Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone LG K10 (2017)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 384 cd/m²
Contraste: 1067:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2
| LG K10 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5.30 | Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.00 | Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5.00 | HTC One A9s IPS, 1280x720, 5.00 | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL IPS, 1280x720, 5.20 | LG K10 IPS, 1280x720, 5.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 6% | 4% | 24% | 13% | -3% | |
| Brightness middle | 384 | 295 -23% | 412 7% | 348 -9% | 507 32% | 370 -4% |
| Brightness | 350 | 299 -15% | 414 18% | 320 -9% | 474 35% | 355 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 96 13% | 94 11% | 85 0% | 85 0% | 92 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.42 -17% | 0.23 36% | 0.53 -47% | 0.28 22% | |
| Contrast | 1067 | 981 -8% | 1513 42% | 957 -10% | 1321 24% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6 | 5.8 3% | 5.6 7% | 3.5 42% | 4.7 22% | 6.7 -12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14 | 8.6 39% | 9.7 31% | 6.4 54% | 7.2 49% | 17.8 -27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 4.8 19% | 6.9 -17% | 4 32% | 4.8 19% | 7.9 -34% |
| Gamma | 2 110% | 1.84 120% | 2.4 92% | 2.3 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 8042 81% | 6252 104% | 8422 77% | 6527 100% | 6441 101% | 9072 72% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG K10 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG K10 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG K10 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG K10 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG K10 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG K10 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG K10 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG K10 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG K10 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG K10 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| HTC One A9s | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG K10 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 51 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
LG K10 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (39% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC One A9s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.03 / 0.17 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.76 / 1.59 / 1.61 Watt |
| Carga |
3.24 / 4.15 Watt |
    
| |
| LG K10 2017 2800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2600 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | HTC One A9s 2300 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL 4100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | 3% | -47% | -39% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.76 | 0.96 -26% | 0.68 11% | 1.29 -70% | 0.74 3% |
| Idle Average * | 1.59 | 1.14 28% | 1.58 1% | 2.28 -43% | 2.04 -28% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.61 | 1.23 24% | 1.61 -0% | 2.52 -57% | 2.22 -38% |
| Load Average * | 3.24 | 2.45 24% | 3.36 -4% | 4.06 -25% | 5.57 -72% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.15 | 2.92 30% | 3.91 6% | 5.91 -42% | 6.59 -59% |
* ... smaller is better
| LG K10 2017 2800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2600 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | HTC One A9s 2300 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL 4100 mAh | LG K10 2300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 4% | 17% | -5% | 23% | -16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1477 | 1212 -18% | 1998 35% | 1543 4% | 1462 -1% | 1123 -24% |
| H.264 | 613 | 590 -4% | 683 11% | 587 -4% | 845 38% | 603 -2% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 532 | 502 -6% | 630 18% | 517 -3% | 814 53% | 453 -15% |
| Load | 298 | 433 45% | 306 3% | 245 -18% | 301 1% | 231 -22% |
Pro
Contra
O LG K10 (2017) certamente conseguiu uma coisa: é um evidente progresso em comparação com o seu predecessor. A carcaça mais uma vez se tornou mais fina de de maior qualidade, a bateria dura bastante mais e isso com um evidente poder maior sob o capô. Este aumento do poder é tão notável, que muitos aparelhos concorrentes também são superados pelo LG K10 (2017). Apenas o HTC One A9s possui ainda mais reservas de poder, no entanto, esse aparelho realmente vem de uma faixa de preços diferente.
É claro que há algo do que reclamar: o alto falante soa chiado, o qual torna o uso do modo mãos livres difícil de usar. Da mesma forma é o microfone de qualidade medíocre e a tela poderia ser mais brilhante. Mas, na verdade, essas foram nossas queixas: O sistema operacional é atual, o consumo de energia é bom, a câmera tira fotos muito boas, e o LG K10 (2017) lida bem.
O alto desempenho e a bateria removível são os destaques do LG K10 (2017). A qualidade da carcaça de plástico também deixa uma boa impressão. Em termos de som, a LG poderia se sair melhor, mas no geral, o LG K10 (2017) é um bom smartphone econômico.
No geral, uma clara recomendação para o LG K10 (2017). Somente alguém que precise de mais capacidade de bateria optará pelo Asus Zenfone 3 Max, mas deve considerar que, em contraste com o LG K10 (2017), a bateria não pode ser removida ali. O mesmo vai para o HTC One A9s, onde você, mais uma vez, recebe mais desempenho. Mas, de qualquer forma, o LG K10 (2017) é uma boa opção por menos de 200 Euros (~ $ 212).
The LG K10 (2017) certainly managed one thing: it is a clear progress compared to its predecessor. The casing became again slimmer and more high-quality, the battery lasts noticeably longer and that even with clearly more power under the hood. This power increase is so noticeable, that many competing devices are also outpaced by the LG K10 (2017). Only the HTC One A9s possesses even more power reserves, however, that device really comes from a different price range.
Of course there is something to complain: the speaker sounds squeaky, which makes the hands-free mode also hard to use. Likewise is the microphone of mediocre quality and the screen could be brighter. But actually, that was the extent of our complaints: The operating system is current, the power consumption okay, the camera takes quite good pictures, and the LG K10 (2017) handles well.
The high performance and the removable battery are the highlights of the LG K10 (2017). The quality of the plastic case also leaves a good impression. In terms of sound, the LG could do better, but overall, the LG K10 (2017) is a good budget smartphone.
Overall, a clear recommendation for the LG K10 (2017). Only anyone who absolutely needs more battery capacity will reach for the the Asus Zenfone 3 Max, but should consider that, in contrast to the LG K10 (2017), the battery cannot be removed there. The same goes for the HTC One A9s, where you again get more performance instead. But at any rate, the LG K10 (2017) is a very good deal for currently under 200 Euros (~$212).
LG K10 2017
-
04/12/2017 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer