Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y5 2018

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/25/2018

As cheap as possible. O Y5 2018 é atualmente um dos smartphones mais baratos da linha ocidental da Huawei. Por 120 euros (~$140; versão dos EUA ~$120), os compradores receberão a tarifa padrão nessa faixa de preço. Isso é suficiente para o novo smartphone Huawei sobreviva o enxame de concorrentes?

Huawei Y5 2018 (Y Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6739
Placa gráfica
PowerVR GE8100
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.45 polegadas 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.3 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Card Reader: microSD até 256 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acclerômetro, sensor de proximidade, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 146.5 x 70.9
Bateria
11.47 Wh, 3020 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2, contrast AF, LED flash
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2, LED flash
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono orientado para frente, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta de ejeção SIM, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value: 0.36W/​kg (head), 1.06W/​kg (body); LTE Cat.4: 150 Mb/s (download), 50 Mb/s (upload), fanless
peso
145 g, Suprimento de energia: 50 g
Preço
119 Euro

 

Huawei Y5 2018
Huawei Y5 2018
Huawei Y5 2018
Huawei Y5 2018
Huawei Y5 2018
Huawei Y5 2018

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi A1
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼100% +356%
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼80% +263%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.2 MBit/s ∼39% +77%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼24% +7%
Huawei Y5 2018
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52 MBit/s ∼22%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.1 MBit/s ∼18% -19%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi A1
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼100% +353%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼78% +254%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.6 MBit/s ∼37% +69%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 MBit/s ∼24% +7%
Huawei Y5 2018
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.3 MBit/s ∼22%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s ∼20% -11%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – forest
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – forest
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Huawei Y5 2018 – overview
GPS Huawei Y5 2018 – overview
GPS Huawei Y5 2018 – forest
GPS Huawei Y5 2018 – forest
GPS Huawei Y5 2018 – bridge
GPS Huawei Y5 2018 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
473
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 489 cd/m² Médio: 469.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.02 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 475 cd/m²
Contraste: 625:1 (Preto: 0.76 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.12 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 12 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
96.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.342
Huawei Y5 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Sony Xperia L1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Umidigi A1 Pro
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Xiaomi Mi A1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
35%
30%
65%
43%
Brightness middle
475
425
-11%
479
1%
594
25%
503
6%
Brightness
470
425
-10%
478
2%
570
21%
478
2%
Brightness Distribution
91
93
2%
94
3%
86
-5%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.76
0.37
51%
0.58
24%
0.22
71%
0.37
51%
Contrast
625
1149
84%
826
32%
2700
332%
1359
117%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.12
4.7
48%
4.5
51%
6.63
27%
3.92
57%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
18.86
8.3
56%
7.5
60%
13.99
26%
7.86
58%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
12
4.6
62%
4.1
66%
9.2
23%
4.9
59%
Gamma
2.342 102%
2.17 111%
2.03 118%
2.24 107%
2.223 108%
CCT
9861 66%
7445 87%
7139 91%
8663 75%
7884 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 166.7 Hz ≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 166.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 166.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8882 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
38060 Points ∼54%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
30619 Points ∼43% -20%
Sony Xperia L1
37495 Points ∼53% -1%
Umidigi A1 Pro
36073 Points ∼51% -5%
Xiaomi Mi A1
63101 Points ∼89% +66%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (31018 - 38060, n=6)
35118 Points ∼50% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=336)
70824 Points ∼100% +86%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
45817 Points ∼45%
Umidigi A1 Pro
45868 Points ∼45% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1
77161 Points ∼75% +68%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (39468 - 46435, n=7)
43679 Points ∼43% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (25692 - 290397, n=114)
102559 Points ∼100% +124%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
2675 Points ∼55%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2768 Points ∼57% +3%
Sony Xperia L1
3237 Points ∼66% +21%
Umidigi A1 Pro
3159 Points ∼65% +18%
Xiaomi Mi A1
4895 Points ∼100% +83%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0 - 3320, n=7)
