Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone LG K10 (2017)

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/21/2017

Poder para as pessoas. O LG K10 (2017) traz muito mais poder que o seu predecessor e também foi equipado com uma carcaça de melhor qualidade. Um desempenho maduro por um pouco mais de 200 Euros (~ $212), mas é claro que vamos dar uma olhada mais cuidadosa no smartphone no teste.

LG K10 2017 (K Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6750 1.5 GHz , Mediatek MT6750
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.3 polegadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 277 PPI, Tela táctl capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5mm-Headsetport, Card Reader: microSD até 256 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor, compass, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20); Bandwidth (download/​upload): 300Mbps/​50Mbps; SAR value: 0,541 W/kg (head), 1,310 W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.99 x 148.7 x 75.3
Bateria
10.8 Wh, 2800 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 7 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 14 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 370 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 361 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, Contrast-AF, fladh LED, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix Videos @1080p, wide-angle
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante na traseira, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de energia, cabo de carregamento, headset, LG SmartWorld, Remote Call Service, LG Backup, 24 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, fanless
peso
138 g, Suprimento de energia: 49 g
Preço
209 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC One A9s
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼100% +121%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 MBit/s ∼46% +3%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.2 MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC One A9s
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼100% +100%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s ∼50%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.7 MBit/s ∼46% -9%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500: junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS LG K10: overview
GPS LG K10: overview
GPS LG K10: junction
GPS LG K10: junction
GPS LG K10: bridge
GPS LG K10: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
332
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 384 cd/m² Médio: 349.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.07 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 384 cd/m²
Contraste: 1067:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2
LG K10 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
IPS, 1280x720, 5
HTC One A9s
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2
LG K10
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Screen
5%
-1%
24%
3%
2%
Brightness
350
299
-15%
414
18%
320
-9%
474
35%
355
1%
Brightness Distribution
85
96
13%
94
11%
85
0%
85
0%
92
8%
Black Level *
0.36
0.42
-17%
0.23
36%
0.53
-47%
0.28
22%
Contrast
1067
981
-8%
1513
42%
957
-10%
1321
24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6
5.8
3%
5.6
7%
3.5
42%
4.7
22%
6.7
-12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.9
4.8
19%
6.9
-17%
4
32%
4.8
19%
7.9
-34%
Gamma
2 120%
1.84 130%
2.4 100%
2.3 104%
2.25 107%
2.21 109%
CCT
8042 81%
6252 104%
8422 77%
6527 100%
6441 101%
9072 72%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5069 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43.4 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
39063 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
24748 Points ∼11% -37%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28399 Points ∼12% -27%
HTC One A9s
51330 Points ∼23% +31%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
30365 Points ∼13% -22%
LG K10
27383 Points ∼12% -30%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
1047 Points ∼35%
HTC One A9s
1175 Points ∼39% +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
699 Points ∼23% -33%
LG K10
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
252 Points ∼5%
HTC One A9s
359 Points ∼7% +42%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
83 Points ∼2% -67%
LG K10
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
303 Points ∼8%
HTC One A9s
425 Points ∼11% +40%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
103 Points ∼3% -66%
LG K10
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
1105 Points ∼38%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
716 Points ∼25% -35%
HTC One A9s
1269 Points ∼43% +15%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
741 Points ∼25% -33%
LG K10
