Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi A1

Christian Irion (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/23/2018

Android puro a um preço justo. O Xiaomi Mi A1 é a versão europeia do Mi 5X. Equipado com a banda LTE 20 e o Android One, por um preço baixo, oferece não apenas atualizações de segurança regulares e oportunas, mas também uma garantia de atualização de dois anos sobre as correções de segurança.

Xiaomi Mi A1 (Mi Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506, Análises do: 650 MHz
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR3
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Capacitiva, multi-touch, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB livre
Conexões
1 (USB Type-C) USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, sensor de aceleração, bússola, giroscópio, sensor hall, USB Type-C, Transmissor de infravermelho, VoLTE, tethering
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GPRS / EDGE (2G): 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz; UMTS / HSPA (3G): 850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz; LTE (4G): 800, 850, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600 MHz - Frequency bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.3 x 155.4 x 75.8
Bateria
3080 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​2.2, Phase comparison AF, dual-LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps (câmera principal); 12.0 MP, f/​2.6, depth of focus, telephoto lens (câmera secundária)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.0 1.12μm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Um só alto-falante com som Dirac HD, Teclado: Onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Android One, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR: 1.75 W/kg (head), 0.76 W/kg (body)
peso
165 g

 

Xiaomi Mi A1
Xiaomi Mi A1
Xiaomi Mi A1
Xiaomi Mi A1
Xiaomi Mi A1
Xiaomi Mi A1
Xiaomi Mi A1

