Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P9

Estilo Leica. A Huawei confia completamente na câmera do sucessor do P8, e mais uma vez, monta um pacote incrível. O novo smartphone de exibição é ainda de maior qualidade e a bateria também é maior. No entanto, ainda há espaço para melhorias.
Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Huawei P9 (P9 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 955 8 x 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Placa gráfica
Memória
3072 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.20 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, 10 pontos multi-touch, IPS-NEO, JDI, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.22 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: COnector combinado para fones e microfone (3,5 mm), Card Reader: Micro-SD máx. 128 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, sensor de rotação, acelerômetri e sensor G sensor, bússola digital, Wifi Direct, OTG, Miracast
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 e 19), LTE Cat. 6 (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39 e 40), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 6.95 x 145 x 70.9
Bateria
11.46 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 3,82 volts, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 33 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 18 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 526 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 566 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Leica dual camera, Summarit-H 27 mm f/2.2 ASPH, BSI CMOS, Flash LED de duas cores, vídeo Full HD)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.4)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, fones, EMUI 4.1, administrador do telefone, HiCare, saúde, designs, mirror, bússola, gravador, memo, 36 Meses Garantia, USB Type-C, fanless
peso
144 g, Suprimento de energia: 64 g
Preço
569 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

149.8 mm 78 mm 9.2 mm 169 g149.4 mm 73.9 mm 7.7 mm 159 g145.9 mm 71.9 mm 9 mm 161 g146 mm 72 mm 7.3 mm 154 g145 mm 73.2 mm 8.2 mm 150 g145 mm 70.9 mm 6.95 mm 144 g144.9 mm 71.8 mm 6.4 mm 147 g142.4 mm 69.6 mm 7.9 mm 152 g138.3 mm 67.1 mm 7.1 mm 143 g
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei P9
Huawei P9
Huawei P9
Huawei P9
Huawei P9
Huawei P9
Photo with black/white sensor
Photo with black/white sensor
Photo with black/white sensor
Photo with black/white sensor
Photo using automatic (no HDR)
Photo using automatic (no HDR)
Edited DNG photo
Edited DNG photo
Photo using automatic (no HDR)
Photo using automatic (no HDR)
Edited DNG photo
Edited DNG photo

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Color sensor
Black/white
531
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
582
cd/m²
578
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 582 cd/m² Médio: 562.6 cd/m² Minimum: 7.89 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 582 cd/m²
Contraste: 1532:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.44% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 77.78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.20
Huawei P8
IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 5.20
Apple iPhone 6S
IPS, 1334x750, 4.70
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.10
Microsoft Lumia 950
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.20
OnePlus 2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Sony Xperia Z5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Screen
-4%
-1%
15%
1%
-3%
-44%
Brightness middle
582
453
-22%
552
-5%
350
-40%
292
-50%
451
-23%
669
15%
Brightness
563
439
-22%
549
-2%
351
-38%
298
-47%
446
-21%
624
11%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
87
-4%
98
8%
92
1%
90
-1%
85
-7%
Black Level *
0.38
0.28
26%
0.39
-3%
0.3
21%
0.68
-79%
Contrast
1532
1618
6%
1415
-8%
1503
-2%
984
-36%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
4.7
-7%
3.4
23%
2.04
54%
2.48
44%
3.84
13%
7.96
-81%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.4
3.25
56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
5.03
-5%
4.16
13%
1.63
66%
1.97
59%
3.97
17%
10.95
-128%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.27 97%
2.21 100%
2.07 106%
2.06 107%
2.46 89%
2.61 84%
CCT
6175 105%
7439 87%
7288 89%
6391 102%
6640 98%
7283 89%
7402 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77.78
72.04
-7%
62.18
-20%
86.86
12%
58.07
-25%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.44
95.93
-4%
99.35
0%
90.14
-9%

* ... smaller is better

sRGB color space coverage: 99.44%
sRGB color space coverage: 99.44%
AdobeRGB color space coverage: 77.78%
AdobeRGB color space coverage: 77.78%
ProPhoto RGB color space coverage: 40.62%
ProPhoto RGB color space coverage: 40.62%

