Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y7 2019

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, T. Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/10/2019

Grande, bom e acessível. O Y7 2019 é vendido por apenas 199 euros (~US$224), mas a Huawei ainda conseguiu colocar uma tela de 6,26 polegadas, duas câmeras traseiras e uma bateria de 4.000-mAh entre seus outros recursos impressionantes. Continue lendo para descobrir se as especificações impressionantes do papel no dispositivo podem se combinar para criar um smartphone de nível de entrada forte e como ele se compara a seus concorrentes.

Huawei Y7 2019 (Y Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
6.26 polegadas 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, Tela táctil multitouch de 10 pontos, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20.83 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, sensor de digitais, sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM: Bands 2, 3, 5, e 8. UMTS: Bands 1, 2, 5 e 8. LTE: Bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8 e 20. SAR values: Body – 0.76 W/kg, Head - 0.35 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.1 x 158.92 x 76.91
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 51 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 37 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 899 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 944 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix , f/1.8. 2 MPix secondary sensor, f/2.4
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular (5V/2A), cabo USB Type-A para micro USB, Ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, EMUI 8.2, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
168 g, Suprimento de energia: 30 g
Preço
199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

160.2 mm 75.7 mm 7.9 mm 191 g158.92 mm 76.91 mm 8.1 mm 168 g158.3 mm 76.7 mm 7.8 mm 155 g156.9 mm 76.4 mm 8.2 mm 180 g156.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.5 mm 169 g148.6 mm 71.2 mm 7.4 mm 145 g147.3 mm 71.5 mm 7.99 mm 149 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
356 (min: 342, max: 371) MBit/s ∼100% +578%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=391)
221 MBit/s ∼62% +321%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
198 MBit/s ∼56% +277%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
119 MBit/s ∼33% +127%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.9 (min: 28, max: 64) MBit/s ∼16% +6%
Huawei Y7 2018
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55 MBit/s ∼15% +5%
Huawei Y7 2019
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.5 (min: 50, max: 54) MBit/s ∼15%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34.8 (min: 27, max: 44) MBit/s ∼10% -34%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
285 (min: 142, max: 294) MBit/s ∼100% +497%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s ∼82% +388%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=391)
212 MBit/s ∼74% +344%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼40% +137%
Huawei Y7 2018
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56.9 MBit/s ∼20% +19%
Huawei Y7 2019
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.7 (min: 43, max: 52) MBit/s ∼17%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.6 (min: 15, max: 59) MBit/s ∼17% 0%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.6 (min: 2, max: 36) MBit/s ∼4% -76%
GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2019: Overview
GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2019: Overview
GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2019: Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2019: Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2019: Loop
GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2019: Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500: Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500: Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500: Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500: Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
555
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 555 cd/m² Médio: 542.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.93 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 547 cd/m²
Contraste: 1116:1 (Preto: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
93% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.35
Huawei Y7 2019
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Huawei P20 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Huawei Y7 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.99
Motorola Moto G7 Play
IPS, 1512x720, 5.7
Nokia 3.1 Plus
IPS, 1440x720, 6
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.26
Screen
-8%
-3%
-5%
16%
29%
7%
Brightness middle
547
528
-3%
393
-28%
479
-12%
526
-4%
519
-5%
421
-23%
Brightness
543
525
-3%
365
-33%
481
-11%
510
-6%
513
-6%
389
-28%
Brightness Distribution
94
89
-5%
85
-10%
94
0%
94
0%
93
-1%
85
-10%
Black Level *
0.49
0.51
-4%
0.29
41%
0.37
24%
0.17
65%
0.33
33%
Contrast
1116
1035
-7%
1355
21%
1295
16%
3094
177%
1276
14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.7
-4%
5.28
-17%
4.91
-9%
6.64
-48%
1.8
60%
3.4
24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.9
8.9
-13%
9
-14%
9.47
-20%
10.02
-27%
3.6
54%
5.9
25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
6.4
-28%
4.2
16%
6.4
-28%
6.4
-28%
1.5
70%
3.9
22%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.22 99%
2.6 85%
2.108 104%
2.344 94%
2.06 107%
2.26 97%
CCT
7400 88%
7987 81%
7086 92%
7292 89%
7989 81%
6462 101%
7330 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9554 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2940 Points ∼52%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3116 Points ∼55% +6%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
2133 Points ∼38% -27%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3628 Points ∼64% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3229 Points ∼57% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5640 Points ∼100% +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (2777 - 3374, n=8)
3113 Points ∼55% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=293)
4529 Points ∼80% +54%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3870 Points ∼66%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3749 Points ∼64% -3%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
2889 Points ∼49% -25%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
4179 Points ∼71% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3912 Points ∼66% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5893 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (3272 - 4022, n=11)
3838 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=347)
4475 Points ∼76% +16%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
761 Points ∼47%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
935 Points ∼58% +23%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
676 Points ∼42% -11%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1194 Points ∼74% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
754 Points ∼47% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1621 Points ∼100% +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (741 - 787, n=11)
760 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=348)
1328 Points ∼82% +75%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
4499 Points ∼74%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
4793 Points ∼79% +7%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
3874 Points ∼64% -14%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
5930 Points ∼98% +32%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4838 Points ∼80% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
4422 Points ∼73% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6052 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (4171 - 4759, n=11)
4480 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 10450, n=341)
4920 Points ∼81% +9%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5431 Points ∼74%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
5704 Points ∼78% +5%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
4918 Points ∼67% -9%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
