Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone LG Q7 Stylus

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum-Balaz (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/31/2018

An affordable stylus phone. Protegido contra choques, água e poeira Foi assim que a LG apresentou seu Q Stylus, que vem com uma caneta integrada em sua carcaça de 6,2 polegadas. Descubra o que mais o smartphone acessível tem a oferecer em nossa análise.

LG Q Stylus (Q Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6750S
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
6.2 polegadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 390 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (de até 2 TB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: accelerometer, proximity sensor, compass, gyroscope
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900/1800), 3G WCDMA (B1/B8), 4G LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 160.2 x 77.8
Bateria
3300 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação USB, cabo USB Type-C, Agulha SIM, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0.46 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.02 W/kg, fanless
peso
172 g, Suprimento de energia: 66 g
Preço
280 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

LG Q Stylus
LG Q Stylus
LG Q Stylus
LG Q Stylus
LG Q Stylus
LG Q Stylus

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +998%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
485 MBit/s ∼72% +689%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼46% +402%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=292)
200 MBit/s ∼30% +225%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.5 (min: 43, max: 58) MBit/s ∼9%
Sharp B10
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
57.2 MBit/s ∼8% -7%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
43 MBit/s ∼6% -30%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +1697%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
485 MBit/s ∼75% +1247%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
347 MBit/s ∼54% +864%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=292)
195 MBit/s ∼30% +442%
Sharp B10
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
58 MBit/s ∼9% +61%
Wiko View 2 Pro
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
47.6 MBit/s ∼7% +32%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
36 (min: 2, max: 52) MBit/s ∼6%
0102030405060Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø52.8 (43-58)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø37.2 (2-52)
GPS LG Q Stylus
GPS LG Q Stylus
GPS LG Q Stylus
GPS LG Q Stylus
GPS LG Q Stylus
GPS LG Q Stylus
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
LG Q Stylus - test chart
LG Q Stylus - test chart (detail)
449
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 458 cd/m² Médio: 440.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.01 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 458 cd/m²
Contraste: 898:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
LG Q Stylus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.2
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.4
Sharp B10
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Wiko View 2 Pro
IPS, 1528x720, 6
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
4%
-1%
17%
-32%
39%
Brightness middle
458
499
9%
560
22%
489
7%
562
23%
597
30%
Brightness
441
506
15%
549
24%
486
10%
541
23%
592
34%
Brightness Distribution
94
96
2%
90
-4%
93
-1%
92
-2%
92
-2%
Black Level *
0.51
0.63
-24%
0.34
33%
0.56
-10%
0.32
37%
Contrast
898
889
-1%
1438
60%
1004
12%
1866
108%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.62
-3%
5.02
-12%
3.8
16%
7.9
-76%
2.4
47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.1
10.91
-54%
8.71
-23%
7.1
-0%
15.7
-121%
5.3
25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.1
2.2
57%
4.6
10%
4.4
14%
10.4
-104%
3.4
33%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.103 105%
2.216 99%
2.22 99%
2.02 109%
2.2 100%
CCT
7381 88%
6115 106%
7587 86%
7213 90%
8834 74%
7172 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8627 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
67.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 37.2 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
1909 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
9059 Points ∼63% +375%
Sharp B10
1778 Points ∼12% -7%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
14369 Points ∼100% +653%
Wiko View 2 Pro
3362 Points ∼23% +76%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3621 Points ∼25% +90%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1909 - 2084, n=2)
1997 Points ∼14% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=177)
4307 Points ∼30% +126%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
2798 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
8874 Points ∼97% +217%
Sharp B10
2629 Points ∼29% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9182 Points ∼100% +228%
Wiko View 2 Pro
4022 Points ∼44% +44%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
4152 Points ∼45% +48%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (2135 - 2798, n=2)
2467 Points ∼27% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=227)
4213 Points ∼46% +51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
653 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
1698 Points ∼69% +160%
Sharp B10
612 Points ∼25% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2468 Points ∼100% +278%
Wiko View 2 Pro
778 Points ∼32% +19%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
858 Points ∼35% +31%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (639 - 653, n=2)
646 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=228)
1246 Points ∼50% +91%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