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9714 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
7058 Points ∼35%
Huawei P8
4479 Points ∼22% -37%
Huawei Mate 8
7344 Points ∼37% +4%
Google Nexus 5X
4324 Points ∼22% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points ∼24% -32%
Motorola Moto X Force
5365 Points ∼27% -24%
Sony Xperia Z5
5184 Points ∼26% -27%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
95743 Points ∼33%
Huawei Mate 8
93767 Points ∼32% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points ∼44% +34%
Motorola Moto X Force
89911 Points ∼31% -6%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
6522 Points ∼10%
Huawei P8
3458 Points ∼5% -47%
Huawei Mate 8
6265 Points ∼10% -4%
Google Nexus 5X
3530 Points ∼6% -46%
Apple iPhone 6S
4422 Points ∼7% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S7
6401 Points ∼10% -2%
Motorola Moto X Force
4791 Points ∼8% -27%
Sony Xperia Z5
4414 Points ∼7% -32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
1767 Points ∼36%
Huawei P8
864 Points ∼18% -51%
Huawei Mate 8
1721 Points ∼35% -3%
Google Nexus 5X
1246 Points ∼25% -29%
Apple iPhone 6S
2539 Points ∼52% +44%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2199 Points ∼45% +24%
Motorola Moto X Force
1262 Points ∼26% -29%
Sony Xperia Z5
1325 Points ∼27% -25%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9
2503 Points ∼47%
Huawei Mate 8
2552 Points ∼48% +2%
Google Nexus 5X
1002 Points ∼19% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2022 Points ∼38% -19%
Motorola Moto X Force
1351 Points ∼25% -46%
Sony Xperia Z5
1024 Points ∼19% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9
829 Points ∼7%
Huawei Mate 8
801 Points ∼7% -3%
Google Nexus 5X
1127 Points ∼10% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2216 Points ∼19% +167%
Motorola Moto X Force
2067 Points ∼18% +149%
Sony Xperia Z5
1103 Points ∼10% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P9
974 Points ∼5%
Huawei Mate 8
945 Points ∼5% -3%
Google Nexus 5X
1096 Points ∼5% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2170 Points ∼11% +123%
Motorola Moto X Force
1849 Points ∼9% +90%
Sony Xperia Z5
1084 Points ∼5% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9
2510 Points ∼47%
Huawei Mate 8
2432 Points ∼46% -3%
Google Nexus 5X
831 Points ∼16% -67%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points ∼38% -20%
Motorola Moto X Force
1282 Points ∼24% -49%
Sony Xperia Z5
812 Points ∼15% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9
1080 Points ∼6%
Huawei Mate 8
1092 Points ∼7% +1%
Google Nexus 5X
1942 Points ∼12% +80%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points ∼18% +179%
Motorola Moto X Force
3226 Points ∼19% +199%
Sony Xperia Z5
2246 Points ∼13% +108%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P9
1237 Points ∼11%
Huawei Mate 8
1244 Points ∼11% +1%
Google Nexus 5X
1497 Points ∼13% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points ∼24% +119%
Motorola Moto X Force
2413 Points ∼21% +95%
Sony Xperia Z5
1613 Points ∼14% +30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9
15517 Points ∼16%
Huawei P8
10494 Points ∼11% -32%
Huawei Mate 8
15575 Points ∼16% 0%
Google Nexus 5X
12451 Points ∼13% -20%
Apple iPhone 6S
13097 Points ∼14% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points ∼21% +29%
Motorola Moto X Force
11963 Points ∼12% -23%
Sony Xperia Z5
11442 Points ∼12% -26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
21577 Points ∼3%
Huawei P8
8743 Points ∼1% -59%
Huawei Mate 8
20537 Points ∼3% -5%
Google Nexus 5X
22180 Points ∼4% +3%
Apple iPhone 6S
42686 Points ∼7% +98%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points ∼5% +55%
Motorola Moto X Force
38394 Points ∼6% +78%
Sony Xperia Z5
37738 Points ∼6% +75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
19854 Points ∼7%
Huawei P8
9080 Points ∼3% -54%
Huawei Mate 8
19179 Points ∼7% -3%
Google Nexus 5X
18898 Points ∼7% -5%
Apple iPhone 6S
28419 Points ∼10% +43%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points ∼10% +46%
Motorola Moto X Force
25751 Points ∼9% +30%
Sony Xperia Z5
24980 Points ∼9% +26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P9
40 fps ∼0%
Huawei P8