7321 Points ∼100% +35%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6238 Points ∼85% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5199 Points ∼71% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6274 Points ∼86% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (4836 - 5656, n=11)
5210 Points ∼71% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4290 - 14439, n=509)
5369 Points ∼73% -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1779 Points ∼65%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1638 Points ∼59% -8%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
1331 Points ∼48% -25%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1025 Points ∼37% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1780 Points ∼65% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2758 Points ∼100% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (1529 - 1823, n=11)
1769 Points ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=355)
1815 Points ∼66% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
414 Points ∼27%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
401 Points ∼26% -3%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
306 Points ∼20% -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
415 Points ∼27% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
412 Points ∼27% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1265 Points ∼81% +206%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (411 - 415, n=11)
413 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=355)
1554 Points ∼100% +275%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
499 Points ∼34%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
482 Points ∼33% -3%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
369 Points ∼25% -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
478 Points ∼33% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
497 Points ∼34% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1438 Points ∼99% +188%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (491 - 501, n=11)
498 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=358)
1451 Points ∼100% +191%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1765 Points ∼64%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1671 Points ∼61% -5%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
1306 Points ∼47% -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1015 Points ∼37% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1773 Points ∼64% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2751 Points ∼100% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (1580 - 1816, n=11)
1767 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=370)
1791 Points ∼65% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
715 Points ∼33%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
604 Points ∼28% -16%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
531 Points ∼25% -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
687 Points ∼32% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
713 Points ∼33% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2015 Points ∼94% +182%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (709 - 718, n=11)
713 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=370)
2145 Points ∼100% +200%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
824 Points ∼38%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
704 Points ∼33% -15%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
612 Points ∼29% -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
740 Points ∼35% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
822 Points ∼38% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2142 Points ∼100% +160%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (808 - 828, n=11)
822 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=371)
1825 Points ∼85% +121%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1707 Points ∼62%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1757 Points ∼64% +3%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
1258 Points ∼46% -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1026 Points ∼37% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1852 Points ∼67% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2759 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (1521 - 1855, n=11)
1788 Points ∼65% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=431)
1744 Points ∼63% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
367 Points ∼29%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
207 Points ∼16% -44%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
255 Points ∼20% -31%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
363 Points ∼28% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
366 Points ∼29% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1193 Points ∼93% +225%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (363 - 369, n=11)
365 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=433)
1283 Points ∼100% +250%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
445 Points ∼33%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
257 Points ∼19% -42%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
310 Points ∼23% -30%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
424 Points ∼31% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
445 Points ∼33% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1365 Points ∼100% +207%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (441 - 449, n=11)
444 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=441)
1229 Points ∼90% +176%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1766 Points ∼65%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1760 Points ∼65% 0%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
1280 Points ∼47% -28%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1021 Points ∼38% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1832 Points ∼67% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2719 Points ∼100% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (1504 - 1833, n=11)
1781 Points ∼66% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=464)
1650 Points ∼61% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
704 Points ∼36%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
109 Points ∼6% -85%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
524 Points ∼27% -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
575 Points ∼30% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
692 Points ∼36% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1929 Points ∼100% +174%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (690 - 716, n=11)
700 Points ∼36% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=464)
1752 Points ∼91% +149%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
813 Points ∼39%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
138 Points ∼7% -83%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
603 Points ∼29% -26%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
637 Points ∼31% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
803 Points ∼39% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2062 Points ∼100% +154%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (800 - 824, n=11)
809 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=472)
1503 Points ∼73% +85%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13655 Points ∼67%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
13387 Points ∼66% -2%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
9153 Points ∼45% -33%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
16576 Points ∼81% +21%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11590 Points ∼57% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13988 Points ∼68% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
20437 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (13596 - 15177, n=10)
14046 Points ∼69% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8253 - 45072, n=623)
13501 Points ∼66% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12281 Points ∼42%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
11713 Points ∼40% -5%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
9713 Points ∼33% -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