2574 Points ∼53% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2399 - 8601, n=202)
4443 Points ∼91% +66%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
4133 Points ∼72%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3624 Points ∼63% -12%
Sony Xperia L1
4285 Points ∼75% +4%
Umidigi A1 Pro
4330 Points ∼76% +5%
Xiaomi Mi A1
5721 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0 - 4711, n=5)
3494 Points ∼61% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=366)
4673 Points ∼82% +13%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
10 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
620 Points ∼69% +6100%
Sony Xperia L1
743 Points ∼83% +7330%
Umidigi A1 Pro
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1
895 Points ∼100% +8850%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7 - 591, n=7)
92.4 Points ∼10% +824%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=442)
670 Points ∼75% +6600%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
187 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
208 Points ∼14% +11%
Sony Xperia L1
386 Points ∼26% +106%
Umidigi A1 Pro
184 Points ∼12% -2%
Xiaomi Mi A1
1012 Points ∼67% +441%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (18 - 188, n=7)
152 Points ∼10% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=442)
1502 Points ∼100% +703%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
1034 Points ∼92%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
591 Points ∼53% -43%
Sony Xperia L1
798 Points ∼71% -23%
Umidigi A1 Pro
802 Points ∼71% -22%
Xiaomi Mi A1
881 Points ∼78% -15%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (683 - 1034, n=7)
901 Points ∼80% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=442)
1123 Points ∼100% +9%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
1363 Points ∼43%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1086 Points ∼34% -20%
Sony Xperia L1
1338 Points ∼42% -2%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1318 Points ∼41% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A1
3187 Points ∼100% +134%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1122 - 1526, n=7)
1352 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=442)
2241 Points ∼70% +64%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
224 Points ∼18%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
536 Points ∼42% +139%
Sony Xperia L1
744 Points ∼59% +232%
Umidigi A1 Pro
208 Points ∼16% -7%
Xiaomi Mi A1
1263 Points ∼100% +464%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (182 - 637, n=7)
269 Points ∼21% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=445)
1132 Points ∼90% +405%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
1451 Points ∼38%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
952 Points ∼25% -34%
Sony Xperia L1
1241 Points ∼33% -14%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1450 Points ∼38% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1
3678 Points ∼97% +153%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1125 - 1451, n=6)
1102 Points ∼29% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=139)
3810 Points ∼100% +163%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
1827 Points ∼42%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1562 Points ∼36% -15%
Sony Xperia L1
1875 Points ∼43% +3%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1852 Points ∼42% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A1
4396 Points ∼100% +141%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1664 - 1852, n=6)
1490 Points ∼34% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 10558, n=186)
3955 Points ∼90% +116%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
662 Points ∼57%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
556 Points ∼47% -16%
Sony Xperia L1
674 Points ∼58% +2%
Umidigi A1 Pro
665 Points ∼57% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1
881 Points ∼75% +33%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (585 - 665, n=6)
536 Points ∼46% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=187)
1171 Points ∼100% +77%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
560 Points ∼27%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
783 Points ∼38% +40%
Sony Xperia L1
968 Points ∼47% +73%
Umidigi A1 Pro
531 Points ∼26% -5%
Xiaomi Mi A1
2070 Points ∼100% +270%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (530 - 589, n=7)
559 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 3669, n=291)
1548 Points ∼75% +176%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
68 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
79 Points ∼8% +16%
Sony Xperia L1
149 Points ∼14% +119%
Umidigi A1 Pro
88 Points ∼8% +29%
Xiaomi Mi A1
388 Points ∼37% +471%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (67 - 92, n=7)
80.3 Points ∼8% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 5220, n=291)
1052 Points ∼100% +1447%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
84 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
99 Points ∼10% +18%
Sony Xperia L1
184 Points ∼18% +119%
Umidigi A1 Pro
108 Points ∼11% +29%
Xiaomi Mi A1
473 Points ∼47% +463%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (83 - 113, n=7)
99 Points ∼10% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 4732, n=299)
1008 Points ∼100% +1100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
562 Points ∼27%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
753 Points ∼36% +34%
Sony Xperia L1
939 Points ∼45% +67%
Umidigi A1 Pro
537 Points ∼26% -4%
Xiaomi Mi A1
2079 Points ∼100% +270%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (524 - 620, n=7)
565 Points ∼27% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=322)
1452 Points ∼70% +158%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
102 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
133 Points ∼9% +30%
Sony Xperia L1
238 Points ∼17% +133%
Umidigi A1 Pro
140 Points ∼10% +37%
Xiaomi Mi A1
390 Points ∼27% +282%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (102 - 148, n=7)
125 Points ∼9% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 8312, n=322)
1421 Points ∼100% +1293%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
125 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
163 Points ∼13% +30%
Sony Xperia L1
285 Points ∼23% +128%
Umidigi A1 Pro
168 Points ∼14% +34%
Xiaomi Mi A1
476 Points ∼39% +281%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (125 - 178, n=7)
152 Points ∼12% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 6378, n=330)
1223 Points ∼100% +878%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
9755 Points ∼62%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼53% -14%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼53% -14%
Sony Xperia L1
10767 Points ∼68% +10%
Xiaomi Mi A1
15816 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (8269 - 10195, n=6)
9421 Points ∼60% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 36494, n=477)
12140 Points ∼77% +24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
3575 Points ∼23%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼20% -11%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼20% -11%
Sony Xperia L1
6015 Points ∼39% +68%
Xiaomi Mi A1
13314 Points ∼86% +272%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2892 - 4346, n=6)
3482 Points ∼22% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=477)
15561 Points ∼100% +335%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
4161 Points ∼30%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼27% -11%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼27% -11%
Sony Xperia L1
6669 Points ∼48% +60%
Xiaomi Mi A1
13799 Points ∼100% +232%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3414 - 4203, n=6)
3929 Points ∼28% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=478)
13454 Points ∼97% +223%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
6 fps ∼22%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
6 fps ∼22% 0%
Sony Xperia L1
11 fps ∼41% +83%
Umidigi A1 Pro
6 fps ∼22% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1
23 fps ∼86% +283%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.9 - 6.1, n=7)
5.69 fps ∼21% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=503)
26.9 fps ∼100% +348%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
10 fps ∼43%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
11 fps ∼47% +10%
Sony Xperia L1
19 fps ∼81% +90%
Umidigi A1 Pro
9.7 fps ∼41% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A1
22 fps ∼94% +120%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (8.2 - 10, n=7)
9.4 fps ∼40% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=506)
23.5 fps ∼100% +135%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
2.7 fps ∼19%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2.2 fps ∼15% -19%
Sony Xperia L1
4.1 fps ∼29% +52%
Umidigi A1 Pro
2.7 fps ∼19% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1
9.8 fps ∼69% +263%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.2 - 2.8, n=7)
2.57 fps ∼18% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=426)
14.3 fps ∼100% +430%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
5.7 fps ∼39%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
4.8 fps ∼33% -16%
Sony Xperia L1
8.8 fps ∼61% +54%
Umidigi A1 Pro
5.4 fps ∼37% -5%
Xiaomi Mi A1
9.5 fps ∼66% +67%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.5 - 5.7, n=7)
5.26 fps ∼36% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=428)
14.5 fps ∼100% +154%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
1.6 fps ∼13%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1.4 fps ∼11% -12%
Sony Xperia L1
2.6 fps ∼21% +63%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1.6 fps ∼13% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1
6.4 fps ∼51% +300%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.3 - 1.6, n=7)
1.514 fps ∼12% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 60, n=289)
12.5 fps ∼100% +681%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
3.4 fps ∼27%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3.4 fps ∼27% 0%
Sony Xperia L1
6.3 fps ∼50% +85%
Umidigi A1 Pro
3.3 fps ∼26% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A1
6.3 fps ∼50% +85%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.8 - 3.6, n=7)
3.29 fps ∼26% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 110, n=291)
12.6 fps ∼100% +271%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
0.85 fps ∼10%
Umidigi A1 Pro
0.9 fps ∼11% +6%
Xiaomi Mi A1
3.6 fps ∼43% +324%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0.76 - 0.91, n=7)
0.857 fps ∼10% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 35, n=220)
8.47 fps ∼100% +896%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2018
1.4 fps ∼18%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1.4 fps ∼18% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A1
3.5 fps ∼45% +150%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.3 - 1.7, n=7)
1.5 fps ∼19% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 50, n=223)
7.79 fps ∼100% +456%

