Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/18/2017

Longa duração da bateria, desempenho limitado. O Asus ZenFone 3 Max tem como objetivo impressionar com sua bateria de alta capacidade e satisfazer os fanáticos do tempo de funcionamento. No entanto, eles terão que fazer compromissos em outros aspectos, como mostram os nossos testes.

Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Zenfone Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6737 1.25 GHz
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.2 polegadas 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 282 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 32 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, proximidade, bússola, USB OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20); largura de banda (download/​upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE); SAR rate: 0.59 W/kg (head), 0.86 W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.55 x 149.5 x 73.7
Bateria
15.6 Wh, 4100 mAh Lítio-Ion, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 30 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix AF, flash LED, vídeos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante na traseira, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Ferramenta SIM, carregador, cabo USB, adaptador USB OTG, ZenCircle, Photocollage, ZenSync, Mobile Manager, 12 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, fanless
peso
148 g, Suprimento de energia: 48 g
Preço
219 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
47.4 MBit/s ∼100%
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
47.1 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
53.5 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
49.7 MBit/s ∼93%
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Overview
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Overview
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Crossing
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Crossing
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Bridge
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
431
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 507 cd/m² Médio: 474.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12.77 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 507 cd/m²
Contraste: 957:1 (Preto: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.25
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei Y6 II Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
LG X Power K220
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Screen
-1%
-9%
-24%
3%
4%
Brightness
474
566
19%
498
5%
487
3%
291
-39%
352
-26%
Brightness Distribution
85
84
-1%
93
9%
92
8%
96
13%
85
0%
Black Level *
0.53
0.57
-8%
0.49
8%
0.9
-70%
0.2
62%
Contrast
957
1028
7%
1051
10%
546
-43%
1905
99%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.7
4.2
11%
6.2
-32%
6.6
-40%
4.7
-0%
7.3
-55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
6.3
-31%
7.4
-54%
4.9
-2%
3
37%
7.4
-54%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.39 100%
2.28 105%
2.12 113%
2.03 118%
2.26 106%
CCT
6441 101%
6614 98%
8664 75%
7090 92%
6291 103%
8417 77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 959 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
72 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32 ms rise
↘ 40 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
30365 Points ∼16%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
26169 Points ∼14% -14%
Honor 5C
53143 Points ∼29% +75%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
33786 Points ∼18% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points ∼15% -10%
LG X Power K220
30432 Points ∼17% 0%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1362 Points ∼5%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1581 Points ∼6% +16%
LG X Power K220
1506 Points ∼6% +11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
569 Points ∼10%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
549 Points ∼10% -4%
LG X Power K220
560 Points ∼10% -2%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
699 Points ∼27%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼56% +103%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
873 Points ∼34% +25%
LG X Power K220
854 Points ∼33% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
83 Points ∼2%
Honor 5C
317 Points ∼6% +282%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
100 Points ∼2% +20%
LG X Power K220
102 Points ∼2% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
103 Points ∼3%
Honor 5C
383 Points ∼10% +272%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
124 Points ∼3% +20%
LG X Power K220
127 Points ∼3% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
741 Points ∼29%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
719 Points ∼28% -3%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼55% +91%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
826 Points ∼32% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points ∼27% -4%
LG X Power K220
860 Points ∼33% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
128 Points ∼2%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
42 Points ∼1% -67%
Honor 5C
480 Points ∼6% +275%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
167 Points ∼2% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points ∼1% -67%
LG X Power K220
165 Points ∼2% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
157 Points ∼3%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
53 Points ∼1% -66%
Honor 5C
563 Points ∼12% +259%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points ∼4% +29%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points ∼1% -66%
LG X Power K220
201 Points ∼4% +28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
7298 Points ∼11%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
9043 Points ∼13% +24%
Honor 5C
13588 Points ∼20% +86%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
9393 Points ∼14% +29%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points ∼13% +24%
LG X Power K220
10103 Points ∼15% +38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3369 Points ∼1%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3767 Points ∼1% +12%
Honor 5C
11319 Points ∼2% +236%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4296 Points ∼1% +28%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points ∼1% +14%
LG X Power K220
4330 Points ∼1% +29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3827 Points ∼2%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
4328 Points ∼2% +13%
Honor 5C
11755 Points ∼6% +207%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4885 Points ∼2% +28%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points ∼2% +15%
LG X Power K220
4960 Points ∼3% +30%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
5.9 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5.2 fps ∼0% -12%
Honor 5C
19 fps ∼1% +222%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
8.4 fps ∼1% +42%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps ∼0% -12%
LG X Power K220
8.4 fps ∼1% +42%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
10 fps ∼2%
Honor 5C
20 fps ∼4% +100%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
15 fps ∼3% +50%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps ∼2% -3%
LG X Power K220
15 fps ∼3% +50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2.2 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3.8 fps ∼1% +73%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps ∼1% +259%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2.8 fps ∼1% +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps ∼0% -18%
LG X Power K220
3.1 fps ∼1% +41%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4.7 fps ∼2%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
1.8 fps ∼1% -62%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps ∼4% +79%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
6.1 fps ∼3% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps ∼2% -19%
LG X Power K220
6.6 fps ∼3% +40%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1.4 fps ∼0%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps ∼1% +221%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1.7 fps ∼0% +21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
LG X Power K220
2 fps ∼0% +43%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3.4 fps ∼2%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps ∼3% +44%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4.1 fps ∼2% +21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
LG X Power K220
4.1 fps ∼2% +21%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2517 Points ∼31%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3691 Points ∼45% +47%
Honor 5C
5120 Points ∼63% +103%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
3400 Points ∼42% +35%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points ∼51% +64%
LG X Power K220
3759 Points ∼46% +49%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
703 Points ∼46%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
544 Points ∼35% -23%
Honor 5C
707 Points ∼46% +1%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points ∼36% -22%
LG X Power K220
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
210 Points ∼2%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
317 Points ∼4% +51%
Honor 5C
814 Points ∼9% +288%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
283 Points ∼3% +35%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points ∼4% +49%
LG X Power K220
290 Points ∼3% +38%
Memory (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
780 Points ∼20%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
797 Points ∼21% +2%
Honor 5C
1504 Points ∼39% +93%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
571 Points ∼15% -27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points ∼17% -18%
LG X Power K220
521 Points ∼14% -33%
System (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1041 Points ∼16%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
1088 Points ∼17% +5%
Honor 5C
2600 Points ∼40% +150%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1093 Points ∼17% +5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points ∼16% +2%
LG X Power K220
1092 Points ∼17% +5%
Overall (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
588 Points ∼18%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
622 Points ∼19% +6%
Honor 5C
1225 Points ∼37% +108%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points ∼6% -65%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points ∼18% -1%
LG X Power K220
200 Points ∼6% -66%