14603 Points ∼50% +19%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10412 Points ∼36% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12527 Points ∼43% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
29116 Points ∼100% +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (12281 - 12550, n=10)
12423 Points ∼43% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3585 - 162695, n=623)
19508 Points ∼67% +59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12562 Points ∼47%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
12048 Points ∼45% -4%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
9583 Points ∼36% -24%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
15000 Points ∼56% +19%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10653 Points ∼40% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12825 Points ∼48% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
26605 Points ∼100% +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (12562 - 12878, n=10)
12732 Points ∼48% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=624)
16310 Points ∼61% +30%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
22 fps ∼44%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
19 fps ∼38% -14%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
16 fps ∼32% -27%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
24 fps ∼48% +9%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
20 fps ∼40% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
22 fps ∼44% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼100% +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (21 - 22, n=11)
19.6 fps ∼39% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=650)
34.1 fps ∼68% +55%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
33 fps ∼70%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
19 fps ∼40% -42%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
27 fps ∼57% -18%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
37 fps ∼79% +12%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
27 fps ∼57% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
20 fps ∼43% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (20 - 34, n=11)
24.3 fps ∼52% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=653)
26.4 fps ∼56% -20%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
9.3 fps ∼42%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
8.7 fps ∼40% -6%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
7.1 fps ∼32% -24%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
10 fps ∼45% +8%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.7 fps ∼44% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
9.3 fps ∼42% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (9.2 - 9.4, n=11)
8.44 fps ∼38% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=569)
18.7 fps ∼85% +101%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
17 fps ∼81%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
8.9 fps ∼42% -48%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
14 fps ∼67% -18%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
20 fps ∼95% +18%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
17 fps ∼81% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
8.9 fps ∼42% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (8.7 - 18, n=11)
11.9 fps ∼57% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=574)
17.3 fps ∼82% +2%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.1 fps ∼39%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
5.2 fps ∼34% -15%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
4.6 fps ∼30% -25%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
6.9 fps ∼45% +13%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6 fps ∼39% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.1 fps ∼39% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼97% +146%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (6 - 6.1, n=11)
5.51 fps ∼36% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=431)
15.5 fps ∼100% +154%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13 fps ∼87%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
5.6 fps ∼37% -57%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
10 fps ∼67% -23%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
15 fps ∼100% +15%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11 fps ∼73% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5.8 fps ∼39% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼93% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (5.7 - 13, n=11)
8.34 fps ∼56% -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=434)
14.8 fps ∼99% +14%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.7 fps ∼42%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
4.3 fps ∼48% +16%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼48% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5.1 fps ∼57% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (1.9 - 3.7, n=3)
3.07 fps ∼35% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=135)
8.89 fps ∼100% +140%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1.1 fps ∼18%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1.3 fps ∼21% +18%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.3 fps ∼21% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3.2 fps ∼52% +191%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (1.1 - 1.2, n=3)
1.133 fps ∼18% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=135)
6.13 fps ∼100% +457%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.1 fps ∼46%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
6.8 fps ∼51% +11%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.8 fps ∼51% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.1 fps ∼61% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (3.2 - 6.1, n=3)
5.1 fps ∼38% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=136)
13.3 fps ∼100% +118%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼23%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3.8 fps ∼26% +12%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.6 fps ∼24% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.5 fps ∼57% +150%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (3.4 - 3.4, n=3)
3.4 fps ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=135)
14.8 fps ∼100% +335%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼32%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3.1 fps ∼30% -9%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
2.6 fps ∼25% -24%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3.9 fps ∼37% +15%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.7 fps ∼26% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.5 fps ∼33% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9 fps ∼86% +165%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (3.3 - 3.5, n=11)
3.11 fps ∼30% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=360)
10.5 fps ∼100% +209%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.8 fps ∼72%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps ∼35% -51%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
5.4 fps ∼57% -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
7.9 fps ∼84% +16%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5.1 fps ∼54% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.3 fps ∼35% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.4 fps ∼89% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (3.3 - 7, n=11)
4.59 fps ∼49% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=364)
9.42 fps ∼100% +39%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
73468 Points ∼51%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
88550 Points ∼62% +21%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
59421 Points ∼41% -19%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
97294 Points ∼68% +32%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
76153 Points ∼53% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
70016 Points ∼49% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
143551 Points ∼100% +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (56497 - 73468, n=11)
69869 Points ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63421 - 374820, n=253)
127177 Points ∼89% +73%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
57533 Points ∼48%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
68232 Points ∼57% +19%
Huawei Y7 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 2048
45687 Points ∼38% -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
76724 Points ∼65% +33%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
55264 Points ∼47% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
55332 Points ∼47% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
118773 Points ∼100% +106%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (54731 - 60077, n=10)
57703 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=460)
83838 Points ∼71% +46%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (17.6 - 23832, n=489)
86.9 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
52.897 Points ∼61%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
42.626 Points ∼49%
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
24.61 Points ∼28%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
23.424 Points ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=10)
22.3 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
22.191 Points ∼26%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
17.86 Points ∼21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
10378 Points ∼100% +152%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
8185 Points ∼79% +99%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=643)
6107 Points ∼59% +48%
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
4508 Points ∼43% +10%
Huawei P20 Lite
4191 Points ∼40% +2%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
4115 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
4032 Points ∼39% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=11)
3971 Points ∼38% -3%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
3363 Points ∼32% -18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
13541 ms * ∼100% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=11)
11469 ms * ∼85% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
11449.6 ms * ∼85% -4%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
11012.1 ms * ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=662)
10916 ms * ∼81% +1%
Nokia 3.1 Plus (Chrome 71)
10887.7 ms * ∼80% +1%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
10788.1 ms * ∼80% +2%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
4806 ms * ∼35% +56%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
3879.5 ms * ∼29% +65%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=115)
64.2 Points ∼100% +89%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
62 Points ∼97% +82%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
34 Points ∼53% 0%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
34 Points ∼53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (31 - 34, n=5)
32.8 Points ∼51% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
32 Points ∼50% -6%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
29 Points ∼45% -15%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
171 Points ∼100% +66%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=324)
119 Points ∼70% +16%
Huawei Y7 2019 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
103 Points ∼60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7)
97 Points ∼57% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
93 Points ∼54% -10%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
86 Points ∼50% -17%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
82 Points ∼48% -20%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Y7 2019Huawei P20 LiteHuawei Y7 2018Motorola Moto G7 PlayNokia 3.1 PlusSamsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018Xiaomi Mi 8 LiteAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
64%
-24%
54%
-30%
-4%
15%
-18%
-17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
61.5
-6%
64.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
55.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
67.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
63.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
49.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=129)
-25%
48.2 (9.5 - 87.1, n=389)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
85
-2%
84.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
81.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
83.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
67.9 (8.2 - 96.5, n=129)
-21%
66.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=389)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
17.48
71.07
307%
9.5
-46%
73
318%
8.33
-52%
16.1
-8%
18.75
7%
18.8 (0.75 - 77.3, n=171)
8%
19.2 (0.14 - 250, n=693)
10%
Random Read 4KB
83.53
48.19
-42%
38.8
-54%
74
-11%
52.37
-37%
72.91
-13%
81.25
-3%
38.2 (3.59 - 117, n=171)
-54%
43.8 (1.59 - 175, n=693)
-48%
Sequential Write 256KB
88.77
198.3
123%
71.5
-19%
111
25%
35.72
-60%
88.48
0%
172.43
94%
95 (14.8 - 189, n=171)
7%
90.2 (2.99 - 392, n=693)
2%
Sequential Read 256KB
305.05
293.94
-4%
256
-16%
289
-5%
272.51
-11%
298.81
-2%
282.62
-7%
234 (25.8 - 452, n=171)
-23%
254 (12.1 - 1468, n=693)
-17%
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060Tooltip
; 1.5.5: Ø53.8 (14-60)
Arena of Valor
010203040Tooltip
; 1.28.2.2: Ø30.7 (1-32)
Carga Máxima
 35.7 °C35.5 °C37.8 °C 
 35.9 °C35.4 °C36.5 °C 
 34.8 °C35.3 °C36.6 °C 
Máximo: 37.8 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C
31.4 °C31.6 °C34 °C
30.5 °C31.4 °C34 °C
31.6 °C31.9 °C33.5 °C
Máximo: 34 °C
Médio: 32.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  33.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.233.72527.830.13124.123.24024.926.35033.337.16323.827.98026.226.710026.228.812517.422.416017.23020017.337.825016.44531516.248.340015.755.250014.663.863016.36780013.470.6100013.872.9125014.373.2160013.869.7200014.370.2250014.669.3315013.777.1400014.580.7500014.479.3630014.373.8800014.668.21000014.6651250014.557.41600014.842.6SPL26.786.7N0.862.2median 14.6median 67Delta1.413.925.917.228.626.930.327.526.819.231.32124.516.824.716.620.613.618.112.522.811.122.410.428.69.734.99.342.58.247.36.855.36.860.46.462.5664.65.963.75.363.25.464.15.1665.267.95.669.95.166.35.259.85.356.55.548.75.441.65.521.976.8180.434.80.1median 56.5median 5.914.11.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Y7 2019Huawei Y7 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Y7 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y7 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.51 / 1.7 / 1.85 Watt
Carga midlight 3.17 / 4.44 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Y7 2019
4000 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2018
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Play
3000 mAh
Nokia 3.1 Plus
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-35%
-38%
-42%
-47%
28%
-37%
-31%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
0.51
0.98
-92%
0.9
-76%
1
-96%
1
-96%
0.62
-22%
0.56
-10%
0.765 (0.51 - 1.26, n=11)
-50%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=723)
-73%
Idle Average *
1.7
2
-18%
1.9
-12%
1.7
-0%
2.4
-41%
0.96
44%
1.99
-17%
2.44 (0.96 - 4.45, n=11)
-44%
1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=722)
-2%
Idle Maximum *
1.85
2.11
-14%
2.3
-24%
2.6
-41%
2.9
-57%
0.99
46%
2.05
-11%
2.54 (0.99 - 4.51, n=11)
-37%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=723)
-9%
Load Average *
3.17
3.9
-23%
4.7
-48%
4.1
-29%
3.7
-17%
1.85
42%
4.62
-46%
3.52 (1.85 - 5.78, n=11)
-11%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=717)
-28%
Load Maximum *
4.44
5.62
-27%
5.7
-28%
6.5
-46%
5.5
-24%
3.04
32%
8.94
-101%
4.94 (3.04 - 7.18, n=11)
-11%
5.86 (1.2 - 14.2, n=717)
-32%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
39h 10min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 38min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 56min
Huawei Y7 2019
4000 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2018
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Play
3000 mAh
Nokia 3.1 Plus
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Battery Runtime
-46%
-33%
-38%
-17%
-9%
-40%
Reader / Idle
2350
750
-68%
1305
-44%
1817
-23%
1678
-29%
H.264
938
470
-50%
687
-27%
916
-2%
662
-29%
WiFi v1.3
1113
582
-48%
624
-44%
690
-38%
920
-17%
848
-24%
547
-51%
Load
296
247
-17%
245
-17%
335
13%
150
-49%

