Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y7 2019

Name: Huawei Y7 2019
Brand: Huawei

Grande, bom e acessível. O Y7 2019 é vendido por apenas 199 euros (~US$224), mas a Huawei ainda conseguiu colocar uma tela de 6,26 polegadas, duas câmeras traseiras e uma bateria de 4.000-mAh entre seus outros recursos impressionantes. Continue lendo para descobrir se as especificações impressionantes do papel no dispositivo podem se combinar para criar um smartphone de nível de entrada forte e como ele se compara a seus concorrentes.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ T. Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/10/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei Y7 2019 (Y7 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A53

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 506

Memória

3 GB

Pantalha

6.26 polegadas 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, Tela táctil multitouch de 10 pontos, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 20.83 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, sensor de digitais, sensor de proximidade

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM: Bands 2, 3, 5, e 8. UMTS: Bands 1, 2, 5 e 8. LTE: Bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8 e 20. SAR values: Body – 0.76 W/kg, Head - 0.35 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.1 x 158.92 x 76.91

Bateria

4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 51 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 37 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 899 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 944 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix , f/1.8. 2 MPix secondary sensor, f/2.4
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/2.0

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular (5V/2A), cabo USB Type-A para micro USB, Ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, EMUI 8.2, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

168 g, Suprimento de energia: 30 g

Preço

199 Euro

Links

Huawei página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash	285 (142^min - 294^max) MBit/s +497%
Huawei P20 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash	233 MBit/s +388%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	113 MBit/s +137%
Huawei Y7 2018 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	56.9 MBit/s +19%
Huawei Y7 2019 Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.7 (43^min - 52^max) MBit/s
Nokia 3.1 Plus PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.6 (15^min - 59^max) MBit/s 0%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Adreno 506, SD 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11.6 (2^min - 36^max) MBit/s -76%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s +616%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash	356 (342^min - 371^max) MBit/s +578%
Huawei P20 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash	198 MBit/s +277%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	119 MBit/s +127%
Nokia 3.1 Plus PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55.9 (28^min - 64^max) MBit/s +6%
Huawei Y7 2018 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55 MBit/s +5%
Huawei Y7 2019 Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.5 (50^min - 54^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G7 Play Adreno 506, SD 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash	34.8 (27^min - 44^max) MBit/s -34%

Huawei Y7 2019; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø52.3 (50-54)

Huawei Y7 2019; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø47.5 (43-52)

GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2019: Cycling around a lake

GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500: Cycling around a lake

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


555 cd/m²	521 cd/m²	542 cd/m²
547 cd/m²	547 cd/m²	547 cd/m²
552 cd/m²	528 cd/m²	545 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 555 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 542.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.93 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 547 cd/m²
Contraste: 1116:1 (Preto: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.35

