Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus (2018)

Super AMOLED FHD+. A série Galaxy A da Samsung está projetada com certo tipo de cliente em mente: aqueles que querem um smartphone com um visual simples e alta qualidade de fabricação. Testamos exaustivamente o Galaxy A6+ de 6 polegadas e relatamos nesta análise o que os compradores podem esperar. O smartphone custa cerca de 370 Euros (~$425; versão internacional ~$350).
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Galaxy Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
3 GB 
, 3GB
Pantalha
6.00 polegadas 2:1, 2220 x 1080 pixel 411 PPI, capacitiva, Super AMOLED, FHD+, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, sensor de posição, sensor-g, bússola digital, microUSB
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), HSPA (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), LTE (Band:1/3/7/8/20/38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 160.2 x 75.7
Bateria
3500 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix dual camera: 16MP (f/1.7) + 5MP (f/1.9)
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix f/1.9
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, headset, SIM ejector tool, USB power supply, Samsung Experience 9.0, Microsoft Apps, Bixby, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR head: 0.36 W/kg, SAR body: 1.39 W/kg, fanless
peso
191 g, Suprimento de energia: 76 g
Preço
0 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

160.2 mm 75.7 mm 7.9 mm 191 g158.4 mm 75.64 mm 9.55 mm 186 g149.1 mm 72.9 mm 8.1 mm 142 g148.6 mm 71.2 mm 7.4 mm 145 g146.5 mm 72.7 mm 7.8 mm 158 g146.1 mm 71.4 mm 7.9 mm 159 g142 mm 70 mm 9.7 mm 171 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s +172%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s +156%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 MBit/s +142%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s +106%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, Exynos 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s +48%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s +31%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +216%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s +160%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s +108%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s +103%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
224 MBit/s +88%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, Exynos 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s +80%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
198 MBit/s +66%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
119 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A6+
Samsung Galaxy A6+
Samsung Galaxy A6+
Samsung Galaxy A6+
Samsung Galaxy A6+
Samsung Galaxy A6+
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
496
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 532 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 512.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 519 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.06
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6.00
Huawei P20 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
HTC U11 Life
SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.20
Sony Xperia XA2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.20
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00
Screen
-106%
-94%
-136%
8%
-204%
-77%
Brightness middle
519
528
2%
545
5%
513
-1%
539
4%
458
-12%
458
-12%
Brightness
513
525
2%
526
3%
506
-1%
542
6%
473
-8%
463
-10%
Brightness Distribution
93
89
-4%
87
-6%
93
0%
93
0%
88
-5%
92
-1%
Black Level *
0.51
0.42
0.42
0.51
0.22
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
4.7
-161%
4.9
-172%
5
-178%
1.6
11%
7.1
-294%
4
-122%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.6
8.9
-147%
8.5
-136%
11.4
-217%
2.6
28%
14.5
-303%
7.4
-106%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
6.4
-327%
5.4
-260%
7.8
-420%
1.5
-0%
10.5
-600%
4.7
-213%
Gamma
2.06 107%
2.22 99%
2.31 95%
2.2 100%
2.28 96%
2.28 96%
2.19 100%
CCT
6462 101%
7987 81%
7610 85%
7964 82%
6422 101%
8951 73%
7425 88%
Contrast
1035
1298
1221
898
2082

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
55332 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
68232 Points +23%
HTC U11 Life
73617 Points +33%
Sony Xperia XA2
71552 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points +10%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points +20%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=10)
57703 Points +4%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
70016 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
88550 Points +26%
Sony Xperia XA2
89228 Points +27%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
82343 Points +18%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points +102%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 73468, n=11)
69869 Points 0%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
5199 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
5704 Points +10%
HTC U11 Life
5818 Points +12%
Sony Xperia XA2
5844 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points -3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points +13%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4836 - 6062, n=14)
5364 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +190%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
4422 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
4793 Points +8%
HTC U11 Life
4835 Points +9%
Sony Xperia XA2
5006 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points -8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points +11%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, n=14)
4502 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +146%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1165 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
1445 Points +24%
HTC U11 Life
1368 Points +17%
Sony Xperia XA2
1563 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points +21%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points +13%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points +103%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (389 - 1337, n=14)
1083 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=162, last 2 years)
5686 Points +388%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
2560 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
3109 Points +21%
HTC U11 Life
3215 Points +26%
Sony Xperia XA2
3256 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points +36%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2560 - 2898, n=14)
2736 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=162, last 2 years)
9595 Points +275%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
914 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
1930 Points +111%
HTC U11 Life
838 Points -8%
Sony Xperia XA2
1328 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points +65%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points +14%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points +174%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (770 - 1522, n=14)
1058 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12306, n=162, last 2 years)
6206 Points +579%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
968 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
848 Points -12%
HTC U11 Life
1515 Points +57%
Sony Xperia XA2
1500 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points +58%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points +5%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (943 - 984, n=14)
962 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
13856 Points +1331%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
814 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
858 Points +5%
HTC U11 Life
858 Points +5%
Sony Xperia XA2
921 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points -19%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points -1%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (10 - 981, n=14)
671 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=162, last 2 years)
1487 Points +83%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
754 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
935 Points +24%
HTC U11 Life
877 Points +16%
Sony Xperia XA2
865 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
773 Points +3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points +23%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points +118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 787, n=13)
761 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (800 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5109 Points +578%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3912 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
3749 Points -4%
HTC U11 Life
4193 Points +7%
Sony Xperia XA2
4170 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4104 Points +5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points +12%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=13)
3862 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
13696 Points +250%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3229 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
3116 Points -3%
HTC U11 Life
3956 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3002 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3374, n=10)
3146 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=71, last 2 years)
10674 Points +231%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
12825 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
12048 Points -6%
HTC U11 Life
16859 Points +31%
Sony Xperia XA2
16974 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points +3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points +9%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points +107%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12562 - 13203, n=12)
12801 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
12527 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
11713 Points -6%
HTC U11 Life
18469 Points +47%
Sony Xperia XA2
18534 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points +6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points +6%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points +134%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12281 - 12736, n=12)
12470 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
13988 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
13387 Points -4%
HTC U11 Life
12919 Points -8%
Sony Xperia XA2
13112 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points -7%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points +22%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (13596 - 15273, n=12)
14216 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
803 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
138 Points -83%
HTC U11 Life
1336 Points +66%
Sony Xperia XA2
