostamos particularmente de suas altas temperaturas sob carga e do forte afogamento térmico da CPU. Considerando a duração da bateria significativamente melhorada do S20, é uma pena.

O Samsung Galaxy S20 oferece maior duração da bateria, uma tela extremamente brilhante e boas câmeras. Infelizmente, ele também tem seu conjunto exclusivo de peculiaridades.

Tudo considerado o Samsung Galaxy S20 é um smartphone com um conjunto muito único de falhas e peculiaridades, e, como tal, será difícil acompanhar dispositivos similares da Huawei, Apple ou OnePlus. No entanto, se você não busca o máximo desempenho, se aprecia uma câmera flexível e está procurando um smartphone compacto, o Samsung Galaxy S20 é definitivamente digno de sua consideração.

Samsung Galaxy S20 - 03/30/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
51 / 70 → 73%
Peso
91%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
56 / 64 → 87%
Desempenho da aplicação
75 / 86 → 87%
Temperatura
84%
Ruído
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
78%
Médio
80%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S20 – Smartphone de alta qualidade com peculiaridades
Florian Schmitt, 2020-03-26 (Update: 2020-04- 3)