Legend

 
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 II Compact Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X Power K220 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Chrome 55)
2534 Points ∼5%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL (Chrome Version 50)
2685 Points ∼5% +6%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
4188 Points ∼8% +65%
Huawei Y6 II Compact (Chrome 50)
2805 Points ∼6% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
2730 Points ∼6% +8%
LG X Power K220 (Chrome 52)
2657 Points ∼5% +5%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Chrome 55)
14983 ms * ∼25%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL (Chrome Version 50)
13524.7 ms * ∼23% +10%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
9111.2 ms * ∼15% +39%
Huawei Y6 II Compact (Chrome 50)
13234 ms * ∼22% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
13046 ms * ∼22% +13%
LG X Power K220 (Chrome 52)
13196 ms * ∼22% +12%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Chrome 55)
35 Points ∼6%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
73 Points ∼13% +109%
Huawei Y6 II Compact (Chrome 50)
50 Points ∼9% +43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points ∼8% +34%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Chrome 55)
16.471 Points ∼0%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL (Chrome Version 50)
17.533 Points ∼0% +6%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
27.934 Points ∼0% +70%
Huawei Y6 II Compact (Chrome 50)
18.304 Points ∼0% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
16.8 Points ∼0% +2%
LG X Power K220 (Chrome 52)
18.133 Points ∼0% +10%

* ... smaller is better

Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TLAsus ZenFone Max ZC550KLHonor 5CHuawei Y6 II CompactSamsung Galaxy J5 2016LG X Power K220
AndroBench 3-5
-41%
54%
7%
25%
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
29.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-36%
24.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-18%
17.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-42%
46.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
58%
18.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-39%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
47.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
38.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-19%
51.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
9%
31.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-34%
79.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
67%
32.08 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-33%
Random Write 4KB
9.1
3.6
-60%
15.7
73%
15.5
70%
11.6
27%
7.32
-20%
Random Read 4KB
20.9
9.1
-56%
61.7
195%
23
10%
21
0%
18.78
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
65.15
31.1
-52%
75.5
16%
75
15%
72
11%
43.74
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB
174.2
130.6
-25%
263
51%
211
21%
147
-16%
196.81
13%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high15 fps
 very low28 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high27 fps
Carga Máxima
 36.8 °C37 °C40.4 °C 
 36.9 °C36.1 °C40.3 °C 
 36.1 °C35.8 °C39.2 °C 
Máximo: 40.4 °C
Médio: 37.6 °C
33.5 °C34.2 °C35.3 °C
34 °C34 °C35.5 °C
33.9 °C33.7 °C33.6 °C
Máximo: 35.5 °C
Médio: 34.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6412525.4413125.335.44032.930.55033.633.36331.627.78028.429.61002727.512520.824.21602229.220021.326.725020.834.731521.242.940019.44950019.555.363017.760.880017.967.4100017.874.8125017.379.1160017.479200016.777.3250017.276.2315018.274.1400017.973.5500017.676.6630017.775.4800017.8781000017.9791250018.166.51600018.258.6SPL3088N1.368.5median 17.9Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TLmedian 67.4Delta1.316.631.653.425.432.925.33032.937.233.640.631.640.428.432.42729.220.823.82222.521.327.720.834.621.240.619.448.919.55517.760.417.969.217.874.917.380.117.477.116.773.717.27518.275.517.974.217.674.917.778.717.882.717.97718.166.818.264.83088.51.371.5median 17.9LG X Power K220median 69.21.315.537.727.732.437.722.330.631.322.326.529.131.726.52931.4262932.337.239.432.32927.736.22924.627.628.624.623.223.425.423.228.321.821.328.330.823.223.330.834.52422.534.537.222.922.437.242.126.921.342.147.428.218.447.456.236.117.556.262.641.517.562.670.848.617.270.875.853.716.875.872.450.217.372.470.548.117.470.568.146.716.668.167.245.117.367.268.547.217.668.570.949.417.670.974.953.217.774.976.554.417.476.576.354.717.776.365.242.617.965.251.330.718.151.346.826.118.146.884.162.229.884.156.714.71.356.7median 65.2Samsung Galaxy J5 2016median 42.6median 17.7median 65.213.911.21.613.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.04 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

