Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y5 2019: Melhor que no ano passado

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/15/2019

Couro falso – qualidades reais. Os compradores sempre tiveram que desembolsar pouco mais de 100 Euros (~$113) pelo Huawei Y5, e eles devem saber que não podem esperar um milagre de desempenho por isso. Este ano, eles receberão uma tela com um entalhe, um acabamento de couro sintético opcional e câmeras aprimoradas. Descubra em nossa análise, por que a melhoria realmente o torna um dispositivo melhor.

Huawei Y5 2019 (Y Serie)
Processador
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
Placa gráfica
PowerVR GE8300
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.71 polegadas 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Entalhe en forma de lágima, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.5 x 147.1 x 70.8
Bateria
0 Wh, 3020 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2, LED flash
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, headset, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value: 0.42 W/​kg head, 0.86 W/​kg body; LTE Cat 4 (150 Mbps /​ 50 Mbps); notification LED, fanless
peso
146 g, Suprimento de energia: 63 g
Preço
129 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei Y5 2019
Huawei Y5 2019
Huawei Y5 2019
Huawei Y5 2019
Huawei Y5 2019
Huawei Y5 2019

Size Comparison

158.7 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 180 g153.6 mm 77.6 mm 9.7 mm 174 g147 mm 71 mm 9 mm 150 g147.1 mm 70.8 mm 8.5 mm 146 g146.5 mm 70.9 mm 8.3 mm 145 g144.5 mm 71 mm 8.3 mm 150 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris C
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
268 (min: 247, max: 276) MBit/s ∼100% +325%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=423)
224 MBit/s ∼84% +256%
Huawei Y5 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
63 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼24%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.5 (min: 49, max: 57) MBit/s ∼21% -12%
Huawei Y5 2018
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52 MBit/s ∼19% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.4 (min: 49, max: 54) MBit/s ∼19% -18%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼18% -23%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris C
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
216 (min: 189, max: 218) MBit/s ∼100% +289%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=423)
214 MBit/s ∼99% +286%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56.6 (min: 29, max: 61) MBit/s ∼26% +2%
Huawei Y5 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.5 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 (min: 52, max: 61) MBit/s ∼26% 0%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼24% -5%
Huawei Y5 2018
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.3 MBit/s ∼24% -6%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – old city
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – old city
GPS Huawei Y5 2019 – overview
GPS Huawei Y5 2019 – overview
GPS Huawei Y5 2019 – bridge
GPS Huawei Y5 2019 – bridge
GPS Huawei Y5 2019 – old city
GPS Huawei Y5 2019 – old city

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Picture of the test chart
Picture of the test chart
Test chart detail
Test chart detail
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
606
cd/m²
611
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 630 cd/m² Médio: 593.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 630 cd/m²
Contraste: 955:1 (Preto: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.79 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
96.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.176
Huawei Y5 2019
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Huawei Y5 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
BQ Aquaris C
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Xiaomi Redmi 7
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Motorola Moto E5 Play
IPS, 960x480, 5.2
Screen
-40%
1%
12%
9%
-35%
Brightness middle
630
475
-25%
338
-46%
623
-1%
444
-30%
369
-41%
Brightness
593
470
-21%
327
-45%
608
3%
441
-26%
358
-40%
Brightness Distribution
88
91
3%
82
-7%
91
3%
90
2%
81
-8%
Black Level *
0.66
0.76
-15%
0.27
59%
0.61
8%
0.45
32%
0.4
39%
Contrast
955
625
-35%
1252
31%
1021
7%
987
3%
923
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.79
9.12
-58%
5.36
7%
4.5
22%
3.94
32%
9.75
-68%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.54
18.86
-98%
9.77
-2%
7.33
23%
6.72
30%
18.28
-92%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7
12
-71%
6.2
11%
4.8
31%
4.8
31%
11.8
-69%
Gamma
2.176 101%
2.342 94%
2.345 94%
2.596 85%
2.294 96%
2.057 107%
CCT
8420 77%
9861 66%
8460 77%
7557 86%
7445 87%
11971 54%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
78.6