730 Points ∼25% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
380 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
42 Points ∼1% -89%
HTC One A9s
524 Points ∼7% +38%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
128 Points ∼2% -66%
LG K10
41 Points ∼1% -89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
445 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
53 Points ∼1% -88%
HTC One A9s
603 Points ∼12% +36%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
157 Points ∼3% -65%
LG K10
52 Points ∼1% -88%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
8223 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
8322 Points ∼12% +1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9256 Points ∼13% +13%
HTC One A9s
12025 Points ∼17% +46%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
7298 Points ∼11% -11%
LG K10
9106 Points ∼13% +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
7936 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3037 Points ∼1% -62%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
3858 Points ∼1% -51%
HTC One A9s
10453 Points ∼2% +32%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3369 Points ∼1% -58%
LG K10
3774 Points ∼1% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
7998 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3535 Points ∼2% -56%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4432 Points ∼2% -45%
HTC One A9s
10766 Points ∼5% +35%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3827 Points ∼2% -52%
LG K10
4339 Points ∼2% -46%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
13 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
4.6 fps ∼0% -65%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
5.2 fps ∼0% -60%
HTC One A9s
18 fps ∼1% +38%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
5.9 fps ∼0% -55%
LG K10
5.2 fps ∼0% -60%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
22 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7.6 fps ∼2% -65%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
9.6 fps ∼2% -56%
HTC One A9s
27 fps ∼6% +23%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
10 fps ∼2% -55%
LG K10
9.7 fps ∼2% -56%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
5.3 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1.8 fps ∼0% -66%
HTC One A9s
7.2 fps ∼1% +36%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2.2 fps ∼0% -58%
LG K10
1.8 fps ∼0% -66%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
11 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
4.1 fps ∼1% -63%
HTC One A9s
14 fps ∼4% +27%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4.7 fps ∼1% -57%
LG K10
4.1 fps ∼1% -63%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
3.5 fps ∼1%
HTC One A9s
2.6 fps ∼1% -26%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1.4 fps ∼0% -60%
LG K10
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
8.6 fps ∼5%
HTC One A9s
11 fps ∼6% +28%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3.4 fps ∼2% -60%
LG K10
fps ∼0% -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
3167 Points ∼46%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
1137 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
569 Points ∼37% -50%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
551 Points ∼36% -52%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
703 Points ∼46% -38%
LG K10
562 Points ∼36% -51%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
508 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
158 Points ∼2% -69%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
313 Points ∼4% -38%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
210 Points ∼2% -59%
LG K10
310 Points ∼4% -39%
Memory (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
623 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
315 Points ∼7% -49%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
741 Points ∼17% +19%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
780 Points ∼18% +25%
LG K10
453 Points ∼11% -27%
System (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
1259 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1134 Points ∼17% -10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
1035 Points ∼16% -18%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1041 Points ∼16% -17%
LG K10
1050 Points ∼16% -17%
Overall (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
821 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
423 Points ∼11% -48%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
603 Points ∼16% -27%
HTC One A9s
Points ∼0% -100%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
588 Points ∼16% -28%
LG K10
536 Points ∼15% -35%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
1480 Points ∼17%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
2311 Points ∼15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
593 Points ∼12%

