Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola One

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/12/2018

One without frills. Para aqueles que estão apenas procurando por um smartphone de gama média com Android puro, uma carcaça agradável e uma tela grande, a Motorola está oferecendo o novo Motorola One. Você poderia descrever o conceito como "concentrando-se no essencial". Analisamos mais de perto o Motorola One em nosso teste.

Motorola One (One Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.9 polegadas 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 285 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 53 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C 2.0 (OTG)
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.97 x 149.5 x 72.2
Bateria
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Ion, TurboCharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix phase comparison auto-focus, LED flash, videos @ 2160p/​30fps (main camera); 2.0 MP, depth sharpness (second camera)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix Flash LED
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, Ferramenta SIM, 24 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, fanless
peso
160 g, Suprimento de energia: 78 g
Preço
300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Motorola One
Motorola One
Motorola One
Motorola One
Motorola One
Motorola One
Motorola One
Motorola One

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +555%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼46% +200%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=306)
211 MBit/s ∼31% +105%
Honor Play
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
188 MBit/s ∼28% +83%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼17% +10%
Motorola One
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
103 (min: 36, max: 118) MBit/s ∼15%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +478%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
347 MBit/s ∼54% +210%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=306)
206 MBit/s ∼32% +84%
Honor Play
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
190 MBit/s ∼29% +70%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼17% +1%
Motorola One
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 57, max: 117) MBit/s ∼17%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø103 (36-118)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø110 (57-117)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – forest
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – forest
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Motorola One – overview
GPS Motorola One – overview
GPS Motorola One – forest
GPS Motorola One – forest
GPS Motorola One – bridge
GPS Motorola One – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
442
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 477 cd/m² Médio: 452.1 cd/m² Minimum: 5.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 467 cd/m²
Contraste: 1229:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.29 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
92.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.376
Motorola One
IPS, 1520x720, 5.9
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Honor Play
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Motorola Moto G6
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Screen
31%
12%
8%
4%
Brightness middle
467
597
28%
489
5%
435
-7%
488
4%
Brightness
452
592
31%
486
8%
426
-6%
478
6%
Brightness Distribution
87
92
6%
93
7%
89
2%
95
9%
Black Level *
0.38
0.32
16%
0.34
11%
0.39
-3%
0.42
-11%
Contrast
1229
1866
52%
1438
17%
1115
-9%
1162
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.29
2.4
55%
3.8
28%
2.89
45%
3.9
26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.71
5.3
31%
7.1
8%
6.03
22%
6.8
12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
3.4
32%
4.4
12%
4.1
18%
5.3
-6%
Gamma
2.376 93%
2.2 100%
2.22 99%
2.251 98%
2.41 91%
CCT
7583 86%
7172 91%
7213 90%
7408 88%
7146 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2451 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2451 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2451 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8931 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola One
3592 Points ∼25%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3621 Points ∼25% +1%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
14369 Points ∼100% +300%
Honor Play
8454 Points ∼59% +135%
Motorola Moto G6
2777 Points ∼19% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (2628 - 3678, n=10)
3281 Points ∼23% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼31% +26%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola One
4374 Points ∼48%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
4152 Points ∼45% -5%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9182 Points ∼100% +110%
Honor Play
6673 Points ∼73% +53%
Motorola Moto G6
3868 Points ∼42% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3148 - 4396, n=12)
4171 Points ∼45% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼47% -2%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola One
878 Points ∼36%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
858 Points ∼35% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2468 Points ∼100% +181%
Honor Play
1904 Points ∼77% +117%
Motorola Moto G6
743 Points ∼30% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (841 - 881, n=13)
799 Points ∼32% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼51% +45%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola One
4936 Points ∼61%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
4953 Points ∼61% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
8101 Points ∼100% +64%
Honor Play
6293 Points ∼78% +27%
Motorola Moto G6
4552 Points ∼56% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=14)
4894 Points ∼60% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=255)
4555 Points ∼56% -8%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola One
5927 Points ∼61%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5659 Points ∼59% -5%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9664 Points ∼100% +63%
Honor Play
9326 Points ∼97% +57%
Motorola Moto G6
5321 Points ∼55% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=16)
5855 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼51% -16%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One
2027 Points ∼75%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1756 Points ∼65% -13%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2257 Points ∼84% +11%
Honor Play
2702 Points ∼100% +33%
Motorola Moto G6
1786 Points ∼66% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1638 - 2119, n=15)
1936 Points ∼72% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼63% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One
441 Points ∼10%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
793 Points ∼18% +80%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4468 Points ∼100% +913%
Honor Play
3041 Points ∼68% +590%
Motorola Moto G6
413 Points ∼9% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (420 - 761, n=15)
449 Points ∼10% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼33% +232%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola One
534 Points ∼15%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
903 Points ∼25% +69%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3669 Points ∼100% +587%
Honor Play
2959 Points ∼81% +454%
Motorola Moto G6
498 Points ∼14% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (507 - 882, n=15)
540 Points ∼15% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼37% +155%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One
2003 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1744 Points ∼60% -13%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2832 Points ∼98% +41%
Honor Play
2885 Points ∼100% +44%
Motorola Moto G6
1816 Points ∼63% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1638 - 2452, n=15)
1962 Points ∼68% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=292)
1689 Points ∼59% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One
762 Points ∼11%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1303 Points ∼19% +71%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6898 Points ∼100% +805%
Honor Play
4040 Points ∼59% +430%
Motorola Moto G6
713 Points ∼10% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (440 - 801, n=15)
729 Points ∼11% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=292)
2068 Points ∼30% +171%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola One
884 Points ∼17%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1381 Points ∼26% +56%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5230 Points ∼100% +492%
Honor Play
3710 Points ∼71% +320%
Motorola Moto G6
824 Points ∼16% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (533 - 885, n=15)
838 Points ∼16% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=293)
1734 Points ∼33% +96%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One
2067 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1712 Points ∼61% -17%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2528 Points ∼89% +22%
Honor Play
2827 Points ∼100% +37%
Motorola Moto G6
1834 Points ∼65% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1636 - 2177, n=17)
1958 Points ∼69% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼58% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One
397 Points ∼8%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
718 Points ∼15% +81%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4746 Points ∼100% +1095%
Honor Play
3018 Points ∼64% +660%
Motorola Moto G6
363 Points ∼8% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (372 - 397, n=17)
384 Points ∼8% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼25% +199%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola One
484 Points ∼12%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
824 Points ∼21% +70%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3972 Points ∼100% +721%
Honor Play
2973 Points ∼75% +514%
Motorola Moto G6
442 Points ∼11% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (452 - 484, n=17)
467 Points ∼12% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼29% +134%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One
2091 Points ∼74%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1757 Points ∼62% -16%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2720 Points ∼96% +30%
Honor Play
2832 Points ∼100% +35%
Motorola Moto G6
1803 Points ∼64% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1631 - 2157, n=17)
1968 Points ∼69% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼54% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One
751 Points ∼9%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1248 Points ∼15% +66%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
8261 Points ∼100% +1000%
Honor Play
3734 Points ∼45% +397%
Motorola Moto G6
690 Points ∼8% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (390 - 751, n=17)
710 Points ∼9% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼20% +117%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola One
876 Points ∼15%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼23% +52%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5687 Points ∼100% +549%
Honor Play
3487 Points ∼61% +298%
Motorola Moto G6
800 Points ∼14% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (476 - 876, n=17)
826 Points ∼15% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼24% +58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola One
15762 Points ∼45%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13217 Points ∼38% -16%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
34928 Points ∼100% +122%
Honor Play
20035 Points ∼57% +27%
Motorola Moto G6
13997 Points ∼40% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (14195 - 16267, n=16)
15727 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼37% -18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola One
13382 Points ∼16%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
18472 Points ∼22% +38%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
82125 Points ∼100% +514%
Honor Play
34836 Points ∼42% +160%
Motorola Moto G6
12441 Points ∼15% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7668 - 13491, n=16)
12957 Points ∼16% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼22% +34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola One
13847 Points ∼22%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
16972 Points ∼27% +23%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
63159 Points ∼100% +356%
Honor Play
29924 Points ∼47% +116%
Motorola Moto G6
12756 Points ∼20% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8541 - 14003, n=16)
13468 Points ∼21% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼24% +9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola One
23 fps ∼15%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
30 fps ∼20% +30%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
150 fps ∼100% +552%
Honor Play
115 fps ∼77% +400%
Motorola Moto G6
22 fps ∼15% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (22 - 23, n=17)
22.9 fps ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼21% +37%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola One
35 fps ∼58%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
28 fps ∼47% -20%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
60 fps ∼100% +71%
Honor Play
60 fps ∼100% +71%
Motorola Moto G6
20 fps ∼33% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (17 - 35, n=17)
22.9 fps ∼38% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼42% -29%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola One