4101 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
5960 Points ∼62% +45%
Sharp B10
4447 Points ∼46% +8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9664 Points ∼100% +136%
Wiko View 2 Pro
5395 Points ∼56% +32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5659 Points ∼59% +38%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (3969 - 4101, n=2)
4035 Points ∼42% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4101 - 13211, n=403)
4838 Points ∼50% +18%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
1110 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2613 Points ∼100% +135%
Sharp B10
694 Points ∼27% -37%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2257 Points ∼86% +103%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1808 Points ∼69% +63%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1756 Points ∼67% +58%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (999 - 1110, n=2)
1055 Points ∼40% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (611 - 4364, n=258)
1668 Points ∼64% +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
319 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3797 Points ∼85% +1090%
Sharp B10
322 Points ∼7% +1%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4468 Points ∼100% +1301%
Wiko View 2 Pro
415 Points ∼9% +30%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
793 Points ∼18% +149%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (316 - 319, n=2)
318 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 8206, n=258)
1404 Points ∼31% +340%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
379 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3450 Points ∼94% +810%
Sharp B10
366 Points ∼10% -3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3669 Points ∼100% +868%
Wiko View 2 Pro
501 Points ∼14% +32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
903 Points ∼25% +138%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (373 - 379, n=2)
376 Points ∼10% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 5189, n=261)
1305 Points ∼36% +244%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
1112 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2649 Points ∼94% +138%
Sharp B10
771 Points ∼27% -31%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2832 Points ∼100% +155%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1810 Points ∼64% +63%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1744 Points ∼62% +57%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (976 - 1112, n=2)
1044 Points ∼37% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (530 - 4407, n=272)
1649 Points ∼58% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
495 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4904 Points ∼71% +891%
Sharp B10
477 Points ∼7% -4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6898 Points ∼100% +1294%
Wiko View 2 Pro
716 Points ∼10% +45%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1303 Points ∼19% +163%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (493 - 495, n=2)
494 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=272)
1981 Points ∼29% +300%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
565 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4124 Points ∼79% +630%
Sharp B10
521 Points ∼10% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5230 Points ∼100% +826%
Wiko View 2 Pro
827 Points ∼16% +46%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1381 Points ∼26% +144%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (554 - 565, n=2)
560 Points ∼11% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=273)
1661 Points ∼32% +194%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
1172 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2569 Points ∼100% +119%
Sharp B10
702 Points ∼27% -40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2528 Points ∼98% +116%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1855 Points ∼72% +58%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1712 Points ∼67% +46%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1031 - 1172, n=2)
1102 Points ∼43% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=333)
1604 Points ∼62% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
89 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3673 Points ∼77% +4027%
Sharp B10
328 Points ∼7% +269%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4746 Points ∼100% +5233%
Wiko View 2 Pro
369 Points ∼8% +315%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
718 Points ∼15% +707%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (80 - 89, n=2)
84.5 Points ∼2% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5241, n=333)
1134 Points ∼24% +1174%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
112 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3353 Points ∼84% +2894%
Sharp B10
372 Points ∼9% +232%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3972 Points ∼100% +3446%
Wiko View 2 Pro
449 Points ∼11% +301%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
824 Points ∼21% +636%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (101 - 112, n=2)
107 Points ∼3% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=341)
1085 Points ∼27% +869%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
1172 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2515 Points ∼92% +115%
Sharp B10
694 Points ∼26% -41%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2720 Points ∼100% +132%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1833 Points ∼67% +56%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1757 Points ∼65% +50%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1029 - 1172, n=2)
1101 Points ∼40% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=364)