Pro

+ Tela IPS brilhante
+ Design resistente
+ Funcionalidade Dual-SIM LTE
+ Slot para cartões microSD dedicado
+ GPS rápido e preciso
+ Sensor de digitais
+ Reconhecimento facial
+ SoC não se afoga
+ Baixas temperaturas da superfície
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem Wi-Fi de 5 GHz
- Sem NFC
- micro USB
- Armazenamento interno pequeno
- Não pode armazenar apps ou dados em armazenamento expansível
- Android 8.1 Oreo
- Correções de segurança desatualizadas do Android
The Huawei Y7 2019 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.
The Huawei Y7 2019 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.

O Huawei Y7 2019 é uma atualização triunfante sobre o Y7 2018. O fabricante chinês melhorou em quase todas as áreas importantes, incluindo design, tela, desempenho e duração da bateria. Seus marcos estreitos e painel IPS de 6,26 polegadas também fazem o Y7 2019 parecer mais caro do que é.

A combinação de 3 GB de RAM, 32 GB de espaço de armazenamento e um SoC Snapdragon 450 da Qualcomm é decente, também para um dispositivo de nível de entrada. Existem dispositivos que oferecem melhor desempenho pelo mesmo preço, mas poucos também têm câmeras decentes, funcionalidade real de dois cartões SIM e microSD, além de uma fantástica duração da bateria.

O Huawei Y7 2019 é um excelente valor pelo dinheiro. Poucos smartphones de nível de entrada oferecem tanto quanto o Y7 2019.

Claro, a Huawei comprometeu algumas áreas para manter os custos baixos. A resolução de 720p é decepcionante, assim como a falta de NFC e a inclusão de uma porta micro USB ao invés de Type-C. O Motorola Moto G7 Play e o Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite oferecem melhor desempenho, enquanto o Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus (2018) também seria uma alternativa sólida e tem NFC. No entanto, a Huawei acertou muito com o Y7 2019, e suas deficiências não devem prejudicar o que é um excelente smartphone de nível de entrada.

Huawei Y7 2019 - 04/08/2019 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
37 / 60 → 61%
Peso
91%
Bateria
98%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
27 / 63 → 42%
Desempenho da aplicação
51 / 70 → 73%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 73%
Camera
58%
Médio
72%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y7 2019
Manuel Masiero, 2019-04-10 (Update: 2019-04-11)