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s ∼100% +22%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼84% +2%
Xiaomi Mi A1
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼82%
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼65% -20%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48.1 MBit/s ∼17% -80%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
345 MBit/s ∼100% +46%
Xiaomi Mi A1
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼54% -22%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼43% -38%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29.5 MBit/s ∼9% -88%
GPS test Xiaomi Mi A1
GPS test Xiaomi Mi A1
GPS test Xiaomi Mi A1
GPS test Xiaomi Mi A1
GPS test Xiaomi Mi A1
GPS test Xiaomi Mi A1
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
Taken with main camera
Taken with main camera
Taken with main camera (portrait mode)
Taken with main camera (portrait mode)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
Picture of test chart
Test chart detail
474
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 503 cd/m² Médio: 477.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
Contraste: 1359:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.92 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.223
Xiaomi Mi A1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Nokia 6 2018
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-36%
-45%
-7%
Brightness middle
503
417
-17%
458
-9%
434
-14%
Brightness
478
421
-12%
473
-1%
404
-15%
Brightness Distribution
88
88
0%
88
0%
81
-8%
Black Level *
0.37
0.61
-65%
0.51
-38%
Contrast
1359
684
-50%
898
-34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.92
6.1
-56%
7.1
-81%
4.4
-12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.86
11.2
-42%
14.5
-84%
8.6
-9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.9
7.1
-45%
10.5
-114%
4.2
14%
Gamma
2.223 108%
2.16 111%
2.28 105%
2.24 107%
CCT
7884 82%
8362 78%
8951 73%
7343 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
63101 Points ∼87%
Nokia 6 2018
72580 Points ∼100% +15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼91% +5%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
67578 Points ∼93% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 66045, n=15)
62872 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=336)
70824 Points ∼98% +12%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
4895 Points ∼99%
Nokia 6 2018
4719 Points ∼96% -4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
4924 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=12)
4896 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3138 - 8601, n=201)
4453 Points ∼90% -9%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
5721 Points ∼94%
Nokia 6 2018
5484 Points ∼90% -4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼97% +3%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
6096 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=14)
5859 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=365)
4677 Points ∼77% -18%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
895 Points ∼100%
Nokia 6 2018
895 Points ∼100% 0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (649 - 958, n=15)
767 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=441)
672 Points ∼75% -25%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
1012 Points ∼67%
Nokia 6 2018
1520 Points ∼100% +50%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼67% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
1006 Points ∼66% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (968 - 1026, n=15)
1008 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=441)
1505 Points ∼99% +49%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
881 Points ∼76%
Nokia 6 2018
1161 Points ∼100% +32%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼90% +19%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
928 Points ∼80% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (584 - 1553, n=15)
1005 Points ∼87% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=441)
1124 Points ∼97% +28%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
3187 Points ∼91%
Nokia 6 2018
3237 Points ∼93% +2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼100% +10%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3154 Points ∼90% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1960 - 3261, n=15)
2773 Points ∼79% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=441)
2244 Points ∼64% -30%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
1263 Points ∼84%
Nokia 6 2018
1504 Points ∼100% +19%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼87% +4%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
412 Points ∼27% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1019 - 1323, n=15)
1198 Points ∼80% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=444)
1134 Points ∼75% -10%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
3678 Points ∼96%
Nokia 6 2018
3690 Points ∼96% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3092 Points ∼81% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (2628 - 3678, n=8)
3197 Points ∼83% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=138)
3831 Points ∼100% +4%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
4396 Points ∼98%
Nokia 6 2018
883 Points ∼20% -80%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼98% -1%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
4471 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3148 - 4396, n=10)
4131 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1131 - 10558, n=185)
3970 Points ∼89% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
881 Points ∼21%
Nokia 6 2018
4210 Points ∼100% +378%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼22% +5%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
907 Points ∼22% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (841 - 881, n=11)
784 Points ∼19% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=186)
1175 Points ∼28% +33%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
2070 Points ∼96%
Nokia 6 2018
1738 Points ∼80% -16%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼98% +3%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
2166 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1636 - 2177, n=15)
1941 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (530 - 3669, n=290)
1554 Points ∼72% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
388 Points ∼37%
Nokia 6 2018
707 Points ∼67% +82%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼36% -2%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
383 Points ∼36% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (372 - 393, n=15)
382 Points ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (67 - 5220, n=290)
1056 Points ∼100% +172%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
473 Points ∼47%
Nokia 6 2018
814 Points ∼80% +72%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼46% -2%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
469 Points ∼46% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (452 - 480, n=15)
465 Points ∼46% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (83 - 4732, n=298)
1012 Points ∼100% +114%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
2079 Points ∼96%
Nokia 6 2018
1733 Points ∼80% -17%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼98% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
2167 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1631 - 2157, n=15)
1951 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=321)
1455 Points ∼67% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
390 Points ∼27%
Nokia 6 2018
1249 Points ∼88% +220%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼51% +86%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
724 Points ∼51% +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (390 - 743, n=15)
705 Points ∼49% +81%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=321)
1426 Points ∼100% +266%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
476 Points ∼36%
Nokia 6 2018
1332 Points ∼100% +180%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼64% +78%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
850 Points ∼64% +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (476 - 870, n=15)
819 Points ∼61% +72%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6378, n=329)
1227 Points ∼92% +158%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
15816 Points ∼92%
Nokia 6 2018
13196 Points ∼77% -17%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼99% +8%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
17204 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (14195 - 16267, n=14)
15714 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=476)
12164 Points ∼71% -23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
13314 Points ∼72%
Nokia 6 2018
18572 Points ∼100% +39%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼71% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
13376 Points ∼72% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7668 - 13491, n=14)
12897 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=476)
15585 Points ∼84% +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
13799 Points ∼81%
Nokia 6 2018
17030 Points ∼100% +23%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼82% +1%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
14072 Points ∼83% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8541 - 14003, n=14)
13414 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=477)
13472 Points ∼79% -2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
23 fps ∼77%
Nokia 6 2018
30 fps ∼100% +30%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼77% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
22 fps ∼73% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (22 - 23, n=15)
22.9 fps ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=502)
27 fps ∼90% +17%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
22 fps ∼71%
Nokia 6 2018
31 fps ∼100% +41%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼71% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
23 fps ∼74% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (17 - 35, n=15)
22.2 fps ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=505)
23.5 fps ∼76% +7%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
9.8 fps ∼68%
Nokia 6 2018
14 fps ∼97% +43%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼68% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
9.9 fps ∼69% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 10, n=15)
9.37 fps ∼65% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=425)
14.4 fps ∼100% +47%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
9.5 fps ∼63%
Nokia 6 2018
15 fps ∼100% +58%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼64% +1%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
10 fps ∼67% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7.4 - 18, n=15)
10.1 fps ∼67% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=427)
14.5 fps ∼97% +53%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
6.4 fps ∼51%
Nokia 6 2018
9.8 fps ∼78% +53%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼51% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
6.5 fps ∼52% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 7, n=15)
6.19 fps ∼50% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=288)
12.5 fps ∼100% +95%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
6.3 fps ∼50%
Nokia 6 2018
10 fps ∼79% +59%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼50% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
7 fps ∼56% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=15)
6.55 fps ∼52% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=290)
12.6 fps ∼100% +100%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
3.6 fps ∼42%
Nokia 6 2018
5.6 fps ∼66% +56%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼41% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3.5 fps ∼41% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.4 - 3.8, n=14)
3.51 fps ∼41% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.76 - 35, n=219)
8.51 fps ∼100% +136%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
3.5 fps ∼45%
Nokia 6 2018
5.9 fps ∼75% +69%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼45% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3.8 fps ∼49% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 7.4, n=14)
3.76 fps ∼48% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 50, n=222)
7.82 fps ∼100% +123%
AnTuTu v7
MEM (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
4570 Points ∼71%
Nokia 6 2018
5884 Points ∼91% +29%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5406 Points ∼84% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (0 - 6586, n=5)
4312 Points ∼67% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 17441, n=113)
6452 Points ∼100% +41%
UX (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
21164 Points ∼82%
Nokia 6 2018
25223 Points ∼98% +19%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
21477 Points ∼83% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (0 - 21649, n=5)
16696 Points ∼65% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 58766, n=113)
25844 Points ∼100% +22%
GPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
12776 Points ∼43%
Nokia 6 2018
19743 Points ∼67% +55%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13693 Points ∼47% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (0 - 13599, n=5)
10363 Points ∼35% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 128264, n=113)
29439 Points ∼100% +130%
CPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
38651 Points ∼93%
Nokia 6 2018
39585 Points ∼95% +2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
41767 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (0 - 40836, n=5)
31359 Points ∼75% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 99873, n=113)
41535 Points ∼99% +7%
Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A1
77161 Points ∼75%
Nokia 6 2018
90435 Points ∼88% +17%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
82343 Points ∼80% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (0 - 81789, n=5)
62730 Points ∼61% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 290397, n=113)
103239 Points ∼100% +34%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Mi A1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 224, n=360)
33.7 Points ∼100% +29%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59)
32.796 Points ∼97% +26%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
28.167 Points ∼84% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (23.1 - 31.8, n=15)
27.7 Points ∼82% +6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼80% +3%
Xiaomi Mi A1
26.077 Points ∼77%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59)
5204 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=496)
5011 Points ∼96% +5%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
4993 Points ∼96% +5%
Xiaomi Mi A1
4756 Points ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3804 - 4979, n=15)
4555 Points ∼88% -4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼85% -7%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=515)
11883 ms * ∼100% -20%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
9922.7 ms * ∼84% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A1
9867.5 ms * ∼83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 10895, n=15)
9055 ms * ∼76% +8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼74% +11%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59)
7667 ms * ∼65% +22%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi A1Nokia 6 2018BQ Aquaris X ProLenovo Moto Z2 PlayAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
4%
-6%
78%
4%
-18%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
57.9
61.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-14%
58.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
51.9 (19.6 - 74.7, n=49)
-10%
43.8 (6.38 - 87.1, n=270)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.62
83.42 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
79.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
70.2 (21.1 - 86.9, n=49)
-16%
62.1 (10.8 - 96.5, n=270)
-26%
Random Write 4KB
7.19
15.3
113%
12.07
68%
47.9
566%
15.4 (3.4 - 71.1, n=57)
114%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=549)
88%
Random Read 4KB
78.05
38.78
-50%
37.97
-51%
38.2
-51%
48.1 (11.4 - 149, n=57)
-38%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=549)
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB
202.45
118.32
-42%
139.63
-31%
137.5
-32%
160 (40 - 216, n=57)
-21%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=549)
-65%
Sequential Read 256KB
277.43
272.59
-2%
270.46
-3%
245.6
-11%
266 (115 - 704, n=57)
-4%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=549)
-24%
Carga Máxima
 35.8 °C32.7 °C33.4 °C 
 37.6 °C32.4 °C34.5 °C 
 34 °C32.1 °C32.4 °C 
Máximo: 37.6 °C
Médio: 33.9 °C
31.1 °C32.7 °C33.5 °C
31.5 °C32.5 °C36.6 °C
31.7 °C32.7 °C33.1 °C
Máximo: 36.6 °C
Médio: 32.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  35.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.730.52525.832.43129.831.14029.327.85032.534.3632325.78024.625.310024.825.212520.823.416020.131.420019.649.225018.657.831516.459.740015.965.65001570.863014.673.380014.271.2100013.976.6125013.876160013.774.4200013.573.9250013.675.8315013.777.1400013.774500013.974630013.972.780001470.6100001468.2125001464.9160001449.1SPL26.386.2N0.867.5median 14Xiaomi Mi A1median 70.8Delta2.11135.245.832.946.537.232.231.738.439.639.728.332.227.330.926.929.726.732.52433.620.939.120.947.319.551.118.559.217.568.517.566.715.768.515.872.916.673.615.87515.476.815.578.51676.715.876.41676.116.375.516.375.516.268.616.463.616.452.128.687.21.167.9median 16.4Nokia 6 2018median 68.52.112.531.634.925.436.225.331.132.928.533.633.431.631.128.423.82724.820.829.62234.621.342.220.847.621.251.919.45619.557.917.759.717.962.517.864.817.366.117.467.516.77417.274.218.271.117.977.917.681.417.778.317.875.317.97318.170.518.263.73086.11.360median 17.9BQ Aquaris X Promedian 64.81.31231.62725.426.225.331.132.930.533.627.731.626.928.425.32725.520.830.42240.121.347.720.849.721.256.919.460.919.564.217.767.517.972.317.876.317.376.917.477.116.774.117.272.718.274.917.972.617.674.317.773.517.874.517.978.818.177.818.270.43086.81.368.2median 17.9Lenovo Moto Z2 Playmedian 72.61.39.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi A1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

BQ Aquaris X Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Moto Z2 Play audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 1.52 / 1.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.2 / 2.8 / 3.4 Watt
Carga midlight 6.2 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi A1
3080 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
49%
40%
69%
38%
40%
Idle Minimum *
2.2
0.67
70%
0.67
70%
0.45
80%
0.958 (0.49 - 2.2, n=15)
56%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
61%
Idle Average *
2.8
1.76
37%
1.7
39%
0.78
72%
2 (0.87 - 3.92, n=15)
29%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
39%
Idle Maximum *
3.4
1.78
48%
1.78
48%
0.84
75%
2.19 (0.9 - 4.03, n=15)
36%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
43%
Load Average *
6.2
2.82
55%
4.42
29%
1.69
73%
3.46 (1.69 - 6.2, n=15)
44%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
36%
Load Maximum *
7.2
4.56
37%
6.3
12%
3.79
47%
5.36 (3.8 - 7.2, n=15)
26%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 33min
Xiaomi Mi A1
3080 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
49%
15%
18%
Reader / Idle
1833
1840
1589
WiFi v1.3
633
942
49%
730
15%
749
18%
Load
362
254
477
H.264
675
644
946

Pro

+ Excelente câmera para fotos
+ Muito bom acabamento
+ Tela brilhante
+ Boa reprodução de cores
+ Muito boa qualidade da voz

Contra

- Alto consumo de energia
- Os fones de ouvido nem sempre funcionam como deveriam
- Sem estabilizador de imagem
- Duração da bateria apenas medíocre
In review: Xiaomi Mi A1. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Xiaomi Mi A1. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

O Mi A1 é o primeiro smartphone da Xiaomi que não é entregue com o sistema operacional MIUI da empresa; ele vem com Android puro. Como o Mi A1 faz parte do projeto Android One, você tem a garantia de atualizações de segurança rápidas e uma garantia de atualização de dois anos. Como o smartphone foi desenvolvido de maneira direcionada para o mercado europeu, a banda LTE, muitas vezes necessária, também está a bordo. Em termos de hardware, o Xiaomi Mi A1 é um excelente smartphone de gama média.

Uma das vantagens dos smartphones Xiaomi é sua câmera, que, para sua faixa de preços, tira fotos excelentes com o efeito Bokeh (desfocagem de profundidade). Além disso, o dispositivo oferece uma tela nítida e brilhante, um processador e memória de trabalho que são suficientemente dimensionados para aplicativos padrão, USB-C e um leitor de digitais que funciona de maneira muito confiável, embora não seja o mais rápido do mercado. Qualquer pessoa que use o Mi A1 para navegação também pode ter certeza de ter feito uma boa escolha. 

Dispositivos alternativos para o Xiaomi Mi A1 são, por exemplo, o Nokia 6 (2018), o BQ Aquaris x Pro, e o Motorola Z2 Play. Todos esses dispositivos vêm com o Android e oferecem desempenho similar. Em termos de preço, o Mi A1 atualmente está significativamente abaixo dos dispositivos alternativos. 

Xiaomi Mi A1 - 06/14/2018 v6
Christian Irion

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
91%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
75%
Desempenho do jogos
25 / 63 → 40%
Desempenho da aplicação
51 / 70 → 73%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
68%
Médio
73%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi A1
Christian Irion, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-06- 2)