9.9 fps ∼14%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
14 fps ∼20% +41%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
71 fps ∼100% +617%
Honor Play
62 fps ∼87% +526%
Motorola Moto G6
9.4 fps ∼13% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 10, n=17)
9.43 fps ∼13% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼24% +70%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola One
19 fps ∼33%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13 fps ∼22% -32%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
58 fps ∼100% +205%
Honor Play
55 fps ∼95% +189%
Motorola Moto G6
8.9 fps ∼15% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7.4 - 19, n=17)
10.6 fps ∼18% -44%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼28% -16%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One
14 fps ∼36%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.8 fps ∼25% -30%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼90% +150%
Honor Play
39 fps ∼100% +179%
Motorola Moto G6
6.1 fps ∼16% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 14, n=17)
6.66 fps ∼17% -52%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼37% +2%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One
6.5 fps ∼12%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.3 fps ∼17% +43%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
54 fps ∼100% +731%
Honor Play
31 fps ∼57% +377%
Motorola Moto G6
5.8 fps ∼11% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=17)
6.52 fps ∼12% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼26% +114%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One
4 fps ∼18%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3.1 fps ∼14% -22%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
22 fps ∼100% +450%
Honor Play
13 fps ∼59% +225%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (2 - 4, n=3)
2.8 fps ∼13% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼46% +155%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One
1.2 fps ∼9%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1.9 fps ∼14% +58%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
14 fps ∼100% +1067%
Honor Play
8.6 fps ∼61% +617%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1.2 - 1.2, n=3)
1.2 fps ∼9% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼46% +441%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One
6.5 fps ∼21%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.4 fps ∼17% -17%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
31 fps ∼100% +377%
Honor Play
22 fps ∼71% +238%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.4 - 6.5, n=3)
4.63 fps ∼15% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼46% +122%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One
3.6 fps ∼11%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps ∼18% +56%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
32 fps ∼100% +789%
Honor Play
24 fps ∼75% +567%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 3.6, n=3)
3.57 fps ∼11% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼49% +336%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One
3.6 fps ∼10%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps ∼16% +56%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼100% +872%
Honor Play
20 fps ∼57% +456%
Motorola Moto G6
3.4 fps ∼10% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.4 - 3.8, n=16)
3.52 fps ∼10% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼28% +174%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola One
7.3 fps ∼22%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.3 fps ∼16% -27%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
33 fps ∼100% +352%
Honor Play
19 fps ∼58% +160%
Motorola Moto G6
3.3 fps ∼10% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 7.4, n=16)
3.98 fps ∼12% -45%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼27% +22%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola One
65759 Points ∼25%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
89006 Points ∼34% +35%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
263165 Points ∼100% +300%
Honor Play
152773 Points ∼58% +132%
Motorola Moto G6
71352 Points ∼27% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (65759 - 81789, n=7)
65501 Points ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼45% +80%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola One
66291 Points ∼29%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
70346 Points ∼31% +6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
227026 Points ∼100% +242%
Honor Play
178745 Points ∼79% +170%
Motorola Moto G6
59454 Points ∼26% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 68348, n=17)
63396 Points ∼28% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=389)
76442 Points ∼34% +15%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola One
860 Points ∼66%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
936 Points ∼72% +9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
1296 Points ∼100% +51%
Honor Play
1091 Points ∼84% +27%
Motorola Moto G6
688 Points ∼53% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (649 - 958, n=17)
772 Points ∼60% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼54% -19%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola One
1019 Points ∼13%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1480 Points ∼19% +45%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
7945 Points ∼100% +680%
Honor Play
2231 Points ∼28% +119%
Motorola Moto G6
965 Points ∼12% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (968 - 1026, n=17)
1008 Points ∼13% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼22% +70%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola One
1235 Points ∼38%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼41% +8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3239 Points ∼100% +162%
Honor Play
2417 Points ∼75% +96%
Motorola Moto G6
770 Points ∼24% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (584 - 1553, n=17)
1018 Points ∼31% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼38% +1%
System (sort by value)
Motorola One
3176 Points ∼49%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3284 Points ∼50% +3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6506 Points ∼100% +105%
Honor Play
3795 Points ∼58% +19%
Motorola Moto G6
2560 Points ∼39% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1960 - 3261, n=17)
2819 Points ∼43% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼39% -21%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola One
1362 Points ∼35%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1570 Points ∼41% +15%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3838 Points ∼100% +182%
Honor Play
2174 Points ∼57% +60%
Motorola Moto G6
1069 Points ∼28% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1019 - 1362, n=17)
1206 Points ∼31% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼33% -8%