Legend

 
Huawei Y5 2018 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia L1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi A1 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi A1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (11 - 224, n=361)
33.6 Points ∼100% +90%
Xiaomi Mi A1
26.077 Points ∼78% +47%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.857 Points ∼53% +1%
Huawei Y5 2018 (Chrome 67)
17.698 Points ∼53%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
17.372 Points ∼52% -2%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (15.4 - 18.1, n=7)
16.9 Points ∼50% -5%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
14.55 Points ∼43% -18%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=497)
5005 Points ∼100% +59%
Xiaomi Mi A1
4756 Points ∼95% +52%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
3191 Points ∼64% +2%
Huawei Y5 2018 (Chrome 67)
3138 Points ∼63%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2781 - 3191, n=7)
3023 Points ∼60% -4%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
2684 Points ∼54% -14%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
2273 Points ∼45% -28%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
17405 ms * ∼100% -6%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (15718 - 17852, n=7)
16843 ms * ∼97% -2%
Huawei Y5 2018 (Chrome 67)
16492 ms * ∼95%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
15718 ms * ∼90% +5%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
12506.5 ms * ∼72% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=516)
11897 ms * ∼68% +28%
Xiaomi Mi A1
9867.5 ms * ∼57% +40%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Y5 2018Lenovo Moto E4 PlusSony Xperia L1Umidigi A1 ProXiaomi Mi A1Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
4%
-45%
-7%
66%
-35%
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
46.6
-25%
26.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-58%
58.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
57.9
-7%
36.9 (6.38 - 65.4, n=103)
-41%
43.8 (6.38 - 87.1, n=270)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.3
-19%
37.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-54%
81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
83.62
2%
55.3 (10.8 - 87.7, n=103)
-32%
62.1 (10.8 - 96.5, n=270)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
11.8
29.4
149%
5.9
-50%
10.2
-14%
7.19
-39%
7.24 (0.49 - 37.9, n=218)
-39%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=550)
14%
Random Read 4KB
39
19.15
-51%
13.6
-65%
29.6
-24%
78.05
100%
19.7 (2.49 - 61.7, n=218)
-49%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=550)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB
47.8
42
-12%
40.2
-16%
44.4
-7%
202.45
324%
41 (8.74 - 97.6, n=218)
-14%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=550)
50%
Sequential Read 256KB
245.3
194.4
-21%
181.9
-26%
269.2
10%
277.43
13%
156 (9.66 - 294, n=218)
-36%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=550)
-14%
Carga Máxima
 37.1 °C34.2 °C33.4 °C 
 36.5 °C34.2 °C33.1 °C 
 35.7 °C34.1 °C33.2 °C 
Máximo: 37.1 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C
33.2 °C34.5 °C37.6 °C
33.7 °C34.2 °C37.7 °C
33.2 °C34.6 °C35.9 °C
Máximo: 37.7 °C
Médio: 35 °C
alimentação elétrica  36.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202534.12527.6333126.835.54028.137.55028.134.76320.526.78017.526.110015.623.412515.92616014.422.220013.722.925012.226.431511.127.340010.134.750010.137.26309.346.58008.851.810008.553.312508.155.216008.35220007.746.825007.845.931508.146.840007.947.25000851.563008.253.380008.354.7100008.248.8125008.245.3160008.334.1SPL47.363.620.763N5.413.90.315.6median 8.3Huawei Y5 2018median 46.5Delta1.810.828.730.525.832.429.831.129.327.832.534.32325.724.625.324.825.220.823.420.131.419.649.218.657.816.459.715.965.61570.814.673.314.271.213.976.613.87613.774.413.573.913.675.813.777.113.77413.97413.972.71470.61468.21464.91449.126.386.20.867.5median 14Xiaomi Mi A1median 70.82.111hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Y5 2018 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi A1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.04 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.3 / 1.7 / 2.5 Watt
Carga midlight 5.5 / 6.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Y5 2018
3020 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A1
3080 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6739
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
26%
3%
-15%
-38%
-20%
20%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
0.89
32%
0.89
32%
1.8
-38%
2.2
-69%
1.821 (1.13 - 2.8, n=7)
-40%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
33%
Idle Average *
1.7
1.87
-10%
2.05
-21%
2.3
-35%
2.8
-65%
2.44 (1.7 - 3.5, n=7)
-44%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
1.98
21%
2.18
13%
3.2
-28%
3.4
-36%
3.31 (2.05 - 6.3, n=7)
-32%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
22%
Load Average *
5.5
3.04
45%
6.02
-9%
4.7
15%
6.2
-13%
5.2 (3.68 - 7, n=7)
5%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
28%
Load Maximum *
6.8
4.01
41%
6.94
-2%
6
12%
7.2
-6%
6.02 (4.52 - 7.4, n=7)
11%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
18%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 25min
Huawei Y5 2018
3020 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A1
3080 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
-17%
-11%
-8%
Reader / Idle
1398
WiFi v1.3
685
788
15%
567
-17%
608
-11%
633
-8%
Load
223
H.264
656

Pro

+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Carcaça leve e estável
+ Permanece frio

Contra

- Sem WLAN 5 GHz
- Alto-falante muito fraco
- Cintilação da tela com brilho baixo

Huawei Y5 2018 - 07/17/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
67%
Teclado
64 / 75 → 85%
Mouse
82%
Conectividade
32 / 60 → 53%
Peso
93%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
79%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 63 → 10%
Desempenho da aplicação
35 / 70 → 50%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
38 / 91 → 42%
Camera
49%
Médio
64%
76%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y5 2018
Florian Wimmer, 2018-07-25 (Update: 2018-08- 1)