10 fps ∼0% -75%
Huawei Mate 8
41 fps ∼0% +3%
Google Nexus 5X
37 fps ∼0% -7%
Microsoft Lumia 950
21.82 fps ∼0% -45%
Apple iPhone 6S
79.6 fps ∼1% +99%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps ∼1% +110%
Motorola Moto X Force
58 fps ∼0% +45%
Sony Xperia Z5
49 fps ∼0% +23%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P9
43 fps ∼1%
Huawei P8
11 fps ∼0% -74%
Huawei Mate 8
44 fps ∼1% +2%
Google Nexus 5X
38 fps ∼1% -12%
Microsoft Lumia 950
13.73 fps ∼0% -68%
Apple iPhone 6S
59.1 fps ∼2% +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps ∼2% +23%
Motorola Moto X Force
42 fps ∼1% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5
49 fps ∼1% +14%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P9
18 fps ∼2%
Huawei P8
5.5 fps ∼1% -69%
Huawei Mate 8
18 fps ∼2% 0%
Google Nexus 5X
16 fps ∼2% -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950
12.3 fps ∼1% -32%
Apple iPhone 6S
39.5 fps ∼4% +119%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps ∼4% +122%
Motorola Moto X Force
27 fps ∼3% +50%
Sony Xperia Z5
24 fps ∼3% +33%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P9
19 fps ∼5%
Huawei P8
5.8 fps ∼2% -69%
Huawei Mate 8
19 fps ∼5% 0%
Google Nexus 5X
17 fps ∼5% -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950
6.76 fps ∼2% -64%
Apple iPhone 6S
56 fps ∼15% +195%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps ∼7% +42%
Motorola Moto X Force
17 fps ∼5% -11%
Sony Xperia Z5
26 fps ∼7% +37%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9
10 fps ∼0%
Huawei Mate 8
10 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps ∼1% +180%
Motorola Moto X Force
20 fps ∼0% +100%
Sony Xperia Z5
16 fps ∼0% +60%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9
11 fps ∼0%
Huawei Mate 8
11 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps ∼0% +36%
Motorola Moto X Force
12 fps ∼0% +9%
Sony Xperia Z5
18 fps ∼1% +64%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼47%
Huawei P8
694 Points ∼32% -33%
Huawei Mate 8
1127 Points ∼52% +10%
Google Nexus 5X
769 Points ∼35% -25%
Microsoft Lumia 950
655 Points ∼30% -36%
Apple iPhone 6S
1207 Points ∼56% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points ∼44% -7%
Motorola Moto X Force
939 Points ∼43% -9%
Sony Xperia Z5
675 Points ∼31% -34%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9
1583 Points ∼5%
Huawei P8
882 Points ∼3% -44%
Huawei Mate 8
1636 Points ∼6% +3%
Google Nexus 5X
2038 Points ∼7% +29%
Microsoft Lumia 950
1437 Points ∼5% -9%
Apple iPhone 6S
4323 Points ∼15% +173%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points ∼6% +9%
Motorola Moto X Force
3376 Points ∼12% +113%
Sony Xperia Z5
3095 Points ∼11% +96%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P9
2627 Points ∼30%
Huawei P8
1216 Points ∼14% -54%
Huawei Mate 8
2339 Points ∼26% -11%
Google Nexus 5X
1115 Points ∼13% -58%
Microsoft Lumia 950
1640 Points ∼18% -38%
Apple iPhone 6S
1281 Points ∼14% -51%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points ∼25% -15%
Motorola Moto X Force
1085 Points ∼12% -59%
Sony Xperia Z5
865 Points ∼10% -67%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P9
3930 Points ∼24%
Huawei P8
1860 Points ∼11% -53%
Huawei Mate 8
4064 Points ∼25% +3%
Google Nexus 5X
1730 Points ∼11% -56%
Microsoft Lumia 950
1096 Points ∼7% -72%
Apple iPhone 6S
3466 Points ∼21% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points ∼26% +7%
Motorola Moto X Force
2878 Points ∼17% -27%
Sony Xperia Z5
2360 Points ∼14% -40%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P9
2025 Points ∼24%
Huawei P8
1085 Points ∼13% -46%
Huawei Mate 8
2046 Points ∼24% +1%
Google Nexus 5X
1318 Points ∼16% -35%
Microsoft Lumia 950
1140 Points ∼13% -44%
Apple iPhone 6S
2194 Points ∼26% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points ∼24% -2%
Motorola Moto X Force
1774 Points ∼21% -12%
Sony Xperia Z5
1437 Points ∼17% -29%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei P9
7.9 fps ∼20%
Huawei Mate 8
7.9 fps ∼20% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13.86 fps ∼36% +75%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
328 Points ∼6%
Huawei Mate 8
347 Points ∼6% +6%
Apple iPhone 6S
887 Points ∼16% +170%
Samsung Galaxy S7
732 Points ∼13% +123%