LG X Power K220 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.06 / 0.39 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.74 / 2.04 / 2.22 Watt
Carga midlight 5.57 / 6.59 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Power Consumption
-9%
8%
28%
38%
28%
Idle Minimum *
0.74
1.15
-55%
0.89
-20%
0.57
23%
0.61
18%
0.64
14%
Idle Average *
2.04
2.09
-2%
2.07
-1%
1.53
25%
1.41
31%
1.3
36%
Idle Maximum *
2.22
2.17
2%
2.15
3%
1.6
28%
1.51
32%
1.34
40%
Load Average *
5.57
5.38
3%
3.46
38%
2.82
49%
2.56
54%
4.18
25%
Load Maximum *
6.59
6.08
8%
5.18
21%
5.69
14%
3.1
53%
4.87
26%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 22min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
13h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 05min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 01min
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Battery Runtime
18%
-34%
-22%
0%
21%
Reader / Idle
1462
997
-32%
1175
-20%
1599
9%
Load
301
156
-48%
222
-26%
402
34%
365
21%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
814
959
18%
584
-28%
623
-23%
643
-21%
987
21%
H.264
845
602
-29%
682
-19%
658
-22%

Pro

+ Carcaça metálica sólida e fina
+ Boa configuração de memória
+ USB OTG
+ Dual-SIM
+ GPS relativamente veloz
+ Baixas temperaturas
+ Muito boa duração da bateria
+ Baixo consumo de energia
+ Tela relativamente brilhante sem tonalidade azul

Contra

- Apenas 12 meses de garantia
- Correções de segurança desatualizadas
- Um pouco de software desconfortável
- Alto falante ruim
- Som diminuto do microfone
- Desempenho baixo ocasional
In review: Asus ZenFone 3 Max. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany.
In review: Asus ZenFone 3 Max. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany.

O Asus ZenFone 3 Max mantém sua promessa mais importante: Sua duração de bateria é extremamente longa. Por mais agradável que seja, temos de dizer que o LG X Power inclusive supera esta duração. Gostamos da carcaça do modelo de teste; ela é de muito alta qualidade para esta faixa de preços, mas não se destaca entre a multidão de smartphones. Mais qualidades positivas se encontram na boa tela, baixo consumo de energia no modo inativo e baixa emissão de temperaturas.

Não gostamos tanto do desempenho. O aparelho é mais lento que seus concorrentes em todos os aspectos. Talvez isto se deve à interface ZenUI da Asus? O aparelho somente é condicionalmente adequado para jogos 3D, mas websites mais sofisticados também poderiam ser um problema.

O ZenFone 3 Max oferece uma boa configuração de memória para esta faixa de preços, pode usar dois cartões SIM, e é leve e fino. O aparelho será uma boa opção para que se focar principalmente na duração da bateria.

Em comparação com o seu predecessor direto, o ZenFone Max, o nosso modelo de teste faz muitas coisa melhor, mas perdeu um pouco de seu tempo de duração. O Asus ZenFone 3 Max é uma atualização bem sucedida e é adequado principalmente para os fanáticos da duração da bateria. Todos os outros terão que fazer compromissos na câmera, alto falante, e qualidade das chamadas. Mas isto não é incomum nesta faixa de preços.

Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL - 01/02/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
64 / 75 → 85%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
36 / 60 → 61%
Peso
93%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 63 → 10%
Desempenho da aplicação
29 / 70 → 41%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
48 / 91 → 53%
Camera
65%
Médio
68%
81%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL
Florian Wimmer, 2017-01-18 (Update: 2017-02- 4)