Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 7.1

Nokia 7.ONE. O Nokia 7.1 da HMD é baseado em Android One e, portanto, livre de aplicativos desnecessários, mais comumente chamado de bloatware. O resultado é um sistema minimalista e rápido, projetado para rodar aplicativos ainda mais exigentes. Descubra em nossa análise se isso é verdade ou não, e como o Nokia 7.1 se sai quando comparado a seus rivais.
Nokia 7.1 (7 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 8 x 1.8 GHz, Kryo 260
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 509
Memória
3 GB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.84 polegadas 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio de 3,5-mm, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, e-compass, giroscópio, USB Type-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1,900), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B5/B8), LTE Cat. 6 (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 149.7 x 71.2
Bateria
3060 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual: 12MP (f/1.8, 1.28µm) + 5MP (f/2.4, 1.12µm)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 24mm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação USB, cabo USB Type-C, fones estéreo, Ferramenta SIM, Android One, 24 Meses Garantia, Head SAR: 0.26 W/kg, body SAR: 1.74 W/kg, fanless
peso
160 g, Suprimento de energia: 77 g
Preço
340 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Nokia 7.1
Nokia 7.1
Nokia 7.1
Nokia 7.1
Nokia 7.1
Nokia 7.1

Size Comparison

158.4 mm 75.64 mm 9.55 mm 186 g159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g157 mm 75 mm 9.6 mm 204 g153 mm 75.7 mm 7.7 mm 155 g149.7 mm 71.2 mm 8 mm 160 g148.2 mm 74.2 mm 8 mm 165 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
347 MBit/s +50%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (164min - 362max) MBit/s +38%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
308 MBit/s +33%
Nokia 7.1
Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
232 (217min - 244max) MBit/s
Sharp D10
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
163 (79min - 172max) MBit/s -30%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +13%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
339 MBit/s +1%
Sharp D10
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
336 (287min - 344max) MBit/s +1%
Nokia 7.1
Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
334 (311min - 342max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (265min - 284max) MBit/s -16%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Nokia 7.1; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø334 (311-342)
Nokia 7.1; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø232 (217-244)
GPS Nokia 7.1
GPS Nokia 7.1
GPS Nokia 7.1
GPS Nokia 7.1
GPS Nokia 7.1
GPS Nokia 7.1
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Nokia 7.1 test chart
Nokia 7.1 test chart (zoomed in)
538
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 577 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 549.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 577 cd/m²
Contraste: 1603:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 10.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Nokia 7.1
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.20
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6.00
Sharp D10
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.90
Screen
10%
30%
41%
11%
Brightness middle
577
595
3%
597
3%
570
-1%
745
29%
Brightness
550
561
2%
592
8%
565
3%
723
31%
Brightness Distribution
91
87
-4%
92
1%
93
2%
89
-2%
Black Level *
0.36
0.54
-50%
0.32
11%
0.6
-67%
Contrast
1603
1102
-31%
1866
16%
1242
-23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.4
4.2
43%
2.4
68%
1.5
80%
4.52
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
15
6
60%
5.3
65%
3.6
76%
9.14
39%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
10.2
4.7
54%
3.4
67%
1.2
88%
5.8
43%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.12 104%
2.2 100%
2.07 106%
2.262 97%
CCT
9657 67%
7577 86%
7172 91%
6504 100%
7660 85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2315 Hz ≤ 21 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 21 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 23.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
1333 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
1506 Points +13%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
858 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1525 Points +14%
Sharp D10
875 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1323 - 1506, n=11)
1351 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5228 Points +292%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
4902 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
5426 Points +11%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
4152 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4429 Points -10%
Sharp D10
4203 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4781 - 5426, n=11)
4960 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
14045 Points +187%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
4560 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
5041 Points +11%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3621 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4026 Points -12%
Sharp D10
3728 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4278 - 5041, n=11)
4505 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)
10872 Points +138%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
6343 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
6999 Points +10%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5659 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
5625 Points -11%
Sharp D10
5796 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6040 - 7618, n=11)
6624 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +138%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
5663 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
6068 Points +7%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
4953 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
5387 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5611 - 6277, n=11)
5833 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +92%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
19762 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
20404 Points +3%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
16972 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
15167 Points -23%
Sharp D10
17032 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (19525 - 20404, n=11)
19846 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
20610 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
20722 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
18472 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
15567 Points -24%
Sharp D10
18635 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (20610 - 21067, n=11)
20839 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
17274 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
19365 Points +12%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13217 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
13914 Points -19%
Sharp D10
13090 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (15766 - 19365, n=11)
17020 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
1462 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
1493 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
960 Points -34%
Sharp D10
1351 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1458 - 1493, n=11)
1475 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points +158%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
1323 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
1329 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1248 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
845 Points -36%
Sharp D10
1269 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1313 - 1353, n=11)
1331 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points +216%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
2316 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
2626 Points +13%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1757 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1829 Points -21%
Sharp D10
1743 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1349 - 2626, n=11)
2280 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
1534 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
1525 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1381 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1071 Points -30%
Sharp D10
1395 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1525 - 1568, n=11)
1541 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)
9351 Points +510%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
1396 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
1358 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1303 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
954 Points -32%
Sharp D10
1325 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1358 - 1406, n=11)
1395 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)
16352 Points +1071%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
2347 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
2683 Points +14%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1744 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1871 Points -20%
Sharp D10