Legend

 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11783 Points ∼18%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4084 Points ∼6% -65%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11329 Points ∼17% -4%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8202 Points ∼12% -30%
Microsoft Lumia 950
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6990 Points ∼10% -41%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
16200 Points ∼24% +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13161 Points ∼20% +12%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8699 Points ∼13% -26%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8627 Points ∼13% -27%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
68.4 Points ∼17%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
65 Points ∼16% -5%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45 Points ∼11% -34%
Microsoft Lumia 950
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.525 Points ∼6% -64%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
118.6 Points ∼29% +73%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
74 Points ∼18% +8%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.373 Points ∼12% -28%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
37 Points ∼9% -46%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2922.6 ms * ∼5%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11807.9 ms * ∼20% -304%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3643 ms * ∼6% -25%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4733.8 ms * ∼8% -62%
Microsoft Lumia 950
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6913.5 ms * ∼12% -137%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1715 ms * ∼3% +41%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2561.5 ms * ∼4% +12%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4080.1 ms * ∼7% -40%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5693.1 ms * ∼10% -95%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 Points ∼16%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
70 Points ∼9% -45%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
139 Points ∼17% +9%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
107 Points ∼13% -16%
Microsoft Lumia 950
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
64 Points ∼8% -50%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
187 Points ∼23% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
166 Points ∼21% +30%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
103 Points ∼13% -20%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
73 Points ∼9% -43%
Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6580 (6523min) Points ∼87%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2756 (2248min) Points ∼36% -58%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7008 Points ∼93% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7570 Points ∼100% +15%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1029 Points ∼47%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points ∼32% -33%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1127 Points ∼52% +10%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
769 Points ∼35% -25%
Microsoft Lumia 950
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
655 Points ∼30% -36%
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1207 Points ∼56% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
957 Points ∼44% -7%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
939 Points ∼43% -9%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
675 Points ∼31% -34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.83 MB/s ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
53.6 MB/s ∼62% +116%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.96 MB/s ∼54% +89%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.05 MB/s ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
72.33 MB/s ∼75% +31%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79.04 MB/s ∼82% +44%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.45 MB/s ∼15%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10.04 MB/s ∼3% -79%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15.74 MB/s ∼5% -67%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12.21 MB/s ∼4% -74%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
16.01 MB/s ∼5% -66%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19.78 MB/s ∼6% -58%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.46 MB/s ∼4% -76%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 MB/s ∼11%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.46 MB/s ∼6% -42%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.98 MB/s ∼7% -36%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.8 MB/s ∼7% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
85.9 MB/s ∼23% +120%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
22.55 MB/s ∼6% -42%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.59 MB/s ∼1% -91%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
72.19 MB/s ∼5%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.58 MB/s ∼3% -45%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
124.78 MB/s ∼9% +73%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
98.64 MB/s ∼7% +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
145.72 MB/s ∼11% +102%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.99 MB/s ∼4% -34%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
115.48 MB/s ∼9% +60%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
281.26 MB/s ∼14%
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
139.95 MB/s ∼7% -50%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
238.28 MB/s ∼12% -15%
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
245.19 MB/s ∼12% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
483.82 MB/s ∼24% +72%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
252.03 MB/s ∼12% -10%
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
219.84 MB/s ∼11% -22%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
Carga Máxima
 41.9 °C38.8 °C40.2 °C 
 42.1 °C39.6 °C39.4 °C 
 41.1 °C38 °C38.6 °C 
Máximo: 42.1 °C
Médio: 40 °C
36.2 °C38.5 °C38.8 °C
35.6 °C38.6 °C38.1 °C
35.9 °C38.1 °C38.2 °C
Máximo: 38.8 °C
Médio: 37.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  33.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.38 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.77 / 2.36 / 2.37 Watt
Carga midlight 3.09 / 5.35 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P8
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 5X
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Microsoft Lumia 950
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
-12%
-1%
-17%
-4%
23%
7%
-64%
Idle Minimum *
0.77
0.7
9%
0.55
29%
0.7
9%
0.6
22%
0.5
35%
0.68
12%
1.97
-156%
Idle Average *
2.36
2
15%
1.44
39%
1.7
28%
1.7
28%
1.6
32%
1.02
57%
2.42
-3%
Idle Maximum *
2.37
2.1
11%
1.9
20%
1.8
24%
1.8
24%
1.9
20%
1.14
52%
2.96
-25%
Load Average *
3.09
4.9
-59%
3.36
-9%
5.6
-81%
5.7
-84%
2.5
19%
4.73
-53%
5.94
-92%
Load Maximum *
5.35
7.4
-38%
9.76
-82%
8.7
-63%
6
-12%
4.8
10%
7.16
-34%
7.79
-46%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 14min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 28min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 26min
Huawei P9
11.46 Wh
Huawei P8
 Wh
Apple iPhone 6S
7 Wh
Samsung Galaxy S7
11.55 Wh
Motorola Moto X Force
 Wh
Google Nexus 5X
10 Wh
Microsoft Lumia 950
12 Wh
Huawei Mate 8
 Wh
Battery Runtime
-16%
-6%
19%
17%
2%
-17%
43%
Reader / Idle
1514
826
-45%
1510
0%
1810
20%
1610
6%
1775
17%
1500
-1%
1872
24%
H.264
568
581
2%
699
23%
892
57%
710
25%
555
-2%
570
0%
963
70%
WiFi v1.3
569
434
-24%
492
-14%
456
-20%
426
-25%
412
-28%
250
-56%
865
52%
Load
206
215
4%
137
-33%
242
17%
330
60%
245
19%
187
-9%
256
24%

Pro

+ SoC veloz
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ Ampla cobertura de frequências
+ Boas câmeras
+ Qualidade das chamadas
+ Headset incluído
+ Carga rápida
+ USB Tipo C
+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem App2SD
- LTE Cat.. Apenas 6
- Sem receptor de rádio
- Sem infravermelhos
- Sem MHL ou SlimPort
- Somente USB 2.0
- DNGs não podem ser armazenados na micro-SD
- Afogamento do SoC sob carga permanente
In review: Huawei P9. Review sample courtesy of Huawei.
In review: Huawei P9. Review sample courtesy of Huawei.

A empresa chinesa continua com a história de sucesso da sua série P com o Huawei P9, e consistentemente desenvolve ainda mais o seu carro chefe. Mais uma vez, o ótimo painel IPS, bom desempenho, qualidade das fotos da dual-câmera Leica, a boa duração da bateria e o generoso período de garantia, nos impressionaram.

Os componentes que a Huawei instalou em seu smartphone, no geral, funcionam bem, mas nem sempre são os mais modernos. Por exemplo, LTE Cat. 9 não está abordo, somente o antigo Cat. Versão 6. No entanto, ele tem uma gama de frequências muito ampla. Também é agradável que as qualidades do telefone não sejam passadas por alto. O P9 oferece uma qualidade de chamadas muito e uma boa supressão do ruído de fundo.

O Huawei P9 é um potente smartphone premium que não precisa de superlativos, e convence com o seu conceito geral balanceado.

Junto com o leve EMUI 4.1, o SoC veloz fornece um desempenho incrível, mas mostra um afogamento bastante notório sob uso intenso permanente. A dual-câmera não é a reinvenção anunciada da fotografia móvel, mas tira boas fotos com um toque muito original. Por outro lado, o recurso de vídeo da câmera mostra fraquezas. Suas gravações a 60 FPS não são impressionantes, e não oferece Ultra HD, para começar.

Embora a Huawei tenha aumentado o preço com o seu P9, o smartphone ainda oferece uma boa razão de preço-desempenho e um pacote balanceado. No entanto, o aparelho não satisfará completamente os fanáticos dos óculos VR ou os entusiastas do vídeo.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Huawei P9 - 04/28/2016 v5.1(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
93%
Teclado
70 / 75 → 93%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
55 / 60 → 92%
Peso
93%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
50 / 63 → 80%
Desempenho da aplicação
59 / 70 → 84%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
81%
Médio
79%
90%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P9
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-05- 6 (Update: 2016-05- 9)