1500 Points ∼55% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
98 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4826 Points ∼58% +4824%
Sharp B10
480 Points ∼6% +390%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
8261 Points ∼100% +8330%
Wiko View 2 Pro
706 Points ∼9% +620%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1248 Points ∼15% +1173%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (96 - 98, n=2)
97 Points ∼1% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (98 - 8312, n=364)
1551 Points ∼19% +1483%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
123 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4008 Points ∼70% +3159%
Sharp B10
515 Points ∼9% +319%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5687 Points ∼100% +4524%
Wiko View 2 Pro
818 Points ∼14% +565%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼23% +985%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (120 - 123, n=2)
122 Points ∼2% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 6378, n=372)
1323 Points ∼23% +976%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
10050 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
18756 Points ∼54% +87%
Sharp B10
7716 Points ∼22% -23%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
34928 Points ∼100% +248%
Wiko View 2 Pro
15177 Points ∼43% +51%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13217 Points ∼38% +32%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (9903 - 10050, n=2)
9977 Points ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (7095 - 36762, n=519)
12613 Points ∼36% +26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
9864 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
36190 Points ∼44% +267%
Sharp B10
9749 Points ∼12% -1%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
82125 Points ∼100% +733%
Wiko View 2 Pro
12550 Points ∼15% +27%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
18472 Points ∼22% +87%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (9656 - 9864, n=2)
9760 Points ∼12% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=519)
17318 Points ∼21% +76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
9905 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
29994 Points ∼47% +203%
Sharp B10
9210 Points ∼15% -7%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
63159 Points ∼100% +538%
Wiko View 2 Pro
12878 Points ∼20% +30%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
16972 Points ∼27% +71%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (9710 - 9905, n=2)
9808 Points ∼16% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=520)
14575 Points ∼23% +47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
17 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
146 fps ∼97% +759%
Sharp B10
17 fps ∼11% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
150 fps ∼100% +782%
Wiko View 2 Pro
22 fps ∼15% +29%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
30 fps ∼20% +76%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (17 - 17, n=2)
17 fps ∼11% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=545)
30.1 fps ∼20% +77%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
16 fps ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
60 fps ∼100% +275%
Sharp B10
25 fps ∼42% +56%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
60 fps ∼100% +275%
Wiko View 2 Pro
33 fps ∼55% +106%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
28 fps ∼47% +75%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (16 - 16, n=2)
16 fps ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=548)
24.4 fps ∼41% +53%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
7.1 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
76 fps ∼100% +970%
Sharp B10
6.8 fps ∼9% -4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
71 fps ∼93% +900%
Wiko View 2 Pro
9.4 fps ∼12% +32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
14 fps ∼18% +97%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (7.1 - 7.1, n=2)
7.1 fps ∼9% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=467)
16.1 fps ∼21% +127%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
6.7 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
47 fps ∼81% +601%
Sharp B10
13 fps ∼22% +94%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
58 fps ∼100% +766%
Wiko View 2 Pro
17 fps ∼29% +154%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13 fps ∼22% +94%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (6.7 - 6.8, n=2)
6.75 fps ∼12% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=470)
15.5 fps ∼27% +131%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
4.7 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
45 fps ∼100% +857%
Sharp B10
4.6 fps ∼10% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼78% +645%
Wiko View 2 Pro
6.1 fps ∼14% +30%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.8 fps ∼22% +109%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (4.7 - 4.7, n=2)
4.7 fps ∼10% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 88, n=332)
13.7 fps ∼30% +191%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
4.5 fps ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
25 fps ∼46% +456%
Sharp B10
9.9 fps ∼18% +120%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
54 fps ∼100% +1100%
Wiko View 2 Pro
12 fps ∼22% +167%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.3 fps ∼17% +107%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (4.5 - 4.5, n=2)
4.5 fps ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=334)
13.5 fps ∼25% +200%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
1.3 fps ∼6%
Sharp B10
2.9 fps ∼13% +123%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
22 fps ∼100% +1592%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3.1 fps ∼14% +138%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
1.3 fps ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 59, n=45)
10.9 fps ∼50% +738%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
0.86 fps ∼6%
Sharp B10
0.86 fps ∼6% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
14 fps ∼100% +1528%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1.9 fps ∼14% +121%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
0.86 fps ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.86 - 22, n=45)
6.44 fps ∼46% +649%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
2 fps ∼6%
Sharp B10
4.6 fps ∼15% +130%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
31 fps ∼100% +1450%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.4 fps ∼17% +170%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
2 fps ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 59, n=45)
15.3 fps ∼49% +665%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
2.3 fps ∼7%
Sharp B10
2.3 fps ∼7% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
32 fps ∼100% +1291%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps ∼18% +143%
Average Mediatek MT6750S
2.3 fps ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 63, n=45)
16.6 fps ∼52% +622%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
2.5 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
28 fps ∼80% +1020%
Sharp B10
2.4 fps ∼7% -4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼100% +1300%
Wiko View 2 Pro
3.5 fps ∼10% +40%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps ∼16% +124%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (2.5 - 2.5, n=2)
2.5 fps ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 54, n=262)
9.48 fps ∼27% +279%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
2.4 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
15 fps ∼45% +525%
Sharp B10
4.8 fps ∼15% +100%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
33 fps ∼100% +1275%
Wiko View 2 Pro
6.6 fps ∼20% +175%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.3 fps ∼16% +121%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (2.4 - 2.4, n=2)
2.4 fps ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 58, n=265)
8.65 fps ∼26% +260%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
56626 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
236552 Points ∼90% +318%
Sharp B10
53835 Points ∼20% -5%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
263165 Points ∼100% +365%
Wiko View 2 Pro
69661 Points ∼26% +23%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
89006 Points ∼34% +57%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (52855 - 56626, n=2)
54741 Points ∼21% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=152)
112194 Points ∼43% +98%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
45829 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
214090 Points ∼94% +367%
Sharp B10
42355 Points ∼19% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
227026 Points ∼100% +395%
Wiko View 2 Pro
57201 Points ∼25% +25%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
70346 Points ∼31% +53%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (44064 - 45829, n=2)
44947 Points ∼20% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=378)
74328 Points ∼33% +62%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
657 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
1132 Points ∼87% +72%
Sharp B10
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
1296 Points ∼100% +97%
Wiko View 2 Pro
743 Points ∼57% +13%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
936 Points ∼72% +42%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (657 - 751, n=2)
704 Points ∼54% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=480)
687 Points ∼53% +5%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
633 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
6506 Points ∼82% +928%
Sharp B10
644 Points ∼8% +2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
7945 Points ∼100% +1155%
Wiko View 2 Pro
975 Points ∼12% +54%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1480 Points ∼19% +134%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (631 - 633, n=2)
632 Points ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=480)
1669 Points ∼21% +164%
Memory (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
778 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2068 Points ∼64% +166%
Sharp B10
609 Points ∼19% -22%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3239 Points ∼100% +316%
Wiko View 2 Pro
861 Points ∼27% +11%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼41% +71%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (778 - 800, n=2)
789 Points ∼24% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=480)
1197 Points ∼37% +54%
System (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
1868 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
6137 Points ∼94% +229%
Sharp B10
1077 Points ∼17% -42%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6506 Points ∼100% +248%
Wiko View 2 Pro
2894 Points ∼44% +55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3284 Points ∼50% +76%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1407 - 1868, n=2)
1638 Points ∼25% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=480)
2422 Points ∼37% +30%
Overall (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus
882 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3110 Points ∼81% +253%
Sharp B10
253 Points ∼7% -71%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3838 Points ∼100% +335%
Wiko View 2 Pro
1159 Points ∼30% +31%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1570 Points ∼41% +78%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (855 - 882, n=2)
869 Points ∼23% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=484)
1212 Points ∼32% +37%

