Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G6

Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/23/2018

G de gênio? O mais recente lançamento da série Motorola-G é anunciado com autoconfiança e se apresenta como um avanço bem-sucedido do Moto G5. Um SoC mais rápido, uma câmera dupla e um design atualizado devem atrair clientes. Você pode descobrir as qualidades e fraquezas do smartphone Moto neste teste.

Motorola Moto G6 (Moto G6 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506, Memoría: 600 MHz
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.7 polegadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, 10 pontos multitouch, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glas 3, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta combinada de microfone e fones (3,5 mm), Card Reader: microSD de até 128 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: proximidade, posição, e sensores G, magnetômetro, BeiDou, AGPS, OTG, MTP
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800, e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, e 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 4 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 153.8 x 72.3
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix + 5 MPix (f/1.8, 1080p video @ 60 fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (1080p video @ 30 fps)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Carregador turbo de 15 W, cabo USB, Capa de Gel transparente, Guia de início rápido, cartão de garantia, 24 Meses Garantia, P2i splash water protection, face unlocking, FM radio, three microphones, Dolby Audio, head SAR: 0.636 W/kg, body SAR: 1.365 W/kg, fanless
peso
167 g
Preço
249 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s ∼100% +156%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s ∼87% +122%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼84% +114%
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼65% +67%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼42% +7%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼39%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 MBit/s ∼18% -53%
ZTE Blade V9
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
MBit/s ∼0% -100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
345 MBit/s ∼100% +205%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼81% +148%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼54% +64%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼43% +31%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼33%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s ∼32% -2%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼14% -56%
ZTE Blade V9
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
MBit/s ∼0% -100%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Motorola Moto G6
Motorola Moto G6
Motorola Moto G6
Motorola Moto G6
Motorola Moto G6
Motorola Moto G6