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1000 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9418 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1715 Points ∼37%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1451 Points ∼31% -15%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1405 Points ∼30% -18%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
1218 Points ∼26% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3850 Points ∼82% +124%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1397 Points ∼30% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (1607 - 1715, n=2)
1661 Points ∼36% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4676 Points ∼100% +173%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2436 Points ∼52%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1827 Points ∼39% -25%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1602 Points ∼34% -34%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
1769 Points ∼38% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4301 Points ∼92% +77%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1635 Points ∼35% -33%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2354 - 2436, n=2)
2395 Points ∼51% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=376)
4682 Points ∼100% +92%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
839 Points ∼59%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
662 Points ∼47% -21%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
636 Points ∼45% -24%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
647 Points ∼46% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1227 Points ∼87% +46%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
647 Points ∼46% -23%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (832 - 839, n=2)
836 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=376)
1413 Points ∼100% +68%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4195 Points ∼71%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2675 Points ∼45% -36%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3146 Points ∼53% -25%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
3281 Points ∼55% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
5912 Points ∼100% +41%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3209 Points ∼54% -24%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (4195 - 5511, n=5)
4868 Points ∼82% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=367)
5225 Points ∼88% +25%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5616 Points ∼79%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4133 Points ∼58% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
4058 Points ∼57% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7117 Points ∼100% +27%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
4152 Points ∼58% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (4229 - 7216, n=5)
6100 Points ∼86% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=538)
5652 Points ∼79% +1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1868 Points ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
15735 Points ∼100% +742%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (1740 - 1868, n=2)
1804 Points ∼11% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=54)
2680 Points ∼17% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
210 Points ∼1%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14536 Points ∼100% +6822%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (203 - 210, n=2)
207 Points ∼1% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=54)
2699 Points ∼19% +1185%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
262 Points ∼2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14786 Points ∼100% +5544%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (253 - 262, n=2)
258 Points ∼2% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=54)
2460 Points ∼17% +839%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
940 Points ∼44%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
600 Points ∼28% -36%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2133 Points ∼100% +127%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (780 - 940, n=4)
860 Points ∼40% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=373)
1938 Points ∼91% +106%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
250 Points ∼15%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
87 Points ∼5% -65%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
469 Points ∼28% +88%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (197 - 253, n=4)
238 Points ∼14% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8206, n=373)
1701 Points ∼100% +580%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
299 Points ∼19%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
107 Points ∼7% -64%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
567 Points ∼36% +90%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (238 - 300, n=4)
284 Points ∼18% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6312, n=374)
1589 Points ∼100% +431%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
924 Points ∼43%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
614 Points ∼29% -34%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
885 Points ∼41% -4%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
861 Points ∼40% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2147 Points ∼100% +132%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
877 Points ∼41% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (775 - 954, n=5)
876 Points ∼41% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=403)
1857 Points ∼86% +101%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
451 Points ∼20%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
145 Points ∼6% -68%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
250 Points ∼11% -45%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
247 Points ∼11% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
813 Points ∼35% +80%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
249 Points ∼11% -45%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (450 - 461, n=5)
455 Points ∼20% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=403)
2310 Points ∼100% +412%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
509 Points ∼26%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
175 Points ∼9% -66%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
297 Points ∼15% -42%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
294 Points ∼15% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
943 Points ∼49% +85%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
296 Points ∼15% -42%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (504 - 521, n=5)
509 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=403)
1944 Points ∼100% +282%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
918 Points ∼43%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
560 Points ∼26% -39%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2119 Points ∼100% +131%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (738 - 918, n=4)
847 Points ∼40% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=453)
1847 Points ∼87% +101%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
197 Points ∼14%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
68 Points ∼5% -65%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
424 Points ∼30% +115%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (197 - 250, n=4)
223 Points ∼16% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 6362, n=453)
1413 Points ∼100% +617%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
239 Points ∼18%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
84 Points ∼6% -65%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
516 Points ∼38% +116%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (239 - 298, n=4)
266 Points ∼19% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 5734, n=454)
1365 Points ∼100% +471%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
911 Points ∼43%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
562 Points ∼26% -38%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
892 Points ∼42% -2%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
845 Points ∼40% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2132 Points ∼100% +134%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
819 Points ∼38% -10%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (755 - 923, n=5)
857 Points ∼40% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=494)