Legend

 
LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sharp B10 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Wiko View 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
75.959 Points ∼100% +296%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
63.012 Points ∼83% +229%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=402)
36 Points ∼47% +88%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
27.615 Points ∼36% +44%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
22.257 Points ∼29% +16%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
19.174 Points ∼25%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (18.7 - 19.2, n=2)
18.9 Points ∼25% -1%
Sharp B10 (Chrome 68)
12.743 Points ∼17% -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
14663 Points ∼100% +322%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼99% +318%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=538)
5400 Points ∼37% +55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
5017 Points ∼34% +44%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4001 Points ∼27% +15%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
3474 Points ∼24%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (3422 - 3474, n=2)
3448 Points ∼24% -1%
Sharp B10 (Chrome 68)
2468 Points ∼17% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sharp B10 (Chrome 68)
18581 ms * ∼100% -41%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (13203 - 13671, n=2)
13437 ms * ∼72% -2%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
13202.5 ms * ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=557)
11641 ms * ∼63% +12%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)
11455.8 ms * ∼62% +13%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
10086 ms * ∼54% +24%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼15% +79%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
2710 ms * ∼15% +79%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
72 Points ∼100% +188%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=48)
61.3 Points ∼85% +145%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
37 Points ∼51% +48%
LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69)
25 Points ∼35%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (19 - 25, n=2)
22 Points ∼31% -12%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
223 Points ∼100% +214%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
202 Points ∼91% +185%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=270)
108 Points ∼48% +52%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
106 Points ∼48% +49%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
71 Points ∼32%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (70 - 71, n=2)
70.5 Points ∼32% -1%