1334 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points +44%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points +6%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points +153%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (800 - 829, n=14)
812 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=52, last 2 years)
3548 Points +342%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
692 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
109 Points -84%
HTC U11 Life
1257 Points +82%
Sony Xperia XA2
1251 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points +52%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points +5%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points +174%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (690 - 716, n=14)
701 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=52, last 2 years)
3905 Points +464%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1832 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
1760 Points -4%
HTC U11 Life
1711 Points -7%
Sony Xperia XA2
1737 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points -4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points +16%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1504 - 1901, n=14)
1785 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=52, last 2 years)
3005 Points +64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
445 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
257 Points -42%
HTC U11 Life
839 Points +89%
Sony Xperia XA2
811 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points +83%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points +4%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points +199%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (438 - 449, n=14)
443 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)
2680 Points +502%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
366 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
207 Points -43%
HTC U11 Life
729 Points +99%
Sony Xperia XA2
709 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points +94%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points +4%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points +217%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (349 - 382, n=14)
365 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)
2667 Points +629%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1852 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
1757 Points -5%
HTC U11 Life
1779 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XA2
1631 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points -8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points +15%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1521 - 1860, n=14)
1790 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)
3126 Points +69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
20 fps
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps -5%
HTC U11 Life
29 fps +45%
Sony Xperia XA2
31 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps +65%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps +10%
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps +140%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=13)
28.1 fps +41%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=180, last 2 years)
83.1 fps +316%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
22 fps
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps -14%
HTC U11 Life
30 fps +36%
Sony Xperia XA2
30 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps +55%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps +5%
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 23, n=13)
21.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=180, last 2 years)
243 fps +1005%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
8.9 fps
Huawei P20 Lite
8.9 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps +57%
Sony Xperia XA2
15 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps +69%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps +8%
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps +147%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.7 - 18, n=13)
13.9 fps +56%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=181, last 2 years)
70.8 fps +696%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
9.3 fps
Huawei P20 Lite
8.7 fps -6%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps +51%
Sony Xperia XA2
14 fps +51%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps +61%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps +5%
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps +147%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=13)
9.3 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=181, last 2 years)
137.8 fps +1382%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
5.8 fps
Huawei P20 Lite
5.6 fps -3%
HTC U11 Life
9.8 fps +69%
Sony Xperia XA2
10 fps +72%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps +55%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps +9%
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps +159%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=13)
9.98 fps +72%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=181, last 2 years)
59.7 fps +929%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
6.1 fps
Huawei P20 Lite
5.2 fps -15%
HTC U11 Life
9.7 fps +59%
Sony Xperia XA2
9.7 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps +49%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps +5%
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps +130%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.9, n=13)
6.15 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=181, last 2 years)
97.1 fps +1492%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3.3 fps
Huawei P20 Lite
3.3 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life
5.4 fps +64%
Sony Xperia XA2
6 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps +58%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps +6%
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 7, n=13)
5.4 fps +64%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=181, last 2 years)
42.7 fps +1194%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3.5 fps
Huawei P20 Lite
3.1 fps -11%
HTC U11 Life
5.5 fps +57%
Sony Xperia XA2
5.5 fps +57%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps +49%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps 0%
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.6, n=13)
3.44 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=181, last 2 years)
58.6 fps +1574%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
15.07 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.38 - 5.41, n=2)
5.4 fps
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
258 Points
Nokia 7 Plus
349 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (129 - 129, n=2)
129 Points
Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=61, last 2 years)
2145 Points