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera
Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera (portrait mode)
Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera
Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera
Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera
Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera
Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera while driving
Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera
Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera
Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera
Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera
Motorola Moto G6: Image taken with main camera
Moto G6
Moto G6
Galaxy J7
Galaxy J7
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite
Blade V9
Blade V9
462
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 488 cd/m² Médio: 477.6 cd/m² Minimum: 12.96 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 488 cd/m²
Contraste: 1162:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
94.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.41
Motorola Moto G6
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Motorola Moto G5s
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Blade V9
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Honor 9 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Nokia 6 2018
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
-7%
-15%
8%
-34%
20%
-44%
Brightness middle
488
490
0%
459
-6%
627
28%
417
-15%
454
-7%
458
-6%
Brightness
478
502
5%
437
-9%
622
30%
421
-12%
463
-3%
473
-1%
Brightness Distribution
95
92
-3%
90
-5%
82
-14%
88
-7%
86
-9%
88
-7%
Black Level *
0.42
0.43
-2%
0.62
-48%
0.41
2%
0.61
-45%
0.51
-21%
Contrast
1162
1140
-2%
740
-36%
1529
32%
684
-41%
898
-23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.9
5.7
-46%
4.5
-15%
4.5
-15%
6.1
-56%
2
49%
7.1
-82%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.8
7.8
-15%
7.3
-7%
7
-3%
11.2
-65%
5.3
22%
14.5
-113%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.3
4.7
11%
4.9
8%
5.1
4%
7.1
-34%
1.7
68%
10.5
-98%
Gamma
2.41 100%
2.4 100%
2.17 111%
2.26 106%
2.16 111%
2.1 114%
2.28 105%
CCT
7146 91%
7526 86%
7261 90%
7201 90%
8362 78%
6394 102%
8951 73%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2315 Hz ≤ 17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
59454 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto G5s
46370 Points ∼64% -22%
ZTE Blade V9
60077 Points ∼83% +1%
Honor 9 Lite
67727 Points ∼93% +14%
Nokia 6 2018
72580 Points ∼100% +22%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points ∼65% -20%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼91% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=5)
57359 Points ∼79% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=336)
70824 Points ∼98% +19%
AnTuTu v7
CPU (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
34408 Points ∼82%
ZTE Blade V9
33896 Points ∼81% -1%
Honor 9 Lite
41874 Points ∼100% +22%
Nokia 6 2018
39585 Points ∼95% +15%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
32810 Points ∼78% -5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
41767 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (33638 - 34913, n=6)
34138 Points ∼82% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 99873, n=113)
41535 Points ∼99% +21%
Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
71352 Points ∼69%
ZTE Blade V9
71712 Points ∼69% +1%
Honor 9 Lite
89639 Points ∼87% +26%
Nokia 6 2018
90435 Points ∼88% +27%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
61811 Points ∼60% -13%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
82343 Points ∼80% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 71712, n=6)
68401 Points ∼66% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 290397, n=113)
103239 Points ∼100% +45%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
4552 Points ∼93%
Motorola Moto G5s
3604 Points ∼73% -21%
ZTE Blade V9
4401 Points ∼90% -3%
Honor 9 Lite
4911 Points ∼100% +8%
Nokia 6 2018
4719 Points ∼96% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points ∼76% -18%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4401 - 4759, n=6)
4585 Points ∼93% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3138 - 8601, n=201)
4453 Points ∼91% -2%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
5321 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G5s
4669 Points ∼79% -12%
ZTE Blade V9
4967 Points ∼84% -7%
Honor 9 Lite
5887 Points ∼100% +11%
Nokia 6 2018
5484 Points ∼93% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points ∼84% -8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4967 - 5656, n=6)
5322 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=365)
4677 Points ∼79% -12%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
688 Points ∼77%
Motorola Moto G5s
703 Points ∼79% +2%
ZTE Blade V9
731 Points ∼82% +6%
Honor 9 Lite
888 Points ∼99% +29%
Nokia 6 2018
895 Points ∼100% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points ∼1% -99%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼90% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (10 - 814, n=6)
624 Points ∼70% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=441)
672 Points ∼75% -2%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
965 Points ∼63%
Motorola Moto G5s
723 Points ∼48% -25%
ZTE Blade V9
956 Points ∼63% -1%
Honor 9 Lite
859 Points ∼57% -11%
Nokia 6 2018
1520 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points ∼35% -45%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼67% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (955 - 975, n=6)
964 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=441)
1505 Points ∼99% +56%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
770 Points ∼44%
Motorola Moto G5s
656 Points ∼37% -15%
ZTE Blade V9
962 Points ∼55% +25%
Honor 9 Lite
1757 Points ∼100% +128%
Nokia 6 2018
1161 Points ∼66% +51%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points ∼72% +64%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼60% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (770 - 1522, n=6)
980 Points ∼56% +27%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=441)
1124 Points ∼64% +46%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
2560 Points ∼73%
Motorola Moto G5s
1553 Points ∼44% -39%
ZTE Blade V9
2772 Points ∼79% +8%
Honor 9 Lite
3058 Points ∼88% +19%
Nokia 6 2018
3237 Points ∼93% +26%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points ∼68% -7%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2560 - 2898, n=6)
2725 Points ∼78% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=441)
2244 Points ∼64% -12%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
1069 Points ∼71%
Motorola Moto G5s
848 Points ∼56% -21%
ZTE Blade V9
1169 Points ∼78% +9%
Honor 9 Lite
1423 Points ∼95% +33%
Nokia 6 2018
1504 Points ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points ∼23% -67%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼87% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (442 - 1169, n=6)
1027 Points ∼68% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=444)
1134 Points ∼75% +6%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
2777 Points ∼72%
Motorola Moto G5s
1871 Points ∼49% -33%
ZTE Blade V9
3157 Points ∼82% +14%
Honor 9 Lite
3117 Points ∼81% +12%
Nokia 6 2018
3690 Points ∼96% +33%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points ∼62% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3362, n=5)
3065 Points ∼80% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=138)
3831 Points ∼100% +38%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
3868 Points ∼89%
Motorola Moto G5s
2270 Points ∼52% -41%
ZTE Blade V9
3907 Points ∼89% +1%
Honor 9 Lite
3730 Points ∼85% -4%
Nokia 6 2018
883 Points ∼20% -77%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points ∼86% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=6)
3816 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1131 - 10558, n=185)
3970 Points ∼91% +3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
743 Points ∼18%
Motorola Moto G5s
630 Points ∼15% -15%
ZTE Blade V9
769 Points ∼18% +3%
Honor 9 Lite
945 Points ∼22% +27%
Nokia 6 2018
4210 Points ∼100% +467%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points ∼17% -1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼22% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 778, n=6)
757 Points ∼18% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=186)
1175 Points ∼28% +58%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
1834 Points ∼86%
Motorola Moto G5s
1199 Points ∼56% -35%
ZTE Blade V9