	Huawei Y7 2019 IPS, 1520x720, 6.26	Huawei P20 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84	Huawei Y7 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 5.99	Motorola Moto G7 Play IPS, 1512x720, 5.70	Nokia 3.1 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 6.00	Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6.00	Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 6.26
Screen		-8%	-3%	-5%	16%	29%	7%
Brightness middle	547	528 -3%	393 -28%	479 -12%	526 -4%	519 -5%	421 -23%
Brightness	543	525 -3%	365 -33%	481 -11%	510 -6%	513 -6%	389 -28%
Brightness Distribution	94	89 -5%	85 -10%	94 0%	94 0%	93 -1%	85 -10%
Black Level *	0.49	0.51 -4%	0.29 41%	0.37 24%	0.17 65%		0.33 33%
Contrast	1116	1035 -7%	1355 21%	1295 16%	3094 177%		1276 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.5	4.7 -4%	5.28 -17%	4.91 -9%	6.64 -48%	1.8 60%	3.4 24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.9	8.9 -13%	9 -14%	9.47 -20%	10.02 -27%	3.6 54%	5.9 25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5	6.4 -28%	4.2 16%	6.4 -28%	6.4 -28%	1.5 70%	3.9 22%
Gamma	2.35 ^94%	2.22 ^99%	2.6 ^85%	2.108 ^104%	2.344 ^94%	2.06 ^107%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	7400 ^88%	7987 ^81%	7086 ^92%	7292 ^89%	7989 ^81%	6462 ^101%	7330 ^89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.8 ms rise
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22.8 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	761 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	935 Points +23%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	676 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1194 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	754 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1621 Points +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 787, n=13)	761 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +587%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3870 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	3749 Points -3%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	2889 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	4179 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3912 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5893 Points +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=13)	3862 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +263%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	2940 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	3116 Points +6%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	2133 Points -27%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3628 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3229 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5640 Points +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3374, n=10)	3146 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points +270%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	5431 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	5704 Points +5%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	4918 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	7321 Points +35%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6238 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	5199 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	6274 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4836 - 6062, n=14)	5364 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +178%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	4499 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	4793 Points +7%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	3874 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	5930 Points +32%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4838 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	4422 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	6052 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, n=14)	4502 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +142%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	12562 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	12048 Points -4%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	9583 Points -24%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	15000 Points +19%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	10653 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	12825 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	26605 Points +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12562 - 13203, n=12)	12801 Points +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	12281 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	11713 Points -5%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	9713 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	14603 Points +19%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	10412 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	12527 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	29116 Points +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12281 - 12736, n=12)	12470 Points +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	13655 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	13387 Points -2%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	9153 Points -33%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	16576 Points +21%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	11590 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	13988 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	20437 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (13596 - 15273, n=12)	14216 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	813 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	138 Points -83%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	603 Points -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	637 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	803 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2062 Points +154%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (800 - 829, n=14)	812 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points +363%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	704 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	109 Points -85%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	524 Points -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	575 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	692 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1929 Points +174%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (690 - 716, n=14)	701 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points +495%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1766 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	1760 Points 0%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	1280 Points -28%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1021 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1832 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2719 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1504 - 1901, n=14)	1785 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points +75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	824 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	704 Points -15%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	612 Points -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	740 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	822 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2142 Points +160%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (808 - 828, n=14)	821 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +1035%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	715 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	604 Points -16%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	531 Points -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	687 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	713 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2015 Points +182%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (702 - 718, n=14)	713 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +2187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1765 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	1671 Points -5%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	1306 Points -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1015 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1773 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2751 Points +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1580 - 1816, n=14)	1760 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	445 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	257 Points -42%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	310 Points -30%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	424 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	445 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1365 Points +207%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (438 - 449, n=14)	443 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)	2755 Points +519%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	367 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	207 Points -44%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	255 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	Points -100%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	363 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	366 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1193 Points +225%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (349 - 382, n=14)	365 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)	2751 Points +650%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1707 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	1757 Points +3%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	1258 Points -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1026 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1852 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2759 Points +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1521 - 1860, n=14)	1790 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)	3163 Points +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	499 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	482 Points -3%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	369 Points -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	478 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	497 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1438 Points +188%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (488 - 501, n=14)	496 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)	6737 Points +1250%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	414 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	401 Points -3%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	306 Points -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	415 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	412 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1265 Points +206%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (403 - 415, n=14)	411 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)	9723 Points +2249%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1779 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	1638 Points -8%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	1331 Points -25%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1025 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1780 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2758 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1529 - 1826, n=14)	1773 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)	4224 Points +137%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	33 fps