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (66.1 - 104.3, n=2, last 2 years)
85.2 Points +284%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.9 Points +143%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
32.22 Points +45%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
28.99 Points +31%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
27.37 Points +23%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.84 Points +21%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
23.42 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=13)
22.4 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
22.19 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points +726%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points +171%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
5256 Points +30%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
4893 Points +21%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
4771 Points +18%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points +10%
Huawei P20 Lite
4191 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
4032 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=14)
3981 Points -1%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=14)
11506 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
11450 ms *
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
10788 ms * +6%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
10236 ms * +11%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
9493 ms * +17%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8742 ms * +24%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
6442 ms * +44%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937 ms * +66%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years)
1658 ms * +86%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points +81%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
106 Points +14%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
100 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7)
97 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
93 Points
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
89 Points -4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points -8%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
86 Points -8%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018Huawei P20 LiteHTC U11 LifeSony Xperia XA2Samsung Galaxy A5 2017BQ Aquaris X ProNokia 7 PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
72%
30%
-4%
-29%
-10%
20%
-7%
827%
Sequential Read 256KB
298.8
293.9
-2%
268
-10%
271.5
-9%
182
-39%
270.5
-9%
283.1
-5%
242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247)
-19%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
392%
Sequential Write 256KB
88.5
198.3
124%
120
36%
127.4
44%
77.1
-13%
139.6
58%
211.6
139%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
14%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
1125%
Random Read 4KB
72.9
48.19
-34%
39.3
-46%
43.07
-41%
22.41
-69%
37.97
-48%
54.7
-25%
43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247)
-41%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
233%
Random Write 4KB
16.1
71.1
342%
50.2
212%
13.82
-14%
12.13
-25%
12.07
-25%
19.62
22%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
39%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
1558%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
86 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
73.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
78.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
82.2
-1%
71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178)
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
64.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
56 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-17%
49.77 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-27%
62.3
-8%
52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178)
-22%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Temple Run 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 default60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 26.4 °C26.4 °C25.9 °C 
 26.8 °C26.4 °C26.7 °C 
 26.9 °C26.6 °C26.2 °C 
Máximo: 26.9 °C
Médio: 26.5 °C
25.5 °C25.3 °C25.2 °C
25.3 °C26.1 °C25.7 °C
25.3 °C26 °C25.6 °C
Máximo: 26.1 °C
Médio: 25.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  24.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.241.72532.942.33137.239.94031.739.75039.640.86328.333.58027.32910026.929.512526.737.21602439.120020.947.825020.949.631519.551.240018.55950017.560.363017.563.880015.766.7100015.869.9125016.674.9160015.873.1200015.471.2250015.574.431501678.9400015.878.650001675.1630016.378.7800016.371.21000016.270.21250016.465.71600016.461SPL28.686.9N1.165.7median 16.4median 66.7Delta2.210.435.24232.941.837.230.431.736.639.641.828.331.427.331.526.934.226.731.42429.620.938.320.947.619.546.618.55417.562.817.559.415.758.915.86316.666.415.869.315.471.315.573.41674.815.875.91676.516.371.216.371.616.271.316.467.516.459.628.684.11.153.6median 16.4median 632.211.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018Huawei P20 Lite
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.22 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.62 / 0.96 / 0.99 Watt
Carga midlight 1.85 / 3.04 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3500 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-95%
-76%
-45%
-28%
-82%
-102%
-101%
-106%
Idle Minimum *
0.62
0.98
-58%
0.63
-2%
0.39
37%
0.64
-3%
0.67
-8%
0.65
-5%
0.794 ?(0.51 - 1.26, n=14)
-28%
0.896 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years)
-45%
Idle Average *
0.96
2
-108%
2.1
-119%
1.61
-68%
1.36
-42%
1.7
-77%
1.76
-83%
2.27 ?(0.96 - 4.45, n=14)
-136%
1.449 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years)
-51%
Idle Maximum *
0.99
2.11
-113%
2.15
-117%
1.62
-64%
1.4
-41%
1.78
-80%
1.78
-80%
2.48 ?(0.99 - 4.51, n=14)
-151%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years)
-65%
Load Average *
1.85
3.9
-111%
3.34
-81%
3.12
-69%
2.53
-37%
4.42
-139%
4.47
-142%
3.95 ?(1.85 - 7.1, n=14)
-114%
5.51 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=159, last 2 years)
-198%
Load Maximum *
3.04
5.62
-85%
4.83
-59%
4.92
-62%
3.63
-19%
6.3
-107%
9.13
-200%
5.38 ?(3.04 - 8.8, n=14)
-77%
8.19 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=159, last 2 years)
-169%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
30h 17min
WiFi Websurfing
14h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 35min
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3500 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Battery Runtime
-41%
-10%
4%
20%
-17%
-26%
Reader / Idle
1817
750
-59%
1820
0%
2503
38%
2418
33%
1840
1%
1703
-6%
H.264
916
470
-49%
798
-13%
766
-16%
984
7%
644
-30%
706
-23%
WiFi v1.3
848
582
-31%
725
-15%
886
4%
843
-1%
730
-14%
672
-21%
Load
335
247
-26%
303
-10%
298
-11%
467
39%
254
-24%
158
-53%

Pro

+ Câmera selfie de alta resolução
+ GPS preciso
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Tela OLED

Contra

- Desempenho medíocre do sistema
- Reconhecimento facial lento
- Sem USB Type C

Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 - 06/26/2018 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
87%
Conectividade
41 / 60 → 69%
Peso
89%
Bateria
97%
Pantalha
92%
Desempenho do jogos
27 / 63 → 42%
Desempenho da aplicação
48 / 70 → 69%
Temperatura
96%
Ruído
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
72%
Médio
74%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus (2018)
Mike Wobker, 2018-07-11 (Update: 2018-07-22)