1841 Points ∼86% 0%
Honor 9 Lite
1748 Points ∼82% -5%
Nokia 6 2018
1738 Points ∼82% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points ∼71% -17%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1521 - 1855, n=6)
1787 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (530 - 3669, n=290)
1554 Points ∼73% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
363 Points ∼34%
Motorola Moto G5s
243 Points ∼23% -33%
ZTE Blade V9
365 Points ∼35% +1%
Honor 9 Lite
253 Points ∼24% -30%
Nokia 6 2018
707 Points ∼67% +95%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points ∼19% -45%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼36% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (363 - 369, n=6)
366 Points ∼35% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (67 - 5220, n=290)
1056 Points ∼100% +191%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
442 Points ∼44%
Motorola Moto G5s
295 Points ∼29% -33%
ZTE Blade V9
444 Points ∼44% 0%
Honor 9 Lite
312 Points ∼31% -29%
Nokia 6 2018
814 Points ∼80% +84%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points ∼24% -44%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼46% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (441 - 449, n=6)
444 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (83 - 4732, n=298)
1012 Points ∼100% +129%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
1803 Points ∼85%
Motorola Moto G5s
1158 Points ∼54% -36%
ZTE Blade V9
1813 Points ∼85% +1%
Honor 9 Lite
1788 Points ∼84% -1%
Nokia 6 2018
1733 Points ∼81% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points ∼72% -15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1504 - 1833, n=6)
1766 Points ∼83% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=321)
1455 Points ∼68% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
690 Points ∼48%
Motorola Moto G5s
483 Points ∼34% -30%
ZTE Blade V9
697 Points ∼49% +1%
Honor 9 Lite
184 Points ∼13% -73%
Nokia 6 2018
1249 Points ∼88% +81%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points ∼19% -60%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼51% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (690 - 716, n=6)
702 Points ∼49% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=321)
1426 Points ∼100% +107%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
800 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto G5s
555 Points ∼42% -31%
ZTE Blade V9
807 Points ∼61% +1%
Honor 9 Lite
230 Points ∼17% -71%
Nokia 6 2018
1332 Points ∼100% +67%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points ∼26% -57%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼64% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (800 - 824, n=6)
810 Points ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6378, n=329)
1227 Points ∼92% +53%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
13997 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto G5s
9045 Points ∼53% -35%
ZTE Blade V9
13862 Points ∼81% -1%
Honor 9 Lite
14780 Points ∼87% +6%
Nokia 6 2018
13196 Points ∼77% -6%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points ∼76% -7%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (13596 - 15177, n=5)
14124 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=476)
12164 Points ∼71% -13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
12441 Points ∼67%
Motorola Moto G5s
9626 Points ∼52% -23%
ZTE Blade V9
12482 Points ∼67% 0%
Honor 9 Lite
11712 Points ∼63% -6%
Nokia 6 2018
18572 Points ∼100% +49%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points ∼40% -40%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼71% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12347 - 12550, n=5)
12469 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=476)
15585 Points ∼84% +25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
12756 Points ∼75%
Motorola Moto G5s
9491 Points ∼56% -26%
ZTE Blade V9
12764 Points ∼75% 0%
Honor 9 Lite
12278 Points ∼72% -4%
Nokia 6 2018
17030 Points ∼100% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points ∼49% -35%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼82% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12604 - 12878, n=5)
12765 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=477)
13472 Points ∼79% +6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
22 fps ∼73%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼53% -27%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
19 fps ∼63% -14%
Nokia 6 2018
30 fps ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼40% -45%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼77% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 22, n=6)
18 fps ∼60% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=502)
27 fps ∼90% +23%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
20 fps ∼65%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼52% -20%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
18 fps ∼58% -10%
Nokia 6 2018
31 fps ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼39% -40%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼71% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=6)
23.5 fps ∼76% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=505)
23.5 fps ∼76% +18%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
9.4 fps ∼65%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.1 fps ∼49% -24%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
8.6 fps ∼60% -9%
Nokia 6 2018
14 fps ∼97% +49%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼35% -46%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼68% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=6)
7.75 fps ∼54% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=425)
14.4 fps ∼100% +53%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
8.9 fps ∼59%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.4 fps ∼49% -17%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼56% -6%
Nokia 6 2018
15 fps ∼100% +69%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼34% -43%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼64% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.9 - 18, n=6)
11.8 fps ∼79% +33%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=427)
14.5 fps ∼97% +63%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
6.1 fps ∼49%
Motorola Moto G5s
4.6 fps ∼37% -25%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼26% -48%
Nokia 6 2018
9.8 fps ∼78% +61%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.3 fps ∼26% -46%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼51% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.1, n=6)
5.05 fps ∼40% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=288)
12.5 fps ∼100% +105%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
5.8 fps ∼46%
Motorola Moto G5s
5 fps ∼40% -14%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
5 fps ∼40% -14%
Nokia 6 2018
10 fps ∼79% +72%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.2 fps ∼25% -45%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼50% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.8 - 13, n=6)
8.27 fps ∼66% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=290)
12.6 fps ∼100% +117%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
3.4 fps ∼40%
Motorola Moto G5s
2.5 fps ∼29% -26%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼38% -6%
Nokia 6 2018
5.6 fps ∼66% +65%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼22% -44%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼41% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.5, n=6)
2.85 fps ∼33% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (0.76 - 35, n=219)
8.51 fps ∼100% +150%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
3.3 fps ∼42%
Motorola Moto G5s
2.7 fps ∼35% -18%
ZTE Blade V9
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
2.9 fps ∼37% -12%
Nokia 6 2018
5.9 fps ∼75% +79%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼24% -42%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼45% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 7, n=6)
4.53 fps ∼58% +37%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 50, n=222)
7.82 fps ∼100% +137%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
5.38 fps ∼44%
ZTE Blade V9
5.41 fps ∼45% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.38 - 5.41, n=2)
5.4 fps ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼100% +125%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6
129 Points ∼23%
ZTE Blade V9
129 Points ∼23% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (129 - 129, n=2)
129 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 1702, n=62)
573 Points ∼100% +344%