1714 Points ∼80% +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
362 Points ∼20%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
102 Points ∼6% -72%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
46 Points ∼2% -87%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
55 Points ∼3% -85%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
807 Points ∼44% +123%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
199 Points ∼11% -45%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (357 - 434, n=5)
398 Points ∼22% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=493)
1844 Points ∼100% +409%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
418 Points ∼26%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
125 Points ∼8% -70%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
58 Points ∼4% -86%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
69 Points ∼4% -83%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
936 Points ∼58% +124%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
239 Points ∼15% -43%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (411 - 492, n=5)
451 Points ∼28% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=496)
1603 Points ∼100% +283%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
15004 Points ∼95%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
9755 Points ∼62% -35%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10427 Points ∼66% -31%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
10105 Points ∼64% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
15735 Points ∼100% +5%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10784 Points ∼69% -28%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (12725 - 15348, n=5)
14432 Points ∼92% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=655)
13978 Points ∼89% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7514 Points ∼36%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3575 Points ∼17% -52%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5487 Points ∼26% -27%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
5434 Points ∼26% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14536 Points ∼69% +93%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5712 Points ∼27% -24%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (7514 - 7695, n=5)
7583 Points ∼36% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=653)
21146 Points ∼100% +181%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8452 Points ∼49%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4161 Points ∼24% -51%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6133 Points ∼35% -27%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
6056 Points ∼35% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14786 Points ∼85% +75%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6379 Points ∼37% -25%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (8316 - 8657, n=5)
8474 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=653)
17322 Points ∼100% +105%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼38%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6 fps ∼16% -57%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼21% -46%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
7.6 fps ∼21% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
25 fps ∼68% +79%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼21% -46%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (14 - 14, n=5)
14 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=677)
36.9 fps ∼100% +164%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
21 fps ∼57%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 fps ∼27% -52%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
14 fps ∼38% -33%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
13 fps ∼35% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
37 fps ∼100% +76%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
20 fps ∼54% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (20 - 23, n=5)
21.2 fps ∼57% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=686)
27.7 fps ∼75% +32%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.5 fps ∼31%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.7 fps ∼13% -58%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼13% -58%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
2.8 fps ∼13% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
11 fps ∼52% +69%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼13% -58%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (6.5 - 6.7, n=5)
6.56 fps ∼31% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=583)
21.1 fps ∼100% +225%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
12 fps ∼63%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
5.7 fps ∼30% -52%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6.1 fps ∼32% -49%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
5.6 fps ∼29% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
19 fps ∼100% +58%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
11 fps ∼58% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (11 - 15, n=5)
13 fps ∼68% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=592)
19 fps ∼100% +58%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.3 fps ∼25%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.6 fps ∼9% -63%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7 fps ∼40% +63%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.5 - 4.3, n=5)
3.92 fps ∼23% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=449)
17.3 fps ∼100% +302%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7.8 fps ∼48%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3.4 fps ∼21% -56%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14 fps ∼85% +79%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (7.6 - 11, n=5)
8.92 fps ∼54% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=451)
16.4 fps ∼100% +110%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.8 fps ∼28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4.2 fps ∼42% +50%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.7 - 3.7, n=5)
3.14 fps ∼32% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=167)
9.89 fps ∼100% +253%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼12%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1.3 fps ∼19% +63%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (0.8 - 0.85, n=5)
0.82 fps ∼12% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=166)
6.84 fps ∼100% +755%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.3 fps ∼30%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7 fps ∼49% +63%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.3 - 5.8, n=5)
4.52 fps ∼31% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=171)
14.4 fps ∼100% +235%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼14%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3.9 fps ∼24% +70%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (2.3 - 4.2, n=5)
2.9 fps ∼18% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=171)
16 fps ∼100% +596%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼17%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.85 fps ∼7% -57%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3.9 fps ∼33% +95%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (1.9 - 2, n=5)
1.98 fps ∼17% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=374)
11.8 fps ∼100% +490%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.2 fps ∼30%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.4 fps ∼13% -56%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7.8 fps ∼74% +144%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (3.1 - 4.1, n=5)
3.58 fps ∼34% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=378)
10.6 fps ∼100% +231%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
63421 Points ∼46%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
45817 Points ∼33% -28%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
43307 Points ∼31% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
102781 Points ∼74% +62%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (63421 - 65996, n=5)
64636 Points ∼46% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 459850, n=285)
139075 Points ∼100% +119%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
775 Points ∼72%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
649 Points ∼61% -16%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1071 Points ∼100% +38%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
720 Points ∼67% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (715 - 1037, n=5)