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	19 fps -42%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	27 fps -18%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	37 fps +12%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	27 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	20 fps -39%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	47 fps +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=13)	28.1 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +156%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	22 fps
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	19 fps -14%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	16 fps -27%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	24 fps +9%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	20 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	22 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	50 fps +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 23, n=13)	21.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +1023%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	17 fps
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	8.9 fps -48%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	14 fps -18%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	20 fps +18%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	17 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	8.9 fps -48%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	21 fps +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.7 - 18, n=13)	13.9 fps -18%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +325%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	9.3 fps
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	8.7 fps -6%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	7.1 fps -24%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	10 fps +8%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	9.7 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	9.3 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	22 fps +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=13)	9.3 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +1412%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	13 fps
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	5.6 fps -57%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	10 fps -23%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	15 fps +15%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	11 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	5.8 fps -55%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	14 fps +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=13)	9.98 fps -23%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +368%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	6.1 fps
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	5.2 fps -15%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	4.6 fps -25%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	6.9 fps +13%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	6.1 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	15 fps +146%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.9, n=13)	6.15 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +1523%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	6.8 fps
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	3.3 fps -51%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	5.4 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	7.9 fps +16%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	5.1 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.3 fps -51%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.4 fps +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 7, n=13)	5.4 fps -21%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +538%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.4 fps
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	3.1 fps -9%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	2.6 fps -24%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3.9 fps +15%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2.7 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.5 fps +3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	9 fps +165%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.6, n=13)	3.44 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +1662%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	6.1 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	6.8 fps +11%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6.8 fps +11%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.1 fps +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.2 - 6.4, n=6)	5.65 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)	44 fps +621%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.4 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	3.8 fps +12%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3.6 fps +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.5 fps +150%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.6, n=6)	3.42 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)	64.3 fps +1791%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.7 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	4.3 fps +16%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4.3 fps +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5.1 fps +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1.9 - 3.8, n=6)	3.38 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)	32.8 fps +786%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1.1 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	1.3 fps +18%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1.3 fps +18%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	3.2 fps +191%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1.1 - 1.4, n=6)	1.183 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)	25.6 fps +2227%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	73468 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	88550 Points +21%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	59421 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	97294 Points +32%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	76153 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	70016 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	143551 Points +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 73468, n=11)	69869 Points -5%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	57533 Points
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096	68232 Points +19%
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048	45687 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048	76724 Points +33%
Nokia 3.1 Plus Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	55264 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	55332 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	118773 Points +106%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=10)	57703 Points 0%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	52.9 Points
Motorola Moto G7 Play	42.63 Points
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71)	24.61 Points
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)	23.42 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=13)	22.4 Points
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)	22.19 Points
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	17.86 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)	33503 Points +714%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	10378 Points +152%
Motorola Moto G7 Play	8185 Points +99%
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71)	4508 Points +10%
Huawei P20 Lite	4191 Points +2%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	4115 Points
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)	4032 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=14)	3981 Points -3%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	3363 Points -18%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	13541 ms * -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=14)	11506 ms * -4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)	11450 ms * -4%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	11012 ms *
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71)	10888 ms * +1%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)	10788 ms * +2%
Motorola Moto G7 Play	4806 ms * +56%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	3880 ms * +65%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +86%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +291%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	62 Points +82%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)	34 Points 0%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	34 Points
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018	32 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (28 - 34, n=8)	31.3 Points -8%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	29 Points -15%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)	171 Points +66%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	103 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7)	97 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)	93 Points -10%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)	86 Points -17%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	82 Points -20%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei Y7 2019	Huawei P20 Lite	Huawei Y7 2018	Motorola Moto G7 Play	Nokia 3.1 Plus	Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018	Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		64%	-24%	54%	-30%	-4%	15%	-11%	801%
Sequential Read 256KB	305	293.9 -4%	256 -16%	289 -5%	272.5 -11%	298.8 -2%	282.6 -7%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -21%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 394%
Sequential Write 256KB	88.8	198.3 123%	71.5 -19%	111 25%	35.72 -60%	88.5 0%	172.4 94%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) 13%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 1159%
Random Read 4KB	83.5	48.19 -42%	38.8 -54%	74 -11%	52.4 -37%	72.9 -13%	81.3 -3%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) -48%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 196%
Random Write 4KB	17.48	71.1 307%	9.5 -46%	73 318%	8.33 -52%	16.1 -8%	18.75 7%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) 28%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 1456%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	86.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	85 -2%	84.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	81.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	85.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	65.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	69 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 5%	61.5 -7%	64.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	55.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -16%	67.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	64 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -20%