Legend

 
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 224, n=360)
33.7 Points ∼100% +49%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
28.167 Points ∼84% +25%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼80% +19%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
26.42 Points ∼78% +17%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
25.972 Points ∼77% +15%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
22.556 Points ∼67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.6, n=6)
22.3 Points ∼66% -1%
ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18)
22.014 Points ∼65% -2%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
18.661 Points ∼55% -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=496)
5011 Points ∼100% +27%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
4993 Points ∼100% +27%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
4742 Points ∼95% +20%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4560 Points ∼91% +16%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼88% +12%
ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18)
3969 Points ∼79% +1%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
3943 Points ∼79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4032, n=6)
3901 Points ∼78% -1%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
3035 Points ∼61% -23%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
13057 ms * ∼100% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=515)
11883 ms * ∼91% -1%
ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18)
11862.7 ms * ∼91% -1%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
11751.4 ms * ∼90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11370 - 11863, n=6)
11577 ms * ∼89% +1%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
10250.4 ms * ∼79% +13%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
9922.7 ms * ∼76% +16%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼67% +26%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6820.9 ms * ∼52% +42%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Nokia 6 2018
117 Points ∼100% +30%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
108 Points ∼92% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=246)
99.4 Points ∼85% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 93, n=3)
91 Points ∼78% +1%
ZTE Blade V9 (Ume Browser 1.2.18)
90 Points ∼77% 0%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
90 Points ∼77%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼74% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
75 Points ∼64% -17%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
61 Points ∼52% -32%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 130, n=35)
54 Points ∼100% +74%
Nokia 6 2018 (Chrome 66)
35 Points ∼65% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (31 - 32, n=2)
31.5 Points ∼58% +2%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
31 Points ∼57%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G6Motorola Moto G5sZTE Blade V9Honor 9 LiteSamsung Galaxy J7 2017BQ Aquaris X ProAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-13%
-19%
11%
-35%
-18%
-31%
-38%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
62.09 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
71.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
17%
63.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-19%
46.1 (9.34 - 87.1, n=95)
-25%
43.8 (6.38 - 87.1, n=270)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
83.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
83.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
4%
65.6 (15.6 - 96.5, n=95)
-13%
62.1 (10.8 - 96.5, n=270)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
59.91
46.2
-23%
12.47
-79%
66.83
12%
10.54
-82%
12.07
-80%
17.6 (0.75 - 74.9, n=135)
-71%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=549)
-77%
Random Read 4KB
69.91
40.6
-42%
29.81
-57%
68.39
-2%
25.86
-63%
37.97
-46%
34.4 (3.59 - 117, n=135)
-51%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=549)
-51%
Sequential Write 256KB
117.19
77.5
-34%
119.36
2%
138.21
18%
52.98
-55%
139.63
19%
92.2 (14.8 - 189, n=135)
-21%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=549)
-39%
Sequential Read 256KB
238.23
259
9%
265.4
11%
269.56
13%
198.47
-17%
270.46
14%
225 (25.8 - 440, n=135)
-6%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=549)
-11%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min31 fps
 high HD30 fps
PUBG Mobile
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 Smooth26 fps
Carga Máxima
 31.5 °C31.7 °C32 °C 
 32.2 °C32.7 °C36.4 °C 
 31.9 °C32.6 °C35.6 °C 
Máximo: 36.4 °C
Médio: 33 °C
30.1 °C30.8 °C31.1 °C
30.5 °C31.6 °C30.9 °C
29.7 °C31.8 °C30.6 °C
Máximo: 31.8 °C
Médio: 30.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  24.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.537.82538.233.63135.836.1402937.5503436.36333.830.18027.230.410028.627.912528.933.416027.748.320026.65225021.860.831522.562.840021.363.350021.466.763019.168.380018.966.7100019.768.9125018.772.7160018.471.1200019.173.2250018.676.9315019.878.6400019.578500019.278.863001977.1800019.175.41000019.375.51250019.971.91600019.861.8SPL31.787.4N1.770median 19.7Motorola Moto G6median 68.9Delta1.97.228.623.524.921.724.621.926.422.630.831.423.622.920.218.619.920.617.622.319.135.619.136.617.443.916.951.216.854.315.156.816.557.915.663156615.565.315.368.215.76915.573.815.573.415.473.415.873.81672.115.872.416.171.616.168.117.354.527.982.9151.3median 16ZTE Blade V9median 65.30.613.631.630.825.430.525.331.232.930.733.631.731.628.828.422.6272620.836.82240.221.349.220.853.721.257.119.462.619.567.417.767.817.969.517.870.717.372.117.474.616.775.217.275.518.277.917.981.417.67917.775.617.875.417.971.318.162.618.255.83087.11.370.5median 17.9Samsung Galaxy J7 2017median 69.51.310.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

ZTE Blade V9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.19 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.6 / 1.81 / 1.86 Watt
Carga midlight 2.78 / 4.04 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V9
3200 mAh
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-3%
-20%
-4%
35%
-23%
-0%
-25%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.67
-12%
0.71
-18%
0.85
-42%
0.67
-12%
0.39
35%
0.67
-12%
0.642 (0.6 - 0.71, n=6)
-7%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
-44%
Idle Average *
1.81
1.4
23%
1.73
4%
2
-10%
1.76
3%
1.06
41%
1.7
6%
1.797 (0.96 - 2.16, n=6)
1%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
6%
Idle Maximum *
1.86
1.52
18%
1.78
4%
2.04
-10%
1.78
4%
1.08
42%
1.78
4%
1.853 (0.99 - 2.24, n=6)
-0%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
-5%
Load Average *
2.78
4.56
-64%
2.74
1%
3.23
-16%
2.82
-1%
1.82
35%
4.42
-59%
2.61 (1.85 - 3, n=6)
6%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
-43%
Load Maximum *
4.04
7.05
-75%
4.36
-8%
4.93
-22%
4.56
-13%
3.21
21%
6.3
-56%
4.1 (3.04 - 4.57, n=6)
-1%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
-39%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
19h 30min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 66)
9h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 00min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 38min
Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V9
3200 mAh
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
43%
-8%
67%
18%
Reader / Idle
1170
1233
5%
965
-18%
1950
67%
1840
57%
H.264
600
645
8%
622
4%
1096
83%
644
7%
WiFi v1.3
553
518
-6%
790
43%
601
9%
904
63%
730
32%
Load
338
225
-33%
253
-25%
525
55%
254
-25%

Pro

+ Tela de alto contraste e brilhante
+ Dual SIM e expansão microSD
+ Boa câmera dupla
+ Design atraente
+ GPS confiável
+ Boa qualidade de voz

Contra

- O vidro traseiro atrai sujeira e é escorregadio
- Baixo alcance do WLAN
- Somente LTE Cat. 4
Testing the Motorola Moto G6. Test unit provided by Motorola Germany.
Testing the Motorola Moto G6. Test unit provided by Motorola Germany.

Depois de apenas seis meses, a Motorola oferece a mais recente adição da popular série G aos clientes. Com uma nova tela,vidro treseiro, uma câmera dupla e o novo Snapdragon 450, o salto é maior que aquele entre o Moto G5 e o G5s.

Também temos que enfatizar positivamente que o fabricante não aumentou o preço. Com um preço de 249 Euros (~$298; cerca de $250 nos EUA) na introdução no mercado, ainda está bem perto de alguns concorrentes mais poderosos que já estão disponíveis há algum tempo, como o Breve Análise do Smartphone BQ Aquaris X Pro ou o Moto X4, por exemplo. No entanto, isso mudará nos próximos meses, quando o preço cair lentamente.

Visualmente, o Motorola Moto G6 parece um Moto X4 Light e mantém muitas características positivas de seu modelo irmão maior.

Motorola Moto G6 - 05/07/2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
91%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
40 / 60 → 67%
Peso
91%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
27 / 63 → 42%
Desempenho da aplicação
47 / 70 → 67%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
71%
Médio
74%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G6
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-06- 1)