834 Points ∼78% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼70% -3%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
471 Points ∼24%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
187 Points ∼9% -60%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
428 Points ∼22% -9%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
434 Points ∼22% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1072 Points ∼54% +128%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
418 Points ∼21% -11%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (470 - 483, n=5)
476 Points ∼24% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼100% +322%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1421 Points ∼81%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1034 Points ∼59% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
502 Points ∼29% -65%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
457 Points ∼26% -68%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1758 Points ∼100% +24%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
490 Points ∼28% -66%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (531 - 1458, n=5)
1104 Points ∼63% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼85% +5%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1798 Points ∼44%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1363 Points ∼33% -24%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1228 Points ∼30% -32%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
1187 Points ∼29% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4090 Points ∼100% +127%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1241 Points ∼30% -31%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (1419 - 1798, n=5)
1583 Points ∼39% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼71% +62%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
983 Points ∼58%
Huawei Y5 2018
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
224 Points ∼13% -77%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
643 Points ∼38% -35%
BQ Aquaris C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 2048
219 Points ∼13% -78%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1695 Points ∼100% +72%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
654 Points ∼39% -33%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
  (744 - 986, n=5)
901 Points ∼53% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=621)
1460 Points ∼86% +49%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 108, n=94)
31.9 Points ∼100% +103%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
26.9 Points ∼84% +72%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
15.682 Points ∼49%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (13.4 - 15.7, n=5)
14.9 Points ∼47% -5%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=84)
34.9 runs/min ∼100% +137%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chome 73)
27.44 runs/min ∼79% +87%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chome 74)
14.7 runs/min ∼42%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (12.5 - 15.7, n=4)
14.6 runs/min ∼42% -1%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=150)
64.2 Points ∼100% +83%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
58 Points ∼90% +66%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
35 Points ∼55%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (30 - 35, n=5)
33 Points ∼51% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
8258 Points ∼100% +79%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 43280, n=677)
6450 Points ∼78% +40%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
4603 Points ∼56%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (3920 - 4603, n=5)
4326 Points ∼52% -6%
BQ Aquaris C (Chrome 70)
3160 Points ∼38% -31%
Huawei Y5 2018 (Chrome 67)
3138 Points ∼38% -32%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
2503 Points ∼30% -46%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
2412 Points ∼29% -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Y5 2018 (Chrome 67)
16492 ms * ∼100% -59%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼84% -33%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
13477 ms * ∼82% -30%
BQ Aquaris C (Chrome 70)
13253 ms * ∼80% -28%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (10198 - 12215, n=5)
10886 ms * ∼66% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼65% -3%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
10364 ms * ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
4856.4 ms * ∼29% +53%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Y5 2019Huawei Y5 2018Nokia 2.1BQ Aquaris CXiaomi Redmi 7Motorola Moto E5 PlayAverage 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
-0%
-11%
22%
28%
-36%
17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
59.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
63.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
28.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-54%
39.2 (6.38 - 65.7, n=128)
-38%
49 (3.4 - 87.1, n=410)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
83.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
83.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
58.5 (8.1 - 87.7, n=128)
-28%
67.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=410)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
13.1
11.8
-10%
13.45
3%
9.8
-25%
14.4
10%
43.16
229%
7.9 (0.49 - 44.9, n=246)
-40%
21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730)
63%
Random Read 4KB
62.1
39
-37%
50.46
-19%
39.1
-37%
73.6
19%
46.31
-25%
21.3 (2.49 - 62.1, n=246)
-66%
46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730)
-26%
Sequential Write 256KB
45.2
47.8
6%
51.18
13%
45.7
1%
84.7
87%
52.2
15%
42.6 (8.74 - 106, n=246)
-6%
94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730)
109%
Sequential Read 256KB
272.1
245.3
-10%
288.26
6%
275.9
1%
298
10%
279
3%
165 (9.66 - 294, n=246)
-39%
266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730)
-2%
010203040Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.29.1.2: Ø32.3 (30-34)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.29.1.2: Ø30.6 (19-32)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.4a: Ø8.12 (4-12)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.4a: Ø9.1 (2-17)
Carga Máxima
 41.2 °C36.3 °C35.5 °C 
 40.6 °C36.6 °C36.2 °C 
 39.2 °C36.2 °C35.3 °C 
Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 37.5 °C
31.8 °C33.9 °C36.9 °C
32.8 °C34.6 °C37.2 °C
34.1 °C35.7 °C36.8 °C
Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.2442544.148.43134.1364038.135.15038.938.2633033.18025.925.810025.326.612523.228.716020.530.420020.436.8250204331518.648.440017.354.350017.260.763020.267.880019.673.3100016.174125013.970.3160015.268.4200015.564250014.561.2315014.261400014.170.3500015.973.5630015.368.2800014.957.81000014.664.81250014.961.11600014.752.7SPL65.528.362.981.1N18.11.115.547.6median 15.9median 61.1Delta2.411.22534.127.63326.835.528.137.528.134.720.526.717.526.115.623.415.92614.422.213.722.912.226.411.127.310.134.710.137.29.346.58.851.88.553.38.155.28.3527.746.87.845.98.146.87.947.2851.58.253.38.354.78.248.88.245.38.334.147.363.620.7635.413.90.315.6median 8.3median 46.51.810.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Y5 2019Huawei Y5 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Y5 2019 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y5 2018 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Carga midlight 3.3 / 4.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Y5 2019
3020 mAh
Huawei Y5 2018
3020 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
BQ Aquaris C
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto E5 Play
2120 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-23%
20%
0%
4%
5%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
1.3
-8%
0.7
42%
0.7
42%
1
17%
1.2
-0%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.7
11%
1.2
37%
1.9
-0%
1.7
11%
1.6
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
2.5
-4%
1.9
21%
2.5
-4%
2.1
12%
2
17%
Load Average *
3.3
5.5
-67%
3.2
3%
4.1
-24%
3.3
-0%
3.6
-9%
Load Maximum *
4.6
6.8
-48%
4.8
-4%
5.2
-13%
5.6
-22%
4.5
2%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 9min
Huawei Y5 2019
3020 mAh
Huawei Y5 2018
3020 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
BQ Aquaris C
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto E5 Play
2120 mAh
Battery Runtime
-3%
14%
-18%
18%
-46%
Reader / Idle
1256
1489
19%
H.264
732
902
23%
WiFi v1.3
709
685
-3%
809
14%
583
-18%
848
20%
382.9
-46%
Load
249
268
8%