Legend

 
Motorola One Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Honor Play HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
75.959 Points ∼100% +256%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼48% +72%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
33.094 Points ∼44% +55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
27.615 Points ∼36% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (21.3 - 31.8, n=17)
27.2 Points ∼36% +28%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
22.556 Points ∼30% +6%
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
21.317 Points ∼28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼100% +284%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
6692 Points ∼46% +77%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=558)
5562 Points ∼38% +47%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
5017 Points ∼35% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3781 - 4979, n=17)
4524 Points ∼31% +20%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
3943 Points ∼27% +4%
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
3781 Points ∼26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
12194 ms * ∼100%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
11751.4 ms * ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼94% +6%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
10086 ms * ∼83% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 12194, n=17)
9289 ms * ∼76% +24%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
6220.7 ms * ∼51% +49%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼22% +78%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=63)
63.6 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
37 Points ∼58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (35 - 38, n=2)
36.5 Points ∼57%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
31 Points ∼49%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
223 Points ∼100% +97%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
119 Points ∼53% +5%
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
113 Points ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)
111 Points ∼50% -2%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
106 Points ∼48% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (60 - 113, n=12)
90.5 Points ∼41% -20%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
90 Points ∼40% -20%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola OneSony Xperia XA2 PlusXiaomi Pocophone F1Honor PlayMotorola Moto G6Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-13%
21%
80%
-11%
-23%
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
71.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18%
61.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
54.3 (14.1 - 74.7, n=68)
-11%
45.5 (3.4 - 87.1, n=318)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
80.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
75.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
73.2 (21.1 - 86.9, n=68)
-9%
63.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=318)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
69.1
10.5
-85%
17.81
-74%
155.5
125%
59.91
-13%
19.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=77)
-71%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
-77%
Random Read 4KB
61.9
77.43
25%
101.01
63%
142.4
130%
69.91
13%
50.4 (11.4 - 149, n=77)
-19%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-38%
Sequential Write 256KB
214.9
146.16
-32%
155.57
-28%
188.3
-12%
117.19
-45%
165 (40 - 246, n=77)
-23%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-63%
Sequential Read 256KB
280.2
281.06
0%
705.38
152%
894.5
219%
238.23
-15%
271 (115 - 704, n=77)
-3%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-18%
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min31 fps
 high HD31 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high54 fps
 minimal57 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 32.7 °C31.4 °C31.6 °C 
 33.1 °C31.6 °C32.1 °C 
 32.8 °C31.5 °C32.7 °C 
Máximo: 33.1 °C
Médio: 32.2 °C
31.4 °C32 °C33.4 °C
31.4 °C32.5 °C33.4 °C
31.4 °C32.1 °C33.3 °C
Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 32.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.947.42536.544.23137.235.44037.637.65031.739.46323.822.88024.423.310023.621.312519.919.916023.324.420018.437.725018.244.831515.851.440014.658.750015.560.56301359.680012.363.9100012.167125011.969.3160010.770.2200010.767.2250010.566.9315010.365.1400010.768.4500010.571.8630010.569.2800010.665.71000010.664.71250010.562.61600010.642.6SPL63.572.461.552.561.424.179.7N16.225.514.68.214.50.644.7median 11.9median 63.9Delta3.411.235.430.133.236.823.730.131.933.139.738.830.233.925.221.521.923.822.326.419.338.316.646.916.347.916.552.41858.715.463.715.663.114.269.614.876.314.672.614.468.414.575.214.870.814.674.114.871.614.871.115.266.614.663.815.162.114.654.415.344.927.183.40.954median 15.1median 63.71.211.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola OneXiaomi Pocophone F1
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola One audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Pocophone F1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.05 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1 / 1.6 / 2 Watt
Carga midlight 3.3 / 5.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola One
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Honor Play
3750 mAh
Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
13%
-19%
-75%
14%
-9%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.35
65%
0.65
35%
1.4
-40%
0.6
40%
0.981 (0.49 - 2.2, n=17)
2%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=636)
12%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.81
-13%
1.97
-23%
2.6
-63%
1.81
-13%
1.985 (0.87 - 3.92, n=17)
-24%
1.719 (0.6 - 6.2, n=635)
-7%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.83
8%
2.01
-1%
4.3
-115%
1.86
7%
2.27 (0.9 - 4.03, n=17)
-14%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=636)
-0%
Load Average *
3.3
3.31
-0%
4.29
-30%
6.5
-97%
2.78
16%
3.51 (1.69 - 6.2, n=17)
-6%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=630)
-22%
Load Maximum *
5.1
4.97
3%
9.05
-77%
8.2
-61%
4.04
21%
5.38 (3.8 - 7.2, n=17)
-5%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=630)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
27h 32min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 49min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 28min
Motorola One
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Honor Play
3750 mAh
Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
78%
10%
-6%
-13%
Reader / Idle
1652
4682
183%
2088
26%
1723
4%
1170
-29%
H.264
769
893
16%
936
22%
759
-1%
600
-22%
WiFi v1.3
735
837
14%
808
10%
710
-3%
553
-25%
Load
268
529
97%
220
-18%
204
-24%
338
26%