1711 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2288 - 2683, n=11)
2386 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)
4426 Points +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
945 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
962 Points +2%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
824 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
741 Points -22%
Sharp D10
832 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (934 - 962, n=11)
950 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=106, last 2 years)
2738 Points +190%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
811 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
814 Points 0%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
718 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
634 Points -22%
Sharp D10
723 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (797 - 818, n=11)
812 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=106, last 2 years)
2733 Points +237%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
2251 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
2634 Points +17%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1712 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1821 Points -19%
Sharp D10
1755 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2251 - 2634, n=11)
2358 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=106, last 2 years)
3156 Points +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
1009 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
972 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
903 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
737 Points -27%
Sharp D10
912 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (765 - 1016, n=11)
980 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=183, last 2 years)
6705 Points +565%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
869 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
823 Points -5%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
793 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
629 Points -28%
Sharp D10
806 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (645 - 872, n=11)
841 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=182, last 2 years)
9675 Points +1013%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
2310 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
2644 Points +14%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1756 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1845 Points -20%
Sharp D10
1697 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2258 - 2644, n=11)
2372 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=182, last 2 years)
4216 Points +83%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
34 fps
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
34 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
28 fps -18%
Sharp D10
29 fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (30 - 40, n=12)
34.3 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +149%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
35 fps
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
36 fps +3%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
30 fps -14%
Sharp D10
30 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (35 - 36, n=12)
35.6 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +606%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
15 fps
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
15 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13 fps -13%
Sharp D10
14 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (13 - 18, n=12)
15 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps +381%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
16 fps
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
16 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
14 fps -12%
Sharp D10
13 fps -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (16 - 16, n=12)
16 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +779%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
9.6 fps
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
9.8 fps +2%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.3 fps -3%
Sharp D10
9.6 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.7 - 12, n=12)
9.47 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +534%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
10 fps
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
10 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.8 fps -2%
Sharp D10
9.8 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6.3 - 10, n=12)
9.68 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +890%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
5.9 fps
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
6 fps +2%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.3 fps -10%
Sharp D10
5.4 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.1 - 7.4, n=12)
5.96 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +636%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
6.3 fps
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
6.3 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps -11%
Sharp D10
5.5 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6.3 - 6.3, n=12)
6.3 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +851%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
5.5 fps
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
5.3 fps -4%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.4 fps -2%
Sharp D10
5.4 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4.9 - 6.9, n=9)
5.59 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=227, last 2 years)
43.9 fps +698%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
6 fps
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
6 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps -7%
Sharp D10
5.6 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.4 - 6.1, n=9)
5.93 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=227, last 2 years)
64 fps +967%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
3.5 fps
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
3.4 fps -3%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3.1 fps -11%
Sharp D10
3.2 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2 - 4.4, n=9)
3.27 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=227, last 2 years)
32.7 fps +834%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
2.2 fps
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
2.2 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1.9 fps -14%
Sharp D10
1.9 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2.2 - 3.5, n=9)
2.36 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=227, last 2 years)
25.5 fps +1059%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
116496 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
138661 Points +19%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
89006 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
122826 Points +5%
Sharp D10
90099 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (115565 - 138661, n=11)
118863 Points +2%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
95013 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
125213 Points +32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
70346 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
87728 Points -8%
Sharp D10
72035 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (92015 - 125213, n=10)
98051 Points +3%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
1941 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
2156 Points +11%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1570 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
2009 Points +4%
Sharp D10
1539 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1734 - 2156, n=10)
1957 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +197%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
4457 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
5348 Points +20%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3284 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4506 Points +1%
Sharp D10
3298 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4320 - 5348, n=10)
4559 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +117%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
1917 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
2314 Points +21%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
2445 Points +28%
Sharp D10
1235 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1236 - 2492, n=10)
1958 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +227%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
1590 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
1605 Points +1%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1480 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1356 Points -15%
Sharp D10
1495 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1590 - 1632, n=10)
1608 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +794%
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 7.1
1046 Points
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
1088 Points +4%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
936 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1090 Points +4%
Sharp D10
921 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (876 - 1088, n=10)
1037 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +43%