Pro

+ Boa câmera principal
+ Desempenho comparativamente alto
+ Design moderno
+ Tela brilhante
+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem leitor de digitais
- A tela tem uma tonalidade azul
- Sem certificação DRM
- Sem muito espaço de armazenamento
- A carcaça é um pouco sensível à pressão

Veredicto – Muitas melhorias

Testing the Huawei Y5 2019. Test unit provided by Cyberport.
Testing the Huawei Y5 2019. Test unit provided by Cyberport.

O Huawei Y5 2019 é uma boa atualização em relação ao Y5 2018 e oferece várias vantagens. Por um lado, devemos mencionar o maior desempenho do sistema, depois está o design mais moderno com um entalhe em forma de lágrima, e também está o alto-falante dedicado que, apesar de oferecer um som medíocre, ainda é melhor do que seu antecessor. A tela tem uma reprodução de cores mais precisa e também pode ser mais brilhante do que a do antecessor, se necessário.

A Huawei teria feito um favor a si mesma e aos seus clientes adicionando um sensor de digitais, mas por outro lado, com 13 Megapixels, a câmera agora oferece uma resolução bastante alta na comparação de classes e também pode tirar fotos aceitáveis.

O Huawei Y5 2019: Um bom smartphone econômico com muito desempenho e melhoria significativa em relação ao seu antecessor.

Xiaomi Redmi 7 é um forte concorrente, com certeza. Custa apenas 30 Euros (~$34) a mais e oferece significativamente mais desempenho, um sensor de digitais e maior duração da bateria. O BQ Aquaris C oferece um WLAN e sensor de digitais consideravelmente mais rápidos. Ao mesmo tempo, o Huawei Y5 2019 eliminou várias fraquezas do seu antecessor e é agora um smartphone de baixo custo competitivo.

Atualmente, o custo adicional em comparação com o Y5 2018 é de cerca de 20 Euros (~$23). Se você não pode decidir entre os dois smartphones, o modelo mais atual é definitivamente a melhor escolha.

Nota: No momento de nossos testes, todos estão falando sobre a guerra comercial entre os EUA e a China, e a Huawei é particularmente afetada. No entanto, o fabricante afirma que não deve haver limitações em termos de atualizações de software ou aplicativos utilizáveis para todos os modelos atualmente disponíveis e que foram vendidos.

Huawei Y5 2019 - 06/14/2019 v6(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
72%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
35 / 60 → 59%
Peso
93%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
16 / 63 → 25%
Desempenho da aplicação
49 / 70 → 70%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
60%
Médio
69%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y5 2019: Melhor que no ano passado
Florian Schmitt, 2019-06-15 (Update: 2019-06-18)