Legend

 
LG K10 2017 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Spreadtrum SC9830A, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One A9s Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
3407 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2842 Points ∼6% -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2773 Points ∼6% -19%
HTC One A9s
4395 Points ∼9% +29%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2534 Points ∼5% -26%
LG K10
2838 Points ∼6% -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
11708.2 ms * ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
13701.5 ms * ∼23% -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
12952.9 ms * ∼22% -11%
HTC One A9s
9346 ms * ∼16% +20%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
14983 ms * ∼25% -28%
LG K10
16638 ms * ∼28% -42%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
20.838 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.2 Points ∼5% -22%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.094 Points ∼5% -18%
HTC One A9s
27.48 Points ∼8% +32%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
16.471 Points ∼5% -21%
LG K10
17.478 Points ∼5% -16%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
61.63 MB/s ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
18.7 MB/s ∼21% -70%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
51.1 MB/s ∼59% -17%
HTC One A9s
25.6 MB/s ∼29% -58%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
29.59 MB/s ∼34% -52%
LG K10
45 MB/s ∼52% -27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
77.4 MB/s ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
20.82 MB/s ∼22% -73%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
65.5 MB/s ∼68% -15%
HTC One A9s
39.6 MB/s ∼41% -49%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
47.67 MB/s ∼49% -38%
LG K10
75.47 MB/s ∼78% -2%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
10.8 MB/s ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
9.43 MB/s ∼6% -13%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
28.31 MB/s ∼19% +162%
HTC One A9s
34.6 MB/s ∼23% +220%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
9.1 MB/s ∼6% -16%
LG K10
7.5 MB/s ∼5% -31%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
25.1 MB/s ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.82 MB/s ∼10% -33%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
17.9 MB/s ∼10% -29%
HTC One A9s
21.3 MB/s ∼12% -15%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
20.9 MB/s ∼12% -17%
LG K10
9.2 MB/s ∼5% -63%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
43.6 MB/s ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
41.4 MB/s ∼20% -5%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
43.95 MB/s ∼21% +1%
HTC One A9s
68.6 MB/s ∼33% +57%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
65.15 MB/s ∼32% +49%
LG K10
78 MB/s ∼38% +79%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
LG K10 2017
246.1 MB/s ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
64.42 MB/s ∼8% -74%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
144.12 MB/s ∼18% -41%
HTC One A9s
210.2 MB/s ∼27% -15%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
174.2 MB/s ∼22% -29%
LG K10
131 MB/s ∼17% -47%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high51 fps
Carga Máxima
 39.6 °C40.1 °C35.1 °C 
 39.2 °C40.1 °C35.6 °C 
 37.2 °C37.7 °C33.8 °C 
Máximo: 40.1 °C
Médio: 37.6 °C
32.8 °C34.7 °C41.2 °C
33.3 °C34.2 °C41.3 °C
33.7 °C34.3 °C37.5 °C
Máximo: 41.3 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  35.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6452525.440.63125.334.94032.931.85033.632.86331.632.58028.428.2100272812520.828.81602227.820021.325.525020.826.631521.226.640019.436.250019.543.363017.750.480017.957.4100017.864.8125017.371.9160017.475.3200016.776.7250017.276.5315018.273.7400017.972500017.668.3630017.766.9800017.869.91000017.967.31250018.160.21600018.254.7SPL3084.3N1.348.9median 17.9LG K10 2017median 60.2Delta1.317.927.628.827.626.626.426.625.726.325.727.725.127.727.924.827.922.825.422.824.223.224.227.123.527.136.930.936.935.12035.141.519.941.546.921.746.953.124.253.15521.25556.421.156.457.617.957.659.32059.362.520.462.567.918.167.968.414.868.470.51670.572.914.972.974.814.474.875.213.975.272.213.372.267.912.867.968.812.968.858.312.958.350.613.250.644.912.844.982.629.282.648.71.248.7median 58.3HTC One A9smedian 17.9median 58.310.83.610.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
LG K10 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.34 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

HTC One A9s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.17 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.76 / 1.59 / 1.61 Watt
Carga midlight 3.24 / 4.15 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG K10 2017
2800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
HTC One A9s
2300 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
Power Consumption
16%
3%
-47%
-39%
Idle Minimum *
0.76
0.96
-26%
0.68
11%
1.29
-70%
0.74
3%
Idle Average *
1.59
1.14
28%
1.58
1%
2.28
-43%
2.04
-28%
Idle Maximum *
1.61
1.23
24%
1.61
-0%
2.52
-57%
2.22
-38%
Load Average *
3.24
2.45
24%
3.36
-4%
4.06
-25%
5.57
-72%
Load Maximum *
4.15
2.92
30%
3.91
6%
5.91
-42%
6.59
-59%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 37min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
8h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 13min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 58min
LG K10 2017
2800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
2800 mAh
HTC One A9s
2300 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
LG K10
2300 mAh
Battery Runtime
4%
17%
-5%
23%
-16%
Reader / Idle
1477
1212
-18%
1998
35%
1543
4%
1462
-1%
1123
-24%
H.264
613
590
-4%
683
11%
587
-4%
845
38%
603
-2%
WiFi v1.3
532
502
-6%
630
18%
517
-3%
814
53%
453
-15%
Load
298
433
45%
306
3%
245
-18%
301
1%
231
-22%