Legend

 
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sharp D10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +131%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL (Chrome 67)
51.5 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.99 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (44.2 - 51.5, n=11)
45.3 Points 0%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
45.08 Points
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)
27.85 Points -38%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
27.61 Points -39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points +287%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL (Chrome 67)
9746 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (8163 - 9746, n=12)
8665 Points 0%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
8627 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
5017 Points -42%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)
5004 Points -42%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
10086 ms * -121%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)
9807 ms * -115%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4105 - 5066, n=12)
4688 ms * -3%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
4562 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4123 ms * +10%
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL (Chrome 67)
4105 ms * +10%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +65%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +146%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (46 - 61, n=9)
54.4 Points +1%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
54 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
37 Points -31%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (147 - 184, n=8)
158 Points +7%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
147 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
106 Points -28%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 7.1Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KLSony Xperia XA2 PlusSamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Sharp D10Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
124%
17%
20%
22%
5%
980%
Sequential Read 256KB
250.9
286.6
14%
281.1
12%
295.8
18%
280.7
12%
Sequential Write 256KB
126
201.8
60%
146.2
16%
104.9
-17%
211.5
68%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-20%
Random Read 4KB
44.9
71.2
59%
77.4
72%
84
87%
47.2
5%
Random Write 4KB
11.93
83.5
600%
10.5
-12%
15.45
30%
16.79
41%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
86 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
78.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
83.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178)
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
67 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
64.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
63.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178)
-14%

Asphalt 9: Legends

051015202530Tooltip
Nokia 7.1; High Quality: Ø29.4 (23-31)
Nokia 7.1; Standard / low: Ø29.7 (27-31)