Pro

+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Atualização garantida para Android 10
+ Bom som dos alto-falantes
+ Dificilmente esquenta
+ Fotos nítidas da câmera
+ Slot microSD separado

Contra

- WLAN lento
- Fone de ouvido se distorce
- O brilho muda em ângulos de visão horizontais íngremes
- SoC ultrapassado
In review: Motorola One. Test unit provided by Motorola Germany.
In review: Motorola One. Test unit provided by Motorola Germany.

Existe um conceito claro no Motorola One: Por um lado, a Motorola quer oferecer um dispositivo sem frescuras para todos aqueles para quem o design mais organicamente arredondado do fabricante é muito brincalhão. Por outro lado, o Android One deve garantir que as correções de segurança mais atuais sempre cheguem ao dispositivo rapidamente e que o sistema operacional permaneça atualizado pelo menos nos próximos anos. No entanto, particularmente em termos de software, existem duas ressalvas: Primeiro, a Motorola ainda está demorando muito até que as atualizações cheguem ao dispositivo (a atualização de setembro foi completamente omitida e a atualização de outubro chegou em novembro), e os usuários também precisam ter paciência até receber o patch do Android-9. Em segundo lugar, o Android 9 já é contado como uma das duas atualizações prometidas do Android One, de modo que apenas o Android 10 ainda é garantido aos usuários.

O que mais o Motorola One pode oferecer? Uma duração de bateria aceitável e uma câmera decente, uma carcaça robusta e um desempenho confiável mesmo sob cargas pesadas prolongadas.

O Motorola One é um smartphone que resulta muito sólido em muitas áreas. No entanto, neste ponto, há uma forte concorrência em sua faixa de preço.

Aqueles que podem pagar 50 Euros (~$56) a mais podem obter muito mais desempenho e uma duração de bateria significativamente maior com o Honor Play o Xiaomi Pocophone. Sob esta luz, a relação preço-desempenho do Motorola One parece duvidosa. No entanto, qualquer pessoa para quem as atualizações garantidas para os próximos dois anos são importantes e que não se importam com a frequência de atualização de dois meses terá um smartphone que é sólido.

Motorola One - 11/07/2018 v6
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
41 / 60 → 69%
Peso
91%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
33 / 63 → 52%
Desempenho da aplicação
52 / 70 → 75%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
77%
Médio
74%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola One
Florian Schmitt, 2018-11-12 (Update: 2018-11-12)