Pro

+ Carcaça de qualidade
+ Bateria removível
+ Boas durações da bateria
+ Alto desempenho
+ NFC e USB-OTG
+ Android 7 atual
+ Fotos nítidas da câmera

Contra

- Desempenho fraco da câmera sob iluminação baixa
- Qualidade média do microfone
- Alto falante berrante
- A tela poderia ser mais brilhante

O LG K10 (2017) certamente conseguiu uma coisa: é um evidente progresso em comparação com o seu predecessor. A carcaça mais uma vez se tornou mais fina de de maior qualidade, a bateria dura bastante mais e isso com um evidente poder maior sob o capô. Este aumento do poder é tão notável, que muitos aparelhos concorrentes também são superados pelo LG K10 (2017). Apenas o HTC One A9s possui ainda mais reservas de poder, no entanto, esse aparelho realmente vem de uma faixa de preços diferente.

É claro que há algo do que reclamar: o alto falante soa chiado, o qual torna o uso do modo mãos livres difícil de usar. Da mesma forma é o microfone de qualidade medíocre e a tela poderia ser mais brilhante. Mas, na verdade, essas foram nossas queixas: O sistema operacional é atual, o consumo de energia é bom, a câmera tira fotos muito boas, e o LG K10 (2017) lida bem.

O alto desempenho e a bateria removível são os destaques do LG K10 (2017). A qualidade da carcaça de plástico também deixa uma boa impressão. Em termos de som, a LG poderia se sair melhor, mas no geral, o LG K10 (2017) é um bom smartphone econômico.

No geral, uma clara recomendação para o LG K10 (2017). Somente alguém que precise de mais capacidade de bateria optará pelo Asus Zenfone 3 Max, mas deve considerar que, em contraste com o LG K10 (2017), a bateria não pode ser removida ali. O mesmo vai para o HTC One A9s, onde você, mais uma vez, recebe mais desempenho. Mas, de qualquer forma, o LG K10 (2017) é uma boa opção por menos de 200 Euros (~ $ 212).

In review: LG K10 (2017). Test unit provided by LG Germany.
In review: LG K10 (2017). Test unit provided by LG Germany.

The LG K10 (2017) certainly managed one thing: it is a clear progress compared to its predecessor. The casing became again slimmer and more high-quality, the battery lasts noticeably longer and that even with clearly more power under the hood. This power increase is so noticeable, that many competing devices are also outpaced by the LG K10 (2017). Only the HTC One A9s possesses even more power reserves, however, that device really comes from a different price range.

Of course there is something to complain: the speaker sounds squeaky, which makes the hands-free mode also hard to use. Likewise is the microphone of mediocre quality and the screen could be brighter. But actually, that was the extent of our complaints: The operating system is current, the power consumption okay, the camera takes quite good pictures, and the LG K10 (2017) handles well.

The high performance and the removable battery are the highlights of the LG K10 (2017). The quality of the plastic case also leaves a good impression. In terms of sound, the LG could do better, but overall, the LG K10 (2017) is a good budget smartphone.

Overall, a clear recommendation for the LG K10 (2017). Only anyone who absolutely needs more battery capacity will reach for the the Asus Zenfone 3 Max, but should consider that, in contrast to the LG K10 (2017), the battery cannot be removed there. The same goes for the HTC One A9s, where you again get more performance instead. But at any rate, the LG K10 (2017) is a very good deal for currently under 200 Euros (~$212).

LG K10 2017 - 04/12/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
83%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
39 / 60 → 66%
Peso
93%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
16 / 63 → 25%
Desempenho da aplicação
36 / 70 → 52%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
47 / 91 → 52%
Camera
75%
Médio
70%
81%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone LG K10 (2017)
Florian Wimmer, 2017-04-21 (Update: 2017-04-24)