Arena of Valor

051015202530Tooltip
Nokia 7.1; min: Ø30.9 (29-32)
Nokia 7.1; high HD: Ø30.4 (29-31)
Carga Máxima
 34.4 °C34.2 °C38.2 °C 
 33.4 °C32.4 °C34.2 °C 
 31.8 °C33.2 °C32.4 °C 
Máximo: 38.2 °C
Médio: 33.8 °C
33.3 °C33.3 °C35.5 °C
33.3 °C33.1 °C35.3 °C
32.4 °C33.1 °C33 °C
Máximo: 35.5 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.734.92525293126.823.64026.322.35029.832.96327.432.180212210019.528.412518.835.316019.243.920017.646.525016.952.231515.857.84001561.3500156763014.770.380014.866.4100014.672.8125014.373160013.472.3200014.473.6250014.473.5315014.876.340001580.3500014.883.2630014.783.780001580.11000014.971.61250015.272.11600015.760SPL26.889.9N0.977.4median 15median 72.1Delta0.69.230.733.82528.726.828.426.328.729.838.227.424.72123.219.525.818.825.719.240.417.641.316.947.415.855.51556.71562.814.766.914.86814.666.514.369.213.471.814.472.514.473.214.876.61577.714.875.314.774.31575.314.972.815.264.515.755.126.885.50.961.4median 15median 66.90.610.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 7.1Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 7.1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.01 / 2.2 / 2.25 Watt
Carga midlight 3.76 / 5.56 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Nokia 7.1
3060 mAh
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Sharp D10
2900 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-107%
25%
5%
26%
-12%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
1.01
1.75
-73%
0.35
65%
0.71
30%
0.7
31%
Idle Average *
2.2
4.48
-104%
1.81
18%
1.36
38%
1
55%
Idle Maximum *
2.25
4.5
-100%
1.83
19%
1.47
35%
1.4
38%
2.54 ?(2 - 4.5, n=12)
-13%
Load Average *
3.76
7.92
-111%
3.31
12%
5.13
-36%
3.7
2%
4.51 ?(3.65 - 7.92, n=12)
-20%
Load Maximum *
5.56
13.62
-145%
4.97
11%
7.89
-42%
5.2
6%
7.37 ?(5.1 - 13.6, n=12)
-33%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
16h 23min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 27min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 36min
Nokia 7.1
3060 mAh
Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Sharp D10
2900 mAh
Battery Runtime
44%
208%
66%
86%
Reader / Idle
983
4682
376%
1467
49%
H.264
507
893
76%
836
65%
WiFi v1.3
346
497
44%
837
142%
605
75%
644
86%
Load
156
529
239%
273
75%

Pro

+ Atualizações de segurança durante, pelo menos 3 anos
+ Sem aplicativos de terceiros
+ Sólido desempenho
+ Design atraente

Contra

- Pouca memória
- Duração da bateria média
- A tela sofre de uma severa tonalidade azul
In review: Nokia 7.1. Review unit courtesy of HMD Global Germany.
In review: Nokia 7.1. Review unit courtesy of HMD Global Germany.

Depois de colocar o Nokia 7.1 à prova, nos sentimos confiantes em dizer que é um smartphone de gama média sólido que se destaca principalmente pelo seu design. A conectividade não é seu ponto forte, e muitos concorrentes podem oferecer uma conectividade melhor por menos dinheiro. No entanto, compensa rodando o sabor puro e limpo de Oreo do Android One. Assim, o usuário permanece responsável pelos aplicativos instalados e as atualizações de segurança são fornecidas por três anos graças à Google.

O Nokia 7.1 é um dispositivo de boa aparência que oferece um desempenho sólido. No entanto, nem a duração da bateria, nem a conectividade estão em pé de igualdade com seus concorrentes.

O desempenho do sistema é suficiente para a maioria das tarefas diárias, e é até capaz de executar aplicativos mais exigentes. Com apenas 32 GB, o armazenamento interno é um pouco limitado e os cartões microSD não podem ser usados como armazenamento interno, mas somente como arquivos de mídia. Além disso, a duração da bateria é muito fraca. A câmera principal demonstrou ser razoavelmente decente, e um SKU melhor equipado com 4 GB de RAM e 64 GB de armazenamento está disponível se desejado.

Nokia 7.1 - 11/26/2018 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
85%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
91%
Bateria
88%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
45 / 63 → 71%
Desempenho da aplicação
58 / 70 → 82%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
70%
Médio
75%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 7.1
Mike Wobker, 2018-11-28 (Update: 2018-11-28)