* ... smaller is better

LG Q StylusSamsung Galaxy Note 9Sharp B10Xiaomi Pocophone F1Wiko View 2 ProSony Xperia XA2 PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
115%
-16%
83%
21%
30%
-1%
-9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
6.8 (Kingston 32GB)
-89%
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
57.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
67.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
46.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=109)
-26%
45 (3.4 - 87.1, n=309)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
9.83 (Kingston 32GB)
-88%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
82.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
65.9 (8.2 - 96.5, n=109)
-21%
63.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=309)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
12.07
21
74%
12.9
7%
17.81
48%
6.72
-44%
10.5
-13%
18.4 (0.75 - 77.3, n=147)
52%
15 (0.14 - 164, n=587)
24%
Random Read 4KB
31.45
134
326%
54.6
74%
101.01
221%
65.63
109%
77.43
146%
36 (3.59 - 117, n=147)
14%
36.8 (1.59 - 173, n=587)
17%
Sequential Write 256KB
121.4
196
61%
100.5
-17%
155.57
28%
194.28
60%
146.16
20%
94.1 (14.8 - 189, n=147)
-22%
77.1 (2.99 - 246, n=587)
-36%
Sequential Read 256KB
241.7
805
233%
280.7
16%
705.38
192%
265.37
10%
281.06
16%
229 (25.8 - 440, n=147)
-5%
223 (12.1 - 895, n=587)
-8%
Asphalt 9: Legends
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 High Quality16 fps
 Standard / low23 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min27 fps
 high HD26 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 30.8 °C30.7 °C33 °C 
 31.3 °C31.7 °C34.1 °C 
 31.8 °C32.1 °C32.8 °C 
Máximo: 34.1 °C
Médio: 32 °C
30.8 °C30.9 °C31.3 °C
31.7 °C31.9 °C34.4 °C
31.5 °C34.6 °C35.3 °C
Máximo: 35.3 °C
Médio: 32.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  32.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.935.82529.426.43129.223.54023.525.35030.931.16325.424.5802421.210020.821.712519.919.216017.618.120017.715.625015.616.43151720.540016.127.950015.24063014.650.380015.359.2100014.865.5125014.264.7160013.266.7200014.869.925001470.2315013.778.1400014.683.8500014.376.9630014.473.8800014.776.51000014.868.9125001561.81600014.957.6SPL26.787.6N0.856.6median 14.8median 61.8Delta1.421.8303836.136.83233.529.427.931.536.327.924.722.121.52223.821.224.421.529.720.340.118.446.417.354.316.760.91760.616.162.915.865.615.870.415.372.115.874.514.971.91573.114.775.514.774.91572.515.173.11573.615.473.61567.116.347.727.684.7159.3median 15.8median 67.11.913.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG Q StylusSony Xperia XA2 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG Q Stylus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (41.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.69 / 1.7 / 1.73 Watt
Carga midlight 3.21 / 5.31 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4000 mAh
Sharp B10
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Wiko View 2 Pro
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6750S
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-53%
-42%
-26%
-1%
8%
-7%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.9
-30%
1
-45%
0.65
6%
0.64
7%
0.35
49%
0.845 (0.69 - 1, n=2)
-22%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=624)
-28%
Idle Average *
1.7
1.9
-12%
1.98
-16%
1.97
-16%
2.07
-22%
1.81
-6%
1.635 (1.57 - 1.7, n=2)
4%
1.722 (0.6 - 6.2, n=623)
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.73
3.7
-114%
2.5
-45%
2.01
-16%
2.13
-23%
1.83
-6%
1.685 (1.64 - 1.73, n=2)
3%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=624)
-15%
Load Average *
3.21
5.3
-65%
5.3
-65%
4.29
-34%
2.69
16%
3.31
-3%
3.66 (3.21 - 4.1, n=2)
-14%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=618)
-26%
Load Maximum *
5.31
7.6
-43%
7.4
-39%
9.05
-70%
4.46
16%
4.97
6%
5.67 (5.31 - 6.02, n=2)
-7%
5.72 (1.2 - 14.2, n=618)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 47min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 20min
LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4000 mAh
Sharp B10
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Wiko View 2 Pro
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Battery Runtime
62%
116%
55%
105%
135%
Reader / Idle
1529
1687
10%
2088
37%
4682
206%
H.264
527
896
70%
936
78%
893
69%
WiFi v1.3
419
794
89%
903
116%
808
93%
857
105%
837
100%
Load
200
354
77%
220
10%
529
165%

Pro

+ Stylus inserida na carcaça
+ Protegido contra choques, água e poeira
+ Leve
+ Boa usabilidade

Contra

- Duração da bateria
- USB 2.0
- Sem Wi-Fi ac
- A traseira sofre de arranhões com facilidade
Review: LG Q Stylus. Test unit provided by LG Germany
Review: LG Q Stylus. Test unit provided by LG Germany

O LG Q Stylus apresenta-se como um smartphone robusto para uso diário. Ele oferece bom desempenho e pode gerenciar um pouco mais do que seu uso básico do WhatsApp e navegação na Internet. A caneta incluída fornece a este dispositivo um recurso exclusivo para essa faixa de preço.

O LG Q Stylus com sua caneta é exclusivo para esta faixa de preço. Seu desempenho é bom, mas as durações da bateria poderiam ser melhores.

Compradores em potencial devem estar cientes da duração medíocre da bateria, que é muito menor do que a dos dispositivos concorrentes. As câmeras são boas o suficiente para fotos ocasionais, mas não muito mais. O Q Stylus pode ser usado para jogos, embora os usuários não devam ter expectativas muito altas, uma vez que os tempos de carregamento podem ser muito longos, e as taxas de quadros baixas em títulos mais exigentes.

LG Q Stylus - 10/26/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
87%
Conectividade
39 / 60 → 64%
Peso
90%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
15 / 63 → 23%
Desempenho da aplicação
40 / 70 → 57%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
65 / 91 → 71%
Camera
63%
Médio
71%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone LG Q7 Stylus
Mike Wobker, 2018-10-31 (Update: 2018-10-31)