Dead Trigger 2

Huawei Y7 2019; 1.5.5: Ø53.8 (14-60)

Arena of Valor

Huawei Y7 2019; 1.28.2.2: Ø30.7 (1-32)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


35.7 °C	35.5 °C	37.8 °C
35.9 °C	35.4 °C	36.5 °C
34.8 °C	35.3 °C	36.6 °C

Máximo: 37.8 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C


31.4 °C	31.6 °C	34 °C
30.5 °C	31.4 °C	34 °C
31.6 °C	31.9 °C	33.5 °C

Máximo: 34 °C
Médio: 32.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 33.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei Y7 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Y7 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.1 Watt
Ocioso	0.51 / 1.7 / 1.85 Watt
Carga	3.17 / 4.44 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Huawei Y7 2019 4000 mAh	Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh	Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh	Nokia 3.1 Plus 3500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 3500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-35%	-38%	-42%	-47%	28%	-37%	-34%	-42%
Idle Minimum *	0.51	0.98 -92%	0.9 -76%	1 -96%	1 -96%	0.62 -22%	0.56 -10%	0.794 ?(0.51 - 1.26, n=14) -56%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -76%
Idle Average *	1.7	2 -18%	1.9 -12%	1.7 -0%	2.4 -41%	0.96 44%	1.99 -17%	2.27 ?(0.96 - 4.45, n=14) -34%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Maximum *	1.85	2.11 -14%	2.3 -24%	2.6 -41%	2.9 -57%	0.99 46%	2.05 -11%	2.48 ?(0.99 - 4.51, n=14) -34%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 12%
Load Average *	3.17	3.9 -23%	4.7 -48%	4.1 -29%	3.7 -17%	1.85 42%	4.62 -46%	3.95 ?(1.85 - 7.1, n=14) -25%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -75%
Load Maximum *	4.44	5.62 -27%	5.7 -28%	6.5 -46%	5.5 -24%	3.04 32%	8.94 -101%	5.38 ?(3.04 - 8.8, n=14) -21%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -87%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		39h 10min
WiFi Websurfing		18h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 38min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 56min

	Huawei Y7 2019 4000 mAh	Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh	Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh	Nokia 3.1 Plus 3500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 3500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite 3350 mAh
Battery Runtime		-46%	-33%	-38%	-17%	-9%	-40%
Reader / Idle	2350	750 -68%	1305 -44%			1817 -23%	1678 -29%
H.264	938	470 -50%	687 -27%			916 -2%	662 -29%
WiFi v1.3	1113	582 -48%	624 -44%	690 -38%	920 -17%	848 -24%	547 -51%
Load	296	247 -17%	245 -17%			335 13%	150 -49%

Pro

+ Tela IPS brilhante

+ Design resistente

+ Funcionalidade Dual-SIM LTE

+ Slot para cartões microSD dedicado

+ GPS rápido e preciso

+ Sensor de digitais

+ Reconhecimento facial

+ SoC não se afoga

+ Baixas temperaturas da superfície

+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem Wi-Fi de 5 GHz

- Sem NFC

- micro USB

- Armazenamento interno pequeno

- Não pode armazenar apps ou dados em armazenamento expansível

- Android 8.1 Oreo

- Correções de segurança desatualizadas do Android

The Huawei Y7 2019 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.

O Huawei Y7 2019 é uma atualização triunfante sobre o Y7 2018. O fabricante chinês melhorou em quase todas as áreas importantes, incluindo design, tela, desempenho e duração da bateria. Seus marcos estreitos e painel IPS de 6,26 polegadas também fazem o Y7 2019 parecer mais caro do que é.

A combinação de 3 GB de RAM, 32 GB de espaço de armazenamento e um SoC Snapdragon 450 da Qualcomm é decente, também para um dispositivo de nível de entrada. Existem dispositivos que oferecem melhor desempenho pelo mesmo preço, mas poucos também têm câmeras decentes, funcionalidade real de dois cartões SIM e microSD, além de uma fantástica duração da bateria.

O Huawei Y7 2019 é um excelente valor pelo dinheiro. Poucos smartphones de nível de entrada oferecem tanto quanto o Y7 2019.

Claro, a Huawei comprometeu algumas áreas para manter os custos baixos. A resolução de 720p é decepcionante, assim como a falta de NFC e a inclusão de uma porta micro USB ao invés de Type-C. O Motorola Moto G7 Play e o Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite oferecem melhor desempenho, enquanto o Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus (2018) também seria uma alternativa sólida e tem NFC. No entanto, a Huawei acertou muito com o Y7 2019, e suas deficiências não devem prejudicar o que é um excelente smartphone de nível de entrada.

Huawei Y7 2019 - 2019-10-31 10/31/2019 v7
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento

80%

Teclado

68 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

84%

Conectividade

40 / 70 → 57%

Peso

91%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

83%

Desempenho do jogos

6 / 64 → 10%

Desempenho da aplicação

44 / 86 → 51%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

100%

Audio

73 / 90 → 81%

Camera

47%

Médio

69%

75%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9924 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y7 2019

Manuel Masiero, 2019-04-10 (Update: 2019-04-11)

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y7 2019

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Dead Trigger 2

Arena of Valor

Huawei Y7 2019 audio analysis

Huawei Y7 2018 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare